| |
EI2GYB > ASTRO 07.09.21 10:20l 134 Lines 7207 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 14184_EI2GYB
Read: GUEST
Subj: China wants to build a mega spaceship that's nearl
Path: IZ3LSV<IR1UAW<IW2OHX<UA6ADV<LU4ECL<JE7YGF<GB7CIP<EI2GYB
Sent: 210907/0914Z @:EI2GYB.DGL.IRL.EURO #:14184 BPQ6.0.22
_ _ _ _
/ \ ___| |_ _ __ ___ | \ | | _____ _____
/ _ \ / __| __| '__/ _ \ | \| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / __|
/ ___ \\__ \ |_| | | (_) | | |\ | __/\ V V /\__ \
/_/ \_\___/\__|_| \___/ |_| \_|\___| \_/\_/ |___/
China wants to build a mega spaceship that's nearly a mile long
The Chinese proposal plans to study how to build a giant spacecraft.
China is investigating how to build ultra-large spacecraft that are up to 0.6
mile (1 kilometer) long. But how feasible is the idea, and what would be the
use of such a massive spacecraft?
The project is part of a wider call for research proposals from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China, a funding agency managed by the country's
Ministry of Science and Technology. A research outline posted on the
foundation's website described such enormous spaceships as "major strategic
aerospace equipment for the future use of space resources, exploration of the
mysteries of the universe, and long-term living in orbit."
The foundation wants scientists to conduct research into new, lightweight
design methods that could limit the amount of construction material that has to
be lofted into orbit, and new techniques for safely assembling such massive
structures in space. If funded, the feasibility study would run for five years
and have a budget of 15 million yuan ($2.3 million).
The project might sound like science fiction, but former NASA chief
technologist Mason Peck said the idea isn't entirely off the wall, and the
challenge is more a question of engineering than fundamental science.
"I think it's entirely feasible," Peck, now a professor of aerospace
engineering at Cornell University, told Live Science. "I would describe the
problems here not as insurmountable impediments, but rather problems of scale."
By far the biggest challenge would be the price tag, noted Peck, due to the
huge cost of launching objects and materials into space. The International
Space Station (ISS), which is only 361 feet (110 meters) wide at its widest
point according to NASA, cost roughly $100 billion to build, Peck said, so
constructing something 10 times larger would strain even the most generous
national space budget.
Much depends on what kind of structure the Chinese plan to build, though. The
ISS is packed with equipment and is designed to accommodate humans, which
significantly increases its mass. "If we're talking about something that is
simply long and not also heavy then it's a different story," Peck said.
Building techniques could also reduce the cost of getting a behemoth spaceship
into space. The conventional approach would be to build components on Earth and
then assemble them like Legos in orbit, said Peck, but 3D-printing technology
could potentially turn compact raw materials into structural components of much
larger dimensions in space.
An even more attractive option would be to source raw materials from the moon,
which has low gravity compared with Earth, meaning that launching materials
from its surface into space would be much easier, according to Peck. Still,
that first requires launch infrastructure on the moon and is therefore not an
option in the short term.
Big spaceship, big problems
A structure of such massive proportions will also face unique problems.
Whenever a spacecraft is subjected to forces, whether from maneuvering in orbit
or docking with another vehicle, the motion imparts energy to the spaceship's
structure that causes it to vibrate and bend, Peck explained. With such a large
structure, these vibrations will take a long time to subside so it's likely the
spacecraft will require shock absorbers or active control to counteract those
vibrations, he said.
Designers will also have to make careful trade-offs when deciding what altitude
the spacecraft should orbit at, Peck said. At lower altitudes, drag from the
outer atmosphere slows vehicles down, requiring them to constantly boost
themselves back into a stable orbit. This is already an issue for the ISS, Peck
noted, but for a much larger structure, which has more drag acting on it and
would require more fuel to boost back into place, it would be a major concern.
On the flip side, launching to higher altitudes is much more expensive, and
radiation levels increase quickly the further from Earth's atmosphere an object
gets, which will be a problem if the spacecraft houses humans.
But while building such a structure might be technically possible, it's not
feasible in any practical sense, said Michael Lembeck, a professor of aerospace
engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has worked on
both government and commercial space programs.
"It's kind of like us talking about building the Starship Enterprise," he told
Live Science. "It's fantastical, not feasible, and fun to think about, but not
very realistic for our level of technology," given the cost, he said.
Given the research project's tiny budget, it is likely only meant to be a
small, academic study to map out the very earliest contours of such a project
and identify technological gaps, Lembeck said. For comparison, the budget to
build a capsule to take astronauts to the ISS was $3 billion. "So the level of
effort here is extremely small compared to the outcomes that are desired," he
added.
There are also questions about what such a big spacecraft would be used for.
Lembeck said possibilities include space manufacturing facilities that take
advantage of microgravity and abundant solar power to build high-value products
like semiconductors and optical equipment, or long-term habitats for off-world
living. But both would entail enormous maintenance costs.
"The space station is a $3 billion a year enterprise," Lembeck added. "Multiply
that for larger facilities and it quickly becomes a rather large, expensive
enterprise to pull off."
China has also expressed interest in building enormous solar power arrays in
orbit and beaming the power back to Earth via microwave beams, but Peck said
the economics of such a project just don't stack up. Peck has done some
back-of-the-envelope calculations and estimates it would cost around $1,000 per
watt, compared with just $2 per watt for energy generated from solar panels on
Earth.
Perhaps the most promising application for such a large space structure would
be scientific, Peck said. A space telescope of that scale could potentially see
features on the surface of planets in other solar systems. "That could be
transformative for our understanding of extrasolar planets and potentially life
in the universe," he added.
____ __ ____ ___ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____
( __)( )(___ \ / __)( \/ )( _ \ ( _ \( _ \/ ___)
) _) )( / __/( (_ \ ) / ) _ ( ) _ ( ) _ (\___ \
(____)(__)(____) \___/(__/ (____/ (____/(____/(____/
PART OF THE DONEGAL PACKET RADIO NETWORK
Packet: EI2GYB@EI2GYB.DGL.IRL.EURO
Email: EI2GYB@GMAIL.COM
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
