OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
HB9ABX > SOLAR    11.12.09 22:48l 32 Lines 1206 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : KUI9B4HB9EAS
Read: GUEST
Subj: SS prediction nonsense
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0IUZ<DB0FBB<DB0ERF<OK0NHD<HB9EAS
Sent: 091211/2038z @:HB9EAS.CHE.EU [Basel JN37TM] DP6.00 $:KUI9B4HB9EAS
From: HB9ABX @ HB9EAS.CHE.EU (Felix)
To:   SOLAR @ WW 

Since two years, the solar spots are no longer following the 
predictions.
The so called "experts" at NOAA Space Weather Prediction 
Center predicted in January 07 the beginning of the cycle 24 
to occur in mid 2008. As this did not occur, they shifted the
prediction one year later to mid 2009.
Now we are at the end of 2009 and still no beginning of
the next sunspot cycle ...
Furthermore, they reduced the predicted maximum from 
140 to 90 sunspots, and delayed the predicted peak also 
one year.
Now have a look at the latest update of the preditions
(2009 Dec. 8), and you see that still the preditions are
way out of reality ... see:  
http://home.datacomm.ch/hb9abx/sunspot-08-09.htm
There you also see the previous predictions that were
revised and revised ...
I ask, why the "experts" still continue to make new 
predictions, as the situation is so undecided, that we may
even enter a "mauder minimum" or any kind of solar
spot maximum between 25 and 150 ...
Would it not be wiser if the "experts" would say: We cannot
make any valid prediction, as the present behaving of the sun
is completely out of the our knowledge ?


Felix  HB9ABX





Read previous mail | Read next mail


 19.09.2024 18:10:52lGo back Go up