| |
G8PZT > SYSOP 16.12.12 06:11l 50 Lines 1726 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 090281350PZT
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: G8PZT
Path: IZ3LSV<F1OYP<N9PMO<ZL2BAU<GB7MAX<GB7PZT
Sent: 121216/0348Z @:GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU [Kidderminster] #:28109 XSERV410h
From: G8PZT@GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU (Paula)
To: SYSOP@WW
Subject: Re: G8PZT
X-Mailer: XServ v410h HTTPmail
I wonder why this was sent SP not SB? Let's all enjoy it...
------- Original Message -------
>From: WA2FNQ
>To: SYSOP@WW
>Subject: G8PZT
>
>This message is mainly directed at G8PZT. When I got in to packet 20 plus
years
>ago I thought it was bascically a friendly group of guys. Boy was I wrong.
I
>found that some of you are the worst, nastiest peiple in the hobby who
like to
>resort to name calling and creating conflicts probably just to feed your
own
>broken egos. Like many on the internet when you're behind the keyboard
you're
>a big man. Very sad but that's your problem. As for me I'm not a zombie
or
>humorless. As for wet behind the ears, you don't know me or what my
>qualifications are. So you'd do well to keep your opinions to yourself.
If
>you're not a SYSOP you do not belong on the SYSOP channel. Take your effluent
>someplace else. I've wasted enough of my time with you.
>-
>Jerry WA2FNQ
I thought the sysop channel was for discussing issues relating to BBS's
and the network. I somehow thought that's what I was doing? Hmm, perhaps
my command of English isn't very good then.
Am I not allowed to point out deficiencies in the BBS system? Deficiencies
which could be easily resolved if some of the newer sysops were to set up
their BBS's correctly? Or are we all supposed to sit tight, be quiet, and
accept the status quo?
I think you'll find that my original post simply asked a question. I did
not point any fingers, and the comments were tongue-in-cheek. They obviously
lost something in their journey across the Atlantic.
Why bother even writing if it was a waste of your time?
73, Paula
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
