| |
VK7AX > SSTV 17.08.08 14:41l 252 Lines 8087 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : VK7AX-1708LA
Read: GUEST
Subj: [MM-SSTV] Digest Number 1830
Path: IZ3LSV<IQ0LT<IK8YAP<ED1ZAC<CX2SA<VK7AX
Sent: 080817/1338Z @:VK7AX.#ULV.TAS.AUS.OC #:51019 [Ulverstone] FBB7.00g $:VK7A
From: VK7AX@VK7AX.#ULV.TAS.AUS.OC
To : SSTV@WW
There are 5 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1a. Re: Welcome to SSTV
From: Leslie Elliott
1b. Re: Welcome to SSTV
From: Fr. Johnny
1c. Re: Welcome to SSTV
From: ve3wej gmail
1d. Re: Welcome to SSTV
From: AA0OI
1e. Re: Welcome to SSTV
From: Bob John
Messages
________________________________________________________________________
1a. Re: Welcome to SSTV
Posted by: "Leslie Elliott" kc0pto(AT)yahoo.com kc0pto
Date: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:22 pm ((PDT))
--- In MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups.com, AA0OI <aa0oi(AT)...> wrote:
> > as for MMSSTV
> > pretty much only
> > 14.230
Lately I have been listening on 14.236 for Digital Voice, and more
than a few times I have heard someone using MMSSTV on that freq. I
know it is not illegal, but it sure is rude, to ignore the gentlemen's
agreement band plans. Hope whoever is doing it will read this and
stop doing it. By the way, since the flap about the copyrighted MELP
and the changeover to a open source, I have not heard anyone on using
FDMDV. Hopefully it will rebound from this setback. The voice
quality isn't as good as it was before, but it is still usable, and
hopefully someone will develop a better algorithm to use with it.
Appologizing for the partly off topic, saying 73 de KCØPTO
Les
Messages in this topic (10)
________________________________________________________________________
1b. Re: Welcome to SSTV
Posted by: "Fr. Johnny" fieldservice(AT)beyondbb.com kd5lwu
Date: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:35 pm ((PDT))
Are you sure it's MMSSTV I have heard quite a few HDSSTV or is it
Digital SSTV (I think that's what they call it) using that frequency?
Anyway it is another group that are sending high definition pictures 73
Johnny
Leslie Elliott wrote:
> >
> > --- In MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups.com <mailto:MM-SSTV%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > AA0OI <aa0oi(AT)...> wrote:
> >
>> > > as for MMSSTV
>> > > pretty much only
>> > > 14.230
> >
> > Lately I have been listening on 14.236 for Digital Voice, and more
> > than a few times I have heard someone using MMSSTV on that freq. I
> > know it is not illegal, but it sure is rude, to ignore the gentlemen's
> > agreement band plans. Hope whoever is doing it will read this and
> > stop doing it. By the way, since the flap about the copyrighted MELP
> > and the changeover to a open source, I have not heard anyone on using
> > FDMDV. Hopefully it will rebound from this setback. The voice
> > quality isn't as good as it was before, but it is still usable, and
> > hopefully someone will develop a better algorithm to use with it.
> >
> > Appologizing for the partly off topic, saying 73 de KCØPTO
> > Les
> >
> >
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Messages in this topic (10)
________________________________________________________________________
1c. Re: Welcome to SSTV
Posted by: "ve3wej gmail" ve3wej(AT)gmail.com ve3wej
Date: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:24 pm ((PDT))
honestly, I have heard sstv on 236 for years before the digital voice, and
being a sstv user, what gentlemans agreement....!!!!!!!!!!! you would never
know there was one, with all the old timers using that sstv freqs to call cq
(voice)
VE3WEJ
Dave Garber
10-X # 23465
echolink # 52852
irlp node 2202
email ve3wej(AT)rac.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leslie Elliott" <kc0pto(AT)yahoo.com>
To: <MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 6:22 PM
Subject: [MM-SSTV] Re: Welcome to SSTV
--- In MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups.com, AA0OI <aa0oi(AT)...> wrote:
> > as for MMSSTV
> > pretty much only
> > 14.230
Lately I have been listening on 14.236 for Digital Voice, and more
than a few times I have heard someone using MMSSTV on that freq. I
know it is not illegal, but it sure is rude, to ignore the gentlemen's
agreement band plans. Hope whoever is doing it will read this and
stop doing it. By the way, since the flap about the copyrighted MELP
and the changeover to a open source, I have not heard anyone on using
FDMDV. Hopefully it will rebound from this setback. The voice
quality isn't as good as it was before, but it is still usable, and
hopefully someone will develop a better algorithm to use with it.
Appologizing for the partly off topic, saying 73 de KCØPTO
Les
Messages in this topic (10)
________________________________________________________________________
1d. Re: Welcome to SSTV
Posted by: "AA0OI" aa0oi(AT)yahoo.com aa0oi
Date: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:32 am ((PDT))
HI Dave:
Well you should be here in the states,, we only use 7.173 for digital
sstv,, but the rest of the hams in the world ( and US) have made this
the international "tune Up" freq. People send noises, tune ups,
psk and all sorts of crap.. I would love just to have someone
send sstv.. but it will never happen..
Hams do not know what digital sstv sounds like so they tune up on top
of us..\
we live with what we got..
Garrett / AA0OI
----- Original Message ----
From: ve3wej gmail <ve3wej(AT)gmail.com>
To: MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:24:38 PM
Subject: Re: [MM-SSTV] Re: Welcome to SSTV
honestly, I have heard sstv on 236 for years before the digital voice, and
being a sstv user, what gentlemans agreement... .!!!!!!!! !!! you would never
know there was one, with all the old timers using that sstv freqs to call cq
(voice)
VE3WEJ
Dave Garber
10-X # 23465
echolink # 52852
irlp node 2202
email ve3wej(AT)rac.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leslie Elliott" <kc0pto(AT)yahoo. com>
To: <MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups .com>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 6:22 PM
Subject: [MM-SSTV] Re: Welcome to SSTV
--- In MM-SSTV(AT)yahoogroups .com, AA0OI <aa0oi(AT)...> wrote:
> > as for MMSSTV
> > pretty much only
> > 14.230
Lately I have been listening on 14.236 for Digital Voice, and more
than a few times I have heard someone using MMSSTV on that freq. I
know it is not illegal, but it sure is rude, to ignore the gentlemen's
agreement band plans. Hope whoever is doing it will read this and
stop doing it. By the way, since the flap about the copyrighted MELP
and the changeover to a open source, I have not heard anyone on using
FDMDV. Hopefully it will rebound from this setback. The voice
quality isn't as good as it was before, but it is still usable, and
hopefully someone will develop a better algorithm to use with it.
Appologizing for the partly off topic, saying 73 de KCØPTO
Les
------------ --------- --------- ------
Messages in this topic (10)
________________________________________________________________________
1e. Re: Welcome to SSTV
Posted by: "Bob John" aa8x(AT)wowway.com dist203
Date: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:35 am ((PDT))
,
,
I have installed the new software but I can't tolerate the squealing when
attempting to monitor 14.236. The artifacts are just to piercing for
my ears.
Bob, AA8X
Lately I have been listening on 14.236 for Digital Voice, and more
than a few times I have heard someone using MMSSTV on that freq. I
know it is not illegal, but it sure is rude, to ignore the gentlemen's
agreement band plans. Hope whoever is doing it will read this and
stop doing it. By the way, since the flap about the copyrighted MELP
and the changeover to a open source, I have not heard anyone on using
FDMDV. Hopefully it will rebound from this setback. The voice
quality isn't as good as it was before, but it is still usable, and
hopefully someone will develop a better algorithm to use with it.
Appologizing for the partly off topic, saying 73 de KCØPTO
Les
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
*******************************************************************
ABOVE IS A CROSS POST TO THE PACKET RADIO NETWORK IN AN EFFORT TO
PROMOTE FURTHER INTEREST IN SLOW SCAN TELEVISION AND PACKET RADIO
Courtesy Tony VK7AX VK7AX(AT)VK7AX.#ULV.TAS.AUS.OC
*******************************************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
