OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   20.05.09 01:31l 1539 Lines 33614 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 35511-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 230
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<SP7MGD<CX2SA
Sent: 090520/0028Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:35511 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:35511-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW


Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to
	amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	amsat-bb-request@xxxxx.xxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
	amsat-bb-owner@xxxxx.xxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."


Today's Topics:

1.  Oscar 13 Gateway (Dave Guimont)
2. Re: T7H (Andrew Glasbrenner)
3. Re: RS-22 Telem Over CHILE (Raul Romero)
4.  AO-51 Telem From CHILE !!! (Raul Romero)
5. re: problem with FTDI software installation - LVB Tracker
(TOF, HS0NNU)
6. Re: problem with FTDI software installation - LVB Tracker
(Gould Smith)
7.  AMSAT INDIA May 2009 News Letter (Nitin Muttin [VU3TYG])
8. Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ (Art McBride)
9. Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ (Matthias Bopp)
10.  FO-29 Telem Over CHILE (Raul Romero)
11.  ISS Over CHILE (Raul Romero)
12.  KKS-1 Telem Over CHILE (Raul Romero)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:28:00 -0700
From: Dave Guimont <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  Oscar 13 Gateway
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: matthias.bopp@xxx.xxx n5bf@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090518192813402.WCTC748@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed


Old and young, alike, may be interested in an Oscar 13 Gateway we
established in April 91...

See O13Gateway

http://tinyurl.com/wb6lloOscar





73, Dave, WB6LLO
dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx

Disagree: I learn....

Pulling for P3E...



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:32:21 -0400
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: T7H
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BC13399F2A3A4C64BC7DA1A16A2C86E3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original



>It's probably not the ideal way to start out on the FM birds, using one
>radio
>where you are having to do more work to transmit and go back to receive.
>Other radios where you can program memory channels with TX and RX
>frequencies in different bands (most Kenwood and Yaesu HTs, as well as
>some older Icom HTs) are better to work with, if you want to simplify your
>operating.

Let's not overlook the fact that it is only half duplex, which results in
more collisions on the uplink, uncertainty over whether you were heard, and
generally more chaos. Full duplex operation always tends to be a better
experience for everyone on the pass, and is the more refined method to
operate.

73, Drew KO4MA



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:07:29 -0400
From: "Raul Romero" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS-22 Telem Over CHILE
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <1AB16FF85E2B41E285409812B15E7922@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

Mike Thanks for your interest in my report

but I who should thank you for your very interesting software

I am an amateur radio and whatever my audience is so you and those who want
the freedom to publish this

Rev of trying to capture the greatest amount of telemetry that could allow
second time and once again many of you grcias

Greetings
Raul
CA3SOC

HRD is very nice better mixw32 for decoded CW in Satelitte




----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "'Raul Romero'" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:34 PM
Subject: AW: [amsat-bb] RS-22 Telem Over CHILE


Hi Raul,

can I publish the telemetry also on my SatBlog, please ?

www.dk3wn.info/p

73, Mike
DK3WN


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Raul Romero
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Mai 2009 16:18
An: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] RS-22 Telem Over CHILE

http://ce3soc.no-ip.org/RS-22_Telem_1400UTC_18-05-2009.JPG


73 Raul CA3SOC FF46RJ
ITXA ?

-

ITXB ?

-

TTXA 1?9

-

TTXB 1?7

-

TNAP 1?8

-

TCTR 1?8

-

TSBA 1?2

-

TSBB 75

-

MODB 129

-

MODC 6

-

MTX 35

-

ARX 35

-

RS22

-

UBS 138

-

IBS 19

-

USUN 145



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:01:30 -0400
From: "Raul Romero" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  AO-51 Telem From CHILE !!!
To: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <ED1B95E3CED84947867BC0D9C25156DF@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

59 in 435.150 MHZ FM Telem 9600 Baud



73  Raul



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:50:33]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMD-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=72 >[19:50:33]

WOD:0 ATP:0 BMW:1 BMS:0 CTS:1 CTN:48 CTL:26 CTE:Wed May 20 02:28:29 2009



3:Fm PACB-1 To TIME-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=64 >[19:50:41]

PHT: uptime is 001/08:24:03.  Time is Mon May 18 23:50:48 2009





3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:51:23]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TIME-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=64 >[19:51:51]

PHT: uptime is 001/08:25:13.  Time is Mon May 18 23:51:58 2009





3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMI-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=238 >[19:51:53]

z? J.??[1]?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

8


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

LL Kz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

;[1]


_
L.
X

$[1]
?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

H. *. Z[1] \ w. V?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

q.?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

'


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

5. ?.?.-4.?? ?!?"?#?$z


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

%?&?'.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

(n


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

)?*?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

+,


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

,?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

-?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

.?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

/^


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

0~


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

1.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

2s 3s 4


.5..6 .7..8..9

.:..;.?<?j= J>..?..@..xx.xx.x..xx.xx.xx.x

.H..I.J..K..L..M..



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:51:53]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMD-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=72 >[19:51:53]

WOD:0 ATP:0 BMW:1 BMS:0 CTS:1 CTN:48 CTL:26 CTE:Wed May 20 02:28:29 2009



3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:51:53]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:52:03]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To AMSATN-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=21 >[19:52:03]

PHTHXPB 2-23-07 V1.6



3:Fm PACB-1 To TIME-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=64 >[19:52:31]

PHT: uptime is 001/08:25:53.  Time is Mon May 18 23:52:38 2009





3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMI-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=238 >[19:52:33]

?? J.z?[1]..


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

%


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

:: 8i


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

1[1]         P


_
K.
W

?
?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

>.-[1] '. ?. ?. . J?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

u.?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

7. S.?.-3.?? ?!.."..#?$|


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

%?&?'.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

(p


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

)?*?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

+[


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

,?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

-?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

.?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

/^


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

0'


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

1.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

2s 3r 4


.5..6 .7..8..9

.:..;.?<?j= J>..?..@..xx.xx.x..xx.xx.xx.x

.H..I.J..K..L..M..



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:52:33]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMD-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=72 >[19:52:33]

WOD:0 ATP:0 BMW:1 BMS:0 CTS:1 CTN:48 CTL:26 CTE:Wed May 20 02:28:29 2009



3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:52:33]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TIME-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=64 >[19:52:41]

PHT: uptime is 001/08:26:03.  Time is Mon May 18 23:52:48 2009





3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:52:53]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TIME-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=64 >[19:53:21]

PHT: uptime is 001/08:26:43.  Time is Mon May 18 23:53:28 2009





3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMI-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=238 >[19:53:23]

?? J.?..[1]..


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

C


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

XU T?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

@xxx    ?.


_
M.
X

&[1]
?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

O.? '[1] C. ?. Y. L?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

o.?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

X


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

2. ?.?.-4.?? ..!?"..#?$~


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

%?&?'-


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

(


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

)?*?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

+


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

,?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

-a


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

.'


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

/]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

0.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

1?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

2s 3r 4


.5..6 .7..8..9

.:..;.?<?j= J>..?..@..xx.xx.x..xx.xx.xx.x

.H..I.J..K..L..M..



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:53:23]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMD-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=72 >[19:53:23]

WOD:0 ATP:0 BMW:1 BMS:0 CTS:1 CTN:48 CTL:26 CTE:Wed May 20 02:28:29 2009



3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:53:23]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:53:33]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:53:33]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMD-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=72 >[19:54:33]

WOD:0 ATP:0 BMW:1 BMS:0 CTS:1 CTN:48 CTL:26 CTE:Wed May 20 02:28:29 2009



3:Fm PACB-1 To LSTAT <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=55 >[19:54:33]

A: 0x33F1, P:0x13A8, o:0 l:31931 f:32098 d:0 st:1 e:0a



3:Fm PACB-1 To TIME-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=64 >[19:54:41]

PHT: uptime is 001/08:28:03.  Time is Mon May 18 23:54:48 2009





3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMS-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=35 >[19:54:43]

C0:05 C1:44 C2:76 C3:27 C4:04 C5:01



3:Fm PACB-1 To TLMD-1 <UI pid=F0 [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=72 >[19:54:43]

WOD:0 ATP:0 BMW:1 BMS:0 CTS:1 CTN:48 CTL:26 CTE:Wed May 20 02:28:29 2009




-- Original Message -----


From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "'Raul Romero'" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:42 PM
Subject: AW: [amsat-bb] Re: RS-22 Telem Over CHILE


Raul,

I don't need software for decoding CW - I use my own hardware - my ears,
hihi

Thanks, I will post your comments. If you want, you can join our open
project. I am very glad about every report and from your part of the world
we get not so much :-)

Thanks Raul and best 73,
Mike

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Raul Romero
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Mai 2009 22:07
An: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: RS-22 Telem Over CHILE

Mike Thanks for your interest in my report

but I who should thank you for your very interesting software

I am an amateur radio and whatever my audience is so you and those who want
the freedom to publish this

Rev of trying to capture the greatest amount of telemetry that could allow
second time and once again many of you grcias

Greetings
Raul
CA3SOC

HRD is very nice better mixw32 for decoded CW in Satelitte




----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "'Raul Romero'" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:34 PM
Subject: AW: [amsat-bb] RS-22 Telem Over CHILE


Hi Raul,

can I publish the telemetry also on my SatBlog, please ?

www.dk3wn.info/p

73, Mike
DK3WN


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Raul Romero
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Mai 2009 16:18
An: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] RS-22 Telem Over CHILE

http://ce3soc.no-ip.org/RS-22_Telem_1400UTC_18-05-2009.JPG


73 Raul CA3SOC FF46RJ
ITXA ?

-

ITXB ?

-

TTXA 1?9

-

TTXB 1?7

-

TNAP 1?8

-

TCTR 1?8

-

TSBA 1?2

-

TSBB 75

-

MODB 129

-

MODC 6

-

MTX 35

-

ARX 35

-

RS22

-

UBS 138

-

IBS 19

-

USUN 145

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: "TOF, HS0NNU" <hs0nnu@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] re: problem with FTDI software installation - LVB
	Tracker
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx Philip Jenkins <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <473372.21176.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi Philip
?
When i install.I download "CDM 2.02.04 WHQL Certified.zip" from FTDI web site
and extract to HDD in "CDM 2.02.04 WHQL Certified" folder.
Insert USB plag to socket and wait. When windows found new Hardware "USB
serial converter" goto next step and Install have disk,?Browse to "CDM 2.02.04
WHQL Certified" folder.
?
Sorry can not tell step-by-step
hope ,that?can help.
73's de Toff
HS0NNU


--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Philip Jenkins <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:


From: Philip Jenkins <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] problem with FTDI software installation - LVB Tracker
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 12:07 AM


I am trying to install the FTDI driver (as per the LVB Tracker installation
instructions). I am downloading the VCP software successfully. (Win XP, 2.93
Ghz processor, 1.5 Gn RAM)

I click on the CDM release info Word Document, and the Windows Installer
box pops up "preparing to install". I then get a Word error message "the
command cannot be performed because a dialogue box is open.Click ok, then
close open dialogue boxes to to continue". But no dialogue boxes are open!
If I move the cursor to the Wiindows Installer box's "cancel", the cursor
changes to an hourglass. If I click "ok" in the Word Error box, all the
windows close and I am taken back to the folder where the unzipped FTDI
download files reside.? Any ideas?

Thanks

Philip N4HF
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb





------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:33:14 -0400
From: "Gould Smith" <gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: problem with FTDI software installation - LVB
	Tracker
To: "TOF, HS0NNU" <hs0nnu@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>,	"Philip
	Jenkins" <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <573CACA5D92E4E97AB0EFF6503136C36@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

I had to install it 7-8 times before it took on one computer.  Keep trying.

Gould,
WA4SXM
----- Original Message -----
From: "TOF, HS0NNU" <hs0nnu@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>; "Philip Jenkins" <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:02 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] re: problem with FTDI software installation - LVB
Tracker


Hi Philip

When i install.I download "CDM 2.02.04 WHQL Certified.zip" from FTDI web
site and extract to HDD in "CDM 2.02.04 WHQL Certified" folder.
Insert USB plag to socket and wait. When windows found new Hardware "USB
serial converter" goto next step and Install have disk, Browse to "CDM
2.02.04 WHQL Certified" folder.

Sorry can not tell step-by-step
hope ,that can help.
73's de Toff
HS0NNU


--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Philip Jenkins <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:


From: Philip Jenkins <wythe25@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] problem with FTDI software installation - LVB Tracker
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 12:07 AM


I am trying to install the FTDI driver (as per the LVB Tracker installation
instructions). I am downloading the VCP software successfully. (Win XP, 2.93
Ghz processor, 1.5 Gn RAM)

I click on the CDM release info Word Document, and the Windows Installer
box pops up "preparing to install". I then get a Word error message "the
command cannot be performed because a dialogue box is open.Click ok, then
close open dialogue boxes to to continue". But no dialogue boxes are open!
If I move the cursor to the Wiindows Installer box's "cancel", the cursor
changes to an hourglass. If I click "ok" in the Word Error box, all the
windows close and I am taken back to the folder where the unzipped FTDI
download files reside. Any ideas?

Thanks

Philip N4HF
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:41:53 -0700
From: "Nitin Muttin [VU3TYG]" <vu3tyg@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  AMSAT INDIA May 2009 News Letter
To: amsatindia@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <ae5ecd031fda70c32a962daba17aa7ab@xxx.xx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"

All,

AMSAT INDIA May 2009 newsletter is available for download at
www.amsatindia.org/Newsletter . This can also be accessed direct from the
below url.

http://www.amsatindia.org/Newsletter/AmsatIndia-News-May-09.pdf

Contents in this months News letter.

1. VO-52 operating Award Update.
2. AMSAT INDIA Workshop update
3. Photos of the workshop.
4. Linear Transponder Update
5. New Logo of AMSAT INDIA.
6. News from AMSAT organizations worldwide.

73's
Nitin [VU3TYG]
Secretary AMSAT INDIA
www.amsatindia.org




________________________________________________





------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:49:52 -0700
From: "Art McBride" <kc6uqh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ
To: "'Matthias Bopp'" <matthias.bopp@xxx.xx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5B58DB2367384E2BBFA26BFE7282067F@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

One important feature of circular to circular antenna reception is the 30 dB
of rejection of signals that are opposite polarity from ground and building
reflections that will cause QSB on linear antennas used for reception. If
you are 30 miles out to sea this is not a concern.
Art,
KC6UQH

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Matthias Bopp
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 7:38 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ

Hi Luc,

a linearly polarized antenna on a satellite means, that you will see
different polarization at different times and different locations on
Earth. Assume the satellites transmit vertical polarization but "tumbles"
then the polarization you are receiving is always linear but can vary
between vertical, diagonal, horizontal ...
Therefore it is better if the satellite and the station on earth both use
circular polarization. If this is not possible due to constraints on the
satellite I think it is still better to have a circular polarized antenna
at my station as the losses due to varying linear polarization will always
be only 3dB and thus no strong fading due to polarization will accur.
Please note that a tumbling satellite will most likely still generate strong
fading as the antenna on the satellite will never have a perfect
omni-directional behaviour.

Best regards

Matthias   DD1US

www.dd1us.de


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Luc Leblanc
Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Mai 2009 14:09
An: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ

On 16 May 2009 at 17:27, Roger Kolakowski wrote:

A part of my mystery is solved WiFi and WiMAX I am not a big fan of WiFi as
i have some security concern but i discover that i don't have
the best antenna for 2.4 and fiddling with it is not an option. A true 2.4
is in the mail to replace it and with 2 antennas now i will be
able to install them to have vertical and horizontal polarisation and i will
see if there is some improvement at 2.4ghz when switching
between them. Nobody answer me back regarding the S band linear "not
circular" AO-51 antenna but the fades are probably due to some
antenna blocking than anything else. On the last S band session me and Clare
VE3NPC noted that the fades does not happen at the same time
on our respective QTH there is surely not some selective circular
polarisation path?

> This was probably just a typo; if so, pardon the reply...
>
I was mixing both...hi
>
> Wi-Fi and Wi-Max are different things.  An antenna designed for Wi-Max
> may not operate very well, as you describe, on 2.4 ghz.  Wi-Fi's
> 802.11b/g is on 2.4 ghz (channel 1 is right on top of our allocation),
> so a properly designed Wi-Fi antenna could be good for 13cm Ham
> applications.
>
> >
> Enjoy the new toy,
>
> Greg  KO6TH
>

Some experimenting to come on the next S band session.

"-"


Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Skype VE2DWE
www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE



_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4081 (20090517) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4081 (20090517) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4085 (20090519) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4085 (20090519) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com





------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:10:18 +0200
From: "Matthias Bopp" <matthias.bopp@xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BA9AF80FA64F4CF2B856ECC6AE106103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Art,

this is a very good point. This is also one of the reasons why circular
polarization was chosen for the commercial GPS system.

Best regards

Matthias

www.dd1us.de (including many soundfiles of AMSAT satellites)


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Art McBride [mailto:kc6uqh@xxx.xxxx
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 07:50
An: 'Matthias Bopp'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ

One important feature of circular to circular antenna reception is the 30 dB
of rejection of signals that are opposite polarity from ground and building
reflections that will cause QSB on linear antennas used for reception. If
you are 30 miles out to sea this is not a concern.
Art,
KC6UQH

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Matthias Bopp
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 7:38 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ

Hi Luc,

a linearly polarized antenna on a satellite means, that you will see
different polarization at different times and different locations on
Earth. Assume the satellites transmit vertical polarization but "tumbles"
then the polarization you are receiving is always linear but can vary
between vertical, diagonal, horizontal ...
Therefore it is better if the satellite and the station on earth both use
circular polarization. If this is not possible due to constraints on the
satellite I think it is still better to have a circular polarized antenna
at my station as the losses due to varying linear polarization will always
be only 3dB and thus no strong fading due to polarization will accur.
Please note that a tumbling satellite will most likely still generate strong
fading as the antenna on the satellite will never have a perfect
omni-directional behaviour.

Best regards

Matthias   DD1US

www.dd1us.de


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Luc Leblanc
Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Mai 2009 14:09
An: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ

On 16 May 2009 at 17:27, Roger Kolakowski wrote:

A part of my mystery is solved WiFi and WiMAX I am not a big fan of WiFi as
i have some security concern but i discover that i don't have
the best antenna for 2.4 and fiddling with it is not an option. A true 2.4
is in the mail to replace it and with 2 antennas now i will be
able to install them to have vertical and horizontal polarisation and i will
see if there is some improvement at 2.4ghz when switching
between them. Nobody answer me back regarding the S band linear "not
circular" AO-51 antenna but the fades are probably due to some
antenna blocking than anything else. On the last S band session me and Clare
VE3NPC noted that the fades does not happen at the same time
on our respective QTH there is surely not some selective circular
polarisation path?

> This was probably just a typo; if so, pardon the reply...
>
I was mixing both...hi
>
> Wi-Fi and Wi-Max are different things.  An antenna designed for Wi-Max
> may not operate very well, as you describe, on 2.4 ghz.  Wi-Fi's
> 802.11b/g is on 2.4 ghz (channel 1 is right on top of our allocation),
> so a properly designed Wi-Fi antenna could be good for 13cm Ham
> applications.
>
> >
> Enjoy the new toy,
>
> Greg  KO6TH
>

Some experimenting to come on the next S band session.

"-"


Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Skype VE2DWE
www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE



_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4081 (20090517) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4081 (20090517) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4085 (20090519) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4085 (20090519) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com





------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:26:02 -0400
From: "Raul Romero" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  FO-29 Telem Over CHILE
To: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <2E1C56091D744CC7887F72E230211859@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

HI HI 22 22 88 D5 8F ?5 ?5 25 ?? 24 ?1 ?1 49 5E 8E 8B 97 88 F1 F4 F5 F1 AE
HI HI 22 22 88 D5 8F ?5 ?5 25 ?? 24 ?1 ?1 4F 5A 8E 8B 98 88 F2 F4 F5 F1 AE
HI HI 22 22 88 D5 8F ?5 ?5 25 ?? 24 ?1 ?1 54 57 8F 8C 99 69 F2 F4 F5 F1 AE
HI HI 22 22 88 D5 8F ?5 ?5 25 ?? 24 ?1 ?1 56 58 9? 8D 9A 89 F2 F4 F5 F1 AE

Software here

http://www.dk3wn.info/software.shtml

Tnx Mike

Raul
CA3SOC



------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:05:16 -0400
From: "Raul Romero" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  ISS Over CHILE
To: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <D9B11CF4A786413D9655DAAFCC5A8240@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

16:57 RS0ISS-4/SGATE>CQ>UI,R,F0 (1199 baud):
>ARISS - International Space Station (BBS/APRS on)


------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:35:15 -0400
From: "Raul Romero" <ce3soc@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  KKS-1 Telem Over CHILE
To: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4179E7348D394BECA28C796ABB00B2F6@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

2 8-52-11 MINAMI-SENJYU ARAKAWA-KU TOKYO-TO JAPAN



CW

17:34 UTC 19-05-2009

73

Raul

CA3SOC



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 230
****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 26.03.2026 14:47:35lGo back Go up