| |
G8PZT > SYSOP 18.08.13 12:45l 31 Lines 1031 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 000957229PZT
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Re: Bulletin Distributions
Path: IZ3LSV<F1OYP<SR1BSZ<OK0NBR<OK2PEN<VK6HGR<VK2DOT<GB7PZT
Sent: 130818/1136Z @:GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU [Kidderminster] #:95700 XSERV500a
From: G8PZT@GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU (Paula)
To: SYSOP@WW
Subject: Re: Re: Bulletin Distributions
X-Mailer: XServ v500a HTTPmail
Hi Gus and others,
I think you have made a valid point. I don't approve of sloppy routing,
but maybe I should just stop worrying about it, and accept it. I am too
old to change the world now :-)
Maybe we have to accept that the @ field is now simply an *indication* of
where the sender wanted his bulletin to go, rather than a meaningful field.
Perhaps I will remove the @ field from my BBS, leaving more space for the
subject field.
Agreed, we should reject certain content. I reject content that would contravene
the UK licence regulations, plus foreign language content. The purist in
me would like to reject stuff that wasn't ham-radio related, but we are
desperately short of human-generated bulletins so I won't go that far.
73, Paula G8PZT
------- Original Message -------
>From: I0OJJ
>To: SYSOP@WW
>perhaps in the 'era of globalization' the spread up of the '@' field
>may be almost normal
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
