| |
G8PZT > SYSOP 17.08.13 18:14l 53 Lines 1366 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 000932228PZT
Read: GUEST
Subj: Bulletin Distributions
Path: IZ3LSV<F1OYP<N9PMO<VK2DOT<GB7PZT
Sent: 130817/1709Z @:GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU [Kidderminster] #:93200 XSERV500a
From: G8PZT@GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU (Paula)
To: SYSOP@WW
Subject: Bulletin Distributions
X-Mailer: XServ v500a HTTPmail
I know I've mentioned this before, but I can't remember what the outcome
was after all the shouting had stopped?...
I haven't updated my reject file in a long while, so these are the bulletin
distributions that have managed to get into my BBS in the last couple of
weeks...
@AMSAT
@ARL
@ARRL
@BAYCOM
@CANADA
@DL
@EU
@FRA
@FRANCA
@GBR
@ITA
@JPN
@LATNET
@LUNET
@NA
@NCBBS
@NLDNET
@NTSCA
@USA
@USBBS
@VKNET
@WW
Strictly speaking I should only be seeing @GBR, @EU, @WW, and @AMSAT.
I could easily add the other areas to the reject list, but I am not sure
if that is the correct course of action?
Although theoretically it is against the sender's wishes for me to see their
bulletins if they address them to @VKNET or @USBBS or whatever, nevertheless
some of them are quite interesting. If I reject them, the only person I
am depriving of seeing them is myself, because it seems the rest of the
world is simply ignoring the @Field and spraying everything everywhere!
1) Does the "AT" field have any meaning at all for bulletins these days?
2) Should we each be doing our bit to stop these bulls from propagating
outside their intended geographical / language areas? Or should we spray
everything everywhere to make sure it gets through?
73, Paula
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
