| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 11.07.19 03:45l 690 Lines 24296 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14268
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 268
Path: IZ3LSV<I3XTY<I0OJJ<I0OJJ<EA2RCF<CX2SA
Sent: 190711/0231Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:9875 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14268
>From cx2sa%cx2sa.sal.ury.soam@i0ojj.ampr.org Thu Jul 11 04:45:06 2019
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0k.3b) with SMTP
id AA21751 ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:45:06 +0200
Message-Id: <AMSATBB14268@ir0rm.bbs>
>From: cx2sa@cx2sa.sal.ury.soam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (ir0rm @ 44.134.32.240) -> Sending message
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. RPi 4 (V1) (Peter Ellis)
2. APRS Satellite PATHs (Fred Hillhouse)
3. Request for urgent to listen for the JAISAT-1 raw datal
(Tanan Rangseeprom)
4. Re: RPi 4 (V1) (B J)
5. Re: APRS Satellite PATHs (Ryan Noguchi)
6. Re: APRS Satellite PATHs (Fred Hillhouse)
7. Re: Neil Armstrong - Radio ham? (Daniel Schultz)
8. Re: RF noise from a passing-by BMW i3 (Daniel Schultz)
9. Re: APRS Satellite PATHs (Robert Bruninga)
10. Re: APRS Satellite PATHs (Ryan Noguchi)
11. Request for urgent to listen (Tanan Rangseeprom)
12. Posting to AMSAT-BB with Unsubscribed Email Account
(Robert Bankston)
13. AO-92 in Camera Mode (Chris Thompson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:13:44 +1000
From: Peter Ellis <vk1pe.peter@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] RPi 4 (V1)
Message-ID:
<CAPvf-K+Sw1TmNGq=XZ+LHMQiwcWtNNn1C2Yma+nsbbAy5qJGTg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
For the information of electronics hobbyists....
BEWARE: There is a problem with Raspberry Pi 4 (version 1)
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/your-new-raspberry-pi-4-wont-power-on-usb
-c-cable-problem-now-officially-confirmed/
Peter
VK1PE
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 09:50:32 -0400
From: "Fred Hillhouse" <fmhillhouse@???????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
Message-ID: <167801d53726$71d9ed10$558dc730$@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Greetings,
According to http://www.aprs.org/iss-faq.html
WHAT PATH DO I USE?
All APRS satellites and the ISS support the generic paths of ARISS or
APRSAT. Since all of these satellites supports the same generic paths (when
properly configured), this means you can operate either ISS or PCsat or PSAT
without reconfiguring your TNC! Just set your UNPROTO path to APRS VIA ARISS
and it should work with all APRS birds.
And: http://aprs.org/psat2.html
Sister APRS Satellites: Other APRS transponder satellites on orbit or in
work all share a common uplink, a generic digipeter alias (APRSAT and ARISS)
and a common downlink (145.825 MHz) so all user traffic appears on the live
APRS satellite downlink page and ISS downlink page. The graphic below shows
how the commonality of all this operaation integrates together with
worldwide users and the internet linked ground stations.
Are these statements really true?
If so, why would I consider using the PATH of PFS3-1 for FalconSAT-3 or
RS0ISS for ISS?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:22:38 +0700
From: Tanan Rangseeprom <nanrspm@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Request for urgent to listen for the JAISAT-1 raw
datal
Message-ID:
<CAMw-yOWfV=3ENUCym0syt+r=eWUXHkJ8H3EMCuN-XSQRG=op3A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Dear AMSAT member
The Radio Amateur Society of Thailand (RAST) and the JAISAT-1 Team is
request for urgent assistance from AMSAT members around the world to listen
for the JAISAT-1 Beacon signal on 435.700 MHz in GMSK Mobitex 4800 bps mode
for JAISAT-1 used frames 1 in row 11
41 (0x29) - JAISAT UHF1
42 (0x2A) - JAISAT UHF2
2019-07-08 20:00:55.630 UTC: [128 Bytes KISS Frame (without CRC)]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0x29
1 > C0 00 00 80 04 00 00 00 00 00 29 06 6C A3 69 77 23 5D 03 00
21 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 3A 00 C5 09 44 0C 6C 0A 8F 0B 44 00 08
41 > 00 05 00 01 07 9B 06 B9 00 0E 06 7D 00 05 00 0B 00 03 00 05
61 > 00 9F 00 06 00 07 00 06 00 05 00 0F 00 05 00 03 00 00 00 01
81 > 00 00 00 06 06 2C 0A 40 00 09 E0 00 03 00 AD 99 00 00 0A BA
101 > 03 00 00 5C 02 01 10 01 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 71 DB
121 > DC AA FF FF FF FF BB C0
Please send raw data and KSS files to RAST by email :
jaisatonetele@?????.??? and please use 2019-038H for tracking JAISAT-1
satellite. This is the following link that you can download software decode
:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rh9dlz086g2eiqr/AACJR97tTjemEH7JUu1xkaw1a?dl=0
2019-038H
1 44393U 19038H 19190.93248769 .00000295 00000-0 20832-4 0 9997
2 44393 97.4878 152.7961 0020703 233.1644 126.7690 15.12067899 676
Example of signals in this format can be found with the the reception of
signals from the satellite links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOax6_bSKi0
All amateur radio operators capable of receiving signals from the JAISAT-1
satellite are invited to send the data by email to jaisatonetele@?????.???
and the Radio Amateur Society of Thailand will have a SWL card to confirm
reception.
Sincerely and with respect.
Tanan Rangseeprom, HS1JAN
Project Manager of JAISAT-1
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:59:49 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@?????.???>
To: Peter Ellis <vk1pe.peter@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] RPi 4 (V1)
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkPG8Oy-Fc9tbRjq07kcr2D+4CUtgrT+46OFzc23_knNyg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On 7/10/19, Peter Ellis via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> For the information of electronics hobbyists....
> BEWARE: There is a problem with Raspberry Pi 4 (version 1)
>
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/your-new-raspberry-pi-4-wont-power-on-usb
-c-cable-problem-now-officially-confirmed/
<snip>
More information about the Raspberry Pi 4's performance and problems
is available at:
https://www.hackaday.com
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ryan Noguchi <ai6do@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
Message-ID: <1491128219.3553007.1562775032015@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
FalconSat-3 is a different beast: 9600 bps vs. 1200 bps, and crossband at
different frequencies than the 1200 bps packet satellites. If you want to be
digipeated by FalconSat-3, you need to use the PFS3-1 PATH.?
73, Ryan AI6DO
On Wednesday, July 10, 2019, 6:53:47 AM PDT, Fred Hillhouse via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Greetings,
According to http://www.aprs.org/iss-faq.html
WHAT PATH DO I USE?
All APRS satellites and the ISS support the generic paths of ARISS or
APRSAT. Since all of these satellites supports the same generic paths (when
properly configured), this means you can operate either ISS or PCsat or PSAT
without reconfiguring your TNC! Just set your UNPROTO path to APRS VIA ARISS
and it should work with all APRS birds.
And: http://aprs.org/psat2.html
Sister APRS Satellites: Other APRS transponder satellites on orbit or in
work all share a common uplink, a generic digipeter alias (APRSAT and ARISS)
and a common downlink (145.825 MHz) so all user traffic appears on the live
APRS satellite downlink page and ISS downlink page. The graphic below shows
how the commonality of all this operaation integrates together with
worldwide users and the internet linked ground stations.
Are these statements really true?
If so, why would I consider using the PATH of PFS3-1 for FalconSAT-3 or
RS0ISS for ISS?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:09:32 -0400
From: "Fred Hillhouse" <fmhillhouse@???????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
Message-ID: <16bc01d53742$3ee59460$bcb0bd20$@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Regardless of the other operational requirements of FalconSAT-3, you are
saying FalconSAT-3 will not digipeat using the generic paths. That means the
text in the links provided is incorrect. Or is there some other qualifier I
have missed?
PSAT2 is also a different beast apparently. The text in the link imply APRS
uplinks are narrowband. From the PSAT2 link:
Uplinks: 145.825 MHz narroband [sic] FM packet and 29.4815 MHz SSB PSK31
User Station Software Configuration:
First bullet - Radios must be in Narrowband and track to 1 KHz Doppler on
the uplink.
The reason for asking is to be able to make as few changes to an HT (D72) as
possible. And the main use is to achieve a digipeat. When a satellite is the
only APRS network available it could be a useful way to get information out.
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Ryan Noguchi
via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:11 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
FalconSat-3 is a different beast: 9600 bps vs. 1200 bps, and crossband at
different frequencies than the 1200 bps packet satellites. If you want to be
digipeated by FalconSat-3, you need to use the PFS3-1 PATH.
73, Ryan AI6DO
On Wednesday, July 10, 2019, 6:53:47 AM PDT, Fred Hillhouse via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Greetings,
According to http://www.aprs.org/iss-faq.html
WHAT PATH DO I USE?
All APRS satellites and the ISS support the generic paths of ARISS or
APRSAT. Since all of these satellites supports the same generic paths (when
properly configured), this means you can operate either ISS or PCsat or PSAT
without reconfiguring your TNC! Just set your UNPROTO path to APRS VIA ARISS
and it should work with all APRS birds.
And: http://aprs.org/psat2.html
Sister APRS Satellites: Other APRS transponder satellites on orbit or in
work all share a common uplink, a generic digipeter alias (APRSAT and ARISS)
and a common downlink (145.825 MHz) so all user traffic appears on the live
APRS satellite downlink page and ISS downlink page. The graphic below shows
how the commonality of all this operaation integrates together with
worldwide users and the internet linked ground stations.
Are these statements really true?
If so, why would I consider using the PATH of PFS3-1 for FalconSAT-3 or
RS0ISS for ISS?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:35:42 -0400
From: "Daniel Schultz" <n8fgv@???.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Neil Armstrong - Radio ham?
Message-ID: <389XgJRIQ6416Set.1562780142@?????.???.???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I think if Neil Armstrong had been a ham we would have heard about it long
ago. He also has not lived in the family house in Wapakoneta since he was a
boy, so any antennas must belong to a subsequent owner.
Many houses in the rural parts of Ohio have fairly tall towers with television
antennas for TV reception far from the cities. Residents of Wapakoneta might
be far enough from the TV transmitters to benefit from such a tower.
73, Dan N8FGV
------Original Message------
>I cannot see any mention of Neil Armstrong being a radio ham so does anybody
>know if the current owner of the house is a radio ham or perhaps this is just
a
>random house that happens to have a mast and antennas?
>Best 73 Pete G0ABI
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:38:38 -0400
From: "Daniel Schultz" <n8fgv@???.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] RF noise from a passing-by BMW i3
Message-ID: <785XgJRlM3760Set.1562780318@?????.???.???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
So BMW can't build a car that meets EMI specs so they just turn off the AM
reception and hope that nobody notices? Are there no EMI regulations in
Germany? Or maybe its the same mindset that allowed Volkswagen to cheat on
their smog emissions by using engine software to trick the inspectors.
If they can successfully claim that AM radio is obsolete, others might claim
that Amateur Radio is obsolete when we try to complain about interference to
our service. Or maybe the cell providers would like to force everyone to
stream their news online so that we pay for our data service.
The reason that US cars don't have "HD Radio" installed is that the satellite
radio providers signed agreements with automakers to put satellite receivers
in cars and they don't want to install a free service that might take
customers away from subscription based satellite radio services. That plus the
fact that "HD Radio" in the USA is a proprietary system that requires payment
of licensing fees to iBiquity Inc, unlike Europe's open source digital radio
standard.
If we don't demand that technology providers observe some level of social
reponsibility they will likely argue that the benefits of their new technology
will outweigh the loss of "obsolete technology" and the public might accept
that argument instead of asking them to spend a little more money to clean up
their pollution.
Dan Schultz N8FGV
------Original Message------
>I stumbled across an article relating much of the same, today.
>https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1098893_bmw-i3-electric-car-quirk-no-am-
radio--but-why
>So, save the planet or save the spectrum. Perhaps not both at the same time?
:-)
>--- Zach N0ZGO
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:07:23 -0400
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@????.???>
To: amsat bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
Message-ID: <6cd33f4c1bc337bd64c85f2ae58881ac@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> If so, why would I consider using the PATH of PFS3-1 for FalconSAT-3 or
RS0ISS for ISS?
Here is the APRS satellite Sujmmary:
See http://aprs.org/sats.html
FALCONSAT is not a generic APRS satellite on 145.825 like the others And
was only turned over to APRS digipeating after it finished it original
mission. It has a different frequency, a different modem (9600 baud) and
is full duplex and is not identified as being a "generic" digipeater with
those aliases. But it is a great new capability for Mobiles (the only 9600
baud APRS satellite).
The APRSAT and ARISS aliases will work with ISS as long as the kenwood
radio is acting as the TNC because it can support multiple aliases. But
sometimes, the backup TNC is used (going back a decade) and in that case,
it only supports the RS0ISS call and not the added APRSAT and ARISS
aliases.
Hope that helps.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Fred Hillhouse
via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 9:51 AM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
Greetings,
According to http://www.aprs.org/iss-faq.html WHAT PATH DO I USE?
All APRS satellites and the ISS support the generic paths of ARISS or
APRSAT. Since all of these satellites supports the same generic paths
(when properly configured), this means you can operate either ISS or PCsat
or PSAT without reconfiguring your TNC! Just set your UNPROTO path to APRS
VIA ARISS and it should work with all APRS birds.
And: http://aprs.org/psat2.html
Sister APRS Satellites: Other APRS transponder satellites on orbit or in
work all share a common uplink, a generic digipeter alias (APRSAT and
ARISS) and a common downlink (145.825 MHz) so all user traffic appears on
the live APRS satellite downlink page and ISS downlink page. The graphic
below shows how the commonality of all this operaation integrates together
with worldwide users and the internet linked ground stations.
Are these statements really true?
If so, why would I consider using the PATH of PFS3-1 for FalconSAT-3 or
RS0ISS for ISS?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to
all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:37:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ryan Noguchi <ai6do@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
Message-ID: <2044445416.3610238.1562783830190@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Yes, that's correct. FalconSat-3 doesn't digipeat using the generic ARISS
or APRSAT paths.??
Agreed, it's a pain to have to keep changing PATH, baud rate, and data band
between FalconSat-3 and the other packet satellites. At least there are only
two configurations to have to toggle between. Once you've done it a couple
dozen times, it becomes second nature.?
Yes, PSAT2 (and apparently also AISAT) may need to use Narrow FM mode, but
the mode can be easily programmed into memory channels. I just set up a
different set of memory channels for PSAT2 and AISAT to set that mode and
enable (crude) Doppler correction. I haven't used them yet so don't know if
5 kHz steps will cut it.??
73, Ryan AI6DO
On Wednesday, July 10, 2019, 10:14:18 AM PDT, Fred Hillhouse via
AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Regardless of the other operational requirements of FalconSAT-3, you are
saying FalconSAT-3 will not digipeat using the generic paths. That means the
text in the links provided is incorrect. Or is there some other qualifier I
have missed?
PSAT2 is also a different beast apparently. The text in the link imply APRS
uplinks are narrowband. From the PSAT2 link:
Uplinks: 145.825 MHz narroband [sic] FM packet and 29.4815 MHz SSB PSK31
User Station Software Configuration:
First bullet - Radios must be in Narrowband and track to 1 KHz Doppler on
the uplink.
The reason for asking is to be able to make as few changes to an HT (D72) as
possible. And the main use is to achieve a digipeat. When a satellite is the
only APRS network available it could be a useful way to get information out.
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Ryan Noguchi
via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:11 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
FalconSat-3 is a different beast: 9600 bps vs. 1200 bps, and crossband at
different frequencies than the 1200 bps packet satellites. If you want to be
digipeated by FalconSat-3, you need to use the PFS3-1 PATH.
73, Ryan AI6DO
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:19:03 +0700
From: Tanan Rangseeprom <nanrspm@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Request for urgent to listen
Message-ID:
<CAMw-yOX3wqAO1tZ3M2Mw=96y9n9NyGTVHPaL-VS=TFkqQGShOQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Dear AMSAT member
The Radio Amateur Society of Thailand (RAST) and the JAISAT-1 Team is
request for urgent assistance from AMSAT members around the world to listen
for the JAISAT-1 Beacon signal on 435.700 MHz in GMSK Mobitex 4800 bps mode
for JAISAT-1 used frames 1 in row 11
41 (0x29) - JAISAT UHF1
42 (0x2A) - JAISAT UHF2
2019-07-08 20:00:55.630 UTC: [128 Bytes KISS Frame (without CRC)]
1 > C0 00 00 80 04 00 00 00 00 00 29 06 6C A3 69 77 23 5D 03 00
21 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 3A 00 C5 09 44 0C 6C 0A 8F 0B 44 00 08
41 > 00 05 00 01 07 9B 06 B9 00 0E 06 7D 00 05 00 0B 00 03 00 05
61 > 00 9F 00 06 00 07 00 06 00 05 00 0F 00 05 00 03 00 00 00 01
81 > 00 00 00 06 06 2C 0A 40 00 09 E0 00 03 00 AD 99 00 00 0A BA
101 > 03 00 00 5C 02 01 10 01 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 71 DB
121 > DC AA FF FF FF FF BB C0
Please send raw data and KSS files to RAST by email :
jaisatonetele@?????.??? and please use 2019-038H for tracking JAISAT-1
satellite. This is the following link that you can download software decode
:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rh9dlz086g2eiqr/AACJR97tTjemEH7JUu1xkaw1a?dl=0
2019-038H
1 44393U 19038H 19190.93248769 .00000295 00000-0 20832-4 0 9997
2 44393 97.4878 152.7961 0020703 233.1644 126.7690 15.12067899 676
Example of signals in this format can be found with the the reception of
signals from the satellite links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOax6_bSKi0
Sincerely and with respect.
Tanan Rangseeprom, HS1JAN
Project Manager of JAISAT-1
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:16:17 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robert Bankston <ke4al@?????.???>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Posting to AMSAT-BB with Unsubscribed Email
Account
Message-ID: <932448063.177303.1562811377996@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
There has been an increasing trend on AMSAT-BB, wheresubscribers are posting
to the BB with an email other than they one they usedto subscribe to the
list.? Usually these listmembers signed up with redirect email account
(@?????.??? or @????.????? but attemptto post a message from their personal
account.?Others, who have multiple email accounts accidentally select the
wrongone.? When either of these situationsoccur, their post is put in
quarantine until a list moderator physically logs in andclears it out.
Your quarantined message is not alone. ?AMSAT-BB gets 300+ spam emails a
day.? Each time a post is placed in quarantine, thelist moderators receives
an email notification.?You can do the math to figure out how many emails we
get each and everyday.
I bring this up to help you realize that clearing your emailis not a fast
process.? We could take thetime to look up your name and/or call sign to
make sure you are a subscriber,but, to be honest, this is not an easy
process.?Instead, you will more than likely receive an email stating
?Non-membersare not allowed to post messages to this list.??The easy fix is
just to resend you post from your subscribed emailaccount.? If you changed
email accounts,please visit the AMSAT-BB Info page:?
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb.? From here you can log into
your account andchange your email address.
Thank you for your understanding.
73,
Robert Bankston, KE4ALAMSAT-NA VP of User Services
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 22:27:42 -0400
From: Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>
To: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92 in Camera Mode
Message-ID:
<CAJOf0+tYWWUSe9OVr32NCZCqAJW4p2jxWz9JOs63yCEsBtfXgg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
For anyone decoding images and using FoxTelem with Doppler Tracking enabled
I would appreciate any feedback on how high speed data is being decoded.
Especially if you decoded camera frames in previous runs, like last
October, and can compare.
This was a new feature and previously tracking of the high speed signal was
not great. Let me know if it is better (or worse!)
73
Chris
--
Chris E. Thompson
chrisethompson@?????.???
g0kla@????.???
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 268
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
