OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
KF5JRV > TECH     07.05.16 12:30l 78 Lines 5175 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2580_KF5JRV
Read: GUEST
Subj: First Publish Computer Programs
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<VE2PKT<ZL2BAU<N0KFQ<KF5JRV
Sent: 160507/1122Z 2580@KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA BPQ1.4.65

The First Published Computer Programs

In October 1843, Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace, daughter 
of Lord Byron, translated Menabrea’s paper, "Notions sur la 
machine analytique de M. Charles Babbage" (1842).  Her "Sketch of the 
Analytical Engine Invented by Charles Babbage . . . with Notes by the 
Translator" published in Scientific Memoirs, Selected from the Transactions 
of Foreign Academies of Science and Learned Societies 3 (1843): 666-731 plus 
1 folding chart, was the first edition in English of the the first published 
account of Babbage’s Analytical Engine, and, more significantly, of its 
logical design.

In 1840 Babbage traveled to Torino to present to a group of Italian scientists 
an account of the Engine. Babbage’s talk, complete with drawings, models and 
mechanical notations, emphasized the Engine’s signal feature: its ability to 
guide its own operations. It also included the first computer programs though 
Babbage did not use that word. In attendance at Babbage’s lecture was the 
young Italian mathematician Luigi Federico Menabrea (later Prime Minister of 
Italy), who prepared from his notes an account of the principles of the 
Analytical Engine, which he published in French in 1842.

In keeping with the more general nature and immaterial status of the 
Analytical Engine, Menabrea’s account dealt little with mechanical details. 
Instead he described the functional organization and mathematical operation 
of this more flexible and powerful invention. To illustrate its capabilities, 
he presented several charts or tables of the steps through which the machine 
would be directed to go in performing calculations and finding numerical 
solutions to algebraic equations. These steps were the instructions the 
engine’s operator would punch in coded form on cards to be fed into the 
machine; hence, the charts constituted the first computer programs. 
Menabrea’s charts were taken from those Babbage brought to Torino to 
illustrate his talks there (Stein, Ada: A Life and Legacy, 92).

Menabrea’s paper was translated into English by Babbage’s close friend Ada, 
Countess of Lovelace, daughter of the poet Byron and a talented mathematician 
in her own right. At Babbage’s suggestion, Lady Lovelace added seven 
explanatory notes to her translation, which run about three times the length 
of the original. Her annotated translation has been called “the most 
important paper in the history of digital computing before modern timesö 
(Bromley, “Introductionö in Babbage, Henry Prevost, Babbage’s Calculating 
Engines, xv). As Babbage never published a detailed description of the 
Analytical Engine, Ada’s translation of Menabrea’s paper, with its lengthy 
explanatory notes, represents the most complete contemporary account in 
English of this much-misunderstood machine.

Babbage supplied Ada with algorithms for the solution of various problems, 
which she illustrated in her notes in the form of charts detailing the 
stepwise sequence of events as the machine progressed through a string of 
instructions input from punched cards (Swade, The Cogwheel Brain, 165). This 
was the first published example of a computer “program,ö though neither Ada 
nor Babbage used this term. She also expanded upon Babbage’s general views 
of the Analytical Engine as a symbol-manipulating device rather than a mere 
processor of numbers, suggesting that it might act upon other things besides 
number, were objects found whose mutual fundamental relations could be 
expressed by those of the abstract science of operations. . . . Supposing, 
for instance, that the fundamental relations of pitched sounds in the science 
of harmony and of musical composition were susceptible of such expression and 
adaptations, the engine might compose elaborate and scientific pieces of music 
of any degree of complexity or extent (p. 694) . . . Many persons who are not 
conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because the business of the 
engine is to give its results in numerical notation, the nature of its 
processes must consequently be arithmetical and numerical, rather than 
algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and 
combine its numerical quantities exactly as if they were letters or any other 
general symbols; and in fact it might bring out its results in algebraical 
notation, were provisions made accordingly (p. 713).

Much has been written concerning what mathematical abilities Ada may have 
possessed. Study of the published correspondence between her and Babbage (see 
Toole 1992) is not especially flattering either to her personality or 
mathematical talents: it shows that while Ada was personally enamored of her 
own mathematical prowess, she was in reality no more than a talented novice 
who at times required Babbage’s coaching. Their genuine friendship aside, 
Babbage’s motives for encouraging Ada’s involvement in his work are not hard 
to discern. As Lord Byron’s only legitimate daughter, Ada was an extraordinary 
celebrity, and as the wife of a prominent aristocrat she was in a position to 
act as patron to Babbage and his engines (though she never in fact did so).


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 06.11.2024 04:14:29lGo back Go up