| |
KB2VXA > SOLAR 15.02.11 17:35l 26 Lines 923 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 64165_VK6ZRT
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK2AAB > Solar cell cost, etc.
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0BEL<ZS0MEE<VE3UIL<VK6ZRT
Sent: 110215/1628Z @:VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC #:64165 [Boyanup] $:64165_VK6ZRT
From: KB2VXA@VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC
To : SOLAR@WW
Hi Barry and all,
I guess from reading my post you know I'm highly suspicious of that bit
about letting a house burn just because it has solar panels, I DID say I
SMELL A RAT. Nope, firemen are anything BUT wimps!
You mentioned something about putting a small installation on the $8000
subsidy but I think you have your terms mixed up. Recently I've spoken to
a VK2 about that very thing and his reason for not installing solar is he
can't afford the $8000. That looks to me more like a rebate, that being
"cash back" after the initial outlay while a subsidy is a paralell
payment to defray the homeowner's cost of the installation.
Please correct me if I'm wrong because it looks like one of us is using
the wrong term.
73 de Warren
Station powered by JCP&L atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.
Message timed by NIST: 10:57 on 2011-Feb-15 GMT
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
