| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 15.03.08 19:00l 780 Lines 22956 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 51613-CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V3 134
Path: IZ3LSV<IW2OHX<I0TVL<CX2SA
Sent: 080315/1454Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:51613 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:51613-CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: AMSAT Callsign Badge (Kent R. Frazier)
2. UT1FG/mm report (Robert Turlington)
3. Re: Swan Island DXpedition update (Bill Dzurilla)
4. Re: Hello Group (Nate Duehr)
5. Re: Gulf Alpha questions (Nate Duehr)
6. Curiouser and curiouser. (John Hackett)
7. Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios (Nate Duehr)
8. ATTENTION !!! the AO-7 log 'CQ' chaps. (John Hackett)
9. Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios (G8IFF/KC8NHF)
10. Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios (Nate Duehr)
11. Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios (G8IFF/KC8NHF)
12. Cape1 not heard (john heath)
13. HITSAT Mar 15, 2008 (Mike Rupprecht)
14. Re: Cape1 not heard (Mike Rupprecht)
15. Re: Cape1 not heard (Nick Pugh)
16. Re: Cape1 not heard (Nick Pugh)
17. presentation for hamfest (Nick Pugh)
18. Re: presentation for hamfest (Bob Bruninga )
19. Re: Gulf Alpha questions (Frank Brickle)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:11:30 -0500
From: "Kent R. Frazier" <k5knt(AT)amsat.org>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Callsign Badge
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID:
<7caa889a0803141311l46cc2875i1c5815060a44ab87(AT)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks to all that replied. I guess I'll look for a magnetic clasp to put on
after I order mine.
Kent
--
Kent R. Frazier, K5KNT
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:18:34 +0000
From: Robert Turlington <rob_g8ate(AT)hotmail.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] UT1FG/mm report
To: Amsat Buleitin Board <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <BAY134-W399F94CC1691FCC441B3CDC00B0(AT)phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All
again Yuri UT1FG/mm has been active on Satellites
I worked him from IM33 (AT) 1255utc on SO50 and from IM44 (AT) 1739 on
AO16Regards Robert G8ATE
_________________________________________________________________
Telly addicts unite!
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/tvtown.shtml
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo(AT)yahoo.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Swan Island DXpedition update
To: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo(AT)yahoo.com>, amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org,
fm-satellite(AT)yahoogroups.com, moon-net(AT)list-serv.davidv.net
Cc: sixclub(AT)mailman.qth.net, wsjtgroup(AT)yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <469243.46221.qm(AT)web51104.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
due to mechanical problem with the boat, we are stuck
in trujillo, grid ek66, and will not arrive at swan
island until monday. will be operating on hf and the
sats tonite and saturday, we may also break out the 2m
yagi and amp for a little eme and ms, but it would be
difficult to unpack and repack. will be on so50 at
0400z friday evening.
73, bill
--- Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo(AT)yahoo.com> wrote:
> It looks like a go for the HQ6A expedition this
> weekend. The 6m and 2m gear has arrived safely in
> Honduras, so let's hope for favorable propogation.
> I
> arrive in San Pedro Sula, EK65, on Thursday
> afternoon.
> At the very least, I hope to make some satellite
> contacts from there on Thursday evening and Friday
> morning. On Friday, we go by land to Trujillo,
> EK75,
> then 23 hours by boat, leaving Saturday morning,
> through grid EK76, and arriving at our destination,
> Big Swan Island, EK87, on Sunday morning. Satellite
> contacts should be possible from any of these
> locations, and I know a major HF operation is
> planned
> from the boat, but since the amps and big antennas
> are
> packed up it seems doubtful any serious EME or
> meteor
> work can be done before we get to the island, maybe
> if
> lucky some 6m E skip with a small antenna.
>
> We will have internet and will post news on
> reflectors
> and DX clusters. Log and other info on our website
> at
> http://www.hondurasdx.com/.
>
> 73, Bill NZ5N
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________________
______
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
>
______________________________________________________________________________
______
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:18:02 -0600
From: Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Hello Group
To: "D. Mynatt" <dave(AT)mynatt.biz>
Cc: amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
Message-ID: <FB010A1B-F4EB-4285-9B5D-2BD7BA668625(AT)natetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:13 PM, D. Mynatt wrote:
> Hello, Just joining and wanting to know if anyone from the Colo
> Springs/Pueblo, Colorado area?
>
> Dave
> KA0SWT
There are a number of folks who have been active on the birds in the
past, and are still interested... some with working stations, others
not, along the Front Range, Dave. They're not very "organized" right
now, though -- because...
The Colorado AMSAT Net has been off-air for a while now, in need of
someone to pick it back up and give it some TLC. The net's "owner"
John N0VSE with help from KB0VBZ ran it for many years on the Colorado
Repeater Association's linked repeaters, every single Wednesday night
at 8PM for well over a decade. But John's work and home life schedule
currently does not allow him to be around at 8PM on Wednesday nights,
their Net "slot" for years on the system... and no one else has
stepped up to be "the voice of Colorado AMSAT Net". I'm sure John
would "hand the reins over" to anyone willing to pick it up and do it.
Colorado Front Range AMSAT activity probably needs a couple of
"champions" to work on it (I'm already over-committed to various other
things, and don't work the birds much really -- I stay more in touch
with Satellite activity because many people cross over from Satellite
to terrestrial weak-signal work at VHF and above, which is one of my
passions) and breathe some new life back into it.
The Net time is open, if some folks want to pick it up. The linked
repeater system also has EchoIRLP on it, so anyone could participate
or help run it from just about anywhere... anywhere there's an IRLP or
EchoLink setup... including a laptop.
There are some brilliant but very busy AMSAT folks down near you...
folks who've helped build birds for AMSAT, write code, test systems,
etc. Hard folks to get ahold of though, much in demand in the "real
world" engineering roles they fill.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
nate(AT)natetech.com
(President, Colorado Repeater Association)
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:32:56 -0600
From: Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gulf Alpha questions
To: Amsat-Bb <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <616B0A7A-A9D7-4268-B661-C795AA99AFA9(AT)natetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:35 AM, David wrote:
> Hello Bob, Joe et al
>
> I must agree with Joe. I have two of the Dual Gulfalpha antennas
> for working
> the LEOs. Nicely made and easy to assemble. I've had mine for
> about 2
> years.
>
> 73 de David VK5DG
Either of you guys ever had the chance to compare to say, something
like the Directive Systems yagis? Better, worse? Worth the
difference in price?
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
nate(AT)natetech.com
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:44:55 +0100
From: John Hackett <archie.hackett(AT)hotmail.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Curiouser and curiouser.
To: <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Cc: "Eu-amsat(AT)yahoogroups.com" <eu-amsat(AT)yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <BLU138-W533AA34516811E52359891910B0(AT)phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
No, the title is *NOT* a grammatical error, it's an exclamation of
exasperation by the white rabbit in Lewis Carrol's Alice In Wonderland.
Congratulations are extended to 9M6YBG for working JH7PKU, JA1BCL, JR3KQJ and
JA3DJX with the transponder OFF - (according to his report).
"Extra" points for not noticing and correcting the mistake after the first
day.
Ditto to IK1RAN, also for working UT1FG with the transponder OFF ... but
credit for changing it to ON and YT1FG ... even if he did leave both entries
on the same pass.
Did somebody mention incorrect data would be generated?.
73 John. <la2qaa(AT)amsat.org>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:46:10 -0600
From: Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <4ADDAA41-C309-49D4-9C40-134D176B39C3(AT)natetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Mar 13, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
>
> ???911 002??506 ????????????144?
> ?z??20?
> ????????????430??z??20?
> H19.12.25
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV
Bah. Still no one making anything for 222 and only Kenwood with
current 1.2 GHz product... etc.
Standard grumble.
Hey Icom, Yaesu, Kenwood, etc... the FT-736R's are starting to get
long in the tooth... and this mess of transverters, while I love
supporting the kind folks at DEMI, is an utter mess mobile and in the
shack.
Can anyone say "band modules" at some manufacturer again someday with
current features like DSP IF filtering, please? Pretty please? With
sugar on top?
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
nate(AT)natetech.com
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:49:07 +0100
From: John Hackett <archie.hackett(AT)hotmail.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ATTENTION !!! the AO-7 log 'CQ' chaps.
To: <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Cc: "Eu-amsat(AT)yahoogroups.com" <eu-amsat(AT)yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <BLU138-W42F6AF67F4EC33D936F709910B0(AT)phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
CQ does *NOT* belong in the QSO pane of the AO-7 log. That pane is for
'actual' QSO's ... 'CQ' might be valid in the COMMENTS field though I doubt if
anyone is interested that somebody called CQ.
The following "instruction" is in fact on the same page as the log entry page
but here seems to be difficulty with English speaking stations *NOT
understanding the (quote) "If you need to change an entry you have made, click
on the magnifying glass to review the record ,then click the update link
(unquote).
Presumably, after several requests on the bb's for a little more dilligence in
filling out the log it's quite likely that it's being done deliberately, which
is about on par with the VFO swisher intelligence
(or should one say, lack of).
It has been suggested that these stations might not read the bb's ...
point taken - but surely they have eyes? ... and can read their own entries?
... (as well as the sentence at the top of the page).
There is *ALWAYS* an excuse for human error ... but the same error
consistently ... well ... you know as well as everyone else ...
As I mentioned previously, regarding 'statistics' - if they're not collated
correctly, the results will be incorrect ... in that case, what is the point
in filling out the log in the first place ??.
Pardon me for trying to preserve a very useful resource.
73 John. <la2qaa(AT)amsat.org>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:18:36 +0000
From: G8IFF/KC8NHF <nigel(AT)ngunn.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios
To: Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <47DB946C.1000902(AT)ngunn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
But there are no satellites on 222 and only little ol' USA has that band.
It's a broadcast band with all your favorite music stations in Europe.
Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> Bah. Still no one making anything for 222
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:48:51 -0600
From: Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <B00866D2-4D34-405E-8905-227B5FF28363(AT)natetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Mar 15, 2008, at 3:18 AM, G8IFF/KC8NHF wrote:
> But there are no satellites on 222 and only little ol' USA has that
> band.
I think what you meant to say is... "only little old ITU Region 2 has
that band". Canada, Mexico... etc...
> It's a broadcast band with all your favorite music stations in Europe.
Yeah, yeah... so they can build modules for the bands you guys have
that WE don't, too. (GRIN)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
nate(AT)natetech.com
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:14:11 +0000
From: G8IFF/KC8NHF <nigel(AT)ngunn.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Opinion regarding satellite radios
To: Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <47DBA173.9020100(AT)ngunn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> I think what you meant to say is... "only little old ITU Region 2 has
> that band". Canada, Mexico... etc...
>
I guess so but I would suspect that the USA has the majority of the
amateurs in Region 2.
I suppose my gripe is that too many Americans appear to believe that the
USA is the centre of the universe and the rest of the world should cater
for their needs.
If there really is demand for a VHF/UHF multimode satellite capable
radio with 220 and 1296 then there are several American manufacturers
(TenTec, Elecraft for example) perfectly capable of the task. They
obviously don't see it as a viable product.
> Yeah, yeah... so they can build modules for the bands you guys have
> that WE don't, too. (GRIN)
>
Band modules are a great idea.
It's a pity more rigs don't come with bays for plug in transverters but
it leads to a larger chassis that many wouldn't need or be prepared to
pay for.
Tektronix have made 'scopes for centuries with plug in modules so it's
hardly a new idea. The Ft-736 had transverters but it needs to be a
front panel plug in to allow for easy selection of facilities.
--
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Nigel A. Gunn. 59 Beadlemead, Milton Keynes, MK6 4HF, England.
Tel +44 (0)1908 604004 mobile +44 (0)7951079089
e-mail nigel(AT)ngunn.net www http://www.ngunn.net
Amateur radio stations G8IFF, KC8NHF
Member of ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548, Flying Pig #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, MKARS, RAYNET
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:34:04 -0000
From: "john heath" <g7hia(AT)btinternet.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cape1 not heard
To: "amsat" <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <000801c88688$18ba35b0$4001a8c0(AT)MainPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Listened this morning, 10:00 UTC over England.
Nothing heard.
17 el X yagi FT847
73 John G7HIA
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:15:07 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail(AT)mike-rupprecht.de>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HITSAT Mar 15, 2008
To: <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <000901c8868d$d3551b60$79ff5220$(AT)de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
just heard again HITSAT at 1041 UTC:
HIT1 JR8YJT
HIT2 0000000003a
HIT3 2d58545757575756
HIT4 68e4?. [reset]
Temp +X face : 106,844 ?C [sensor failed]
Temp -X face : 3,551 ?C
Temp +Y face : 13,160 ?C
Temp -Y face : 5,954 ?C
Temp +Z face : 5,954 ?C
Temp -Z face : 5,954 ?C
Temp Transceiver: 5,954 ?C
Temp Battery : 8,356 ?C
Prim. Battery : 4,063 V
Sec. Battery : 8,906 V
RSSI : 1,133 V
73, Mike
DK3WN
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:51:56 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail(AT)mike-rupprecht.de>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cape1 not heard
To: "'amsat'" <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <000101c88692$f7ffc1e0$e7ff45a0$(AT)de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
.. confirm this - I've also listened but nothing on all our morning passes.
73, Mike
DK3WN
Von: amsat-bb-bounces(AT)amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces(AT)amsat.org] Im
Auftrag von john heath
Gesendet: Samstag, 15. M?rz 2008 11:34
An: amsat
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Cape1 not heard
Listened this morning, 10:00 UTC over England.
Nothing heard.
17 el X yagi FT847
73 John G7HIA
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:27:14 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh" <quadpugh(AT)bellsouth.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cape1 not heard
To: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail(AT)mike-rupprecht.de>, "'amsat'"
<amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <000501c886a0$490e4360$6301a8c0(AT)nick1>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
thanks for the effort and please keep listening
nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail(AT)mike-rupprecht.de>
To: "'amsat'" <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:51 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cape1 not heard
.. confirm this - I've also listened but nothing on all our morning passes.
73, Mike
DK3WN
Von: amsat-bb-bounces(AT)amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces(AT)amsat.org] Im
Auftrag von john heath
Gesendet: Samstag, 15. M?rz 2008 11:34
An: amsat
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Cape1 not heard
Listened this morning, 10:00 UTC over England.
Nothing heard.
17 el X yagi FT847
73 John G7HIA
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:28:45 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh" <quadpugh(AT)bellsouth.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cape1 not heard
To: "john heath" <g7hia(AT)btinternet.com>, "amsat" <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <000901c886a0$7eca0fc0$6301a8c0(AT)nick1>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
thanks for the effort and please keep listening
nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "john heath" <g7hia(AT)btinternet.com>
To: "amsat" <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 5:34 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cape1 not heard
> Listened this morning, 10:00 UTC over England.
> Nothing heard.
>
> 17 el X yagi FT847
>
> 73 John G7HIA
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:31:04 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh" <quadpugh(AT)bellsouth.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] presentation for hamfest
To: <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <001001c886a0$d2010270$6301a8c0(AT)nick1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Amsaters
I am looking for power point presentation suitable for a hamfest forum.. Any
help will be appreciated
thanks
nick
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga(AT)usna.edu>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: presentation for hamfest
To: Nick Pugh <quadpugh(AT)bellsouth.net>, amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
Message-ID: <20080315095726.AFH13541(AT)mp3.nettest.usna.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> I am looking for power point presentation
> suitable for a hamfest forum..
The #1 point I make at hamfests are:
1) You dont need special antennas
2) You dont need elevation rotatros
3) You dont need tracking software
4) Just operate from your mobile FM or APRS rig anytime you are commuting or
otherwise in the car.
AO51 sked repeats every 5 days, and GO-32 every 9 days. A simple table on
your dashboard will give you pass times for months... See
http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/MobileLEOtracking.html
But there are a few more slides in my general APRS presentation at the end
that also show why elevation is simply not required. In fact, I should cut
them out into an AMSAT presentation just for this purpose.
get the power point link at the top of this page:
http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs.html
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:02:41 -0400
From: "Frank Brickle" <brickle(AT)pobox.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Gulf Alpha questions
To: "Nate Duehr" <nate(AT)natetech.com>
Cc: Amsat-Bb <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID:
<fc22d18f0803150702jd9b7923u245122b41b89082f(AT)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sad to say, it may be an idle question. The dual-band antennas are no longer
active items in the catalog. Looks like they're concentrating exclusively on
higher-gain single-band yagis, as far as the amateur market is concerned.
73
Frank
AB2KT
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Nate Duehr <nate(AT)natetech.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:35 AM, David wrote:
>
> > Hello Bob, Joe et al
> >
> > I must agree with Joe. I have two of the Dual Gulfalpha antennas
> > for working
> > the LEOs. Nicely made and easy to assemble. I've had mine for
> > about 2
> > years.
> >
> > 73 de David VK5DG
>
>
> Either of you guys ever had the chance to compare to say, something
> like the Directive Systems yagis? Better, worse? Worth the
> difference in price?
>
> --
> Nate Duehr, WY0X
> nate(AT)natetech.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
The only thing we have to fear is whatever comes along next. -- Austin Cline
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 3, Issue 134
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
