|
CX2SA > SATDIG 04.02.09 21:45l 676 Lines 19857 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 6527-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 55
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<F5GOV<F4BWT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 090204/2036Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:6527 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:6527-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. ISS Re-Boost Cancelled (Armando Mercado)
2. Students call space station with home-built radio (Trevor)
3. Re: Iranian satellite keps? (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
4. Re: Students call space station with home-built radio
(Kelly Martin)
5. Re: Students call space station with home-built radio (Trevor)
6. Re: Students call space station with home-built radio (Sebastian)
7. Re: Iranian satellite keps? (Peter Guelzow)
8. Cell Phone in Spce (Dave)
9. Re: Cell Phone in Spce (Kelly Martin)
10. Re: Cell Phone in Spce (Tony Langdon)
11. Full-Duplex - Re: Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
(Andy MacAllister)
12. Satellite list! (Luc Leblanc)
13. KKS-1 Command send (oguro-t@xxxxx.xxxx
14. Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz (Clint Bradford)
15. Fw: George Caswell Sr. - W1ME/K1MON SK (Jerry Muller)
16. Re: Iranian satellite keps? (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
17. Linksys routers and 2M "birdies" (Mark L. Hammond)
18. Re: Cell Phone in Spce (Michael Heim)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:15:02 -0500
From: "Armando Mercado" <am25544@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS Re-Boost Cancelled
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <B464357658C146F6A507C9DBCD8123CD@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original
Hi,
The re-boost scheduled for tomorrow
has been cancelled. Apparently the
last re-boost in January caused
excessive shaking to the station and
flight controllers want to understand
why before they do another burn.
See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28998876/
73, Armando, N8IGJ
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:24:38 +0000 (GMT)
From: Trevor <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Students call space station with home-built radio
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <869384.30298.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Story from the Globe and Mail -
'Students call space station with home-built radio'
http://tinyurl.com/cbk39d
73 Trevor M5AKA
Amateur Radio Daily RSS News: http://www.southgatearc.org/
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:40:21 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Iranian satellite keps?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1233693621.14013.16.camel@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 13:50 -0500, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
> >From another list:
>
> >The numbers from the ITU are:
> >464.98750 MHz and 465.01250 MHz at +7 dBW
http://www.gjcp.net/space/2009-0a4-2024.mp3
Think that's it. Next time it comes round I'll be better prepared for
recording it.
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:57:31 -0600
From: Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Students call space station with home-built
radio
To: Trevor <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<bd4c411e0902031257h6ede3d65vee37c37701885805@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I didn't know that Icom was selling kits.
Kelly
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Trevor <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
> Story from the Globe and Mail -
>
> 'Students call space station with home-built radio'
>
> http://tinyurl.com/cbk39d
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
> Amateur Radio Daily RSS News: http://www.southgatearc.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:33:33 +0000 (GMT)
From: Trevor <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Students call space station with home-built
radio
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <85579.57716.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
--- On Tue, 3/2/09, Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> I didn't know that Icom was selling kits.
I did wonder myself, the story doesn't actually say which part of the system
was "home-built".
Back in the 1920's Radio Amateurs build their own components (resistors etc),
these days things have moved on and we develop systems that can embody
complete transceivers as a component-part.
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:40:03 -0500
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Students call space station with home-built
radio
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <53B8A0FF-FC30-4DE7-BF14-A92C3F159C10@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog.htm
ICOM IC-V8000 (from Radioworld) transceiver, Hygain Two-Meter Oscar
antenna, Yaesu G-5500 rotor.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
On Feb 3, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Trevor wrote:
> --- On Tue, 3/2/09, Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> I didn't know that Icom was selling kits.
>
> I did wonder myself, the story doesn't actually say which part of
> the system was "home-built".
>
> Back in the 1920's Radio Amateurs build their own components
> (resistors etc), these days things have moved on and we develop
> systems that can embody complete transceivers as a component-part.
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:18:53 +0100
From: Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Iranian satellite keps?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4988C2CD.1030607@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
A YouTube video which shows the satellite, it's construction and launch
can be seen here.
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=M8oOOmBIlCA
Obviously the satellite has no solar cells and may only operate from
batteries..
73s Peter DB2OS
Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 13:50 -0500, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
>
>> >From another list:
>>
>>
>>> The numbers from the ITU are:
>>> 464.98750 MHz and 465.01250 MHz at +7 dBW
>>>
>
> http://www.gjcp.net/space/2009-0a4-2024.mp3
>
> Think that's it. Next time it comes round I'll be better prepared for
> recording it.
>
> Gordon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:59:38 -0700
From: "Dave" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cell Phone in Spce
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BAADE65DD82B42EA8E83E3FC6914EAA5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Anyone have a calculation/estimate of cell phone functionality in space? Would
it be able to transmit and receive a signal from/to earth?
Dave
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:33:05 -0600
From: Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
To: Dave <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<bd4c411e0902031833j2a9691d8n2b8649e9f23a17d2@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cell phones need about -95 dBm received to work at all (and really at
-95 dBm about all you get is network beaconing, with no ability to
actually place a call). Typical cell transmit powers rarely go past
one watt, and I think the cell base stations rarely go much over ten
watts (per channel). I think you'll find that there's too much path
loss for that to work to even LEO, notwithstanding the fact that cell
tower antennas typically have radiation patterns that send virtually
all the signal into terrain, that being where the cell phones are.
Kelly
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dave <dave@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Anyone have a calculation/estimate of cell phone functionality in space?
Would it be able to transmit and receive a signal from/to earth?
>
> Dave
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:51:00 +1100
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
To: Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx>, Dave <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <498902ad.02578c0a.2075.55a1@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 01:33 PM 2/4/2009, Kelly Martin wrote:
>Cell phones need about -95 dBm received to work at all (and really at
>-95 dBm about all you get is network beaconing, with no ability to
>actually place a call). Typical cell transmit powers rarely go past
>one watt, and I think the cell base stations rarely go much over ten
>watts (per channel). I think you'll find that there's too much path
>loss for that to work to even LEO, notwithstanding the fact that cell
>tower antennas typically have radiation patterns that send virtually
>all the signal into terrain, that being where the cell phones are.
Some systems (GSM being the main example) have a distance limitation,
of how far you can go from the base station, without losing sync due
to propagation delay. Suffice to say this is well short of any LEO,
even the ISS.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:08:18 -0600
From: "Andy MacAllister" <w5acm@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Full-Duplex - Re: Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
To: "'AMSAT BBS'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <204C85B91B4147B2A18A3A1BBDFFDED6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Alinco says that they will have the DJ-G7 at Dayton.
We will get a chance to check the specs soon!
73 de Andy W5ACM
----- Original Message -----
From: <n3tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Allen Vinegar" <tokens@xxxxxxx.xxx>; <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:50 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
> >From the translated page (thanks for this, Al!):
>
> * Transmission
> 144.000 - 145.995MHz
> 430.000 - 439.995MHz
> 1260.000 - 1299.995MHz
>
>
> Here's hoping Alinco will see fit to produce a version for the U.S.
> amateur market (i.e., with TX ranges that will provide for full U.S.-band
> operation).
>
> 73 to all,
>
> Tim - N3TL
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:58:06 -0500
From: Luc Leblanc <lucleblanc6@xxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Satellite list!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: eu-amsat@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <49885B7E.17615.1109E48@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Some of you are probably aware but just in case check the last updated lists
on:
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_global_security/space_weapons/techni
cal_issues/ucs-satellite-database.html
"-"
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Skype VE2DWE
www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:44:46 +0900
From: <oguro-t@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] KKS-1 Command send
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<B6A9680D2A0408498D5EC11A37AF2B25F6BFA88D46@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Dear
KKS-1 command station seems to transmit the command that changes the mode at
february 4 03:19UTC.
KKS-1 begins to repeat the same beacon now.
609/01/2403:17:00
Details
http://www.kouku-k.ac.jp/~kks-1/kks-gs-news-e.htm
JG1KOE T.Oguro
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:18:38 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New HT for 144/430/1200MHz
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <2219B799-E4B6-4C7D-9B11-3934A991D840@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Alinco DJ-G7 - This is the radio that should be announced at Dayton
this year. Production of the U.S. version expected to start in June.
Neither price nor specs for the US version are currently available.
It's on Alinco's Japanese Web site ...
http://www.alinco.co.jp/denshi/03/djg7_f4.html
Clint Bradford, K6LCS / KAF3359
909-241-7666
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:14:29 -0500
From: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fw: George Caswell Sr. - W1ME/K1MON SK
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <54805908C08C4EFB9003E620D0B1FCED@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
George was a friend for over 35 years. I will miss him.
Jerry - K0TV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hartley Gardner" <hartleyg@xxx.xxx>
To: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@xxxx.xxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:25 PM
Subject: [Fwd: George Caswell Sr.]
Hi Jerry,
Please pass this on to anyone you think should know.
73 DE Hartley
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: George Caswell Sr.
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:54:33 -0500
From: Caroline P. Caswell <cspc@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Hartley Gardner <hartleyg@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx>, sara
<msmj4@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, Ron & Trish <patrona@xxxxxx.xxx>, Judy & Bob
Jamison <Jamison2@xxx.xxx>, John Adams <adams404@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>,
<jlmono@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, Gail Teran <gailteran@xxxxx.xxx>, Elsie Adams
<danderlion@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, Carl Achin - WA1ZCQ <wa1zcq@xxxxx.xxx>,
Anthony Monteiro <aa2tx@xxxxxxx.xxx>
George E. Caswell, 63, of Scarborough, ME died peacefully at the Maine
Veterans Home on February 3rd after a lengthy illness. He was born and
raised in Waltham, MA, the only child of Vera and Leslie B. Caswell. He
was married in Newton, MA on Jan 3, 1970 to Caroline Parmenter of
Palermo, Maine. In 1978 they moved to Scarborough, ME where they raised
their two children, Christine and George Jr.
George was an avid ham radio operator from the age of 13 when he
received his first call sign, K1MON. In later years, after relocating to
Maine, he changed his call sign to W1ME. George was particularly
interested in amateur satellite operation and contacts with astronauts
aboard Mir and the ISS. In Feb 2005, he set up his radio station at the
Rockland, ME high school as part of a PenBay radio club activity and
contacted the International Space Station, allowing high school students
to communicate with the astronauts aboard. It was one of the highlights
of his amateur radio involvement.
George was educated in Waltham, MA schools and attended Westbrook
College for two years. He served in the U.S. Army from 1965-1968 with 27
months being served in Viet Nam. He was employed by Verizon, originally
New England Telephone, for 31 years as a central office technician.
George was also a private pilot for many years and a former member of
the Baldeagles Flying Club in Portland.
George is survived by his wife of 39 years, Caroline P. Caswell;
daughter Christine and her husband Moises Nu?ez, of Somerville, MA: son
George and his wife Laura Johnston, of Reading, MA; mother-in-law Elsie
Adams of Palermo, ME; a special niece, Sara Robinson, her husband Mike,
and daughters Makayla and Jayna; brothers-in-law Jack Adams of
Fairfield, ME and Ron Adams of Houston, TX and their families: and
several nieces and nephews.
Family, friends, and neighbors are welcome to an open house at the
Caswells? home at 16 Westwood Avenue in Scarborough on Saturday February
7 from 2-5pm to share memories and condolences.
The family will have a burial service in the spring at the Maine
Veterans Cemetery in Augusta.
Donations in George's Memory may be made to:
Alzheimer's Association Maine Chapter 170 US Route 1, Suite 250
Falmouth, ME 04105
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:24:23 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Iranian satellite keps?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1233768263.7679.11.camel@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:18 +0100, Peter Guelzow wrote:
> Obviously the satellite has no solar cells and may only operate from
> batteries..
Orbit 30 passed pretty much right overhead at my QTH at about 1710. The
signal was strong enough to pick up inside with my HT's rubber duck, but
no modulation. Wonder if that's it on the way out?
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:32:36 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Linksys routers and 2M "birdies"
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<5d8cecfe0902041032h782af46bo71fa8c75d2cb8317@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello All,
I know this was discussed before, but I want to bring it up again.
Does anybody have a Linksys wireless router/4-port hub that does NOT
make ugly noises around 145.870 MHz (and the satellite portion of 2M
in general)?
I don't want a D-Link (bad previous experience), and I prefer Linksys;
but I would consider some other brand.
Thanks in advance for the feedback!
--
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:48:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael Heim <kd0ar@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
To: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <863241.79827.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I recall doing a broadcast remote where I was engineering the remote from a
single engine aircraft. At about 5000 feet or so, I lost all cellphone
functionality because I was getting into too many cell sites at the same time
and the system locked me out (thats the best explanation I could come up
with). Even if there was enough signal from that distance, I doubt it would
work for that reason.
Michael Heim
Chief Engineer, Forever Broadcasting
New Castle PA
WKST WJST WWGY
814-671-0666
ARS KD0AR
--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cell Phone in Spce
> To: "Kelly Martin" <kelly.lynn.martin@xxxxx.xxx>, "Dave" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 9:51 PM
> At 01:33 PM 2/4/2009, Kelly Martin wrote:
> >Cell phones need about -95 dBm received to work at all
> (and really at
> >-95 dBm about all you get is network beaconing, with no
> ability to
> >actually place a call). Typical cell transmit powers
> rarely go past
> >one watt, and I think the cell base stations rarely go
> much over ten
> >watts (per channel). I think you'll find that
> there's too much path
> >loss for that to work to even LEO, notwithstanding the
> fact that cell
> >tower antennas typically have radiation patterns that
> send virtually
> >all the signal into terrain, that being where the cell
> phones are.
>
> Some systems (GSM being the main example) have a distance
> limitation,
> of how far you can go from the base station, without losing
> sync due
> to propagation delay. Suffice to say this is well short of
> any LEO,
> even the ISS.
>
> 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
> http://vkradio.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those
> of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 55
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |