| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 10.04.09 21:15l 777 Lines 22728 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 24360-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 165
Path: IZ3LSV<IQ3GO<SR1BSZ<SP7MGD<CX2SA
Sent: 090410/1907Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:24360 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:24360-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to
amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
amsat-bb-request@xxxxx.xxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
amsat-bb-owner@xxxxx.xxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Egg Beater Antenna (Steve Bluemel)
2. Re: demo help (Nick)
3. First AO-51 Attempt (Josh Smith)
4. HRD Sat Tracking program - slow? (Bill Dzurilla)
5. Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow? (David McKenzie)
6. Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow? (n3tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
7. Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow? (Howard Kowall)
8. Re: Egg Beater Antenna (Luc Leblanc)
9. Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow? (John Price)
10. diplexer (Josh Smith)
11. Re: diplexer (Diane Bruce)
12. Re: diplexer (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
13. Re: Egg Beater Antenna (Jim Jerzycke)
14. Re: Less than lightening Results (Sebastian)
15. Re: Less than lightening Results (Sebastian)
16. Re: Less than lightening Results (Sebastian)
17. Re: Egg Beater Antenna (Dave Guimont)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:30:17 -0700
From: Steve Bluemel <stevebluemel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Egg Beater Antenna
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<393db9380904091830s5f5f75c7kfc9495ec51c3047c@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello All,
How many of you use Egg Beater Style antennas? Would you please share your
thoughts and opinions about their performance, commercial or homebrew?
Thanks,
Steve KI6OQU
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:08:02 -0500
From: "Nick" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: demo help
To: "'Jerry'" <W0SAT@xxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <003b01c9b9c4$3c0bbaa0$b4232fe0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
For those that volunteered to demo echo link our echolink went down
yesterday Mr. Murphy still is my constant companion
Thanks for you offer to help We will get echolink and try again in about two
weeks
nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry [mailto:W0SAT@xxx.xxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 6:59 PM
To: 'Nick'
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] demo help
Hi : I,m sorry I didn,t get on Echolink till 23;50
And I didn,t see it on Echolink at this time.
Jerry w0sat
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick [mailto:quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 4:30 PM
To: 'Jerry'
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] demo help
Thanks Jerry I am sorry I over look your email. If you could come up on
echolink tonight on the w5exi repeater at 23:30 we will demo echolink to 14
6th graders
Thanks
Nick k5qxj
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry [mailto:W0SAT@xxx.xxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:46 PM
To: 'Nick'
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] demo help
HGi: I sent you a e-mail a few days ago but
I didn,t receive an answer.
73,s Jerry w0sat
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:06 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] demo help
Hi AMSAtters
Thursday Night at 23:30 GMT I would like to demo ECHO link on W5EXI in
Lafayette.LA USA. If you have a few minutes Thursday to talk to a class of
6th grader please respond to my email.
Thanks
Nick k5qxj
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.47/2047 - Release Date: 04/08/09
05:53:00
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.49/2050 - Release Date: 04/09/09
10:27:00
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:48:49 -0400
From: Josh Smith <juicewvu@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] First AO-51 Attempt
To: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<d3bf5a870904100448n3a2afcd7p57470938d89f5800@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I tried to work AO-51 on the ~11:35Z pass over my qth (EM97) and heard
someone returning but didn't quiet have the hang of adjusting the
doppler on the downlink so i didn't catch it. Anyone around that
heard who was answering my call? I would like to thank them for
trying to answer my first AO-51 call.
Thanks
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juicewvu@xxxxx.xxx
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HRD Sat Tracking program - slow?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <260694.59208.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
Anyone using the Sat Tracking feature on Ham Radio Deluxe?
When I click on New Satellite, CPU usage shoots to 100% and it takes over a
minute to display the track of the new sat. Also very slow on several other
functions. This can't be normal, is it my computer or is it Vista? Running a
new Lenovo desktop with Windows Vista.
I tried it with my Windows XP laptop and it worked fine. Darn Vista. Any way
to get it working properly with Vista (32 bit version)?
Any cure?
73, Bill NZ5N
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:48:09 -0400
From: David McKenzie <kb1fsy@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow?
To: billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<ce64a0490904100648o18fa640ak84f5020eb10c4be0@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Blame the programmer, not the operating system.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone using the Sat Tracking feature on Ham Radio Deluxe?
>
> When I click on New Satellite, CPU usage shoots to 100% and it takes over a
> minute to display the track of the new sat. Also very slow on several other
> functions. This can't be normal, is it my computer or is it Vista? Running a
> new Lenovo desktop with Windows Vista.
>
> I tried it with my Windows XP laptop and it worked fine. Darn Vista. Any
> way to get it working properly with Vista (32 bit version)?
>
> Any cure?
>
> 73, Bill NZ5N
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:58:16 +0000
From: n3tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow?
To: David McKenzie <kb1fsy@xxxxxxx.xxx>, billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<041020091358.29317.49DF5077000E946B0000728522228869349B0A02D2089B9A019C
04040A0DBF049BCC02@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
?Maybe it is the programmer ... but it also could be the OS.
I'm running HRD with Satellite Tracker here on a tiny Acer netbook with an
Atom processor - NOT the Mr. Olympia of the processor world ... hihi. The Acer
came with Windows XP Home, and every feature of HRD - including Satellite
Tracker - runs perfectly for me.?
By the way - so does SatPC 32 and Orbitron with WispDDE for Doppler control.?
With HRD, the switch to or addition of another satellite is instantaneous,
with no lag of any kind. And Google Earth tracks right along with it - which
is one of the coolest features I've seen in any ham-related software.
As I said at the start ... I suppose the programmer could be to blame. But I
intend to avoid Vista absolutely as long as I can.
73 to all,
Tim - N3TL -------------- Original message from David McKenzie
<kb1fsy@xxxxxxx.xxx>: --------------
> Blame the programmer, not the operating system.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone using the Sat Tracking feature on Ham Radio Deluxe?
> >
> > When I click on New Satellite, CPU usage shoots to 100% and it takes over
a
> > minute to display the track of the new sat. Also very slow on several
other
> > functions. This can't be normal, is it my computer or is it Vista? Running
a
> > new Lenovo desktop with Windows Vista.
> >
> > I tried it with my Windows XP laptop and it worked fine. Darn Vista. Any
> > way to get it working properly with Vista (32 bit version)?
> >
> > Any cure?
> >
> > 73, Bill NZ5N
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:26:05 -0500
From: "Howard Kowall" <hkowall@xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow?
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <003501c9b9e8$487e5580$6701a8c0@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Good morning
I had the same problem,one computer ran very slow as you say,when I swapped
to the other computer it ran fine.
But here was the catch,Both computers were running Windows XP pro
Never really found what the problem was
Would be interesting to find out what the problem was.
So I really dont think it is the operating system at this time.
Howard
VE4ISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Dzurilla" <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:38 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] HRD Sat Tracking program - slow?
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone using the Sat Tracking feature on Ham Radio Deluxe?
>
> When I click on New Satellite, CPU usage shoots to 100% and it takes over
> a minute to display the track of the new sat. Also very slow on several
> other functions. This can't be normal, is it my computer or is it Vista?
> Running a new Lenovo desktop with Windows Vista.
>
> I tried it with my Windows XP laptop and it worked fine. Darn Vista. Any
> way to get it working properly with Vista (32 bit version)?
>
> Any cure?
>
> 73, Bill NZ5N
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:43:27 -0400
From: Luc Leblanc <lucleblanc6@xxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Egg Beater Antenna
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <49DEC05F.15486.40205ED@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On 9 Apr 2009 at 18:30, Steve Bluemel wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> How many of you use Egg Beater Style antennas? Would you please share your
> thoughts and opinions about their performance, commercial or homebrew?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve KI6OQU
I used a VHF and a UHF at a time. The UHF with radial the VHF without it.
Could be my coaxial line was too long and poor quality it
resulted with a deceptive experience.
"-"
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Skype VE2DWE
www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:56:31 -0400
From: John Price <n4qwf1@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HRD Sat Tracking program - slow?
To: billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxxx "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>,
David McKenzie <kb1fsy@xxxxxxx.xxx>, hkowall@xxxx.xx
Message-ID:
<8d1b8e80904100856w32aa9933wd9c0ec2aec8fc54c@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Interesting the comments on HRD and the slow sat swap. I have not seen
that here on any of my 3 XP machines. I have not tried it on the Vista
laptop.
I do have a problem with the TX contol while in satellite mode and my
FT-847. Pushing the TX makes the radio start blinking and then shows
error in the
display. Only way to get out of it is to turn the radio off. Wondering
if anyone else has seen this problem.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone using the Sat Tracking feature on Ham Radio Deluxe?
>
> When I click on New Satellite, CPU usage shoots to 100% and it takes over a
minute to display the track of the new sat. Also very slow on several other
functions. This can't be normal, is it my computer or is it Vista? Running a
new Lenovo desktop with Windows Vista.
>
> I tried it with my Windows XP laptop and it worked fine. Darn Vista. Any way
to get it working properly with Vista (32 bit version)?
>
> Any cure?
>
> 73, Bill NZ5N
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
N4QWF Amateur Radio Operator
AO-7,AO-27,FO-29,SO-50,AO-51,VO-52,ISS
Email N4QWF@xxxxx.xxx
Echolink nodes #110903 -L #388463
http://home.comcast.net/~n4qwf/site/
Formerly KC4AHW VK3FEZ
Amsat Member #27845
DXCC #33,478
VUCC SAT #135
WAS SAT #296
51 on AO-51 #13
LON -79.256 LAT 37.459 Grid FM07il
>From the Foothills of the Blueridge
*Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to
skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly
proclaiming - "WOW, What a ride!"
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:01:23 -0400
From: Josh Smith <juicewvu@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] diplexer
To: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<d3bf5a870904100901j19610d2ah34459bdbae50e1d4@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I am interesting in home brewing a 2 meter/20 cm diplexer similar to
the inhandle diplexer in my arrow antenna but that can handle a little
more power. Can anyone point me toward a kit or some schematics?
Thanks,
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juicewvu@xxxxx.xxx
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:18:18 -0400
From: Diane Bruce <db@xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: diplexer
To: Josh Smith <juicewvu@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <20090410161818.GB74806@xxxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:01:23PM -0400, Josh Smith wrote:
> I am interesting in home brewing a 2 meter/20 cm diplexer similar to
> the inhandle diplexer in my arrow antenna but that can handle a little
> more power. Can anyone point me toward a kit or some schematics?
http://www.k0lee.com/duplexer.htm
- 73 Diane VA3DB
--
- db@xxxxxxx.xxx db@xx.xxx http://www.db.net/~db
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:48:28 +0100
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: diplexer
To: Josh Smith <juicewvu@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <1239382108.10645.9.camel@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:01 -0400, Josh Smith wrote:
> I am interesting in home brewing a 2 meter/20 cm diplexer similar to
> the inhandle diplexer in my arrow antenna but that can handle a little
> more power. Can anyone point me toward a kit or some schematics?
>
I use this design:
http://www.qsl.net/yc0hle/duplexer2m70cm.pdf
With a couple of WA5VJB "Cheap Yagi" aerials, 5 elements on 70cm and 3
elements on 2m. It works pretty well.
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Egg Beater Antenna
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx Steve Bluemel <stevebluemel@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <386668.61387.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi, Steve
I have a pair of the M2 commercial eggbeaters I use for Field Day. They both
have the radial kits underneath them, and an SSB Electronics preamp. My FT-847
provides the power for the preamps, so I don't need a bias tee.
I've also used them a few times at the home QTH, and they're "OK" for casual
use. They're nicely made, but getting the loops installed can be very
frustrating, as the CopperWeld wire that's used is very stiff and springy.
Watch your eyes when installing them! If you happen to let go of the end
you're wrestling with, it'll fly out reeeally fast. It also tends to tarnish
very quickly, and not knowing how thick the layer of copper is, I wonder about
their long-term performance. It looks like it would be pretty easy to replace
the CopperWeld with some solid copper wire the correct size.
This year I'll be going with one of the Gulf Alpha "Dual Band Easy Satellite"
antennas. It's kind of like an Arrow Antenna on steroids, with 6 elements on
2M, and 8 elements on 70cm on a 6' boom.
73, Jim KQ6EA
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Steve Bluemel <stevebluemel@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Steve Bluemel <stevebluemel@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Egg Beater Antenna
> To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 6:30 PM
> Hello All,
>
> How many of you use Egg Beater Style antennas? Would you
> please share your
> thoughts and opinions about their performance, commercial
> or homebrew?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve KI6OQU
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those
> of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:52:39 -0400
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Less than lightening Results
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <B198AC54-8D19-4FCB-8A1A-5403CCD1E6B5@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
I'm with you Tim. Older than AO-7 and hoping that there is some ham
in Alaska that would get on AO-7.
Does anyone on here know of any active, or semi-active ham in Alaska
on AO-7? Would sure love to setup a sked!
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:10 PM, n3tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
> Heck Greg ... I'm plenty older than AO-7, but I feel like a little
> kid every time I hear my CW signal coming back from her. Working CW
> using a straight key through AO-7 is about the coolest mix of the
> old and new I can think of.
>
>
> Now, if somebody in Alaska will just hear me calling "CQ AK" some
> evening on Mode B....
>
>
> 73 to all,
>
> Tim - N3TL
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:00:19 -0400
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Less than lightening Results
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <22FDD585-E674-4581-9008-B8E247106A63@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
They say that no question is a dumb question, so here goes - since I
haven't seen this discussed before, but maybe I missed it.
What makes AO-7 so special? Why is it that we lost AO-10, AO-13 and
all the others in the past several years, yet this one is still
working? I know the batteries are dead, but I'm primarily interested
in how this bird is able to stay in it's orbit for over 30 years? And
if it's orbit is decaying, how is it that it has apparently decayed so
slowly?
I was under the impression that unless a satellite is occasionally
'boosted', it will eventually re-enter? I somehow doubt AO-7 has any
fuel left in it's boosters; if it had any.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Greg D. wrote:
>
> Yeah, this is one grand old bird (the satellite, I mean). If you
> look at the planetary statistics, the median age of the human
> population is about 26.8 as of 2000, and growing slowly. That makes
> AO-07, at age 35, significantly older than more than half of the
> people on Earth.
>
> Greg KO6TH (one of the few older than AO-07...)
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:01:23 -0400
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Less than lightening Results
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <9ED4B3F3-EC6B-4557-AE50-5A566758BE07@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Guess I should have read further before I posted my message, thanks Bob.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:18 AM, w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
> Tim-Look for Joe-AL1F. He gets on AO7 once in awhile, I have talked
> to him several times.
> 73 Bob W7LRD
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:24:54 -0700
From: Dave Guimont <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Egg Beater Antenna
To: Steve Bluemel <stevebluemel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<20090410182459.ICSI5844.cdptpa-
omta02.mail.rr.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>How many of you use Egg Beater Style antennas? Would you please share your
>thoughts and opinions about their performance, commercial or homebrew?
Steve,
The quadrifilar is a little more difficult to build, but you will get
better results.
I can't locate my original plans, but am sure someone on here can
give you the dimensions...
73, Dave, WB6LLO
dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx
Disagree: I learn....
Pulling for P3E...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 165
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
