OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   27.07.19 20:45l 966 Lines 25229 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14283
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 283
Path: IZ3LSV<I3XTY<I0OJJ<I0OJJ<EA2RCF<CX2SA
Sent: 190727/1935Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:10850 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14283

>From cx2sa%cx2sa.sal.ury.soam@i0ojj.ampr.org Sat Jul 27 21:45:05 2019
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0k.3b) with SMTP
	id AA23331 ; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:45:05 +0200
Message-Id: <AMSATBB14283@ir0rm.bbs>
>From: cx2sa@cx2sa.sal.ury.soam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet   (ir0rm @ 44.134.32.240)  -> Sending message

From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. SatPC32 Not responding with 9700 (Richard Lawn)
   2. Re: Antenna Question (Zach Metzinger)
   3. Re: No TLM on AO-85 pass 2226z 24JUL2019 (Burns Fisher)
   4. Re Antenna Question (Brad Smith)
   5. Re: Re Antenna Question (k6vug@?????????.????
   6. Re: First DTMF grids via PSAT2 (Robert Bruninga)
   7. Might be the last update for DSLWP-B Lunar-Oscar-94 (???)
   8. Re: New Handheld for SO-50 (Ron VE8RT)
   9. Re: New Handheld for SO-50 (Robert Bankston)
  10. SatPC32, PSTRotator and 360 Degree Rotators (John)
  11. Re: SatPC32, PSTRotator and 360 Degree Rotators (John)
  12. Re: New Handheld for SO-50 (Ron VE8RT)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 18:06:49 -0400
From: Richard Lawn <rjlawn@?????.???>
To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Not responding with 9700
Message-ID:
<CADQmrTEvsXF_mE51XeTDqDYpZtv6pzni7NtLyo+KNc3AaCzsJA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

All was well until suddenly SatPC32 started to not respond and lock up. I'm
using Win 10 with the most current version of SatPC32 and the Icom 9700. I
left the station for about a week but have made no changes since all last
worked. Any suggestions? Uninstall SatPC32 and reinstall it?

Rick, W2JAZ


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:19:16 -0500
From: Zach Metzinger <zmetzing@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Question
Message-ID: <ea48d946-7194-e0d5-9b12-ad9db11a6a55@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 2019-07-26 17:04, Greg D wrote:

> There is also the effect of the reflection off the Earth that can add
> 3db to your received signal on low passes.  I believe this is well used
> by EME operators.  But I don't think that fully makes up for the
> distance penalty.  There is also the effect that the satellite's
> radiation pattern isn't necessarily equal in all directions, and other
> than the ISS, most are tumbling somewhat at random.  That, I think,
> could be the main cause of the different signal reports.

Hello Greg,

Using the calculator over at pasternack.com for 70cm:

2000 mile Free Space Path Loss: 	155.4 dB
400 mile  Free Space Path Loss: 	141.4 dB

I suspect he's referring to audio loudness, since the FM threshold
effect would be in play once the CNR was > 8dB (assuming narrowband FM).

--- Zach
N0ZGO


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 18:50:50 -0400
From: Burns Fisher <wb1fj-bb@??????.??>
To: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] No TLM on AO-85 pass 2226z 24JUL2019
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxVxV5xnwwvM-ugOCkXzVUYd0b2rRWQz=xBj5Uqs3tNzPQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Thanks for checking, Hasan.  As Mark said, COR is a fallback mode designed
into the Fox satellites for when the IHU is not operating for whatever
reason.  There have been times when the IHU decided to reset, and a QSO
continued on across the reset unhindered (I've heard the audio
recording--it was pretty cool!)

73,

Burns WB1FJ (Fox software lead)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:50 AM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> Thanks Mark, I should have mentioned voice ops were perfect. I just wanted
> to make sure I wasn't using the bird when I should not have been.
> 73, N0AN
> Hasan
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:17 PM Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@?????.???>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hasan,
> >
> > The bird is a bit unpredictable these days, due to lack of voltage from
> > battery condition. It very well may from time to time be operational in
> > what we call COR, or carrier operated repeater.  In this mode there is no
> > data under voice (DUV).  So just enjoy the voice ops! It?ll fix itself or
> > we?ll give it a nudge (command it) eventually.
> >
> > Mark N8MH
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:28 PM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB <
> > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> >
> >> Was TLM off for that pass? No DUV indication at all, I can usuaLly hear
> >> the
> >> sub-audible and nothing showing on FoxTelem softare.
> >> 73 N0AN
> >> Hasan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> >> Opinions expressed
> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> >> AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> > --
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 23:02:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Brad Smith <corlissbs@???.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re Antenna Question
Message-ID: <1682004349.722490.1564182163955@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

<"Louder" is more S-meter bars, or audibly louder?>
<Is the horizon, for you, over a relatively unpopulated area? Do you live
in a more populated area?>
Audibly much louder at or near the horizon. I have never checked the S-meter
while transmitting, but relied on what I hear in my earphones. Actually, on
the D72, the S-meter only operates on receive and displays the power level
on transmit, so it won't tell me what I need to know.
Not super populated and I roam a lot and notice the same thing happening no
matter where I go-as long as I have a pretty good view of the horizon.
Brad Smith KC9UQR



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 06:21:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: "k6vug@?????????.???? <k6vug@?????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???? Brad Smith <corlissbs@???.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re Antenna Question
Message-ID: <1015577886.1108355.1564208488294@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

 Hi Brad,
?
There is one more thing that may be causing this as an indirect effect.? It
is related to the way we have to twist the beams to match the phase of the
signals.

At very low angles the phase is mostly vertical doesn't seem to change and
the signal is consistent. Whereas on higher ones the beams have to be turned
VERY OFTEN to keep up with the rapid phase changes.

There have been discussions on this BB and in articles about why this
happens but as a net effect the downlink sounds pretty bad on very high
passes.? It sounds great for a second and becomes pure noise the next
second.? I hope this is what you are referring to.?
?
In contrast, when using a RHCP antenna, the signal is strongest at higher
elevations, as it should logically be.? Unfortunately RHCP antennas are
surely not meant for hand held operation.
?
( as a side note, I'd like to add that I'm thrilled to get 6 of 9 bars from
a tiny satellite that is 2000 miles away, Wow !)
?
73!?
Umesh, k6vug
?
?
?



    On Friday, July 26, 2019, 4:03:14 PM PDT, Brad Smith via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

 <"Louder" is more S-meter bars, or audibly louder?>
<Is the horizon, for you, over a relatively unpopulated area? Do you live
in a more populated area?>
Audibly much louder at or near the horizon. I have never checked the S-meter
while transmitting, but relied on what I hear in my earphones. Actually, on
the D72, the S-meter only operates on receive and displays the power level
on transmit, so it won't tell me what I need to know.
Not super populated and I roam a lot and notice the same thing happening no
matter where I go-as long as I have a pretty good view of the horizon.
Brad Smith KC9UQR

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 11:10:26 -0400
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@????.???>
To: amsat bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] First DTMF grids via PSAT2
Message-ID:
<CALdCfNL8inbcOQsU7933uS=x5rpRccnFzVpD4DK1LJe=DNR0mQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

PSAT2 is in DTMF-grid-to-voice mode and will remain that way until we find
out how viable this mode is (any radio can uplink, not just APRS radios).

So far the DTMF downlink beacon only shows a few stations i n Brazil have
tried this mode:
PSAT2-1>APOFF::BLNd-DTMF:f|PY5LF0,PU5NOC,PY5LAF,P,,,,,

Uplink is on 145.980.  See how on the PSAT2 page: http://aprs.org/sats.html

Just load your 16digit DTMF string into DTMF memory and transmit (with
radio in narrowband FM and only in the center of the pass with zero
doppler).

Downlink is Voice and APRS packet on 145.825

Bob, WB4APR

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:36 AM Robert Bruninga <bruninga@????.???> wrote:

> Here is a video PY5LF recorded of his first successful DTMF Grid uplink:
>
> You do not hear his DTMF uplink but you hear the voice response and the
> APRS packet that results:
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/py5lf/videos/2634132619939772/?t=0
>
>
>
> That packet is a 3rd party APRS format for that grid report.  It did not
> get picked up by either the PSAT2 telemetry or USER pages beacause of the 3
> rd party format probably.  Ill see if we can fix that.
>


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 23:36:05 +0800 (CST)
From: ??? <wmc_jx@???.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Might be the last update for DSLWP-B
Lunar-Oscar-94
Message-ID: <5b9215b8.85fd.16c341324cd.Coremail.wmc_jx@???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK

Hi OMs,


Here is the DSLWP-B UHF plan for the following days:


29 Jul 00:15 to 02:15
29 Jul 04:30 to 06:30
29 Jul 20:00 to 22:00
30 Jul 05:30 to 07:30
30 Jul 16:20 to 18:20
31 Jul 06:30 to 08:30
31 Jul 13:24 to 15.24
1 Aug 05:30 to 07:30


All time in UTC. GMSK on both freq & JT4G on 435.4. JT4G repeater message on
436.4 TBD.


Lunar impact expected to be at about 31 Jul 14:20. Later windows for backup.



SSDV album: http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/pics-b.html

Online JT4G telemetry forwarder:
http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/jt4g_forwarder.html
JT4G telemetry display:
http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/jt4g.html
GMSK telemetry: http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/telemetry-b.html



VY TNX & 73!


Wei BG2BHC



--

WEI Mingchuan


Research Center of Satellite Technology
Harbin Institute of Technology
mobile: +86-189-4501-5242
e-mail: wmc_jx@???.???? bg2bhc@?????.???


























































































































































































------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 09:52:00 -0600
From: Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@?????.??>
To: Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New Handheld for SO-50
Message-ID: <20190727095200.c2f754e843a389c00ef2cf07@?????.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Hi Kees,

   I'm looking for a single HT to send to VY0Yl to get her on the FM
satellites (single radio, basic antenna system, simple [smart phone app?
] tracking software) before her summer is over.  What did you decide on
for a radio, and / or do you have any recommendations?

   Thanks,

        Ron VE8RT DP22

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:06:31 -0500
Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've been working the birds for a while now, and I have been using only 2
> Boafengs.  I've realized they desense VERY easily on SO-50 and even AO-91
> and 92.  I have a band pass filter for the FOX sats, so I can hear my
> downlink.  However, I still haven't figured out a way to get full duplex on
> SO-50.  Are there any dual-band handhelds that can receive SO-50?
>
> 73 de KE0STO
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


--
Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@?????.??>


------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robert Bankston <ke4al@?????.???>
To: Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>, 	Ron VE8RT
<ve8rt@?????.??>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New Handheld for SO-50
Message-ID: <397629811.3433270.1564244195009@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ron,
There are only 6 SO-50 capable HT options that I am aware: (May be more, but
these are commonly available)
1)? Kenwood TH-D72 (still in production, so new or used markets)2)? Kenwood
TH-D7 (out of production)3) Yaesu FT-530 (out of production)4)? Icom IC-Z1A
(out of production)5)? Icom IC-W2A (out of production)6)? Icom IC-W32
(earlier model with 5-digit SN) (out of production)
I have personally used the TH-D72, FT-530, and IC-Z1A on SO-50.
Would recommend TH-D72, if you can budget allows.? Otherwise Yaesu FT-530.?
I picked up a FT-530 at a hamfest last year for $25 and had to spend another
$30 for a new battery.
73,

Robert Bankston, KE4AL
Twitter:? @??????????????????? KE4AL.wordpress.com

    On Saturday, July 27, 2019, 10:59:17 AM CDT, Ron VE8RT via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

 Hi Kees,

? I'm looking for a single HT to send to VY0Yl to get her on the FM
satellites (single radio, basic antenna system, simple [smart phone app?
] tracking software) before her summer is over.? What did you decide on
for a radio, and / or do you have any recommendations?

? Thanks,

? ? ? ? Ron VE8RT DP22

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:06:31 -0500
Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've been working the birds for a while now, and I have been using only 2
> Boafengs.? I've realized they desense VERY easily on SO-50 and even AO-91
> and 92.? I have a band pass filter for the FOX sats, so I can hear my
> downlink.? However, I still haven't figured out a way to get full duplex on
> SO-50.? Are there any dual-band handhelds that can receive SO-50?
>
> 73 de KE0STO
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


--
Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@?????.??>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 17:47:10 +0100
From: "John" <john@?????.???.??>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPC32, PSTRotator and 360 Degree Rotators
Message-ID: <096301d5449a$f02470b0$d06d5210$@?????.???.??>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hi All,



For various reasons, we use PSTRotator to control our rotator/elevator stack
- mostly due to the need for IP control of the ERC-M, which SatPC32 doesn't
seem to natively handle.



It all works fine, for the most part, with the exception of the fact that I
don't seem to be able to change my endstop value - normally this would be in
the "Rotor" configuration settings, but since I'm leaving SatPC32 set to
'None' and having PSTRotator in 'Tracking' mode (it follows SatPC32's
headings anyway), I can't see the option (it's not in the list) in order to
pick South for my endstop instead of North.



I can choose between 90 and 180 degree elevation (we use 180 as we only have
360 degrees of azimuth), but does anyone know how I can make SatPC32
understand the endstop being at the North instead of the South?



Many thanks in advance,



John (M5ET)



------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:35:42 +0100
From: "John" <john@?????.???.??>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32, PSTRotator and 360 Degree Rotators
Message-ID: <097501d544a1$b7a53a60$26efaf20$@?????.???.??>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="UTF-8"

Hi Dave,



The ERC unit runs via an IP serial server, so that we can access it from
multiple parts of the site. We have a similar remote control mechanism for
the rig, but that side all works fine.



Still waiting for the next pass that goes through North, to see if SatPC32
now remembers the endstop as North!



John (M5ET)



From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???>
Sent: 27 July 2019 18:20
To: John <john@?????.???.??>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32, PSTRotator and 360 Degree Rotators



So you have the ERC unit connected via IP and not USB?

Dave-KB1PVH


Sent from my Galaxy S9



On Sat, Jul 27, 2019, 1:15 PM John <john@?????.???.??
<mailto:john@?????.???.??> > wrote:

Hi Dave,



Thanks for the insights ? yes, PST is set correctly with North as the endstop.



When I select Yaesu GS232, it goes through the whole ?you need to set up
serversdx? palaver, which since I?m unable to use SDX (it doesn?t talk IP),
seems a little counter intuitive. That said, it did make the option to set
an endstop temporarily available, so hopefully by changing it, storing the
configs and then choosing ?None? again, it might remember the North endstop.
My next pass in a few minutes will hopefully confirm.



PST has no issue tracking the headings that SatPC32 displays even with the
rotor set to none, so hopefully the temporary enable then disable will work.
I?ll report back shortly.



John (M5ET)



From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.??? <mailto:kb1pvh@?????.???> >
Sent: 27 July 2019 18:00
To: John <john@?????.???.?? <mailto:john@?????.???.??> >
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32, PSTRotator and 360 Degree Rotators



John,



 In Rotor setup in SatPC32 you select Yaesu_GS-232 in the drop-down for the
ERC-M controller, FYI.



In the PSTRotator Satellite Tracking window if you click on Setup>Rotor Stop
you can select North or South.

Dave-KB1PVH


Sent from my Galaxy S9



On Sat, Jul 27, 2019, 12:48 PM John via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???
<mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> > wrote:

Hi All,



For various reasons, we use PSTRotator to control our rotator/elevator stack
- mostly due to the need for IP control of the ERC-M, which SatPC32 doesn't
seem to natively handle.



It all works fine, for the most part, with the exception of the fact that I
don't seem to be able to change my endstop value - normally this would be in
the "Rotor" configuration settings, but since I'm leaving SatPC32 set to
'None' and having PSTRotator in 'Tracking' mode (it follows SatPC32's
headings anyway), I can't see the option (it's not in the list) in order to
pick South for my endstop instead of North.



I can choose between 90 and 180 degree elevation (we use 180 as we only have
360 degrees of azimuth), but does anyone know how I can make SatPC32
understand the endstop being at the North instead of the South?



Many thanks in advance,



John (M5ET)

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:30:09 -0600
From: Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@?????.??>
To: Robert Bankston <ke4al@?????.???>
Cc: Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New Handheld for SO-50
Message-ID: <20190727133009.4ac1f9031a8672612d59157d@?????.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Very helpful,

   its challenging to buy used gear here, not everyone will ship
outside of the CONUS never mind to Canada.  I'm interested in buying
more than one working FT-530, if we get more new operators (who do not
have HF privileges) in the north it seems like a good idea to try to
standardize the radio.

   Thanks for the advice, I should put my new V71 to use on get on more
from DP22 myself.

    Ron VE8RT DP22

On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Robert Bankston <ke4al@?????.???> wrote:

> Ron,
> There are only 6 SO-50 capable HT options that I am aware: (May be more,
but these are commonly available)
> 1)? Kenwood TH-D72 (still in production, so new or used markets)2)?
Kenwood TH-D7 (out of production)3) Yaesu FT-530 (out of production)4)? Icom
IC-Z1A (out of production)5)? Icom IC-W2A (out of production)6)? Icom IC-W32
(earlier model with 5-digit SN) (out of production)
> I have personally used the TH-D72, FT-530, and IC-Z1A on SO-50.
> Would recommend TH-D72, if you can budget allows.? Otherwise Yaesu
FT-530.? I picked up a FT-530 at a hamfest last year for $25 and had to
spend another $30 for a new battery.
> 73,
>
> Robert Bankston, KE4AL
> Twitter:? @??????????????????? KE4AL.wordpress.com
>
>     On Saturday, July 27, 2019, 10:59:17 AM CDT, Ron VE8RT via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>  Hi Kees,
>
> ? I'm looking for a single HT to send to VY0Yl to get her on the FM
> satellites (single radio, basic antenna system, simple [smart phone app?
> ] tracking software) before her summer is over.? What did you decide on
> for a radio, and / or do you have any recommendations?
>
> ? Thanks,
>
> ? ? ? ? Ron VE8RT DP22
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:06:31 -0500
> Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been working the birds for a while now, and I have been using only 2
> > Boafengs.? I've realized they desense VERY easily on SO-50 and even AO-91
> > and 92.? I have a band pass filter for the FOX sats, so I can hear my
> > downlink.? However, I still haven't figured out a way to get full duplex
on
> > SO-50.? Are there any dual-band handhelds that can receive SO-50?
> >
> > 73 de KE0STO
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> --
> Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@?????.??>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


--
Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@?????.??>


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 283
*****************************************



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 24.03.2026 18:55:03lGo back Go up