| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 05.02.09 03:34l 787 Lines 24777 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 6616-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 56
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 090205/0228Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:6616 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:6616-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Cell Phone in Spce (Nate Duehr)
2. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Sebastian)
3. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (jeff kb2m)
4. New Alinco DJ-G7 HT questions? (davidmkelly@xxxxx.xxxx
5. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
6. SumbandilaSat launch (G0MRF@xxx.xxxx
7. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Sebastian)
8. Re: SumbandilaSat launch (Sebastian)
9. Re: Cell Phone in Spce (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
10. Re: Cell Phone in Spce (Nate Duehr)
11. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Jeff Wandling W7BRS)
12. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Patrick Domack)
13. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
(Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604)
14. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (George Henry)
15. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Jeff Wandling W7BRS)
16. Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (jeff kb2m)
17. Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz (Eric Fort)
18. Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz (Clint Bradford)
19. Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz (Clint Bradford)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:28:38 -0700
From: "Nate Duehr" <nate@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000b01c98707$29ea1fa0$7dbe5ee0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Technically, operating a cellular phone in-flight is also illegal. (FCC
rule, not FAA. FAA says if you have permission of the Pilot-In-Command
you're okay, and the vast majority of U.S. Flagged Air Carriers have rules
against their pilots being allowed to offer that permission. Non-U.S.
Carriers have their own rules. But the FCC rule overrides the FAA rules.)
Nate WY0X
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Michael Heim
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:48 PM
To: Tony Langdon; AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
I recall doing a broadcast remote where I was engineering the remote from a
single engine aircraft. At about 5000 feet or so, I lost all cellphone
functionality because I was getting into too many cell sites at the same
time and the system locked me out (thats the best explanation I could come
up with). Even if there was enough signal from that distance, I doubt it
would work for that reason.
Michael Heim
Chief Engineer, Forever Broadcasting
New Castle PA
WKST WJST WWGY
814-671-0666
ARS KD0AR
--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
> To: "Kelly Martin" <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx>, "Dave" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 9:51 PM
> At 01:33 PM 2/4/2009, Kelly Martin wrote:
> >Cell phones need about -95 dBm received to work at all
> (and really at
> >-95 dBm about all you get is network beaconing, with no
> ability to
> >actually place a call). Typical cell transmit powers
> rarely go past
> >one watt, and I think the cell base stations rarely go
> much over ten
> >watts (per channel). I think you'll find that
> there's too much path
> >loss for that to work to even LEO, notwithstanding the
> fact that cell
> >tower antennas typically have radiation patterns that
> send virtually
> >all the signal into terrain, that being where the cell
> phones are.
>
> Some systems (GSM being the main example) have a distance
> limitation,
> of how far you can go from the base station, without losing
> sync due
> to propagation delay. Suffice to say this is well short of
> any LEO,
> even the ISS.
>
> 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
> http://vkradio.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those
> of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:25:01 -0500
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <67FEE2A7-0EAB-4815-B51C-577BA1704231@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
I have a Linksys wireless router and don't have the noise problem you
are experiencing. Based on prior posts on here, you might considering
removing the wall wart and using a non-switching power supply. I
myself use the wall wart, and I haven't experienced any noise problems
on the 2 meter downlink. You might also consider building a cage for
the router, if you have determined that's your source of noise.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Feb 4, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Mark L. Hammond wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I know this was discussed before, but I want to bring it up again.
>
> Does anybody have a Linksys wireless router/4-port hub that does NOT
> make ugly noises around 145.870 MHz (and the satellite portion of 2M
> in general)?
>
> I don't want a D-Link (bad previous experience), and I prefer Linksys;
> but I would consider some other brand.
>
> Thanks in advance for the feedback!
>
> --
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:53:46 -0500
From: "jeff kb2m" <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <451CA77974B2445C9F7F656B7898BCD5@xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Good afternoon Mark. I had the same 'birdie' problem with switches over the
years. I now have a hybrid Linksys router model number wrt54gs. I've had
this router in the shack for years, and never had a 'birdie' problem, even
on S band. What is also great about this router is you can download free
firmware to extend it's range, if needed. I will need this feature at my
girlfriends house where she has a lot of neighbors competing for the
wireless channels. I just bought one for her place for $46 at Wal-Mart
today. When I get it installed , if needed, she will have a big signal.
73 Jeff kb2m
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:32 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
> Hello All,
>
> I know this was discussed before, but I want to bring it up again.
>
> Does anybody have a Linksys wireless router/4-port hub that does NOT
> make ugly noises around 145.870 MHz (and the satellite portion of 2M
> in general)?
>
> I don't want a D-Link (bad previous experience), and I prefer Linksys;
> but I would consider some other brand.
>
> Thanks in advance for the feedback!
>
> --
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:20:36 +0000
From: davidmkelly@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] New Alinco DJ-G7 HT questions?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <001636457858d846f104621e5bc2@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed;
delsp=yes
I had Google translate the webpage about the forthcoming Alinco DJ-G7 and
am still left with a few questions.
? Since the modes are F1D/F2D/F3E am I safe to assume it doesn't receive
SSB or CW? They almost made the perfect HT!
? The 1200 MHz frequency output is 1 watt. Is this sufficient with a hand
held Yagi to work AO-51? The EIRP math doesn't look good to my thinking.
? So they show it at Dayton and given past timelines when would it be
available for sale?
? The translations says nothing about packet operations that I can see.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this aspect of the new HT?
Given the right answers this could be as the Google Translation of the
Alinco website says "This is the handy machine, I want!"
David
AC7LY
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:27:13 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1233786433.9171.2.camel@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 16:53 -0500, jeff kb2m wrote:
> firmware to extend it's range, if needed. I will need this feature at my
> girlfriends house where she has a lot of neighbors competing for the
> wireless channels. I just bought one for her place for $46 at Wal-Mart
> today. When I get it installed , if needed, she will have a big signal.
I've never understood this. Why not just split in for a fat, fat
connection and then use *proper* wireless to share it out across a few
houses?
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:01:31 EST
From: G0MRF@xxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] SumbandilaSat launch
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <d2b.436063cf.36bb784b@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
A brief announcement has been made on the Clydespace website saying that the
South African satellite SumbandilaSat will be launched from Baikonur on the
25th of March.
Not sure that some of the detail is correct, but they seem positive about
the date.
_http://www.clyde-space.com/news/127_date-set-for-launch-of-sumbandilasat-sa_
(http://www.clyde-space.com/news/127_date-set-for-launch-of-sumbandilasat-sa)
_http://www.sunspace.co.za/programmes/ZA002.htm_
(http://www.sunspace.co.za/programmes/ZA002.htm)
73
David G0MRF
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:23:49 -0500
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <106D7D32-9E16-4185-8DAA-77EAE4F96959@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Well for one thing, in stateside, it's usually against the rules of
the ISP to share a connection with your neighbors.
However, I disagree with Jeff about increasing the power.
Jeff you should instead check to see which channels the other wireless
networks are set at, and then move your channel far away. I've found
most wireless routers use channel 6 as a default. It's usually a good
idea to move to channel 1. Note that the frequency range of each
channel actually includes part of the other channel(s); so you usually
want to move up or down 3 channels from your neighbors if possible.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Feb 4, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 16:53 -0500, jeff kb2m wrote:
>
>> firmware to extend it's range, if needed. I will need this feature
>> at my
>> girlfriends house where she has a lot of neighbors competing for the
>> wireless channels. I just bought one for her place for $46 at Wal-
>> Mart
>> today. When I get it installed , if needed, she will have a big
>> signal.
>
> I've never understood this. Why not just split in for a fat, fat
> connection and then use *proper* wireless to share it out across a few
> houses?
>
> Gordon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:26:50 -0500
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SumbandilaSat launch
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <AEC67D69-AE3A-4556-90ED-C6E040D91929@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed;
delsp=yes
For the lazy, here is what one of those links say:
SA AMSAT ? 2m/70cm amateur radio transponder and digitalker. This
payload will find not only use by the amateur radio fraternity but
also has a large educational aspect of bringing space science into the
class room.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:01 PM, G0MRF@xxx.xxx wrote:
> A brief announcement has been made on the Clydespace website saying
> that the
> South African satellite SumbandilaSat will be launched from Baikonur
> on the
> 25th of March.
>
> Not sure that some of the detail is correct, but they seem positive
> about
> the date.
>
>
> _http://www.clyde-space.com/news/127_date-set-for-launch-of-sumbandilasat-
sa_
> (http://www.clyde-space.com/news/127_date-set-for-launch-of-sumbandilasat-sa
> )
>
> _http://www.sunspace.co.za/programmes/ZA002.htm_
> (http://www.sunspace.co.za/programmes/ZA002.htm)
>
> 73
>
> David G0MRF
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:38:45 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
To: Nate Duehr <nate@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <498A3515.6000303@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Only if you're in the US.
Nate Duehr wrote:
But the FCC rule overrides the FAA rules.)
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:45:38 -0700
From: "Nate Duehr" <nate@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
To: "'Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF'" <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <007001c9872b$113fff00$33bffd00$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Duh.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF [mailto:nigel@xxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 5:39 PM
To: Nate Duehr
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
Only if you're in the US.
Nate Duehr wrote:
But the FCC rule overrides the FAA rules.)
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:59:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Wandling W7BRS <amsat@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.82.0902041655380.2236@xxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Yup, and..
For liability reasons, I wouldn't share your bandwidth with another
household. Who knows what they'll do with the connection. Download
illegal stuff, share illegal stuff, etc.. It's just bad juju.
Make your SSID unpublished, run IPCop on a spare beige box, and use an
AccessPoint not a dual router-hub.
-jeff
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Sebastian wrote:
> Well for one thing, in stateside, it's usually against the rules of
> the ISP to share a connection with your neighbors.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:02:59 -0500
From: Patrick Domack <patrickdk@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090204200259.szpd244i0wwgg0ow@xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
format="flowed"
All of mine are quiet.
Running 2 wrt54gs v1.1, 2 wrt54gl v1.1, 1 wrt54gs v4, 1 wrt54g v6
I run mine from the same 12v supply I run my radio's on. No wallwarts,
I figure I have to be saving alittle electricity that way, if nothing
else.
Quoting "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>:
> Hello All,
>
> I know this was discussed before, but I want to bring it up again.
>
> Does anybody have a Linksys wireless router/4-port hub that does NOT
> make ugly noises around 145.870 MHz (and the satellite portion of 2M
> in general)?
>
> I don't want a D-Link (bad previous experience), and I prefer Linksys;
> but I would consider some other brand.
>
> Thanks in advance for the feedback!
>
> --
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:16:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090205011653.17DDB13805@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Err, check out Bruce Schneier's view on this.
73, doug
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:59:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Wandling W7BRS <amsat@xxxxx.xxx>
Yup, and..
For liability reasons, I wouldn't share your bandwidth with another
household. Who knows what they'll do with the connection. Download
illegal stuff, share illegal stuff, etc.. It's just bad juju.
Make your SSID unpublished, run IPCop on a spare beige box, and use an
AccessPoint not a dual router-hub.
-jeff
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Sebastian wrote:
> Well for one thing, in stateside, it's usually against the rules of
> the ISP to share a connection with your neighbors.
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:26:40 -0600
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <FFBB41CBFA8C4FEBAF5613F38AD1103A@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
No, but I have a Netgear RT-314 wired router that makes a lot of noise right
around 145.810 -145.830.... I have to unplug it when the ISS goes over, if
I want to hear anything.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:32 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
> Hello All,
>
> I know this was discussed before, but I want to bring it up again.
>
> Does anybody have a Linksys wireless router/4-port hub that does NOT
> make ugly noises around 145.870 MHz (and the satellite portion of 2M
> in general)?
>
> I don't want a D-Link (bad previous experience), and I prefer Linksys;
> but I would consider some other brand.
>
> Thanks in advance for the feedback!
>
> --
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:00:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Wandling W7BRS <amsat@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.82.0902041723290.2236@xxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Oh OK, so yea Bruce does have a different opinion about securing networks
vs. the data you hold. You dropped the name but didn't give any context.
Yes, I've read his remarks on this. He has a different opinion. In a
situation where the bandwidth wasn't an issue, I would agree 100%. In the
context of bandwith, I'd do what I could to keep the pedestrian user from
wasting my precious bandwidth.
His remarks don't deal with the bandwidth as far as I remember. He was
speaking to the point of securing your data. If I had his income, and a
network to match I wouldn't worry as much about the script kiddy next door
stealing a few Mb/sec.
His message, in a nutshell; secure your data. The idea that you can
protect your data by password protecting your network is the main
complaint he has. I agree. It's foolish to think protecting your
network secures your data.
I quote: "If I configure my computer to be secure regardless of the
network it's on, then it simply doesn't matter. And if my computer isn't
secure on a public network, securing my own network isn't going to reduce
my risk very much."
The article is here, if you want to refer to it:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/01/my_open_wireles.html
-jeff
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote:
> Err, check out Bruce Schneier's view on this.
>
> 73, doug
>
> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:59:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jeff Wandling W7BRS <amsat@xxxxx.xxx>
>
> Yup, and..
>
> For liability reasons, I wouldn't share your bandwidth with another
> household. Who knows what they'll do with the connection. Download
> illegal stuff, share illegal stuff, etc.. It's just bad juju.
>
> Make your SSID unpublished, run IPCop on a spare beige box, and use an
> AccessPoint not a dual router-hub.
>
> -jeff
>
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Sebastian wrote:
> > Well for one thing, in stateside, it's usually against the rules of
> > the ISP to share a connection with your neighbors.
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:00:24 -0500
From: "jeff kb2m" <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: "AMSAT BB" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <B9607C3E372F423685DFC387DC8CD158@xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
> Jeff you should instead check to see which channels the other wireless
> networks are set at, and then move your channel far away.
Been there done that, I think their all on auto, or something.
>I've never understood this. Why not just split in for a fat, fat
>connection and then use *proper* wireless to share it out across a few
>houses?
I do this. Sometimes I just connect to one of the un-secured routers on the
same channel.
Anyway I hope Mark got the info he needed....
73 Jeff kb2m
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:14:36 -0800
From: Eric Fort <eric.fort@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<2ad2af430902041814lb5db126s615178f035c60c19@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This may be useful, automatic translation from Japanese to English of the
alinco Japanese web page:
*http://tinyurl.com/Alinco-DJ-G7-English*<http://tinyurl.com/Alinco-DJ-G7-
English>
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Alinco DJ-G7 - This is the radio that should be announced at Dayton
> this year. Production of the U.S. version expected to start in June.
>
> Neither price nor specs for the US version are currently available.
>
> It's on Alinco's Japanese Web site ...
>
> http://www.alinco.co.jp/denshi/03/djg7_f4.html
>
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS / KAF3359
> 909-241-7666
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:19:42 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
To: eric.fort@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <8604433A-3B5C-4E80-B832-9618B965F22A@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
The US model is still in the works ... even Alinco doesn't have the
specs on it yet.
Clint
On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Eric Fort wrote:
> This may be useful, automatic translation from Japanese to English
> of the alinco Japanese web page:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/Alinco-DJ-G7-English
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:20:58 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <A0814251-7116-477D-92CA-B76D953B6C10@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
The US model isn't even in production yet ... evn Alinco doesn't have
the specs for the US model yet ....
Clint
On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Eric Fort wrote:
> This may be useful, automatic translation from Japanese to English
> of the alinco Japanese web page:
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 56
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
