| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 04.08.09 01:03l 644 Lines 19044 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 57184-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 377
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<F8KFY<CX2SA
Sent: 090803/2301Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:57184 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:57184-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to
amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
amsat-bb-request@xxxxx.xxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
amsat-bb-owner@xxxxx.xxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ISS UK Pass 13.00utc (Nitin Muttin [VU3TYG])
2. Re: [sarex] ISS UK Pass 13.00utc (David Barber)
3. ANDE web pages updated (Ivan Galysh)
4. Re: ANDE web pages updated (Ivan Galysh)
5. Re: [sarex] ISS UK Pass 13.00utc (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
6. ANDE-2 TLE (Mike Rupprecht)
7. ISS UK Pass 14.35utc (David Barber)
8. Re: ANDE-2 TLE (Ivan Galysh)
9. another set (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
10. Re: another set (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
11. Re: Tubesat, a $4,000 launch opportunity (Trevor .)
12. ANDE2 reception observations (PA3GUO Aug 3rd, 2009)
(Henk, PA3GUO)
13. Re: ANDE2 reception observations (PA3GUO Aug 3rd, 2009)
(Mike Rupprecht)
14. Re: [sarex] Re: ISS UK Pass 14.35utc
(Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BARRIOS TECHNOLOGY])
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:33:57 -0700
From: "Nitin Muttin [VU3TYG]" <vu3tyg@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS UK Pass 13.00utc
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsatindia@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <7a27acdb97b3a43c008203032bd04b3c@xxx.xxx.x.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Same here during the 13.20 UTC pass.Very strong carrier 59 +20db and it was
59 even after LOS.
73's
Nitin [VU3TYG]
--------- Original Message --------
From: david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, sarex@xxxxx.xxx
<sarex@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'Kenneth, N5VHO' <ransomk@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS UK Pass 13.00utc
Date: 08/02/09 05:51 PM"
> Sadly, same again, approximately 30 seconds of silent carrier at 3 minute
> intervals.
>
> Latest Keps would appear to be wrong, a signal being received nearly 1
> minute after predicted LOS on this and previous pass.
>
> David
> G8OQW
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:41:13 +0100
From: "David Barber" <david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] ISS UK Pass 13.00utc
To: "'Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF'" <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <050BB0243819496BB3FA2F843439D2DA@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Yes, exactly the same as yours and as the amsat file.
Both PCsat32 and HRD calculate same AOS & LOS but signal remains audible
after predicted LOS.
There appears to be a difference between the amsat.org (amateur.txt) and
celestrak (nasabare.txt) files.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF [mailto:nigel@xxxxx.xxxx
Sent: 03 August 2009 14:21
To: david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [sarex] ISS UK Pass 13.00utc
David.
Do there agree with your "latest keps"?
ISS (ZARYA)
1 25544U 98067A 09213.83477708 +.00133469 +00000-0 +92643-3 0 03334
2 25544 051.6394 072.4795 0007331 277.0111 189.2970 15.73478508613146
David Barber wrote:
>
> Latest Keps would appear to be wrong, a signal being received nearly 1
> minute after predicted LOS on this and previous pass.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:47:13 -0400
From: Ivan Galysh <ivan.galysh@xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ANDE web pages updated
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4A76EA61.6030302@xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello all,
I updated the website and have all the telemetry information updated
with equations where needed. I'm sure there will be more info I need to
post. That will come as I get time.
Ivan
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:49:32 -0400
From: Ivan Galysh <igalysh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ANDE web pages updated
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4A76EAEC.3010408@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Helps to post the address.
https://goby.nrl.navy.mil/ANDE
Ivan
Ivan Galysh wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I updated the website and have all the telemetry information updated
> with equations where needed. I'm sure there will be more info I need to
> post. That will come as I get time.
>
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:58:31 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] ISS UK Pass 13.00utc
To: david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4A76ED07.2090709@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
My keps are direct from Space-Track a couple of times a day.
David Barber wrote:
> Yes, exactly the same as yours and as the amsat file.
>
> Both PCsat32 and HRD calculate same AOS & LOS but signal remains audible
> after predicted LOS.
>
> There appears to be a difference between the amsat.org (amateur.txt) and
> celestrak (nasabare.txt) files.
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:44:20 +0200
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ANDE-2 TLE
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <003c01ca1448$e2af2390$a80d6ab0$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
. after the last two passes now I am pretty sure with the assignment
CASTOR
1 35695U 09038G 09214.62699302 .00023572 00000-0 12777-3 0 44
2 35695 051.6418 068.2403 0004351 048.6343 311.4991 15.79927223 464
POLLUX
1 35693U 09038E 09214.62668842 .00017764 00000-0 96621-4 0 44
2 35693 051.6406 068.2363 0003496 046.5116 313.6102 15.80074726 469
I tracked the two last passes with different TLE to be sure.
See the graphs here: http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=6768
73, Mike
DK3WN
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:47:55 +0100
From: "David Barber" <david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS UK Pass 14.35utc
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, <sarex@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "'Kenneth, N5VHO'" <ransomk@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <55472B244BA24B68A0C5F2C1E0DEF494@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Frequency has been changed to 145.825MHz.
Still transmitting 30 seconds of silent carrier at 3 minute intervals.
David
G8OQW
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:33:04 -0400
From: Ivan Galysh <ivan.galysh@xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ANDE-2 TLE
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4A770330.8010806@xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
That matches what I was tracking at least on Pollux. I tried 09038F
yesterday and never got clear signal.
Ivan
Mike Rupprecht wrote:
> . after the last two passes now I am pretty sure with the assignment
>
>
> CASTOR
> 1 35695U 09038G 09214.62699302 .00023572 00000-0 12777-3 0 44
> 2 35695 051.6418 068.2403 0004351 048.6343 311.4991 15.79927223 464
> POLLUX
> 1 35693U 09038E 09214.62668842 .00017764 00000-0 96621-4 0 44
> 2 35693 051.6406 068.2363 0003496 046.5116 313.6102 15.80074726 469
>
>
>
> I tracked the two last passes with different TLE to be sure.
>
> See the graphs here: http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=6768
>
>
>
> 73, Mike
>
> DK3WN
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:41:28 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] another set
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4A770528.9020907@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
DRAGONSAT
1 35690U 09038B 09214.94184190 +.00018958 +00000-0 +10063-3 0 00136
2 35690 051.6402 066.5897 0005132 094.2569 265.9015 15.80550111000544
OBJECT C
1 35691U 09038C 09214.87936152 +.00030913 +00000-0 +16367-3 0 00040
2 35691 051.6394 066.9196 0003238 042.4016 317.7204 15.80278660000506
OBJECT D
1 35692U 09038D 09215.00581724 .00053146 00000-0 27692-3 0 66
2 35692 051.6406 066.2644 0003663 036.1760 323.9499 15.80368125 523
OBJECT E
1 35693U 09038E 09214.81642514 +.00017549 +00000-0 +95472-4 0 00058
2 35693 051.6406 067.2528 0003503 047.7013 312.4260 15.80080904000499
OBJECT F
1 35694U 09038F 09214.87997292 +.00009729 +00000-0 +55024-4 0 00062
2 35694 051.6412 066.9285 0004173 047.9504 312.1835 15.79908176000509
OBJECT G
1 35695U 09038G 09214.81674678 +.00023372 +00000-0 +12667-3 0 00051
2 35695 051.6417 067.2569 0004353 049.1142 311.0212 15.79935600000493
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:47:16 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: another set
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4A771494.8010507@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Here's what Space-Track thinks:
DRAGONSAT
1 35690U 09038B 09215.57409835 .00019277 00000-0 10214-3 0 56
2 35690 051.6405 063.3102 0005165 097.3353 262.8249 15.80576396 641
ANDE DEB (POLLUX CYL
1 35691U 09038C 09214.87936152 +.00030913 +00000-0 +16367-3 0 00040
2 35691 051.6394 066.9196 0003238 042.4016 317.7204 15.80278660000506
ANDE DEB (CASTOR CYL
1 35692U 09038D 09215.00581724 .00053146 00000-0 27692-3 0 66
2 35692 051.6406 066.2644 0003663 036.1760 323.9499 15.80368125 523
ANDE POLLUX SPHERE
1 35693U 09038E 09214.81642514 +.00017549 +00000-0 +95472-4 0 00058
2 35693 051.6406 067.2528 0003503 047.7013 312.4260 15.80080904000499
ANDE CASTOR SPHERE
1 35694U 09038F 09214.87997292 +.00009729 +00000-0 +55024-4 0 00062
2 35694 051.6412 066.9285 0004173 047.9504 312.1835 15.79908176000509
ANDE DEB (AVIONICS
1 35695U 09038G 09214.81674678 +.00023372 +00000-0 +12667-3 0 00051
2 35695 051.6417 067.2569 0004353 049.1142 311.0212 15.79935600000493
--
Nigel A. Gunn, 1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA. tel +1 937
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF), e-mail nigel@xxxxx.xxx www
http://www.ngunn.net
Member of ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548, Flying Pigs QRP Club
International #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS, ALC,
GCARES, XWARN.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:50:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tubesat, a $4,000 launch opportunity
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <900492.76055.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
It would be great to see another launch facility available.
I am not aware that they have any track record so it may be a while before
they achieve a reliable launch capability.
The big drawback at present is that the website says the Tubes would re-enter
the atmosphere after a few weeks.. They quote an orbit of 310 km.
While I can see a significant market for filling the Tubes with peoples ashes
so they can burn up in the atmosphere but I'm not convinced their target orbit
would be of any real use for Amateur Radio communications.
Anyway I wish them well, the more launch providers the better.
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:34:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Henk, PA3GUO" <hamoen@xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ANDE2 reception observations (PA3GUO Aug 3rd,
2009)
To: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>, <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>,
<ivan.galysh@xxx.xxxx.xxx>, <pa3guo@xxxxx.xxx>,
<cjhurst@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Message-ID: <1686.212.61.83.38.1249320899.squirrel@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Using Object G as posted by Nigel Sunday (Aug 2nd)
and freq 145.827 (plus doppler correction over that),
I have todays results as below.
At the start/end of a pass mostly POLLUX, and in the middle mostly Castor
Most likely this has to do with difference in freq and the sats moving out.
Anyone a most scientific view on this :-) ?
Henk, PA3GUO
ps1: I took 145.827 as the middle between the two, based on Ken's observation.
ps2: I stripped the data parts from the telemetry below (for this discussion)
09:30:52 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
09:31:58 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
11:03:15 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
11:03:55 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
11:04:14 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
11:04:21 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
11:04:44 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
11:05:44 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
11:06:07 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
11:06:14 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
11:06:33 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
11:06:44 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
11:07:39 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
12:37:25 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
12:37:51 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
12:38:43 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
12:39:13 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
12:39:43 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
12:40:14 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
12:41:09 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
12:41:13 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
12:41:49 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
14:12:27 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
14:13:06 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
14:13:43 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
14:14:13 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
14:14:43 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
14:16:13 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
14:16:24 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
14:16:51 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
15:48:09 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
15:48:43 !KD4HBO-1>TELEM>CQ:SYS
15:48:48 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:MEMS
15:50:21 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
15:51:27 !POLLUX-1>TELEM>CQ:SYST
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:59:05 +0200
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ANDE2 reception observations (PA3GUO Aug 3rd,
2009)
To: "'Henk, PA3GUO'" <hamoen@xxx.xx>, <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>,
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, <ivan.galysh@xxx.xxxx.xxx>, <pa3guo@xxxxx.xxx>,
<cjhurst@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Message-ID: <005401ca1464$179ef920$46dceb60$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Henk,
the problem is that the assignment changed on spacetrack.org. If you use the
"old" TLE and the objects belongs to this TLE the confusion is complete.
Your old E is now D... etc.
old C -> now F
old D -> now C
old F -> now G
old G -> now E
It's not the first time that happens!
I tracked with the following TLE and got excellent results -> see the graphs
on my SatBlog.
CASTOR
1 35695U 09038G 09214.62699302 .00023572 00000-0 12777-3 0 44
2 35695 051.6418 068.2403 0004351 048.6343 311.4991 15.79927223 464
POLLUX
1 35693U 09038E 09214.62668842 .00017764 00000-0 96621-4 0 44
2 35693 051.6406 068.2363 0003496 046.5116 313.6102 15.80074726 469
Let's see what tomorrow brings ...
73, Mike
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Henk, PA3GUO [mailto:hamoen@xxx.xxx
Gesendet: Montag, 3. August 2009 19:35
An: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx nigel@xxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
ivan.galysh@xxx.xxxx.xxxx pa3guo@xxxxx.xxxx cjhurst@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Betreff: ANDE2 reception observations (PA3GUO Aug 3rd, 2009)
Using Object G as posted by Nigel Sunday (Aug 2nd)
and freq 145.827 (plus doppler correction over that),
I have todays results as below.
At the start/end of a pass mostly POLLUX, and in the middle mostly Castor
Most likely this has to do with difference in freq and the sats moving out.
Anyone a most scientific view on this :-) ?
Henk, PA3GUO
ps1: I took 145.827 as the middle between the two, based on Ken's
observation.
ps2: I stripped the data parts from the telemetry below (for this
discussion)
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:01:49 -0500
From: "Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BARRIOS TECHNOLOGY]"
<kenneth.g.ransom@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] Re: ISS UK Pass 14.35utc
To: WIlliam L Reyna Jr <n2qbr@xxx.xxx>,
"david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx<xxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>,
"amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxxx<xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>, "sarex@xxxxx.xxxx
<sarex@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<CBB2346C58D9B14983E5AEFE4B34588631BAA762B6@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Keep in mind that ISS, PCSAT-1 and the ANDE-2 satellites are all transmitting
packet on 145.825 and can be in proximity of each other. www.ariss.net shows
no packet activity from ISS in over 4 days.
I've posted an SSTV report (such as it was) to http://ariss-
sstv.blogspot.com/. Hopefully the experiment will have longer lasting results
tomorrow.
Kenneth - N5VHO
-----Original Message-----
From: sarex-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:sarex-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of
WIlliam L Reyna Jr
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:11 PM
To: david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [sarex] Re: ISS UK Pass 14.35utc
More packet on 145.825 at 17:11 utc
> From: n2qbr@xxx.xxx
> To: david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:51:46 -0400
> Subject: [sarex] Re: ISS UK Pass 14.35utc
>
>
> Heard what sounded like packet on 145.825 at 15:34 utc here in NJ.
>
> > From: david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx
> > To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx sarex@xxxxx.xxx
> > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:47:55 +0100
> > Subject: [sarex] ISS UK Pass 14.35utc
> >
> > Frequency has been changed to 145.825MHz.
> >
> > Still transmitting 30 seconds of silent carrier at 3 minute intervals.
> >
> > David
> > G8OQW
> >
> > ----
> > Sent via sarex@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
> ----
> Sent via sarex@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
----
Sent via sarex@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 377
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
