| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 28.06.14 21:41l 804 Lines 23254 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB9212
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V9 212
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0ANF<CX2SA
Sent: 140628/1936Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:7320 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB9212
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Fwd: Re: ARTSAT1: INVADER will try to send Cosmic Poem
(Jean-L. RAULT)
2. ANTELSat identified (Nico Janssen)
3. Re: Fwd: Re: ARTSAT1: INVADER will try to send Cosmic Poem
(Akihiro Kubota)
4. Re: To Flip or Not to Flip (Erich Eichmann)
5. Nova for Windows (Jim Sanford)
6. SATPC32 (wb4gcs@xxxxxx.xxxx
7. Re: M2 loops with sats (Ted)
8. Just Spoke to the ISS (Clint Bradford)
9. Re: M2 loops with sats (Floyd Rodgers)
10. Re: Just Spoke to the ISS (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
11. Re: M2 loops with sats (Ted)
12. Re: Just Spoke to the ISS (Greg Dolkas)
13. Re: M2 loops with sats (John Becker)
14. Re: Just Spoke to the ISS (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
15. Re: Just Spoke to the ISS (Fabiano Moser)
16. Re: Just Spoke to the ISS (aa5uk@xxxxx.xxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:13:57 +0000
From: "Jean-L. RAULT" <f6agr@xxxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fwd: Re: ARTSAT1: INVADER will try to send Cosmic
Poem
Message-ID: <53AEB185.3090200@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Akihiro San
A translation in english of the ArtSat1 Cosmic Poem would be very
appreciated :o)
Kind regards
Jean-Louis F6AGR
ex- AMSAT-France
Le 28/06/2014 09:42, Akihiro Kubota a ?crit :
> Dear PE0SAT-san and all
>
> Thank you very much for your report!
> We are glad that you can hear the Cosmic Poem!
>
> We are going to try to send it over US next morning (in Japan).
>
> All the best,
>
> Akihiro Kubota
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:28:19 +0200
From: Nico Janssen <hamsat@xxxxxx.xx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx Ray Hoad <ray.hoad@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ANTELSat identified
Message-ID: <53AEB4E3.8090707@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
All,
Using detailed doppler measurements I find that ANTELSat is now
object 40034, 2014-033AA. Yesterday the JSpOC decided to exchange
the TLE set of object 40034 with the set of object 40049,
2014-033AR. So up to yesterday ANTELSat was object 40049 but as of
today it is object 40034.
Doppler measurements show that DUCHIFAT is almost certainly object
40021, 2014-033M. But at this time the distance between objects 40021,
40022 and 40023 is too small to be absolutely sure. Especially the
temperature induced frequency drift on the downlink signals makes it
hard to do a good assessment of the measurements.
73,
Nico PA0DLO
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:40:37 +0900
From: Akihiro Kubota <akihiro.kubota@xxxxx.xxx>
To: f6agr@xxxxxx.xx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Fwd: Re: ARTSAT1: INVADER will try to send
Cosmic Poem
Message-ID: <70A00DCA-4AD5-4F92-BFA9-66BAD9B0A15A@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hello, thanks for your interests.
The cosmic poem is based on Dada?s sound poetry. Hence, it can not be
translated to any languages such as English, French, German, Japanese etc.
http://www.ubu.com/sound/schwitters.html
A full english press release can be downloaded at here
https://cosmicpoem.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/cosmicpoem_pressen2.pdf
all the best,
Akihiro Kubota, ARTSAT project
On Jun 28, 2014, at 9:13 PM, Jean-L. RAULT <f6agr@xxxxxx.xx> wrote:
> Akihiro San
>
> A translation in english of the ArtSat1 Cosmic Poem would be very
> appreciated :o)
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jean-Louis F6AGR
> ex- AMSAT-France
>
>
>
> Le 28/06/2014 09:42, Akihiro Kubota a ?crit :
>> Dear PE0SAT-san and all
>>
>> Thank you very much for your report!
>> We are glad that you can hear the Cosmic Poem!
>>
>> We are going to try to send it over US next morning (in Japan).
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Akihiro Kubota
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:57:03 +0200
From: Erich Eichmann <erich.eichmann@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: dan@xxxx.xxxx AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] To Flip or Not to Flip
Message-ID: <53AEBB9F.3040202@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Dan,
SatPC32 handles the flip mode as follows:
If flip mode is activated It checks whether the satellite crosses the
user's meridian during the pass, either in the North or in the South,
depending on the setting of the rotor end positions in menu "Rotor
Setup" (N or S). The check is made when it starts tracking the
satellite at the beginning of the pass or during the pass (but not,
if the satellite had crossed the meridian already).
The DDE interface (which can be used also by other DDE client
programs) outputs the real azimuth and elevation positions, not the
valures converted for flip mode. SatPC332 supports the Pro.Sis.Tel
controller. So, it can steer that controller directly, also in flip mode.
With azimuth rotors with a range of 450 degr. or more the 450 degr.
modus also avoids the full turn during a pass if the the satellite
crosses the rotor end positions. This mode is in many cases
mechanically easier to realize than flip mode.
ISS: If the latitude of your location is > 52 degr. the azimuth
direction can only be between 90 and 270 degr. So, with your rotor no
flip mode will be necessary.
73s, Erich, DK1TB
Am 27.06.2014 17:27, schrieb Daniel Cussen:
> To Flip or Not to Flip
>
> Ok, my setup has flip capability. It also has azimuth of 1.5 turns
> (540 degrees),
> So flip is not essential for end stops as the rotator neither stops at
> North nor South
>
> The rotator controller software only works in WiSPDDE but this can use
> many different tracking software types.
> Currently using Orbitron. Orbitron only outputs Elevation 0-90 and Az 0-360
>
> The WiSPDDE rotator driver has been modified to automatically flip if
> elevation goes above 70 degrees and starts to drop again. As soon as
> it starts to drop Elevation, Azimuth value has 180 degrees added and
> Elevation is now suddenly >90
>
> The software has the option to enable or disable flip on each pass.
>
> What I need to know is
>
> 1) What is the best way to predict if I should flip or instead just
> move the azimuth without flipping?
>
> 2) Is there any software to automatically decide if Flip is best, and
> output Elevation values >180 to WiSPDDE during the middle of a pass?
>
> For Example worst case would be a satellite coming from due west (270)
> heading east (90).
> I this case it would be best to flip antenna, otherwise azimuth would
> need to rotate 180 degrees suddenly during a pass.
>
> In another case, ISS coming from south west across to south and then
> south east, but with elevation approaching 85 degrees. In this case it
> would be best to not flip, but our current software flips once the box
> is ticked and if the elevation rises above 70 degrees.
>
> At the moment it is not possible to do this in WiSPDDE as it does not
> know where the ISS is going to be at the end of the pass as that info
> is not sent over the DDE interface.
>
> Specific System Setup
> The system will be used to track the ISS for 2.4Ghz HAMTV downlink.
> The beamwidth of dish is 4 to 8 degrees, but signal is very strong at
> high elevations.
> Video is used live so continous accurate tracking is needed
> The azimuth can be any value 0-540 degrees (1.5 turns). Currently the
> software can do 2 things.
>
> 1) Not flip but instead move to an azimuth position where flip is not
> essential, but sometimes the azimuth is too slow to get to the new
> position.
>
> 2) Flip the dish, but on some passes it would be better to not flip
> the dish, if say elevation went to 73 elevation but azimuth could cope
> with tracking.
> The decision is currently a tick box. Orbitron only outputs 0-90
> Elevation so WiSPDDE is not being told by Orbitron to flip, the
> decision is not based on the pass prediction.
>
> I believe some of these problems may be solved with SatPC32 but we
> would possibly need to modify our custom driver to just accept these
> values.
> If using SatPC32 would it solve all these issues? Can it decide to
> flip or not flip based on azimuth speed and pass prediction in the
> middle of a pass?
> Does SatPC32 only ever flip at the start of a pass and never in the
> middle of a pass?
> Will it pick the best option for every pass and output values via DDE
> to WiSPDDE?
>
> The rotator WiSPDDE is specifically written for this task,
> It is a modified version specially modified by Amasat Itallia.
> The rotator we are using is prosistel Azimuth and Elevation rotator.
> This is quite new and so a specific driver was written.
> The azimuth can achieve 1.5 turns (540 degrees) and Elevation 180. The
> manufacturer only specifies Az 360 and Elev 90 but we have special
> modified hardware and software to allow movement above normal range.
> We have been using Orbitron up to now as it allows sun tracking which
> is handy for dish calibration,
>
> In reality the setup may not be used too often for school contacts and
> we could perform a manual pre-test or simulation to see if flip is
> best.
> Another option is to just not use passes for school contacts that
> require flip or that will result in a signal loss in the middle of a
> pass.
>
> What I would like to happen is the software to calculate which option
> is best, to flip on the fly or not to flip
> The decision would be based on the speed of the motors and which mode
> is fastest to keep a signal locked.
>
> For example
>
> Time in seconds 1 AZ 260 El 45
> Time in seconds 2 Az 90 El 80
>
> Assuming both Elevation and Azimuth can move a 5 degrees per second
> Difference without Flip
> Az 170 El 35 Max Time to correct position 34 seconds
> Difference with Flip
> AZ 10 El 50 Max time to correct position 10 seconds
>
> So is there any program that does this and can output to WiSPDDE?
>
> Dan EI9FHB
> _______________________________________________
> Sent viaAMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings:http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:53:14 -0400
From: Jim Sanford <wb4gcs@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: 'Amsat - BBs' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Nova for Windows
Message-ID: <53AEC8CA.3060703@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
All:
Two problems with Nova after the move from Windows 7:
1. It doesn't run. Throws Exception ERegistryException in module
Nfw32.exe at 00079BEE. Failed to set data for ".
Can Nova run on Win7 (32bit??)
2. Can't find my registration number or activation code or whatever?
Any way to recover this?
Thanks, and good luck at FD!
73,
Jim
wb4gcs@xxxxx.xxxx
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: "wb4gcs@xxxxxx.xxxx <wb4gcs@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SATPC32
Message-ID:
<1738862633.934133.1403979312998.open-xchange@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
All:
Trying to make this work on a new install of Windows7, 64 bit. According to
the
help file, this should work, but every time I start SATPC32, it wants
IOPORT.SYS
in WINNT/SYSTEM32/DRIVERS. Which I created, but still doesn't start without
complaining.
Any suggestions?
Thanks & 73,
Jim
wb4gcs@xxxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:24:07 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <kc5qbc@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats
Message-ID: <001f01cf92fe$26adda30$74098e90$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Very pricey and not at all ideal for ssb.
An Elk yagi will perform much better and at less cost
GL, K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Floyd Rodgers
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:10 PM
To: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats
Has anyone tried M2 loops 2m/70cm for use with satellite contacts. Main
target is the SSB birds and yes on field day.
KC5QBC
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:25:19 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Just Spoke to the ISS
Message-ID:
<18691889.1403979919222.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Two Watts ? handheld radio ? tape measure Yagi ? Just spoke to the ISS
11:16AM PDT!
Clint K6LCS
----------------------------------
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.clintbradford.com
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:31:36 -0500
From: Floyd Rodgers <kc5qbc@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: Ted <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats
Message-ID: <53AF0A08.6050806@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Ok, I get it lousy for the money, lousy for signal. I do have better
stuff like circular beams, but just wanted a simple way to get my ONE
contact.
On 6/28/2014 1:24 PM, Ted wrote:
> Very pricey and not at all ideal for ssb.
>
> An Elk yagi will perform much better and at less cost
>
> GL, K7TRK
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 18:36:15 +0000
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Just Spoke to the ISS
Message-ID:
<CAN6TEUc43H2rs3JbjV7H_dLd3YZseLOAdCAarPzWK6ZmPUknpQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi!
About 2 minutes after you, I also had a quick QSO! Five watts
from my back yard, for my first Field Day QSO. Other regulars
were getting through before the ISS footprint covered more of
the continental USA. Then my phone started blowing up, with
tweets and SMS messages from those who heard NA1SS respond to
me. My Field Day could be complete with this QSO, but I'm
going to work portable HF from the yard later, and some western
satellite passes tonight for my satellite QSO bonus.
Did anyone try 70cm for a QSO? NA1SS was saying "2A DX", so a
second transmitter could have been on.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Two Watts ... handheld radio ... tape measure Yagi ... Just spoke to the ISS
> 11:16AM PDT!
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:41:35 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <kc5qbc@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT-BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats
Message-ID: <002001cf9300$97321a80$c5964f80$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
If you just need one contact, Floyd, you can probably do it with an HT. Look
at Clint Bradford's site for some tutorial
GL, K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: Floyd Rodgers [mailto:kc5qbc@xxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 11:32 AM
To: Ted
Cc: 'AMSAT-BB'
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats
Ok, I get it lousy for the money, lousy for signal. I do have better stuff
like circular beams, but just wanted a simple way to get my ONE contact.
On 6/28/2014 1:24 PM, Ted wrote:
> Very pricey and not at all ideal for ssb.
>
> An Elk yagi will perform much better and at less cost
>
> GL, K7TRK
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:03:39 -0700
From: Greg Dolkas <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)"
<amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Just Spoke to the ISS
Message-ID: <cf4f7ba6-2f52-480f-956f-322f5b039f82@xxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I was a few minutes after you (18:19utc). Really good signals from the ISS
on my home system. Taking care of a sick wife, so participating from home...
I also heard the 2 DX designation, so will try the 70cm side on the next pass.
Greg. KO6TH
On June 28, 2014 11:36:15 AM PDT, "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)"
<amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>About 2 minutes after you, I also had a quick QSO! Five watts
>from my back yard, for my first Field Day QSO. Other regulars
>were getting through before the ISS footprint covered more of
>the continental USA. Then my phone started blowing up, with
>tweets and SMS messages from those who heard NA1SS respond to
>me. My Field Day could be complete with this QSO, but I'm
>going to work portable HF from the yard later, and some western
>satellite passes tonight for my satellite QSO bonus.
>
>Did anyone try 70cm for a QSO? NA1SS was saying "2A DX", so a
>second transmitter could have been on.
>
>73!
>
>
>
>
>
>Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
>http://www.wd9ewk.net/
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Clint Bradford
><clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>wrote:
>
>> Two Watts ... handheld radio ... tape measure Yagi ... Just spoke to
>the ISS
>> 11:16AM PDT!
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
>author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:01:02 -0500
From: John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats
Message-ID: <53AF10EE.6090601@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 6/28/2014 1:24 PM, Ted wrote:
> Very pricey and not at all ideal for ssb.
Very happy with my M2 antennas.
42 element UHF 22 VHF both crossed element with pre amp
Grandpa always said "you get what you pay for"
Why I use them and FT847 (2) and not some HT from the backyard.
JAB
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:07:55 +0000
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Just Spoke to the ISS
Message-ID:
<CAN6TEUdzg0NtszxrsFFkkPrGB-06Xs3s1SZsXbSxFN8pTFpLhg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Greg,
I heard NA1SS answering you after I worked him. I also
heard a "WIA", possibly KB5WIA in northern California,
before I got through. He was having a better time with
the stations calling him before the ISS moved away from
the west coast.
Good luck on 70cm, and 73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Greg Dolkas <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> I was a few minutes after you (18:19utc). Really good signals from the ISS
> on my home system. Taking care of a sick wife, so participating from home...
>
> I also heard the 2 DX designation, so will try the 70cm side on the next
> pass.
>
> Greg. KO6TH
>
> On June 28, 2014 11:36:15 AM PDT, "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <
> amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> About 2 minutes after you, I also had a quick QSO! Five watts
>> from my back yard, for my first Field Day QSO. Other regulars
>> were getting through before the ISS footprint covered more of
>> the continental USA. Then my phone started blowing up, with
>> tweets and SMS messages from those who heard NA1SS respond to
>> me. My Field Day could be complete with this QSO, but I'm
>> going to work portable HF from the yard later, and some western
>> satellite passes tonight for my satellite QSO bonus.
>>
>> Did anyone try 70cm for a QSO? NA1SS was saying "2A DX", so a
>> second transmitter could have been on.
>>
>> 73!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
>> http://www.wd9ewk.net/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Two Watts ... handheld radio ... tape measure Yagi ... Just spoke to the
ISS
>>> 11:16AM PDT!
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:08:49 +0100
From: Fabiano Moser <fabianomoser@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Just Spoke to the ISS
Message-ID:
<CAM6o-ma+Dg7mhmpk3gcfYp5qK0NA4KQh5f4mMBZq34C+khw9Kg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Congratulations Clint!
Anyone can ask if possible that We are looking to a Chance in Portugal and
Europe?
Thank you!
Hope ISS made much as possibles Voice QSO?s over America!
73 Fabiano
CT7ABD
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Two Watts ? handheld radio ? tape measure Yagi ? Just spoke to the ISS
> 11:16AM PDT!
>
> Clint K6LCS
>
> ----------------------------------
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS
> http://www.clintbradford.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:34:41 -0700
From: "aa5uk@xxxxx.xxxx <aa5uk@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Just Spoke to the ISS
Message-ID:
<1403984081.48245.YahooMailAndroidMobile@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Did anybody record the ISS Pass. Trying to figure out if they came back to
K9MOT. I thought I heard a partial call.
73, Adrian AA5UK
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 9, Issue 212
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
