| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 07.02.14 20:16l 743 Lines 25277 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB945
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V9 45
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<PY1AYH<PY1AYH<CX2SA
Sent: 140207/1914Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:3235 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB945
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Problem Deploying from ISS (Clint Bradford)
2. Alliance U110 (Tom Lubbers K8TL)
3. NASA Announces Fifth Round of CubeSat Candidates (Clint Bradford)
4. Ham Video (Gaston BERTELS)
5. SO-50 sat//Arctic/n6spp (Eric T-N6SPP)
6. Colorado AMSAT net returns... (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
7. Listening on USB when operating CW (Clayton Coleman)
8. Re: Listening on USB when operating CW (Ng, Peter)
9. Re: Listening on USB when operating CW (Rich/wa4bue)
10. Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
(Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
11. Re: Listening on USB when operating CW (John Becker)
12. Re: Listening on USB when operating CW (Ng, Peter)
13. ICE/ISEE-3 to return to an Earth no longer capable of
speaking to it (ka2pbt)
14. SatPC32 CAT with IC-9100 (Gabriel - EA6VQ)
15. Re: [ARISS-i] Ham Video (???????? ?????? ??????????)
16. Re: ICE/ISEE-3 to return to an Earth no longer capable of
speaking to it (M5AKA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:22:51 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Problem Deploying from ISS
Message-ID:
<2913173.1391725371688.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>From NASA - Flight Engineer Koichi Wakata spent his morning working in the
Japanese Kibo module to install a deployer mechanism that will be used in
concert with the Kibo robotic arm to ?launch? the first set of NanoRacks
CubeSats. Wakata, who ran into some difficulty last week installing an
electronics box that would help control the deployment of the
mini-satellites, successfully installed that box after troubleshooting an
alignment issue. The deployment of the first batch of CubeSats, which had
originally been scheduled for this week before being postponed following
last week?s installation issue, has been postponed further to make sure that
the CubeSats do not fall into the intended orbit of the Global Precipitation
Measurement satellite launching later this month. The exact date of the
CubeSat deployment is still being evaluated.
Clint K6LCS
http://www.work-sat.com
----------------------------------
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.clintbradford.com
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:41:15 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Alliance U110
Message-ID:
<31952214.1391726475778.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I have an Alliance U110 taking up shack space. Used as an elevation rotor.
Hardware very oxidized but otherwise ok. If interested contact me at
k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.
Tom K8TL
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:50:43 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] NASA Announces Fifth Round of CubeSat Candidates
Message-ID: <E766B9F4-1D53-4621-859A-BA1AF9196A4F@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NASA RELEASE 14-042
NASA Announces Fifth Round of CubeSat Space Mission Candidates
NASA has selected 16 small satellites from nine states to fly as auxiliary
payloads aboard rockets planned to launch in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The
proposed CubeSats come from universities across the country, a primary
school, non-profit organizations and NASA field centers.
CubeSats are a class of research spacecraft called nanosatellites. The
cube-shaped satellites measure about 4 inches on each side, have a volume of
about 1 quart and weigh less than 3 pounds.
The selections are from the fifth round of the agency's CubeSat Launch
Initiative. After launch, the satellites will conduct technology
demonstration, educational research or science missions. The selected
spacecraft are eligible for launch after final negotiations, depending on
the availability of a flight opportunity. The organizations sponsoring
satellites are:
-- Boston University, Boston
-- Brown University, Providence, R.I.
-- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Fla.
-- Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Md.
-- Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Mass.
-- Marquette University, Milwaukee
-- NASA's Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
-- NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
-- New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, N.M.
-- St. Thomas More Cathedral School, Arlington, Va.
-- The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, Calif.
-- University of California, Los Angeles
-- University of Florida, Gainesville
-- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
-- Utah State University, Logan (2 CubeSats)
In the previous four rounds of the CubeSat Launch Initiative, 99 CubeSats
from 28 states were selected. To date, 27 CubeSats have launched through the
initiative as part of the agency's Launch Services Program's Educational
Launch of Nanosatellite Program. This year, four separate launches will
carry 17 CubeSats.
For additional information on NASA's CubeSat Launch Initiative, visit:
http://go.nasa.gov/CubeSat_initiative
For information about NASA and agency programs, visit:
http://www.nasa.gov
-end-
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:18:26 +0100
From: Gaston BERTELS <gaston.bertels@xxxxxx.xx>
To: ariss-i@xxxxx.xxxx ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
ariss-press@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Ham Video
Message-ID: <d9b6cd$nvh422@xxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
HamTV Bulletin #6
Februari 7, 2014
Ham Video Commissioning postponed
ESA postponed the Ham Video Commissioning to March 8.
Possible dates for the four Commissioning steps are March 8 (step 1),
March 9 (step 2), and March 16 (step 3).
Step 3 could be turned into step 4.
These dates are all on the weekend.
With this agenda, we have just 1 week of blank transmissions.
The agenda is still to be finalized.
73,
Gaston Bertels, ON4WF
ARISS Europe Chairman
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 19:51:19 -0900
From: Eric T-N6SPP <n6spp@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AL4S_Rich_ALT <riotqontrol@xxxxx.xxx>, K5TDN/KL7TN_Tyler N
<tyler.nicholas@xxx.xxx>, Joseph P_KL3JY <pepephelps21@xxxxx.xxx>,
Mark Sabel <mark.sabel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: KL4E_Craig_eaglervr <ruthann.bledsoe@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>,
KL7XJ_Dale_amsat <kl7xj@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 sat//Arctic/n6spp
Message-ID: <08CFCC42-2CEF-469B-B4FD-F958F3EDE7F7@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi guys(+bcc list here too)-Portable with
Ft-530 and anli800 tele whip from grid- BQ40SI76
Will try for the following passes:
(All AK local time)
2/7 friday 1849-1900 ,good w.usa/kl7
2/7 friiday 2027-2037, AK only pass?
2/8 saturday 1916-1926
2/9 sunday 1803-1815
(All times are within 2min accuracy)
Work schedule and wx permitting, I will be on these passes.. There is a
chance that I will move to another work qth in a few days (new grid?!)about
40miles west of here).
Hope to wk you
73 Eric n6spp
-------------- next part --------------
~via iP5
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800 (PST)
From: "Patrick STODDARD \(WD9EWK/VA7EWK\)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Colorado AMSAT net returns...
Message-ID:
<1391789516.32622.YahooMailBasic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi!
Last weekend, I saw a tweet that from Jeff K0JSC that AMSAT retweeted,
saying that there would be a new AMSAT net starting up on Thursdays at
1900 local time (currently 0200 UTC Friday). I e-mailed Jeff for more
information about the net, so I could update AMSAT's list of nets at:
http://ww2.amsat.org/?page_id=2113
I was also hoping to be able to connect into the net. Jeff explained that
the net was available on the Rocky Mountain Radio League's 146.940
MHz repeater near Denver, as well as on his system of repeaters in
Colorado. After some back-and-forth e-mails, I was able to find a way
to connect into the Allstar Link system and get to Jeff's repeater system
as the net was starting up last night. The web site for Jeff's repeater
system http://www.k0jsc.com/ provides an audio feed from the repeater
system, for those wanting to listen in on the activity.
The net control last night was Skyler KD0WHB, a 15-year-old ham. If
I didn't hear it mentioned on the net, I wouldn't have realized this was
the first time he had been a net control. Skyler read satellite-related
news bulletins, took check-ins, and asked everyone who checked in if
they had ever worked satellites. There were 10 check-ins to the net, 9
from around Colorado plus me.
Congratulations to KD0WHB for running a great net, K0JSC and the
Rocky Mountain Radio League for allowing those repeaters to be used
for the net, and everyone who checked in. It was great to hear the
discussion related to satellites.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:42:36 -0600
From: Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Listening on USB when operating CW
Message-ID:
<CAPovOwe8MLhZq3kaFqEsDkK_wD2TN5dgO6FFNWCvnP35RsqL-Q@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I assume many home station satellite operators utilize some kind of
full-duplex radio or combination of two radios for CW on the current
satellites.
Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
passband. I realize this is not a new phenomenon. I would assume
these drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler
correction. If they were using computer control, I would assume their
CW would stay on the same place in the transponder's passband. It is
visually apparent when the stations manually make larger frequency
movements because of the curve displayed on my SDR application's
waterfall display.
Many times I have been engaged in a QSO only to have someone CQ'ing on
CW drift across my existing QSO. Anyone who operates satellites has
probably had this happen to them many times. Sometimes myself or
others in QSO may try to tell the CW operator "Hello - QSO in
progress" but it is apparent they are not hearing us.
My question is, does it make sense for people using CW on the
satellites to have their receiver set to USB? Do some operators do
this? If listening on a VFO with USB and had your transmit VFO set to
CW, would this help make it easier for CW ops to know when they have
drifted into an existing voice QSO?
73
Clayton
W5PFG
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:19 -0800
From: "Ng, Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>
To: "'Clayton Coleman'" <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Message-ID:
<44D6D682B38A5D4FAA2DBDE4AFD3B87D01CE71321507@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections
dynamically change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this
mean anyone engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a
stable frequency?
73 Peter ve7ngp
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Clayton Coleman
Sent: February 7, 2014 08:43
To: AMSAT-BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Listening on USB when operating CW
I assume many home station satellite operators utilize some kind of
full-duplex radio or combination of two radios for CW on the current
satellites.
Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
passband. I realize this is not a new phenomenon. I would assume these
drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler correction. If
they were using computer control, I would assume their CW would stay on the
same place in the transponder's passband. It is visually apparent when the
stations manually make larger frequency movements because of the curve
displayed on my SDR application's waterfall display.
Many times I have been engaged in a QSO only to have someone CQ'ing on CW
drift across my existing QSO. Anyone who operates satellites has probably
had this happen to them many times. Sometimes myself or others in QSO may
try to tell the CW operator "Hello - QSO in progress" but it is apparent
they are not hearing us.
My question is, does it make sense for people using CW on the satellites to
have their receiver set to USB? Do some operators do this? If listening on
a VFO with USB and had your transmit VFO set to CW, would this help make it
easier for CW ops to know when they have drifted into an existing voice QSO?
73
Clayton
W5PFG
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:23:18 -0500
From: "Rich/wa4bue" <richard.siff@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Clayton Coleman" <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>, "AMSAT-BB"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Message-ID: <A9C4CE02D2714974AC8481C837489759@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
I am not a constant user of the sats, but I notice this with both some CW
and SSB transmissions.
Some sats just have drift.
It is still fun.
God Bless
R
W4BUE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clayton Coleman" <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:42 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Listening on USB when operating CW
>I assume many home station satellite operators utilize some kind of
> full-duplex radio or combination of two radios for CW on the current
> satellites.
>
> Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
> Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
> passband. I realize this is not a new phenomenon. I would assume
> these drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler
> correction. If they were using computer control, I would assume their
> CW would stay on the same place in the transponder's passband. It is
> visually apparent when the stations manually make larger frequency
> movements because of the curve displayed on my SDR application's
> waterfall display.
>
> Many times I have been engaged in a QSO only to have someone CQ'ing on
> CW drift across my existing QSO. Anyone who operates satellites has
> probably had this happen to them many times. Sometimes myself or
> others in QSO may try to tell the CW operator "Hello - QSO in
> progress" but it is apparent they are not hearing us.
>
> My question is, does it make sense for people using CW on the
> satellites to have their receiver set to USB? Do some operators do
> this? If listening on a VFO with USB and had your transmit VFO set to
> CW, would this help make it easier for CW ops to know when they have
> drifted into an existing voice QSO?
>
> 73
> Clayton
> W5PFG
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:24:58 -0700
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Message-ID:
<CAN6TEUeZYPo2UnaiKajabg6PMfY8+d+Fvxt4o6CLbJv4A91Maw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Clayton,
Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
> Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
> passband. I realize this is not a new phenomenon. I would assume
> these drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler
> correction. If they were using computer control, I would assume their
> CW would stay on the same place in the transponder's passband. It is
> visually apparent when the stations manually make larger frequency
> movements because of the curve displayed on my SDR application's
> waterfall display.
>
>
You're basically correct.
Stations using full computer control like what you get in SatPC32 will
be able to keep their frequencies steady at the satellite, but there
would still be some drift in what you observe on your SDR software's
waterfall display. I also see this when I'm working those stations
with my portable two-radio setup, where I'm having to make minor
adjustments on both my uplink and downlink frequencies to keep up with
the other station. For the mode B satellites where the operators are
only adjusting the higher of the two frequencies (uplink), it might be
easier to keep the downlink frequency at your receiver from drifting
so much. There would be some drift at the satellite, but not so much
on your waterfall display.
> My question is, does it make sense for people using CW on the
> satellites to have their receiver set to USB? Do some operators do
> this? If listening on a VFO with USB and had your transmit VFO set to
> CW, would this help make it easier for CW ops to know when they have
> drifted into an existing voice QSO?
>
For the few times I have worked CW via satellite, I always set my
receiver to USB. Without computer control, I would have to be
adjusting my receive VFO all the time to keep the CW signal in my
receiver's CW passband if it drifted. My ear can do an OK job of
dealing with the drifting signal (changing pitch of the CW) when
the receiver is in USB. When I use USB, I also avoid using any
narrow receive filtering.
For the FUNcube Dongle Pro+ and HDSDR, I only use USB on these
satellites. I may widen the audio passband HDSDR has for USB,
but I don't bother putting it into CW when copying CW signals.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:26:42 -0600
From: John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Message-ID: <52F51752.2080604@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections
dynamically change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this
mean anyone engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a
stable frequency?
>
by "stable" do you mean a freq already being used?
John, W0JAB
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:33:16 -0800
From: "Ng, Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>
To: "'John Becker'" <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Message-ID:
<44D6D682B38A5D4FAA2DBDE4AFD3B87D01CE71321508@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Yes, the frequency in use by the CW station that is not adjusting for
doppler will appear to be moving for stations that are adjusting for
doppler....right?
Peter ve7ngp
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: February 7, 2014 09:27
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections
dynamically change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this
mean anyone engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a
stable frequency?
>
by "stable" do you mean a freq already being used?
John, W0JAB
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:18:34 +0000
From: ka2pbt <ka2pbt@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] ICE/ISEE-3 to return to an Earth no longer capable
of speaking to it
Message-ID:
<CAE1O4xrmoudedhOe6rFJy4=NpXEkYAe-wbN4QBib5tznECXrqA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>From Emily Lakdawalla of The Planetary Society:
"So ISEE-3 will pass by us, ready to talk with us, but in the 30 years
since it departed Earth we've lost the ability to speak its language. I
wonder if ham radio operators will be able to pick up its carrier signal --
it's meaningless, I guess, but it feels like an honorable thing to do, a
kind of salute to the venerable ship as it passes by."
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2014/02070836-isee-3.html
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:22:29 +0100
From: "Gabriel - EA6VQ" <ea6vq@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 CAT with IC-9100
Message-ID: <01cf01cf2431$90a31cc0$b1e95640$@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am testing SatPC32 V.12.8c together with my new IC-9100 for Doppler
correction.
The only problem I notice is that when I activate the CAT (C+) it doesn't
set the rig in satellite mode and I have to do it manually in the
transceiver.
Not a very big trouble, but I wonder if I am doing something wrong as I
can't believe something so simple is not done by the program.
I will appreciate your comments.
73. Gabriel - EA6VQ
_________________________________________________________
Web-Site: HTTP://www.dxmaps.com
VQLog 3.1 (build 78): HTTP://www.vqlog.com
_________________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:43:02 +0000
From: ???????? ?????? ?????????? <Sergey.Samburov@xxxx.xx>
To: Gaston BERTELS <gaston.bertels@xxxxxx.xx>, "ariss-i@xxxxx.xxxx
<ariss-i@xxxxx.xxx>, "ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxxx <ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxx>,
"amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "ariss-press@xxxxx.xxxx
<ariss-press@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [ARISS-i] Ham Video
Message-ID:
<7396F8158AB78E4EA0F6591B38E0849CB3282C7C@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
OK
________________________________
From: ariss-i-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:ariss-i-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf
Of Gaston BERTELS
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:18 PM
To: ariss-i@xxxxx.xxxx ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
ariss-press@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [ARISS-i] Ham Video
HamTV Bulletin #6
Februari 7, 2014
Ham Video Commissioning postponed
ESA postponed the Ham Video Commissioning to March 8.
Possible dates for the four Commissioning steps are March 8 (step 1), March
9 (step 2), and March 16 (step 3).
Step 3 could be turned into step 4.
These dates are all on the weekend.
With this agenda, we have just 1 week of blank transmissions.
The agenda is still to be finalized.
73,
Gaston Bertels, ON4WF
ARISS Europe Chairman
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:03:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ICE/ISEE-3 to return to an Earth no longer
capable of speaking to it
Message-ID:
<1391799805.78234.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Frequencies given at http://mdkenny.customer.netspace.net.au/ISEE-3.pdf
73 Trevor M5AKA
On Friday, 7 February 2014, 18:46, ka2pbt <ka2pbt@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
From Emily Lakdawalla of The Planetary Society:
"So ISEE-3 will pass by us, ready to talk with us, but in the 30 years
since it departed Earth we've lost the ability to speak its language. I
wonder if ham radio operators will be able to pick up its carrier signal --
it's meaningless, I guess, but it feels like an honorable thing to do, a
kind of salute to the venerable ship as it passes by."
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2014/02070836-isee-3.html
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 9, Issue 45
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
