| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 27.09.12 13:32l 918 Lines 27457 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB7321
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 321
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<ON4HU<CX2SA
Sent: 120927/1129Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:2168 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB7321
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. LVB tracker es laptop prob. (Tom)
2. New items on the AMSAT-UK Web Shop (Ciaran Morgan)
3. Re: beep box help (Gordon JC Pearce)
4. Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7, Issue 312)
(Steve May)
5. Re: beep box help (Tony Langdon)
6. Re: beep box help (Mark L. Hammond)
7. Re: beep box help (Timothy Stranex)
8. Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7, Issue 312)
(Bob- W7LRD)
9. Propulsion on Phase-3 Satellites.. (Peter Guelzow)
10. Re: beep box help (Mark L. Hammond)
11. Recent N8RO/P Western Trip (Ronald Oldham)
12. UT1FG/MM (Omar Alvarez)
13. Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7, Issue
312) (Gus 8P6SM)
14. Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7, Issue
312) (Trevor .)
15. ISS_KIBO CubeSats deployment postponed (Mineo Wakita)
16. Re: IC-910 with Clifton Labs IF buffer and SDR-IQ
(Wouter Weggelaar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:01:54 -0500
From: Tom <t.gentry@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] LVB tracker es laptop prob.
Message-ID: <C334E892-249F-4739-A99A-0DD531F03B65@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I had a very similar issue with an Acer lt and LVB Tracker. Never solved it
but replaced lt with mini tower and all is well. It seems to be an issue of
Win7 or perhaps voltage levels on the USB. Try a tower to prove it is the lt.
73,
Tom
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:00:04 +0100
From: "Ciaran Morgan" <Ciaran@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
To: "'Amsat - BBs'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] New items on the AMSAT-UK Web Shop
Message-ID: <000801cd9c21$855ab2e0$901018a0$@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello folks,
David/G0MRF, part of the FUNcube team, has designed and manufactured a 2m
Filtered Preamp for use with the FUNcube dongle or any 2m receiver and has
made it available for purchase through the AMSAT-UK web shop.
I currently have two versions of the preamp. The first is a kit form and
includes all the components required to build the preamp yourself.
The second is a prebuilt version. The stock on the prebuilt version is very
limited.
Both kit and prebuilt versions are on sale for ?47 plus p&p.
You can read a bit more on the AMSAT-UK web site at http://www.uk.amsat.org
- look under the ?Projects? section and you will also be able to read the
construction notes as well as the measurement report carried out on the
preamp.
The AMSAT-UK web shop is at http://shop.amsat.org.uk and the premps appear
under the ?Hardware? category in the catalogue.
AMSAT-UK is grateful to David/G0MRF for his work on the preamp.
73
Ciaran/M0XTD
(email : m0xtd at amsat.org)
AMSAT-UK Shop Manager
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:25:11 +0100
From: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: beep box help
Message-ID: <506364A7.5030307@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 26/09/12 19:18, Mark L. Hammond wrote:
> Looks to me like the program will decode the packets right on the
> client software.
Not much help if there is no way to run the client software. It's
Windows-only. I don't know anyone that uses Windows.
> Packets copied, decoded. Then, there's always the documentation on
> the web. Isn't this what you say isn't there?
>
> What is so secret?
>
>
http://fspace.edu.vn/F_1_packet_for_radio_operators/F-1_Telemetry_Decoder_User
Manual.pdf
You're right, that one has it. Many of the other projects don't appear
to publish their spec, though.
--
Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:37:03 -0400
From: Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7,
Issue 312)
Message-ID:
<CAE0P9Veqyytae5R_-7DOCGZuWHtASVkvSc+SX75u5wrwz30Esw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I don't know why everyone thinks it is so expensive to send something to
space. Here is a video of a couple of guys that sent some Natural Light
beer "into space" with a weather balloon. Why can't we just get together
with these guys and send up a satellite?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_00eZtsuJ9M
Note: Before I get my inbox filled up with "Yer an idiot! There's more to
it than that!!!" please understand that I know fully well that there is
just a bit more to it to get a satellite into orbit than what the guys do
in this video. It is still a well-produced video of about the last thing
I'd think of to send up on a balloon.
Steve, W5IEM
*This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying the communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the email along with any
and all attachments from your system*
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:24:27 +1000
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: beep box help
Message-ID: <50637292.054b420a.7a23.ffffed83@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 03:44 AM 9/27/2012, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
>I'd love to get involved in that, and indeed I think a lot of the
>current thread was spawned by a discussion of tracking the F-1 sat.
>Unfortunately, there is only a Windows binary available of this
>software. I know amateur radio is a technical hobby, but I haven't
>the inclination to be a computer nerd as well, and I haven't the
>time, inclination or money to buy another computer and a copy of
>Windows and all the expensive training courses.
Well, the modern ham does need some level of computer expertise,
though not necessarily programming. You still have a few
options. The software may run under WINE (which runs on Linux and OS
X) - if this is the case, you're in luck, you don't need Windows, or
there's a number of virtual machine options - both free and
commercial that you could load a copy of Windows in. Virtualbox is a
free option, VMware is a commercial one that is no cost for Linux
(VMware Server), some cost for Macs. Parallels is another commercial
Mac alternative. Of course, with this approach, you'd need a copy of
Windows to install into the virtual machine.
Sadly, a lot of ham radio apps do require Windows. I have the same
issues, but VMware Fusion (with Windows 7) on the Mac gets around
that quite nicely.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:25:03 -0400
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: beep box help
Message-ID:
<CAPRXzyoaEse4szocD=N-enGD+MB1yRGFfVoEj+Qs6vdteL8a_w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Well...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> On 26/09/12 19:18, Mark L. Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Looks to me like the program will decode the packets right on the
>> client software.
>
>
> Not much help if there is no way to run the client software. It's
> Windows-only. I don't know anyone that uses Windows.
Hyperbole?
>
>
>> Packets copied, decoded. Then, there's always the documentation on
>> the web. Isn't this what you say isn't there?
>>
>> What is so secret?
>>
>>
>>
http://fspace.edu.vn/F_1_packet_for_radio_operators/F-1_Telemetry_Decoder_User
Manual.pdf
>
>
> You're right, that one has it. Many of the other projects don't appear to
> publish their spec, though.
>
>
> --
> Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ
> _______________________________________________
Really? Maybe my Windows computer has special features that yours doesn't ;)
Let's see:
http://www.fit.ac.jp/~tanaka/fitsat.shtml
and
http://techedsat.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32&Itemid=18
7
and
https://sites.google.com/site/jq1ziijq1zij/home/shou-xin-fang-fa
(I'll let you translate that one...can't do all the work for you, no
fun in that! ;)
And the mother lode!
http://www.dk3wn.info/satellites.shtml
Just look around...search...it's pretty much there from what I can tell.
73,
--
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:33:55 +0200
From: Timothy Stranex <tstranex@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: beep box help
Message-ID:
<CABtiSaWkSRgdHMBFpN3y-EBSaRTeOMXg6SYXn3gEAYoYRnwNMQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hi
There are also telemetry decoders available for various satellites on
the Carpcomm website. For example:
http://carpcomm.com/satellite/fspace1
http://carpcomm.com/satellite/swisscube
http://carpcomm.com/satellite/csswe
http://carpcomm.com/satellite/horyu2
Just click "Submit data", enter the morse characters or hex data frame
that you've received, and it will be decoded and the latest telemetry
values will be displayed on the page for everyone to see. We're
continuously working on adding decoders for all the new satellites.
Regards,
Timothy
HB9FFH
http://carpcomm.com/
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Looks to me like the program will decode the packets right on the
> client software.
> Packets copied, decoded. Then, there's always the documentation on
> the web. Isn't this what you say isn't there?
>
> What is so secret?
>
>
http://fspace.edu.vn/F_1_packet_for_radio_operators/F-1_Telemetry_Decoder_User
Manual.pdf
>
> F-1?s AX.25 packet format
> Beacon Data format:
> No
> Data
> Description
> Size (bit)
> 1
> Date time
> Date: dd/mm/y: 5/4/3=12 bits
> 29
> Time: hh/mm/ss: 5/6/6=17 bits
> 2
> Battery voltage
> Battery voltage multiplied by 100, divide by 100 to get actual value
> 11
> 3
> Solar cells voltage
> Solar cells voltage multiplied by 10, divide by 10 to get actual value
> 8
> 4
> Temperature 1
> oC (side 1)
> 8
> 5
> Temperature 2
> oC (side 2)
> 8
> 6
> Temperature 3
> oC (side 3)
> 8
> 7
> Temperature 4
> oC (side 4)
> 8
> 8
> Temperature 5
> oC (side 5)
> 8
> 9
> Temperature 6
> oC (side 6)
> 8
> 10
> Temperature 7
> oC (inside solar cell)
> 8
> 11
> Temperature 8
> oC (onboard)
> 8
> Total
> 112 bits = 14 bytes
> Note:
> - Temperature reading from sensors, will be added with 100 before
> transmission to ensure a positive number so please subtract 100 to get
> actual value
> - 112 bits, divide to 14 chunks of 8bits, each chunk becomes one byte
> - years beginning from 2012, current year = 2012 -> Y = 0
> Mark N8MH
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
wrote:
>> On 26/09/12 11:40, Stefan Wagener wrote:
>>
>>> What you do with the data is totally up to you. Many of us help these
>>> teams
>>> and forward telemetry information to them. Some teams have developed
>>> special software to decode the data and allow us to actively monitor the
>>> status of the satellite and any experiments.
>>
>>
>> I'd love to get involved in that, and indeed I think a lot of the current
>> thread was spawned by a discussion of tracking the F-1 sat. Unfortunately,
>> there is only a Windows binary available of this software. I know amateur
>> radio is a technical hobby, but I haven't the inclination to be a computer
>> nerd as well, and I haven't the time, inclination or money to buy another
>> computer and a copy of Windows and all the expensive training courses.
>>
>> I do wonder if having the telemetry in an unpublished format counts as
using
>> a "secret code"?
>>
>> --
>> Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> --
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7,
Issue 312)
Message-ID:
<1992137259.32823.1348695785733.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxxx
xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
cool Steve hic cool!!
73 Bob W7LRD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve May" <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:37:03 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol. 7, Issue
312)
I don't know why everyone thinks it is so expensive to send something to
space. Here is a video of a couple of guys that sent some Natural Light
beer "into space" with a weather balloon. Why can't we just get together
with these guys and send up a satellite?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_00eZtsuJ9M
Note: Before I get my inbox filled up with "Yer an idiot! There's more to
it than that!!!" please understand that I know fully well that there is
just a bit more to it to get a satellite into orbit than what the guys do
in this video. It is still a well-produced video of about the last thing
I'd think of to send up on a balloon.
Steve, W5IEM
*This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying the communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the email along with any
and all attachments from your system*
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:53:23 +0200
From: Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Propulsion on Phase-3 Satellites..
Message-ID: <50637953.2000101@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hi,
> Since you brought up "politics"...all I know is that trying the same thing
over and over usually ensures getting the same results. I dont think we are
going to see an AO-10,13 or 40 again because of the propulsion issue. I
doubt any group is going to let a pyalod on with a motor unless there are
"real rocket scientist" doing the job...the record has not been all that
sterling.
Just for clarification:
AMSAT P3-A on Ariane-1 L02 together with Firewheel.
AMSAT P3-B / AO-10 on Ariane-1 L06 with ECS-1 first European
Communication Satellite.
AMSAT P3-C / AO-13 on Ariane-401 with Panamsat-1 and METEOSAT-P2.
AMSAT P3-D / AO-40 on Ariane-507 with Panamsat PAS-1R and STRV-1C,
STRV-1D for DERA.
AMSAT was also flying explosive Bolt-cutters for the clamp-bands on
these missions.
For one of the earlier launchers AMSAT-DL designed and build
Separation-Sequencers for the non-AMSAT payload/adapters as part of some
"launch compensation".
The SBS on P3-D was provided by AMSAT and it was carrying the heaviest
primary payload on Ariane-5 at that time. Was this "too risky" for the
paying primary payload?
No, because we delivered and went through all required quality gates..
The propulsion system always had to go through several Safety
Submissions Phases in which we had to certify and demonstrate that the
launch configuration of critical software and hardware commands is in
conformity with the CSG safety regulations and has been tested as an
effective inhibit to all the potential hazardous commands (means also
propulsion).
The command inhibit circuits (hardware and software) dedicated to
hazardous systems have been tested and validated and they are working
properly.
A system check was successfully performed at CSG (Center Spatial
Guyanaise) facilities before loading with fuel.
There were 7 Levels of Safety Barriers (hardware and software) to
ensure this !!!
So don't even think or believe that any P3-Satellite would have ever
been launched without them (the launch provider) knowing what we were doing!
Neither CSG (also responsible for the safety of the people at the launch
center), or ESA or Arianespace or any of the other Payloads and
Customers would do that..
We have been already discussing P3-E in details and there was no doubt
about it concerning all pre- and post-launch operations, even after the
fate of AO-40!!
What happened to AO-40 later are two completely different shoes.. And
even this was discussed with them in lengthy and they were not
concerned... Shit happens..
We were told to be still satisfied since our bird was alive for more
than 4 years (!) compared to other commercial satellites they have been
launching and which failed only days later for even more stupid reasons..
So let's stop this kind of destructive assumptions making and
conclusion making, if you don't know what you are talking about..
*** The Launch is the problem... not the propulsion !! ***
If we bring enough money, they will for sure take P3-E into orbit as
soon as possible..
The rough number of 10 Million Euro is indeed the commercial value,
nothing we paid in the past or will be in the future..
We always have to look for "compensation"...
So, we will continue to fight for it and to find ways to launch P3-E.
73s Peter DB2OS
There is a saying: Where there's a will, there's a way. A firm belief in
the feasibility of a case involving the feasibility of an idea is the
basis of all creative thought and action....
If you don't even try and keep your goals low, you will never get beyond
earth surface...
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:58:22 -0400
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Timothy Stranex <tstranex@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: beep box help
Message-ID: <50637a7f.8b46e00a.6958.4e07@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Very nice, Timothy! Thanks for making telem easy to decode and for sharing
your links.
73,
Mark N8MH
At 11:33 PM 9/26/2012 +0200, Timothy Stranex wrote:
>Hi
>
>There are also telemetry decoders available for various satellites on
>the Carpcomm website. For example:
>
>http://carpcomm.com/satellite/fspace1
>http://carpcomm.com/satellite/swisscube
>http://carpcomm.com/satellite/csswe
>http://carpcomm.com/satellite/horyu2
>
>Just click "Submit data", enter the morse characters or hex data frame
>that you've received, and it will be decoded and the latest telemetry
>values will be displayed on the page for everyone to see. We're
>continuously working on adding decoders for all the new satellites.
>
>Regards,
>Timothy
>HB9FFH
>http://carpcomm.com/
>
>On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
>> Looks to me like the program will decode the packets right on the
>> client software.
>> Packets copied, decoded. Then, there's always the documentation on
>> the web. Isn't this what you say isn't there?
>>
>> What is so secret?
>>
>>
http://fspace.edu.vn/F_1_packet_for_radio_operators/F-1_Telemetry_Decoder_User
Manual.pdf
>>
>> F-1’s AX.25 packet format
>> Beacon Data format:
>> No
>> Data
>> Description
>> Size (bit)
>> 1
>> Date time
>> Date: dd/mm/y: 5/4/3=12 bits
>> 29
>> Time: hh/mm/ss: 5/6/6=17 bits
>> 2
>> Battery voltage
>> Battery voltage multiplied by 100, divide by 100 to get actual value
>> 11
>> 3
>> Solar cells voltage
>> Solar cells voltage multiplied by 10, divide by 10 to get actual value
>> 8
>> 4
>> Temperature 1
>> oC (side 1)
>> 8
>> 5
>> Temperature 2
>> oC (side 2)
>> 8
>> 6
>> Temperature 3
>> oC (side 3)
>> 8
>> 7
>> Temperature 4
>> oC (side 4)
>> 8
>> 8
>> Temperature 5
>> oC (side 5)
>> 8
>> 9
>> Temperature 6
>> oC (side 6)
>> 8
>> 10
>> Temperature 7
>> oC (inside solar cell)
>> 8
>> 11
>> Temperature 8
>> oC (onboard)
>> 8
>> Total
>> 112 bits = 14 bytes
>> Note:
>> - Temperature reading from sensors, will be added with 100 before
>> transmission to ensure a positive number so please subtract 100 to get
>> actual value
>> - 112 bits, divide to 14 chunks of 8bits, each chunk becomes one byte
>> - years beginning from 2012, current year = 2012 -> Y = 0
>> Mark N8MH
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
wrote:
>>> On 26/09/12 11:40, Stefan Wagener wrote:
>>>
>>>> What you do with the data is totally up to you. Many of us help these
>>>> teams
>>>> and forward telemetry information to them. Some teams have developed
>>>> special software to decode the data and allow us to actively monitor the
>>>> status of the satellite and any experiments.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd love to get involved in that, and indeed I think a lot of the current
>>> thread was spawned by a discussion of tracking the F-1 sat. Unfortunately,
>>> there is only a Windows binary available of this software. I know amateur
>>> radio is a technical hobby, but I haven't the inclination to be a computer
>>> nerd as well, and I haven't the time, inclination or money to buy another
>>> computer and a copy of Windows and all the expensive training courses.
>>>
>>> I do wonder if having the telemetry in an unpublished format counts as
using
>>> a "secret code"?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ronald Oldham <rgoldham@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Recent N8RO/P Western Trip
Message-ID:
<1348701985.49293.YahooMailRC@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Many thanks to all of you for the contacts during my recent western trip
through
NM, AZ, CA, NV, UT, CO and TX. I have uploaded all contacts to LOTW. If you
need
a paper card please contact me by e-mail with the contact details and I will
send one to you.
Again many thanks for the QSOs.
73,
Ron - N8RO
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Omar Alvarez <xe1aom@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] UT1FG/MM
Message-ID:
<1348719171.32854.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Anyone have information about where is Yuri UT1FG/MM. He was spoted in 6 mts
for? KH7Y and CX2TQ
Regards
Omar
XE1AO
DK89df
?
********************************
M.C. Omar Alvarez C?rdenas
Facultad de Telematica, U de C
316 1075
xe1aom@xxxx.xx
omar_ac@xxxxxxx.xxx
********************************
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:49:44 -0400
From: Gus 8P6SM <8p6sm@xxxx.xxx>
To: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol.
7, Issue 312)
Message-ID: <5063F708.6080800@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 09/26/2012 10:06 AM, Trevor . wrote:
> Ion motor, see http://www.uk.amsat.org//p=5153
This 404'd.
--
73, de Gus 8P6SM
The Easternmost Isle
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:59:50 +0100 (BST)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: Gus 8P6SM <8p6sm@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Launch Costs (was-re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol.
7, Issue 312)
Message-ID:
<1348732790.31494.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Typo, should have read http://www.uk.amsat.org/?p=5153
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Thu, 27/9/12, Gus 8P6SM <8p6sm@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > Ion motor, see http://www.uk.amsat.org//p=5153
>
> This 404'd.
>
> -- 73, de Gus 8P6SM
> The Easternmost Isle
>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:10:32 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS_KIBO CubeSats deployment postponed
Message-ID: <5188749EB1AE40C29529821A45D333A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
JAXA says,
The deployment of CubeSats were planned on September 27. But it was postponed
under the influence of the separation postponement of ATV-3. We are examining
it now about the release enforcement day after the postponement.
http://iss.jaxa.jp/kibo/about/jssod/
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:27:18 +0200
From: Wouter Weggelaar <wouterweg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Amsat-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: IC-910 with Clifton Labs IF buffer and SDR-IQ
Message-ID:
<CAKXf1rG8NJudtsnBOSzGEEnCik98b9RBTZd8dnNijXiD-zoVwA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Its almost the same as the one I have done for 9k6 BPSK reception.
Works prefectly
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Looks like a cool mod. I wish I had the soldering skills.
>
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Droid RAZR
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 321
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
