| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 22.01.09 13:52l 860 Lines 25612 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 3146-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 35
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0AR<F4BWT<YO6PLB<CX2SA
Sent: 090122/1247Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:3146 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:3146-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271 (D. Mynatt)
2. Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271 (Iain Young, G7III)
3. ISS Crew Active! (Sebastian)
4. Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271 (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604)
5. Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271 (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604)
6. Re: ISS Crew Active! (w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxxx
7. Re: ISS Crew Active! (Andrew Koenig)
8. Re: springtime project (George Henry)
9. Very-short Antenna experts? (Robert Bruninga)
10. Re: springtime project (Jim Jerzycke)
11. Re: antenna seperation (Mike Ryan)
12. Re: springtime project (Jim Jerzycke)
13. IC-910H For Sale (John Henderson N4NAB)
14. Guess who turns 19 tomorrow?? (Mark Hammond)
15. How is ISS currently configured? (Mike Ryan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:26:02 -0700
From: "D. Mynatt" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271
To: "Iain Young, G7III" <g7iii@xxxxx.xxx>, <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <A399EDAF057C4C9A83E3A5F982E51B48@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Iain-
The units have a small 1/8" plug on the back that appears to be the one that
the Hosenose folks say is the port to the interface existing internal ICOM
interface unit. I'm thinking I don't need the UX-14 as they may already have
it. That's what I think, but I'm a senior, so, thoughts sometimes go awry...
away...
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Iain Young, G7III" <g7iii@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:08 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271
> Hi Dave,
>
> I think you need the UX-14 plugin replacement rather than just the LCU-3
> for these rigs, as they use the older CI-IV protocol, rather than CI-V
>
> See http://www.hosenose.com/detail.asp?product_id=UX-14PX
>
>
> HTH
>
>
> Iain
>
>
> Dave wrote:
>> Hi group- Any one have experience with the Hosenose LCU-3 interface to
>> IC-471 or IC-271 ?
>>
>> I'm thinking of using it with SatPC32. Any advice?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dave/KA0SWT
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.10/1906 - Release Date: 1/21/2009
7:07 AM
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:30:33 +0000
From: "Iain Young, G7III" <g7iii@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271
To: "D. Mynatt" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <497785E9.8050609@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Ah, if you already have a UX-14 in the rigs, then the LCU-3 is probably
all you need, as the UX-14 simply converts from CI-IV to CI-V.
Sorry for the noise - mind you UX-14's are soooo rare, they should
probably be framed!!!
73s
Iain
D. Mynatt wrote:
> Hi Iain-
>
> The units have a small 1/8" plug on the back that appears to be the one
> that the Hosenose folks say is the port to the interface existing
> internal ICOM interface unit. I'm thinking I don't need the UX-14 as
> they may already have it. That's what I think, but I'm a senior, so,
> thoughts sometimes go awry... away...
>
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Iain Young, G7III" <g7iii@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:08 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271
>
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I think you need the UX-14 plugin replacement rather than just the LCU-3
>> for these rigs, as they use the older CI-IV protocol, rather than CI-V
>>
>> See http://www.hosenose.com/detail.asp?product_id=UX-14PX
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>>
>> Iain
>>
>>
>> Dave wrote:
>>> Hi group- Any one have experience with the Hosenose LCU-3 interface
>>> to IC-471 or IC-271 ?
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of using it with SatPC32. Any advice?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dave/KA0SWT
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.10/1906 - Release Date:
> 1/21/2009 7:07 AM
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:44:54 -0500
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS Crew Active!
To: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <77EB2193-2236-4522-855B-4AECC3384155@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
What a thrill to announce my call while I was just getting into the
footprint of the ISS, and getting a response from Mike - NA1SS, of the
crew of the Shuttle!
At first I didn't hear anyone, it was quiet, but I heard my downlink
stronger than usual, and all of a sudden, I heard "W4AS this is Mike
NA1SS of the International Space Shuttle". I think my first words
were, are you really in the shuttle?
He went on and worked a few more stations, he didn't seem to be in a
hurry, and we actually had a bit of a rag chew, but at 4:30 pm eastern
time, I guess there weren't too many hams trying to hear the ISS.
Just wanted to put this up here, so others can be aware that they are
active on the 'repeater' 70cm up and 2 meters down.
At one point the signal was 60 db over S9, I should have turned my
preamp off to see what the actual reading was.
If anyone recorded the pass I would love to have it. Guess I should
start to record them from now on.
73 de W4AS
Sebastian
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:36:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271
To: dave@xxxxxx.xxx
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090121223624.D87201A403@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
That's the way it was set up. But main window persists in
transmitting out of the second digital window.
I just have assigned the main RX audio channel to that second
instantiation of MMTTY, and it operates as it should. It's just wierd
that the main logging window persists in actuating the second digital
window.
73, doug
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:26:52 -0000
From: "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@xxx.xx>
Doug,
Are the two copies of MMTTY run from two different folders? This is
required in order that each copy can have its own mmtty.ini file. You
can set up the MMTTY copy used from DI1 to receive from the left
channel (main RX) and transmit using FSK, and set up the copy used from
DI2 for AFSK, receiving from the right channel (the 2nd RX).
Alternatively, you could set the second copy up for FSK, but that would
require a separate serial port for each copy of MMTTY - typically you
would do this for SO2R (FSK from both radios).
I have used such a setup, configured for FSK in DI1 and AFSK in DI2, in
SO1V with the two VFOs linked. If you program a couple of function keys
with {CAT1ASC} macros to switch the radio between FSK D and AFSK A you
can even transmit in FSK from DI1 or AFSK from DI2 as you choose (both
copies transmit from VFO A). Using the same configuration in SO2V with
the 2nd RX unlinked, the DI2 copy becomes a read-only decoder for the
2nd RX and the radio transmits only from DI1 in FSK.
73,
Rich VE3KI
--- In N1MMLogger-Digital@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-
8604 <faunt@...> wrote:
>
> I've got a dual-RX K3, and have N1MM runnig with two copies of MMTTY.
> But in trying to get thing figured out, I find I'm transmitting from
> the wrong window. I have to be "in the seocnd window" to TX FSK.
> But the first window is the main RX and since I;m not in split, that's
> my TX VFO.
>
> What have I got confused?
>
> 73, doug
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:52:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LCU-3 and ICOM 471 or 271
To: dave@xxxxxx.xxxx AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090121225222.260081A403@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
My apologies, that was obviously to the wrong mailing list.
73, doug
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:02:23 +0000
From: w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS Crew Active!
To: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<012120092302.25678.4977A97E000EF3800000644E22155670740B9D04C999@xxxxxxx
.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
Sebastian
It never gets old!!
73 Bob W7LRD
--
"if this were easy, everyone would be doing it"
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
> What a thrill to announce my call while I was just getting into the
> footprint of the ISS, and getting a response from Mike - NA1SS, of the
> crew of the Shuttle!
>
> At first I didn't hear anyone, it was quiet, but I heard my downlink
> stronger than usual, and all of a sudden, I heard "W4AS this is Mike
> NA1SS of the International Space Shuttle". I think my first words
> were, are you really in the shuttle?
>
> He went on and worked a few more stations, he didn't seem to be in a
> hurry, and we actually had a bit of a rag chew, but at 4:30 pm eastern
> time, I guess there weren't too many hams trying to hear the ISS.
>
> Just wanted to put this up here, so others can be aware that they are
> active on the 'repeater' 70cm up and 2 meters down.
>
> At one point the signal was 60 db over S9, I should have turned my
> preamp off to see what the actual reading was.
>
> If anyone recorded the pass I would love to have it. Guess I should
> start to record them from now on.
>
>
> 73 de W4AS
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:16:17 -0600
From: Andrew Koenig <ke5gdb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS Crew Active!
To: w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: AMSAT BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>, Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<2f52b89b0901211516y1a2f299ct53fc14ec8d2e8239@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
It never does.
I have a recording of the end of Sebastian's contact, all of mine, and a few
others after mine until I lost the bird. You can download it at
http://www.thathamkid.com/ISSContactFull.mp3
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:02 PM, <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Sebastian
> It never gets old!!
> 73 Bob W7LRD
>
> --
> "if this were easy, everyone would be doing it"
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
>
> > What a thrill to announce my call while I was just getting into the
> > footprint of the ISS, and getting a response from Mike - NA1SS, of the
> > crew of the Shuttle!
> >
> > At first I didn't hear anyone, it was quiet, but I heard my downlink
> > stronger than usual, and all of a sudden, I heard "W4AS this is Mike
> > NA1SS of the International Space Shuttle". I think my first words
> > were, are you really in the shuttle?
> >
> > He went on and worked a few more stations, he didn't seem to be in a
> > hurry, and we actually had a bit of a rag chew, but at 4:30 pm eastern
> > time, I guess there weren't too many hams trying to hear the ISS.
> >
> > Just wanted to put this up here, so others can be aware that they are
> > active on the 'repeater' 70cm up and 2 meters down.
> >
> > At one point the signal was 60 db over S9, I should have turned my
> > preamp off to see what the actual reading was.
> >
> > If anyone recorded the pass I would love to have it. Guess I should
> > start to record them from now on.
> >
> >
> > 73 de W4AS
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
Andrew Koenig
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:03:42 -0600
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <CD32FACCFA194425B80BDE2840E4B282@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Cole" <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
[snip]
>
> You can separate the elevation section from the azimuth section of
> the B5400. Then you attach the elevation section to the side of the
> mast with a custom-made bracket.
>
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
Ahhhh.... custom bracket. Shoulda thought of that.....
DOH!
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:14:54 -0500
From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Very-short Antenna experts?
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <EF4A1EA4B69C48798E7561EDF230A0E6@xxxxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Need Antenna experts on very-short, yet broadband antennas.
Sorry for off-amsat-topic post, but some research students need:
Size: on the order of 3 feet or less
Freq: 10 MHz
BW: 500 KHz
Range: 1 km between like antennas
Power: say 10W?
We know how to make very short HF antennas, we know how to make
broadband antennas, but we don't know how to make very short,
very broadband antennas. Looked at some H field claims, but they
seemed to be snake-oil salesmen.
Bob
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:37:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
To: amsat bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <818590.9774.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
You can also get a separation kit from Yaesu that lets you mount the rotors
apart. I've got one and it works fine.
Jim KQ6EA
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
> To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:03 PM
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edward Cole" <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
>
>
> [snip]
> >
> > You can separate the elevation section from the
> azimuth section of
> > the B5400. Then you attach the elevation section to
> the side of the
> > mast with a custom-made bracket.
> >
> > 73, Ed - KL7UW
>
>
>
> Ahhhh.... custom bracket. Shoulda thought of that.....
>
>
> DOH!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those
> of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:34:13 -0500
From: "Mike Ryan" <mryan301@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: antenna seperation
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <8B33A3FA9FE445AFBEFEAB7654862BF1@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
A similar and related question. I'm building a 3element 2m and 7element 70cm
beam using the Wa5VJB Cheap Yagi design ( I am thinking 1 inch PVC instead of
wood). In the original design it puts both on the same boom, the 70cm antenna
in front of the 2M. This will make for somewhat a longer boom and I'm hoping
for alternatives. I know the Arrow has the antennas interleaved as does the
Cushcraft A270 and mfj-1868 but I cant help but think there is interaction
between them that I wont have the equipment or expertise to compensate for. I
will be mounting horizontal.
Instead can I stack them one over the other and if so how far apart? (same
question as original poster). Or how about side by side? Will that be less
sensitive and how far apart in that case?
Mike WB1AAT
-----
Angus angus at young5769.freeserve.co.uk
Sun Jan 18 01:39:01 PST 2009
a.. Previous message: [amsat-bb] Re: az/el rotor for sale
b.. Next message: [amsat-bb] ISS orbital timing & links
c.. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Hi all, perhaps what appears to be a simple question but how far apart do I
need to space a 6 ele X yagi for 2mtrs (1 wavelength long) and a pair of 12
ele X for 70cms (horizontally spaced and 3 wavelengths long each). The
antennas are all homebrew and I know that as far apart as possible is the best
solution BUT this is not possible so just how far should I be looking for as a
minimum? I am trying to make sure that the de-sensing of any other radio
equipment is kept to a minimum (no fancy rigs here, an old FT817 for 70cms and
a FT-480r with a 25 watt linear when needed).
regards
Gus M0IKB
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 5.8 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 7796 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
The Professional version does not have this message
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:48:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
To: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <904015.59373.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
The sep kit that I have consists of some studs that go into the el rotor
housing where the bracket was, and some nuts and "muffler clamps" (like 1/2 a
u-bolt and clamp) that clamp the rotor housing to the side of the mast. The
bottom end of the mast goes into a regular mast mount clamp (GC-038?) turned
"upside down", and installed on the top of the az rotor. You could use two of
these to mast-mount the az rotor, and then put a mast on the top. I use the
sep kit with a G-5500 and an 8' Glen Martin tower. The az rotor goes on the
tower shelf, and the mast goes up through the top of the tower and thrust
bearing, and I have the el rotor about 6' above the thrust bearing. This gives
me enough room to do a full 180 elevation flip with my antennas, and still
clear the ground.
I'm going to mount the whole shebang on a little Harbor Freight trailer this
year, and tow it down to our Field Day site. Should be much easier than
building everything up "from scratch" each year!
73, Jim
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
> To: kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx
> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 5:31 PM
> Really! The ones I've seen from Yeasu top-mounted the
> elevation
> rotator.
>
> 73, doug
>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:26:10 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
>
> Well, the one I have mounts the rotor to the *side* of
> the mast. If you put enough mast through it, I suppose you
> could mount another antenna on top, but I'd get worried
> about the bending moment with something big on top.
>
>
> --- On Wed, 1/21/09, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
> <faunt@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
> <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
> > To: kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx
> > Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 5:00 PM
> > Ah, but that separation kit mounts the elevation
> rotator on
> > top of the
> > mast, so if you want to mount an antenna above it,
> you
> > still need
> > something custom. It's not that hard to do,
> it's
> > just that having an
> > antenna above the satellite antennas can cause a
> problem
> > either
> > because of physical or electrical obstruction.
> >
> > 73, doug
> >
> > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:37:08 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> >
> > You can also get a separation kit from Yaesu
> that lets
> > you mount the rotors apart. I've got one and it
> works
> > fine.
> > Jim KQ6EA
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 1/21/09, George Henry
> <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
> > > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime project
> > > To: "amsat bb"
> <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> > > Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:03 PM
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Edward Cole"
> > <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> > > To: "George Henry"
> <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:37 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: springtime
> project
> > >
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > You can separate the elevation section
> from
> > the
> > > azimuth section of
> > > > the B5400. Then you attach the
> elevation
> > section to
> > > the side of the
> > > > mast with a custom-made bracket.
> > > >
> > > > 73, Ed - KL7UW
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ahhhh.... custom bracket. Shoulda thought
> of
> > that.....
> > >
> > >
> > > DOH!
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions
> expressed are
> > those
> > > of the author.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support
> the
> > amateur
> > > satellite program!
> > > Subscription settings:
> > > http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed
> are
> > those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
> amateur
> > satellite program!
> > Subscription settings:
> > http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:52:44 -0500
From: "John Henderson N4NAB" <jah@xx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] IC-910H For Sale
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000001c97c34$1edd4110$5c97c330$@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Like new 10 out of 10 IC-910H with UX-910 1.2Ghz board. Six months old but
must sell. All boxes, manuals and original accessories. Current price at HRO
for combo is $1940.
Best offer....Pictures on request.
John
John Henderson N4NAB
212 Bayside Drive
Cape Carteret, NC 28584
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:12:58 -0500
From: Mark Hammond <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Guess who turns 19 tomorrow??
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<5d8cecfe0901211112s2aa7b60cn7650768912c9a4ed@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Guess who turns 19 tomorrow (January 22, 2009)?
AO-16, DO-17, WO-18, and LO-19!
Happy Birthday to our Microsats.
73,
--
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:09:57 -0500
From: "Mike Ryan" <mryan301@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] How is ISS currently configured?
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <7395695B1DBB44CFBB7A095587F10734@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Heard lots of stations on 145.800 on the 04:10 UTC pass her ein the East US,
but couldnt figure out what the uplink was.
Looked at http://www.ariss.org and found no hints.
Any help?
Mike WB1AAT
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 35
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
