| |
W9JUN > SYSOP 14.11.19 02:31l 22 Lines 790 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 879_W9JUN
Read: GUEST
Subj: Communication
Path: IZ3LSV<IW8PGT<I3XTY<I0OJJ<I0OJJ<N6RME<AA6HF<N3HYM<NS2B<KA9LCF<W9JUN
Sent: 191114/0112Z @:W9JUN.#SEIN.IN.USA.NOAM #:879 [DUPONT IN USA] $:879_W9JUN
>From w9jun%w9jun.#sein.in.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Thu Nov 14 02:30:13 2019
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m-uro) with SMTP
id AA32948 ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:30:13 +0100
Message-Id: <879_W9JUN@i0ojj.bbs>
>From: w9jun@w9jun.#sein.in.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (i0ojj @ 44.134.32.240) -> Sending message
From: W9JUN@W9JUN.#SEIN.IN.USA.NOAM
To : SYSOPS@WW
Here is a very broad comment: Those who should be good communicators turn out to be some of the worst -- amateur radio ops
I am finding that ham ops don't do well at responding, and if they do, timeliness is not important. If we can't close the loop
on a communique between each other locally, distance communication and time sensitive urgent or emergency traffic will be in je
opardy.
Don
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
