OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   02.09.13 21:09l 163 Lines 5435 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB8288
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V8 288
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<JE7YGF<7M3TJZ<CX2SA
Sent: 130902/1908Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:10683 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB8288
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: So50 (B J)
   2. Was So50, now center of the passband (Andrew Glasbrenner)
   3. Re: So50 (Bryce Salmi)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:11:39 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: So50
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkOSNbH7ApixPgciycUH2kb7Q9sRxNLyySS_n3EcjpjXdw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 9/2/13, Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Or just work the transponders (not the FM repeaters) and avoid the lids.
> That normally means being somewhere other than the exact middle of the
> passband. I have a few stations that I will absolutely not work until they
> clean up their operating style. Otherwise, I go out of my way to look for
> new ops.
>

If I happen to hear a QSO in progress when I'm checking for my
downlink on, say, FO-29, I move further up into the band and continue.
 I might miss some potential contacts but I'm not in anyone's way.

73s

Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL

<snip>


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:50:03 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Was So50, now center of the passband
Message-ID:
<29937931.1378147804101.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


Let me clarify a little. Previous to SatPC32 being the ubiquitous way to
operate the transponders, people tended to spread out much more on the
linear sats. CW was generally in the lower third to maybe middle, and voice
was often spread out over much more of the passband. Now...I love Sat PC32,
and I like full Doppler tuning, but just because the program defaults to the
middle of the passband doesn't mean everyone should operate within 10 KHz of
there.

See
http://s139.photobucket.com/user/glasbrenner/media/radio/FO-29FDanotated.jpg.h
tml?sort=3&o=13

Spread out and use the VFO! There's no reason to pile up like sardines in
the middle. Maybe even (GASP) edit the doppler.sqf file to put you elsewhere
in the passband to fine tune things at the start of the pass? Got a
schedule, or operating from a rare grid? Let everyone know where to look
(i.e. 25 khz up from the middle) and save yourself and others some QRM?

73, Drew KO4MA

-----Original Message-----
>From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
>Sent: Sep 2, 2013 2:11 PM
>To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: So50
>
>On 9/2/13, Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> Or just work the transponders (not the FM repeaters) and avoid the lids.
>> That normally means being somewhere other than the exact middle of the
>> passband. I have a few stations that I will absolutely not work until they
>> clean up their operating style. Otherwise, I go out of my way to look for
>> new ops.
>>
>
>If I happen to hear a QSO in progress when I'm checking for my
>downlink on, say, FO-29, I move further up into the band and continue.
> I might miss some potential contacts but I'm not in anyone's way.
>
>73s
>
>Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
>
><snip>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:50:25 -0700
From: Bryce Salmi <bstguitarist@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: So50
Message-ID:
<CAN5j0sq6RuiFQC=_y031gXNbCSNKbmZRDwZn6fHReCeviF1Q=w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I may be mistaken but wouldn't instances like this be viable candidates to
notify an ARRL Official Observer about? They are there to help educate
people about proper operating practices and nudge others who are pushing
the limits.

Bryce
KB1LQC


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:11 AM, B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> On 9/2/13, Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > Or just work the transponders (not the FM repeaters) and avoid the lids.
> > That normally means being somewhere other than the exact middle of the
> > passband. I have a few stations that I will absolutely not work until
> they
> > clean up their operating style. Otherwise, I go out of my way to look for
> > new ops.
> >
>
> If I happen to hear a QSO in progress when I'm checking for my
> downlink on, say, FO-29, I move further up into the band and continue.
>  I might miss some potential contacts but I'm not in anyone's way.
>
> 73s
>
> Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
>
> <snip>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 8, Issue 288
****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 18.10.2024 17:23:23lGo back Go up