| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 21.12.13 21:04l 768 Lines 24465 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB8467
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V8 467
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0ANF<CX2SA
Sent: 131221/2002Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:1682 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB8467
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. tle repair program (Jim White)
2. Re: tle repair program (Paul Williamson)
3. PCSAT32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE) (Peter Wilson)
4. Re: Setup Complications (Ted)
5. Re: Setup Complications (Greg D)
6. SpaceX And Orbital Launches Rescheduled For Next Month (B J)
7. Re: SatPC32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE) (Alan)
8. Re: PCSAT32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE) (Erich Eichmann)
9. Re: tle repair program (Jim White)
10. VQ9JC (gkcarr@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
11. Re: tle repair program (Paul Williamson)
12. Re: tle repair program (Jim White)
13. ISS EVA #1 Successful (Clint Bradford)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:19:05 -0700
From: Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] tle repair program
Message-ID: <52B4D069.3070702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Does anyone know of a program that will 'repair' tle's so they have the
right format, spacings, checksums, etc. to assure they will read into
various tracking programs?
Jim
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:25:24 -0800
From: Paul Williamson <kb5mu@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: tle repair program
Message-ID: <8ECEB3C5-EA3C-47B0-A440-8F369A6CD50B@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
There?s still NASAWASH, which will do some of that.
http://mustbeart.com/software/nasawash.html
The program could do more to fix spacing problems, but some of what you want
is impossible or very difficult. The NASA format is pretty compact and
doesn?t have a lot of redundancy that would make it easy for a program to
figure out what was meant by some corrupted version.
-Paul
On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a program that will 'repair' tle's so they have the
right format, spacings, checksums, etc. to assure they will read into
various tracking programs?
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:48:36 -0000
From: "Peter Wilson" <protest@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] PCSAT32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE)
Message-ID: <000401cefdc4$db188e40$9149aac0$@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All,
I am planning to get started on the linear satellites and have bought a
G5500 rotator and two Wimo antennas for 2/70.
Before I put the rotator onto the roof I have been using it in the shack to
make sure it does what it should. However
when I get overhead passes, with the Flip 180 feature turned on, the rotator
doesn't take the antenna over the top, it still
stops at the maximum elevation and then turns to the new azimuth (not sure I
explained that very well).
Also, I have set SATPC to A+ hoping that the software would automatically
switch to the next satellite - it doesn't.
What am I doing wrong guys?
Is there a friendly operator in the Hertfordshire area of the UK I can make
contact with?
Thanks in advance
Peter
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:57:45 -0800
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Joel Black'" <w4jbb@xxxxxxx.xxx>, "'Amsat BB'"
<AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Setup Complications
Message-ID: <000301cefde7$a95adca0$fc1095e0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Joel, don't forget to consider an Elk on a rat shack (or other) rotor.
Manually aim it watching your software..1 feed line...nice gain...low
profile and much more efficient that the QFH & Lindy. Very cost efficient. I
have pix and some construction notes on request
GL, Ted
K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Joel Black
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 4:35 AM
To: Amsat BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Setup Complications
This is not going as smoothly as I had anticipated (does anything ever go as
anticipated?).
I had initially planned on using my Arrow II antenna without the diplexer
and an old Alliance U-110 rotor. As you'll read below, that doesn't look
like it will happen anytime soon.
Even though the group was helpful trying to get the Alliance U-110 rotor
controller synced (sunc?) up, It does not work reliably. It will turn in one
direction, but not the other. I do not have the money to send the controller
off for repair and Norm doesn't repair the U-100's and -110's. I could buy
one from him, but again, that's money that isn't in the budget. After this
issue, I took the controller apart and after a couple of hours, I finally
get it to step in one direction correctly, but I cannot get it to go in the
opposite direction. Shorting the shaft to the contacts in the controller
rotates the rotor correctly so I am fairly certain the rotor is good - I
have a controller issue. The online diagrams show a blow-up of the parts,
but not now to correctly put it back together (there is a tab on the back of
the black dial face and I'm not sure where that or the contacts on the
actual geared dial go. I'm going to reluctantly email Norm and ask him, but
he does this as a business and I don't want to interfere with that. In the
past, he has been nice enough to offer advice though. I'm still playing with
it and it hasn't "whooped" me yet.
For now, I do *not* have a rotor I can use. I am looking at purchasing
another controller if I'm too stupid for Norm to help ;) . They're fairly
cheap on the "Bay of E."
Without a reliable rotor, my pursuit has led me to QFH and Lindenblad
antennas. Which of the two would be the better performer? I have found the
pages with build instructions, but what do folks here think. I know they
will be poor performers compared to CP yagis, I'm not looking for that
comparison. I understand they're omni antennas with CP. I'm okay with that.
I realize I'm not concentrating all of my RF in a narrow beam width. That's
okay too. Yep, I will be disappointed. I'm disappointed now with the rotor
controller. :)
I had initially thought that I'd put whatever I got inside the attic.
With an omni, that probably wouldn't be prudent. I have enough coax for two
runs to the chimney about 60' away.
So, any thoughts comparing the QFH to the Lindy?
Again, thanks for all the help getting me going again.
73,
Joel - W4JBB
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:37:38 -0800
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Joel Black <w4jbb@xxxxxxx.xxx>, Amsat BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Setup Complications
Message-ID: <52B4F0E2.8050105@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Joel,
If you're into homebrewing something, instead of fixing a rotor
controller by making a new antenna, why not make a new controller?
The U1xx Rotor you have sounds like what I have. The controller is
simply a mechanical counter that moves a wheel either left or right 10
degrees per "click" of the internal microswitch, stopping when the wheel
aligns with the dial you set.
This can be done with a simple micro-controller chip and a bit of
software you can write.
My controller does full Az / El control of a pair of rotors, with both
manual and computer-controlled operation. A lot more than what you get
with the original controller, but you don't need to go that far.
Take a look at http://home.wavecable.com/~ko6th at the top of the page
on the left is a link to the design document. You can get a much more
cost effective micro-controller chip these days, compared to what I
used, but the principles are the same. Experiment and see what you can
build.
Have fun,
Greg KO6TH
Joel Black wrote:
> This is not going as smoothly as I had anticipated (does anything ever
> go as anticipated?).
>
> I had initially planned on using my Arrow II antenna without the
> diplexer and an old Alliance U-110 rotor. As you'll read below, that
> doesn't look like it will happen anytime soon.
>
> Even though the group was helpful trying to get the Alliance U-110
> rotor controller synced (sunc?) up, It does not work reliably. It will
> turn in one direction, but not the other. I do not have the money to
> send the controller off for repair and Norm doesn't repair the U-100's
> and -110's. I could buy one from him, but again, that's money that
> isn't in the budget. After this issue, I took the controller apart and
> after a couple of hours, I finally get it to step in one direction
> correctly, but I cannot get it to go in the opposite direction.
> Shorting the shaft to the contacts in the controller rotates the rotor
> correctly so I am fairly certain the rotor is good - I have a
> controller issue. The online diagrams show a blow-up of the parts, but
> not now to correctly put it back together (there is a tab on the back
> of the black dial face and I'm not sure where that or the contacts on
> the actual geared dial go. I'm going to reluctantly email Norm and ask
> him, but he does this as a business and I don't want to interfere with
> that. In the past, he has been nice enough to offer advice though. I'm
> still playing with it and it hasn't "whooped" me yet.
>
> For now, I do *not* have a rotor I can use. I am looking at purchasing
> another controller if I'm too stupid for Norm to help ;) . They're
> fairly cheap on the "Bay of E."
>
> Without a reliable rotor, my pursuit has led me to QFH and Lindenblad
> antennas. Which of the two would be the better performer? I have found
> the pages with build instructions, but what do folks here think. I
> know they will be poor performers compared to CP yagis, I'm not
> looking for that comparison. I understand they're omni antennas with
> CP. I'm okay with that. I realize I'm not concentrating all of my RF
> in a narrow beam width. That's okay too. Yep, I will be disappointed.
> I'm disappointed now with the rotor controller. :)
>
> I had initially thought that I'd put whatever I got inside the attic.
> With an omni, that probably wouldn't be prudent. I have enough coax
> for two runs to the chimney about 60' away.
>
> So, any thoughts comparing the QFH to the Lindy?
>
> Again, thanks for all the help getting me going again.
>
> 73,
> Joel - W4JBB
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:08:17 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SpaceX And Orbital Launches Rescheduled For Next
Month
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkMFA_=u5Qjc-XkTHcCjMGzy-bFEFYGvhLxU_sh4XGoAcQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/12/antares-cygnus-mission-to-iss-delayed/
http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/12/20/spacex-orbital-launches-slip-january/
http://www.americaspace.com/?p=47039
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 06:48:34 -0600
From: Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: CC <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SatPC32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE)
Message-ID: <002C8C99829C45D8A255A229B25AC659@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Peter,
Call??
What rotator interface are you using?
Do you have your desired satellites set in the PRIOR.SQF file?
73s,
Alan
WA4SCA
<-----Original Message-----
<From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx
<[mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Peter Wilson
<Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 2:49 PM
<To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: [amsat-bb] PCSAT32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE)
<
<Hi All,
<
<
<
<I am planning to get started on the linear satellites and have bought a
<G5500 rotator and two Wimo antennas for 2/70.
<
<
<
<Before I put the rotator onto the roof I have been using it in
<the shack to
<make sure it does what it should. However
<
<when I get overhead passes, with the Flip 180 feature turned
<on, the rotator
<doesn't take the antenna over the top, it still
<
<stops at the maximum elevation and then turns to the new
<azimuth (not sure I
<explained that very well).
<
<
<
<Also, I have set SATPC to A+ hoping that the software would
<automatically
<switch to the next satellite - it doesn't.
<
<
<
<What am I doing wrong guys?
<
<
<
<Is there a friendly operator in the Hertfordshire area of the
<UK I can make
<contact with?
<
<
<
<Thanks in advance
<
<
<
<Peter
<
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of
<the author.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
<satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:59:46 +0100
From: "Erich Eichmann" <erich.eichmann@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "Peter Wilson" <protest@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PCSAT32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE)
Message-ID: <EDF9C528CAB5448E89B2CBE772D8EECE@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Peter,
you have two options in menu "Rotor Setup":
1. Limit max. elevation to 90? and activate 450? azimuth range,
2. Limit azimut range to 360? and activate Flip mode (180? elevation).
You cannot combine 450? azimut and 180? elevation. That isn't necessary.
The purpose of both options is the same and the results practically also.. I
would prefer option 1 since it is mechanically easier.
The program performs automatic satellite switching (A+) only for satellites
that have an entry in aux. file "Prior.SQF". This text file can be opened
and edited form menu "?", "Auxiliary Files." The file itself contains the
necessary instructions.
73s, Erich, DK1TB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Wilson" <protest@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 9:48 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] PCSAT32 and Yaesu 5500 rotator (NEWBIE)
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am planning to get started on the linear satellites and have bought a
> G5500 rotator and two Wimo antennas for 2/70.
>
>
>
> Before I put the rotator onto the roof I have been using it in the shack
> to
> make sure it does what it should. However
>
> when I get overhead passes, with the Flip 180 feature turned on, the
> rotator
> doesn't take the antenna over the top, it still
>
> stops at the maximum elevation and then turns to the new azimuth (not sure
> I
> explained that very well).
>
>
>
> Also, I have set SATPC to A+ hoping that the software would automatically
> switch to the next satellite - it doesn't.
>
>
>
> What am I doing wrong guys?
>
>
>
> Is there a friendly operator in the Hertfordshire area of the UK I can
> make
> contact with?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:05:13 -0700
From: Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Paul Williamson <kb5mu@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: tle repair program
Message-ID: <52B5A019.1040505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Thanks Paul. I had forgotten about nasawash.
But it did not help with these sets because it requires a valid checksum
and these have no checksum byte at all. Of course adding an arbitrary
byte for the checksum does not help.
How about one that reads in tle's without regard to checksums and
creates AMSAT format. Then creates TLEs from the AMSAT format. Perhaps
that would clean them up. . .
Or something that reads a TLE and creates a valid checksum'd output. . .
Jim
On 12/20/2013 5:25 PM, Paul Williamson wrote:
> There?s still NASAWASH, which will do some of that.
>
> http://mustbeart.com/software/nasawash.html
>
> The program could do more to fix spacing problems, but some of what you
want is impossible or very difficult. The NASA format is pretty compact and
doesn?t have a lot of redundancy that would make it easy for a program to
figure out what was meant by some corrupted version.
>
> -Paul
>
> On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know of a program that will 'repair' tle's so they have the
right format, spacings, checksums, etc. to assure they will read into
various tracking programs?
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:21:13 -0600 (CST)
From: gkcarr@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] VQ9JC
Message-ID: <1387639273.848327033@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I just worked Jim, VQ9JC, our good /mm - ND9M - rover on 18069. CW up 1
Have not heard/worked him on the hamsats for donkey yonks.
73
George
WA5KBH
Thanks
nick
Office 337 593 8700
Cell 337 258 2527
Helping UL become a world Class Engineering and Educational School
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:55:39 -0800
From: Paul Williamson <kb5mu@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: tle repair program
Message-ID: <292D2C1D-0011-4A5C-852F-90A196B94191@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Where in the world are you getting TLE sets that don?t have a checksum? Boo!
It would be a one-line change to make NASAWASH always ignore the checksum on
input (it always regenerates the checksum on output). With a little more
effort this could be controlled by a command-line switch.
I can probably generate a quick hack executable for you if needed. Let me
know what platform. Or if you?re set up to compile C programs you shouldn?t
have any trouble modifying NASAWASH.
-Paul
On Dec 21, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Thanks Paul. I had forgotten about nasawash.
> But it did not help with these sets because it requires a valid checksum
and these have no checksum byte at all. Of course adding an arbitrary byte
for the checksum does not help.
>
> How about one that reads in tle's without regard to checksums and creates
AMSAT format. Then creates TLEs from the AMSAT format. Perhaps that would
clean them up. . .
>
> Or something that reads a TLE and creates a valid checksum'd output. . .
>
> Jim
>
> On 12/20/2013 5:25 PM, Paul Williamson wrote:
>> There?s still NASAWASH, which will do some of that.
>>
>> http://mustbeart.com/software/nasawash.html
>>
>> The program could do more to fix spacing problems, but some of what you
want is impossible or very difficult. The NASA format is pretty compact and
doesn?t have a lot of redundancy that would make it easy for a program to
figure out what was meant by some corrupted version.
>>
>> -Paul
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know of a program that will 'repair' tle's so they have the
right format, spacings, checksums, etc. to assure they will read into
various tracking programs?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:02:13 -0700
From: Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Paul Williamson <kb5mu@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: tle repair program
Message-ID: <52B5C995.5080805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Thanks Paul.
Yes, I had the same reaction when I realized there were no checksums and
I have fed back to this sat owner the errors and omissions in these tles
for their action. I have no control over that.
Alan sent me Rick von Glahn's program Element Manager and I got it to
fix these up enough they read into NOVA. But EM is flagging a couple of
values in red. I have pulsed Rick about what checks he makes. He lives
near me so I can go pound on his door if necessary :)
EM does seems to do a lot of stuff and I don't have the help file. But
I'm sure Rick will be supportive.
I think I'm good for now.
Jim
On 12/21/2013 9:55 AM, Paul Williamson wrote:
> Where in the world are you getting TLE sets that don?t have a checksum? Boo!
>
> It would be a one-line change to make NASAWASH always ignore the checksum
on input (it always regenerates the checksum on output). With a little more
effort this could be controlled by a command-line switch.
>
> I can probably generate a quick hack executable for you if needed. Let me
know what platform. Or if you?re set up to compile C programs you shouldn?t
have any trouble modifying NASAWASH.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Paul. I had forgotten about nasawash.
>> But it did not help with these sets because it requires a valid checksum
and these have no checksum byte at all. Of course adding an arbitrary byte
for the checksum does not help.
>>
>> How about one that reads in tle's without regard to checksums and creates
AMSAT format. Then creates TLEs from the AMSAT format. Perhaps that would
clean them up. . .
>>
>> Or something that reads a TLE and creates a valid checksum'd output. . .
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On 12/20/2013 5:25 PM, Paul Williamson wrote:
>>> There?s still NASAWASH, which will do some of that.
>>>
>>> http://mustbeart.com/software/nasawash.html
>>>
>>> The program could do more to fix spacing problems, but some of what you
want is impossible or very difficult. The NASA format is pretty compact and
doesn?t have a lot of redundancy that would make it easy for a program to
figure out what was meant by some corrupted version.
>>>
>>> -Paul
>>>
>>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know of a program that will 'repair' tle's so they have the
right format, spacings, checksums, etc. to assure they will read into
various tracking programs?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:31:49 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS EVA #1 Successful
Message-ID:
<24419652.1387647109650.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Now THAT was truly "reality TV." Astronauts finished a little ahead of time,
and are both
back in the air lock aboard the ISS.
Clint
----------------------------------
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.clintbradford.com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 8, Issue 467
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
