| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 03.01.09 15:03l 696 Lines 22503 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 63926_CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 7
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<HG8LXL<CX2SA
Sent: 090103/1400Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:63926 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:63926_CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Question adding RHCP to Cheap Yagi (Curt Nixon)
2. Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ? (Alan Sieg WB5RMG)
3. Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ? (Rafael Valdez G.)
4. Re: An Off-Topic Question (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
5. RH and LH CP simutaniously (R. Chastain)
6. Re: RH and LH CP simutaniously (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
7. Re: RH and LH CP simutaniously (John B. Stephensen)
8. Re: RH and LH CP simutaniously (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
9. Decoding GO-32 data (N1MIW)
10. Re: Decoding GO-32 data (Edward Cole)
11. Re: KC0TOH (Nate Duehr)
12. Active- ISS L / v Repeater 01.50utc UK / Europe Pass
(David Barber)
13. Re: Decoding GO-32 data (Gould Smith)
14. Active- ISS L / v Repeater 03.26utc UK / Europe Pass
(David Barber)
15. Active- ISS L / v Repeater passes from 00.16 to 03.25utc UK /
Europe Pass? (Peter Evans)
16. Active- ISS L / v Repeater 05.01utc UK / Europe Pass
(David Barber)
17. ISS over EU at 0505 (Dave Aitch)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:05:40 -0500
From: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Question adding RHCP to Cheap Yagi
To: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <495E7394.6050600@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Greg:
Yes it would..These will use the physical offset fed without the delay
section. My problem was getting my arms around the polarity
direction--RH or LH. I have it figured out now so I'm finishing up the
assembly.
Thanks
Curt
Greg D. wrote:
> Hi Curt,
>
> For CP you would either have the elements offset and feed them
> in-phase, or have them not offset and feed them with the phase delay.
> You want to create a spin to the wave as it travels down the boom. I
> expect doing both would make a mess out of things.
>
> Greg KO6TH
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:19:23 -0500
> > From: cptcurt@xxxxx.xxx
> > To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Question adding RHCP to Cheap Yagi
> >
> > Good Morning All:
> >
> > I've been using a 10el version of Kent Britain's Cheap yagi for my 70cm
> > downlink antenna. It suffers from deep fades so I am going to add the
> > second yagi with physical offset to get to RHCP in the x config.
> >
> > Question is:
> >
> > normally I would reverse the coax connections to a dipole driver but
> > this is a hairpin (half of a folded dipole. )
> >
> > Do I reverse the connections as normal? Kents instructions just say
> > offset the elements and feed in phase.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Curt
> > KU8L
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills. Get your
> Hotmail? account.
>
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_122
008>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:10:30 -0600 (CST)
From: "Alan Sieg WB5RMG" <wb5rmg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1332.198.119.224.78.1230930630.squirrel@xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
WB5RMG (showing his lack of understanding) said :
> Reckon is there any harm in also doing LOTW ?
Thanks to BB-responses and several email replies (and some good'ol RTFM)
I now recognize that LOTW is not 'just another QSL/log toolbox'...
A simple definition for LOTW : a contact database to make it easier for
the ARRL to confirm 2-way contacts by those requesting ARRL awards.
I'm sure that there are other benefits that I may learn of as I go
down that path; but not being an award collector, the biggest benefit I
see now with LOTW is to add my few contacts that others may be waiting
for confirmation - for their award... Seems simple enough, and I will
probably start that process before long.
Thanks again for the guidance ... HNY /;^)
--
<- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->
<- http://www.somenet.net * http://wb5rmg.somenet.net ->
<- http://www.linkedin.com/in/alansieg * My 'Day Job' ->
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:15:34 -0700
From: "Rafael Valdez G." <rafavaldez@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?
To: <wb5rmg@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BAY111-W304FC420233A842A01CBB8DBE20@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Just for the record,
VE3DRT has been awarded eQSL eGrid Award number 1.....
73's and happy new year
Rafael XE2RV
@ DL55lt
> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:10:30 -0600> From: wb5rmg@xxxxxxx.xxx> To: amsat-
bb@xxxxx.xxx> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?> > WB5RMG (showing his
lack of understanding) said :> > Reckon is there any harm in also doing LOTW
?> > Thanks to BB-responses and several email replies (and some good'ol RTFM)>
I now recognize that LOTW is not 'just another QSL/log toolbox'...> > A simple
definition for LOTW : a contact database to make it easier for> the ARRL to
confirm 2-way contacts by those requesting ARRL awards.> > I'm sure that there
are other benefits that I may learn of as I go> down that path; but not being
an award collector, the biggest benefit I> see now with LOTW is to add my few
contacts that others may be waiting> for confirmation - for their award...
Seems simple enough, and I will> probably start that process before long.> >
Thanks again for the guidance ... HNY /;^)> -- > <- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG =
Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->> <- http://www.somenet.net * ht!
tp://wb5rmg.somenet.net ->> <- http://www.linkedin.com/in/alansieg * My 'Day
Job' ->> > _______________________________________________> Sent via AMSAT-
BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.> Not an AMSAT-NA
member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!> Subscription
settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:59:10 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: An Off-Topic Question
To: "D. Mynatt" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <495E9C3E.4000803@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
D. Mynatt wrote:
> I asked sometime ago in the group, but sometimes things change and stuff
comes along so I thought I'd ask again and see if any one had a mini-computer
like a PdP-11 with tapes drives and the large external disk drives in the
floor boxes.
>
> As I mentioned before, just trying to find a unit to show students the older
technologies as well as how to program with Cobol/Fortran.
>
> Using PCs is the best way to do a lot of stuff, but a mini-mainframe is the
visually appealing idea.
>
> Just thought I'd ask in case things changed out there!
>
Hm, I've just donated mine to a museum in the south of England...
I'll try and look out some pics of it.
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:15:10 -0800 (PST)
From: "R. Chastain" <suenrod@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] RH and LH CP simutaniously
To: Amsat-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <337965.58197.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi all,
??? Has anyone ever considered the possibilty of using PIN diodes and a free
running square wave oscillator to electronically switch between RHCP and LHCP?
The switching frequency would have to be high enough so as to not introduce
a tone to the signal.
?
Just a thought I have had for awhile.
?
RoD
KD0XX
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:26:03 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RH and LH CP simutaniously
To: Amsat-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <495EA28B.5080509@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
R. Chastain wrote:
> Hi all,
> Has anyone ever considered the possibilty of using PIN diodes and a free
running square wave oscillator to electronically switch between RHCP and LHCP?
> The switching frequency would have to be high enough so as to not introduce
> a tone to the signal.
>
> Just a thought I have had for awhile.
Why would this not work? Or rather, why would this be at best no better
than a normal planar-polarised antenna?
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:30:14 -0000
From: "John B. Stephensen" <kd6ozh@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RH and LH CP simutaniously
To: "R. Chastain" <suenrod@xxxxx.xxx>, "Amsat-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <AAFD0581FAD4473DBF9A292A2D06A413@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
You can use a 90-degree hybrid splitter/combiner to produce LHCP and RHCP
for two receivers. Switching will produce sidebands at the switching
frequency and alias undesired signals into the receiver passband.
73,
John
KD6OZH
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. Chastain" <suenrod@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "Amsat-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 23:15 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] RH and LH CP simutaniously
Hi all,
Has anyone ever considered the possibilty of using PIN diodes and a free
running square wave oscillator to electronically switch between RHCP and
LHCP?
The switching frequency would have to be high enough so as to not introduce
a tone to the signal.
Just a thought I have had for awhile.
RoD
KD0XX
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:28:54 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RH and LH CP simutaniously
To: "R. Chastain" <suenrod@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Amsat-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <495EA336.1080705@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Would effectively cause a 3dB loss of antenna gain as seen by another
circularly polarised antenna as the receiving end would receive
negligable signal 50% of the time.
R. Chastain wrote:
> Hi all,
> ??? Has anyone ever considered the possibilty of using PIN diodes and a free
running square wave oscillator to electronically switch between RHCP and LHCP?
> The switching frequency would have to be high enough so as to not introduce
> a tone to the signal.
> ?
> Just a thought I have had for awhile.
> ?
> RoD
> KD0XX
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1871 - Release Date: 1/1/2009
5:01 PM
>
>
--
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Nigel A. Gunn. G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF)
1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA 937 825 5032
e-mail nigel@xxxxx.xxx www http://www.ngunn.net
Member of ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548, Flying Pig #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, AMSAT-UK, MKARS,
ALC
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:26:20 -0500
From: "N1MIW" <n1miw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Decoding GO-32 data
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <E81530D8251F41118F06B2CFDD558BA7@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I was wondering if anyone has tried to record a .WAV file of this bird &
decode it later on. I've seen some archived posts where MixW was used, but
it wasn't clear what the individual did to set up the software. I've tried
tinkering around myself with MixW - I played the file back & ran a cable
from the speaker out to the line in on my computer, but I don't think I had
the 9K6 protocol set properly in the program (basic changing of the
parameters didn't work either).
I guess I'm looking to "cheat" from you guys since I can't get any decodes.
Is what I'm trying to do even possible?
For a little info on my station setup:
FT-847
audio is captured from the DATA port for 9K6 & higher speeds
auto track for antennas & doppler
Audio recording in 8khz mono (could there be a problem here???)
...I receive GO-32 quite well with an S-5 or better on some passes, so
receiving the signal is not an issue. Even if it's just sending telemetry
right now, it would be fun to play with the high-speed data. Is there
another program I could use for decoding the data? Any help is appreciated!
73's from FN41
...Larry N1MIW
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:03:05 -0900
From: Edward Cole <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Decoding GO-32 data
To: "N1MIW" <n1miw@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <200901030107.n0317jc4085515@xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 03:26 PM 1/2/2009, N1MIW wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has tried to record a .WAV file of this bird &
>decode it later on. I've seen some archived posts where MixW was used, but
>it wasn't clear what the individual did to set up the software. I've tried
>tinkering around myself with MixW - I played the file back & ran a cable
>from the speaker out to the line in on my computer, but I don't think I had
>the 9K6 protocol set properly in the program (basic changing of the
>parameters didn't work either).
>
>I guess I'm looking to "cheat" from you guys since I can't get any decodes.
>Is what I'm trying to do even possible?
>
>For a little info on my station setup:
>
>FT-847
>audio is captured from the DATA port for 9K6 & higher speeds
>auto track for antennas & doppler
>Audio recording in 8khz mono (could there be a problem here???)
Yes. For 9K6 (9600 baud data) you should recover audio from the 9600
line (pin-4 on the Packet Jack). Did you misspeak when you said
"DATA". On the FT-847, there is a separate DATA jack that provides
for audio output/PTT and audio input for psk modulation/demodulation.
Likewise your recording speed should match or exceed 9600 Hz (others
correct me if this bad advice).
PS: I used MIX-W2 for recovering telemetry from AO-40 (but I am far
from an expert on using MIX-W).
>...I receive GO-32 quite well with an S-5 or better on some passes, so
>receiving the signal is not an issue. Even if it's just sending telemetry
>right now, it would be fun to play with the high-speed data. Is there
>another program I could use for decoding the data? Any help is appreciated!
>73's from FN41
Have you checked the Amsat-NA website? It has been some time since I
captured telemetry so maybe someone else could help with GO-32 data
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:18:22 -0700
From: Nate Duehr <nate@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: KC0TOH
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <A007AA2E-E4B2-472B-A64C-8009C31DCB79@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
> Are you on this list, or does someone have a working email for him?
>
> 73, Drew KO4MA
I can get one. He's a local here in Denver.
He's very enthusiastic on the local repeaters about his newfound
interest in satellites.
--
Nate Duehr
nate@xxxxxxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 02:01:10 -0000
From: "David Barber" <david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Active- ISS L / v Repeater 01.50utc UK / Europe
Pass
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, <sarex@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <040B57F20CD747869D4877134100EBAB@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Repeater active for 01.50utc UK / Europe Pass.
Worked Peter, MW0CXH, many thanks, very good signal through repeater.
It was worth getting up!
No other stations heard.
David
G8OQW
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:11:46 -0500
From: "Gould Smith" <gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Decoding GO-32 data
To: "N1MIW" <n1miw@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <3CE0839285DB4C538E805F62ABEDB9DE@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hello Larry,
Yes you can record AO-51 & GO-32 digital data using your sound card.
Douglas Quagliana has written a program to record and play back 9600 bps
data. This is very useful in checking out your ground station and looking
at the data later. AMSAT offers a Digital Disk with these programs and it
has already recorded 9600 bps digital files to check out your demodulating
and decoding system and software. WiSP and TLMEcho are also on the Digital
Disk to decode and display the digital data.
>...I receive GO-32 quite well with an S-5 or better on some passes, so
>receiving the signal is not an issue.
I have an FT-847 and I can't decode at S 5 (your mileage may vary), the DCD
LED lights which means that the modem can recover the clock, but I am a long
way from full decode of the data. You need a very good S/N ratio to reliably
copy the TLM.
AO-51 will probably be in TLM mode next week, so you can try, it probably
will be running 700-800 mW. I need a pre-amp at the antenna to reliably
copy AO-51 and GO-32 digital data.
73,
Gould, WA4SXM
----- Original Message -----
From: "N1MIW" <n1miw@xxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 7:26 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Decoding GO-32 data
> I was wondering if anyone has tried to record a .WAV file of this bird &
> decode it later on. I've seen some archived posts where MixW was used, but
> it wasn't clear what the individual did to set up the software. I've tried
> tinkering around myself with MixW - I played the file back & ran a cable
> from the speaker out to the line in on my computer, but I don't think I
> had
> the 9K6 protocol set properly in the program (basic changing of the
> parameters didn't work either).
>
> I guess I'm looking to "cheat" from you guys since I can't get any
> decodes.
> Is what I'm trying to do even possible?
>
> For a little info on my station setup:
>
> FT-847
> audio is captured from the DATA port for 9K6 & higher speeds
> auto track for antennas & doppler
> Audio recording in 8khz mono (could there be a problem here???)
>
> ...I receive GO-32 quite well with an S-5 or better on some passes, so
> receiving the signal is not an issue. Even if it's just sending telemetry
> right now, it would be fun to play with the high-speed data. Is there
> another program I could use for decoding the data? Any help is
> appreciated!
> 73's from FN41
>
> ...Larry N1MIW
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 03:40:16 -0000
From: "David Barber" <david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Active- ISS L / v Repeater 03.26utc UK / Europe
Pass
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, <sarex@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <D099BE15A467403A857389DCE203CF39@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Repeater active for 03.26utc UK / Europe Pass.
Just Peter, MW0CXH and me again this pass.
Downlink recorded.
David
G8OQW
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:27:52 -0000
From: "Peter Evans" <mw0cxh@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Active- ISS L / v Repeater passes from 00.16 to
03.25utc UK / Europe Pass?
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <851DDB5AC81E42E28EE14294C454890A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Worked the iss cross band repeater this morning for the 1st time in L/V mode
and was able to open the repeater on the last 3 passes.
I could hear myself very well on the down-link , I used manual Doppler
correction on the up-link in 5kc steps and worked ok.
Many thanks for the reports that have been sent to me from dl7et and ea4bgh
and the 2 qso I had with Dave g8oqw who I could hear for 98% of his overs with
his 10 watts and 19 elements on a tripod.
Set-up here...
Kenwood TS 2000X
65 watts at the antenna end,
2 x 23 element tonna antenna stacked
And one hell of a cold night to go up on the roof to alter my 23cm troppo
system to go on the elevation rotator, but I had to give this a go!.
73,
Peter MW0CXH
IO71
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:16:56 -0000
From: "David Barber" <david.barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Active- ISS L / v Repeater 05.01utc UK / Europe
Pass
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, <sarex@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <FD94598DEEC24E59895AEBFA2F29A904@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Repeater active for 05.01utc UK / Europe Pass.
Just Peter, MW0CXH and me again this pass.
Hope NASA don't bill us for our air time!
Downlink recorded.
David
G8OQW
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:21:46 -0000
From: "Dave Aitch" <dave@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS over EU at 0505
To: "'AMSAT-BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <036301c96d63$2c75b030$85611090$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Heard MW0CXH and G8OQW, end stopping signal.
Despite best efforts and manual uplink tuning, my
10w with the 910 doesn't cut the squelch.
73, Dave.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 7
**************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
