| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 28.01.09 23:18l 515 Lines 14351 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 4686-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 47
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<F5GOV<CX2SA
Sent: 090128/2115Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:4686 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:4686-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: AO-51 SSTV (Andrew Koenig)
2. SSTV from Hawaii (Robert Smith)
3. Re: ISS packet ? (Dirgantara YF?EEE)
4. PRISM seems Object J (Mike Rupprecht)
5. ISS APRS 145.825 (Tony)
6. Re: HEO vs. LEO cost comparison (Bob McGwier)
7. SATPC-32 KEPS (Mike McConnell)
8. AO-7 8000 QSO. K3SZH. (TERRY BROMLEY)
9. TLE decided (Mineo Wakita)
10. Re: TLE decided (Mineo Wakita)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:15:45 -0600
From: Andrew Koenig <ke5gdb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 SSTV
To: Allen Vinegar <tokens@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<2f52b89b0901271315o28dc2493g7d8816d7ef7259d7@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I'm glad to hear someone copied my image! I was juggling an Arrow Antenna, 2
FT-60's, and a laptop (which was on the side of a table outside) all while
trying to keep the receiving FT-60 close to the computer mic; and when
transmitting, key up the computer and the HT hand mic at the same time while
holding the mic next to the computer speaker.
It did seem however that there were several images sent that were WAY too
quite to receive. I did my best to get mine in loud, but I know Sebastion's
(W4AS) sent an image that had audio too low to decode.
Very interesting mode, especially for us with the hand held stations.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Allen Vinegar <tokens@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> John,
>
> I am referring to the pass at about 23:25Z which was possibly too low to
> the
> east for you. I am sending my pictures in a handheld operation and don't
> have the ability to have an actual exchange with anyone. Looking forward to
> trying again and perhaps getting some feedback if anyone copies my picture.
> I am juggling an Arrow antenna, two HTs and a VC-H1 to get my pictures sent
> and to receive and record the pass.
>
> 73,
> Al W8KHP
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John W Lee" <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
> To: <tokens@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-51 SSTV
>
>
> > Al,
> > I don't know what time you are referring to on AO-51.
> > The first pass on the west coast (01:04Z) was OK,
> > Had exchanges with KE5GDB and VE7VW with no
> > problems. Good pictures both ways.
> >
> > The second pass was completely quiet. I called on voice
> > several times and sent CQ pictures with no reply
> >
> > I did hear some Spanish voices in there a couple of times,
> > and a couple of other unidentified voice transmissions.
> >
> > 73,
> > John K6YK
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:07:50 -0500 "Allen Vinegar" <tokens@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> > writes:
> >> Lots of noise on AO-51 prevented me from getting clear download of
> >> pictures. Did get two that were clear enough to see they were from
> >> WP4CNU and KB2HSH. Several interfering carriers came on several
> >> times during SSTV transmissions. Anyone who is copying pictures
> >> please let us know if we are getting through. Copies of pictures
> >> would also be appreciated. Don't know if I succeeded last night or
> >> not.
> >>
> >> Thanks & 73,
> >>
> >> Al W8KHP
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
> >> author.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> >> program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Durable and cost effective steel buildings. Click for huge discounts.
> >
>
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw29rwjIsnkeQ160uUPWxOd6uNc5fO
iKrEZ8uuNGh3N7UYHUE/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
Andrew Koenig
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:52:22 -1000
From: "Robert Smith" <dukenuke@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SSTV from Hawaii
To: "Amsat-Bb@xxxxx. Org" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <001901c980c9$897640a0$2f01a8c0@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Aloha all
Assuming I am not interfering with anyone,
I am going to attempt a QRP SSTV transmission
from Hawaii at 0348Z today (01/28/09 UTC date)
via AO-51. Several west coast states should
be within the footprint. I will be using a Yaesu-
VX-7R with a homebrew Yagi. Please feel free
to listen in and I'd appreciate any feedback
(good or bad!)
Mahalo and 73, de robert NH7WN
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:57:50 +0700
From: Dirgantara YF?EEE <enggi1401@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS packet ?
To: "Ron G. Seiler" <rgseiler@xxxx.xx>, "'Jeffrey Koehler'"
<jeffk13057@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <016f01c980d2$bf8bafa0$51b83a72@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
still in 145.825 mhz or 145.800 mhz ?
73 de YF0EEE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron G. Seiler" <rgseiler@xxxx.xx>
To: "'Jeffrey Koehler'" <jeffk13057@xxxxx.xxx>; <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:40 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS packet ?
Hi Jeff,
This is what was heard in four minutes of that pass here on the West Coast:
Fm RS0ISS-3 To ID <UI pid=F0 Len=8 >[20:35:39]
RS0ISS/R
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:35:40]
:EMAIL :k6koz@xxxxxxx.xxx GREETINGS FROM SPACE!!!
Fm VA7VW-6 To APRS Via RS0ISS-3 <UI pid=F0 Len=36 >[20:35:56]
=5015.17N/11917.32W`via ISS {UISS51}
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:36:40]
:EMAIL :k6koz@xxxxxxx.xxx GREETINGS FROM SPACE!!!
Fm VA7VW-6 To CQ Via RS0ISS-3 <UI pid=F0 Len=28 >[20:36:51]
Hello to All www.va7vw.ca
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:36:54]
=3416.08N/11854.83W# DM04, Moorpark,Ca. via Satellite
Fm VA7VW-6 To K6KOZ Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=20 >[20:37:10]
Hello www.va7vw.ca
Fm VA7VW-6 To K6KOZ Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=19 >[20:37:19]
Ron in Vernon, B.C.
Fm VA7VW-6 To APRS Via RS0ISS-3 <UI pid=F0 Len=55 >[20:37:43]
:EMAIL :va7vw@xxxxx.xxx Check-in from Vernon, B.C.
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:37:54]
=3416.08N/11854.83W# DM04, Moorpark,Ca. via Satellite
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:37:59]
:EMAIL :k6koz@xxxxxxx.xxx GREETINGS FROM SPACE!!!
Fm AK7AT-1 To APRS Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=45 >[20:38:23]
[DN13qn] Greetings Spaceoids and Earthlings!
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:38:33]
:EMAIL :k6koz@xxxxxxx.xxx GREETINGS FROM SPACE!!!
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:38:37]
=3416.08N/11854.83W# DM04, Moorpark,Ca. via Satellite
Fm VA7VW-6 To AK7AT-1 Via RS0ISS-3 <UI pid=F0 Len=14 >[20:38:43]
73 Ron in DO00
Fm VA7VW-6 To CQ Via RS0ISS-3 <UI pid=F0 Len=28 >[20:39:03]
Hello to All www.va7vw.ca
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:39:04]
:EMAIL :k6koz@xxxxxxx.xxx GREETINGS FROM SPACE!!!
Fm K6KOZ To APEG02 Via RS0ISS-3* <UI pid=F0 Len=53 >[20:39:07]
=3416.08N/11854.83W# DM04, Moorpark,Ca. via Satellite
73,
Ron VA7VW DO00ig
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Koehler
Sent: 27-Jan-09 05:14 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS packet ?
I had a pretty high pass early last night and heard nothing here in FN13....
Left the radio on and around 2100-2130 local heard a bunch of packets, some
strong, some not. Not sure whether anyone was digipeating or not, cound not
get UISS up and running fast enough before LOS.
73, Jeff WB2SYK FN13xc
--- On Mon, 1/26/09, Alan Sieg WB5RMG <wb5rmg@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
From: Alan Sieg WB5RMG <wb5rmg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS packet ?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 10:18 PM
Tony -K2MO said :
> Iss in packet mode (Orbit 58,375) - 145.800
- and I just listened in on the 0305z pass here from Huntsville...
I heard some packets, but couldn't decode anything.
Also don't see any current beacons via findu .. ..
Signal seemed pretty weak.
Any other reports ? Maybe I just got out of practice .?.
Thanks /;^)
--
<- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->
<- http://www.somenet.net * http://wb5rmg.somenet.net ->
<- http://www.linkedin.com/in/alansieg * My 'Day Job' ->
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:06:52 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] PRISM seems Object J
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <00a001c980d3$f11d8bf0$d358a3d0$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
All,
21:08 UTC
I had only a 8 degr elevation pass first and used both TLE for analyzing the
doppler frequency.
Well, it seems my assumption was right - seems we have to change the TLE for
PRISM to OBJECT J.
22:41 UTC
After this second pass with higher elevation (32 degr) I am sure that PRISM
is OBJECT J.
You can see the graphs here in my SatBlog: http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=2407
73, Mike
DK3WN
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:31:47 -0500
From: Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS APRS 145.825
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <3F903977F5B140A282604C3192D7B5B5@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
All,
Iss is in APRS mode - 145.825 -- orbit 58,390.
Tony -K2MO
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:45 -0500
From: Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HEO vs. LEO cost comparison
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <497FB761.2000601@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
If it cost $4,000,000 to launch a HEO we would have put one, possibly
two of them up since AO-40. We would at least be building the second.
Also $500,000 will barely cover the cost of the solar panels. It will
not cover the cost of the motor.
Dream on Macduff!
Bob
N4HY
trevor wrote:
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:11:41 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Trevor <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HEO vs. LEO cost comparison
> To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Message-ID: <177654.20922.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> --- On Mon, 26/1/09, Eric Fort <eric.fort@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>> question, What is the cost comparison between launching 1
>> HEO sat vs. a
>> constellation of LEO sats similar to what iridium has
>> flying?
>>
>
> Wiki quotes the cost of the Iridium constellation at $6 Billion
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_(satellite)
>
> An HEO satellite could cost $4 million to launch add to that the cost of the
satellite itself, maybe $500k using volunteer labour.
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>
>
--
ARRL SDR Working Group Chair
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
"It is human nature to think wisely and act in
an absurd fashion.", Anatole France.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:09:38 -0600
From: "Mike McConnell" <w0pd@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SATPC-32 KEPS
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <00ca01c980ed$7960a0b0$6c21e210$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Alan and Erich,
Thanks for helping me on the new KEPS. I got them installed and working.
Thanks a lot.
Mike McConnell, Ph.D.
W0PD
AMSAT #36792
ARRL#0001168388
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:11:29 -0000
From: "TERRY BROMLEY" <terry.bromley@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-7 8000 QSO. K3SZH.
To: "AMSAT" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4699861311A24BD190E7AC89B0568EC5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Congratulation's Joe, wow 8000 thats a lot of talking hi hi. It's been a great
pleasure to have been a part of it tnx.
From Your Friend Across The Pond.
TERRY GIWPR.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:33:17 +0900
From: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] TLE decided
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <97C9813C36A121ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In Space-Track:
OBJECT A = GOSAT
OBJECT B = PRISM
OBJECT C = SDS-1
OBJECT D = ?
OBJECT E = ?
OBJECT F = ?
OBJECT G = STARS
OBJECT H = KKS-1
OBJECT J = H-2A R/B
OBJECT K = H-2A DEB
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:44:21 +0900
From: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: TLE decided
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <9AC9814E861AD0ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Although Space-Track public relations are issued as the point,
OBJECT Number of PRISM 'B', not 'J', was shown with some proof.
It seems to be better to think that TLE is not fluid decision
still more.
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 47
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
