| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 17.05.09 20:16l 110 Lines 3406 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 34931-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 228
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<PY1AYH<PY1AYH<CX2SA
Sent: 090517/1912Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:34931 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:34931-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to
amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
amsat-bb-request@xxxxx.xxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
amsat-bb-owner@xxxxx.xxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: SatPC32 with 2 Transceivers (Howard Kowall)
2. K3SZH-9000 ++ (TERRY BROMLEY)
3. Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ (Gordon JC Pearce)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:34:50 -0500
From: "Howard Kowall" <hkowall@xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SatPC32 with 2 Transceivers
To: "AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <004b01c9d705$0470f610$6701a8c0@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
----- Original Message -----
From: Howard Kowall
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 10:25 AM
Subject: SatPC32 with 2 Transceivers
Hello to all
Well it has been resolved,got my FT897D and FT817ND working with Satpc32
and I am now able to run 1 as downlink the other as uplink and the freq.
calibration working.
I would like to thank all who replied to my problem and a very special
thanks to Erich DK1TB who was able to supply me with a fix,providing me with a
new Satpc32 exe file which did the trick,and another thanks to Tim N3TL for
his help and input.
Hope to be able to have a QSO with a few of you on the Sat's
Thaks to all once again
Howard
VE4ISP
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 19:14:44 +0100
From: "TERRY BROMLEY" <terry.bromley@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] K3SZH-9000 ++
To: "AMSAT" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <D30BBDD66D6F47FCA2D9F26EB995E9C0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Congratulations Joe for your 9000 + in the log. Great to have been a little
part of it.
Your Friend Terry G1WPR.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 19:48:57 +0100
From: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ
To: "'amsat-bb'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4A105C19.2090706@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Roger Kolakowski wrote:
> Not that they were optimum tuned for the 2.5 GHz frequency but what polarity
> were the "Pringles Can" washer antennas that were so popular for
> Net-Stumbling a few years ago?
>
Theoretically linear, but they should be considered to be a quarter wave
vertical with some crap lying around in the nearfield. They don't have
any gain, and they certainly don't work as yagis - in fact, they work
better sideways!
The can needs to be made of metal, and about 85mm in diameter. That
will give you a belter of a wifi antenna. The threaded rod and washer
idea is just stupid. Leave that off.
Gordon
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 228
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
