| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 25.07.12 21:11l 360 Lines 10584 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB7234
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 234
Path: IZ3LSV<IR1UAW<IK1NHL<CX2SA
Sent: 120725/1903Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:63775 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB7234
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Looking for Maspro relays (i8cvs)
2. Using less mobile bandwidth in replies. (Tom Gentry)
3. Re: Using less mobile bandwidth in replies. (Jim Wright)
4. Re: Using less mobile bandwidth in replies. (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
5. One of our EM55 satellite operators (Rick - WA4NVM)
6. satpc32 sqf adjustment (Lizeth Norman)
7. Re: One questiong for ant hombrewers... (Art McBride)
8. Re: Looking for Maspro relays (PE0SAT | Amateur Radio)
9. New website (LOGERSATGROUP SAT)
10. Rochester ISS TV News Report (Trevor .)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:26:51 +0200
From: "i8cvs" <domenico.i8cvs@xxx.xx>
To: "PE0SAT | Amateur Radio" <pe0sat@xxxxx.xx>, "Amsat - BBs"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Looking for Maspro relays
Message-ID: <008201cd69e3$0abf1500$0301a8c0@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Jan PE0SAT
It is not a coax relay and so you can replace it with a similar one with
the same contact size.
By the way it is much better to replace it with a small coax relay model
CX 120 A made by TohTsu wich costs Euro 38,00 in Italy and is suitable
for coax cable RG58/CU
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message -----
From: "PE0SAT | Amateur Radio" <pe0sat@xxxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 4:10 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Looking for Maspro relays
>
> Hi, thanks for reading.
>
> I have to replace the relay for RHCP/LHCP switching of the VHF model
> because it is no longer switching.
>
> Is there anybody out there who knows where I can get these?
>
>
> 73 Jan PE0SAT
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:46:53 -0500
From: Tom Gentry <t.gentry@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Using less mobile bandwidth in replies.
Message-ID: <500F25DD.9020009@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
This BBS is a joy to read and in general has great deportment (that's
what teachers call behaviour) and very few flame incidents. However I
have a suggestion to reduce congestion, at least on my mobile devices.
Before you click on reply to answer someones email, highlight the text
you are actually replying to and not the entire message with footers
warnings etc. Then when you click reply, only the pertinent part shows
up in your reply. Type your reply and then hit send. It is a really
fast way to cut down on the number of characters that need to be processed.
73,
Tom K5VOU
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:40:28 -0400
From: Jim Wright <wrightjrjr@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Using less mobile bandwidth in replies.
Message-ID: <500F326C.3000606@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 7/24/2012 6:46 PM, Tom Gentry wrote:
> This BBS is a joy to read and in general has great deportment (that's
> what teachers call behaviour) and very few flame incidents.
How does one do that highlight on an android? Mine keeps scrolling away
when I try it.
Jim
ps: I send this from the desk top after trying on the droid.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:00:44 -0400
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Jim Wright <wrightjrjr@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Using less mobile bandwidth in replies.
Message-ID:
<CAEMY9Ff0oYbb_bxRvEdL1Q-yCYvbnbHSDA4qscmgQOgShpLC2A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I just uncheck "quote text" and just my response goes through.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:40:22 -0500
From: "Rick - WA4NVM" <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] One of our EM55 satellite operators
Message-ID: <CDC88363F0D84F078D21A9CE7327809D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The Herb S. Brier Instructor of the Year Award
Joe Lowenthal, WA4OVO, of Memphis, Tennessee, was named the recipient of the
2012 Herb S. Brier Instructor of the Year Award. The Board noted that
Lowenthal "has a demonstrated record as an outstanding instructor for
Amateur Radio classes, with hundreds of students benefitting from his
expertise in the classroom and generous mentoring."
Herb S. Brier, W9AD, long-time CQ Novice Editor, represented the spirit of
effective, caring Amateur Radio instruction. The ARRL, in conjunction with
the Lake County (Indiana) Amateur Radio Club, sponsors this award in his
memory to recognize the very best in volunteer Amateur Radio instruction and
recruitment.
You may have worked Joe from Maine this year. That's his second home, lately.
73 all,
Rick WA4NVM
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:41:24 -0500
From: Lizeth Norman <normanlizeth@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] satpc32 sqf adjustment
Message-ID:
<CAJUhCTPuezm1EJnBey_mR4Rn7xfivj=uvdOmyB=0xHhwPrSueQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi all!
What is the offset in satpc32 for AO-7? Will be up for the 9z ish pass.
73 es see you on the birds
n3ykf/oa4
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:41:07 -0700
From: "Art McBride" <kc6uqh@xxx.xxx>
To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?'P=E1vel_Milan=E9s_Costa_co7wt'?="
<co7wt@xxxxxx.xx.xx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: One questiong for ant hombrewers...
Message-ID: <A09C2B631A784798B0736192E218B90F@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Pavel,
You may want to consider a one wavelength one turn QFH. Its best gain is
below 30 degrees above the horizon. The pattern is still omni.
Art,
KC6UQH
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of P?vel Milan?s Costa co7wt
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 5:14 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] One questiong for ant hombrewers...
Hi to all.
I'm Pavel Milanes, CO7WT, from Cuba, member of the GROS.
I have a question in my head and I have not enough arguments to decide, I
have to BUILD my own antennas, so having this into account:
What is the most cost effective (cost / gain / difficult in building / omni
pattern) that can I build?
I have in plans to build a LNA from a servian pdf using the BF998 MOSFET,
that will be at the antenna point, Andrew Heliax LDF-4 50 ohms for the
download to the shack and of course this is a FIXED antenna, with NO rotors.
I have heard of and modeled all this ones and all have his pros and cons...
- QFH
- Turnstile dipoles
- Turnstile moxons (100 ohms)
- Eggbeater
I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that the best election will be the QFH,
because his really omni pattern, beside the fact that I will have to build
two of them (rhcp and lhcp switched properly with a relay) and the lower
gain will be 'compensated' with the LNA...
Please, I don't want to start a flag war, only heard about some experiences
to decide my self.
Last tip, TRX on 70 cm will be a Kenwood channelized TK-382N for FM (5W) and
TRX on 2m will be a Alinco DR-130.
73
Este mensaje ha sido enviado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que
ofrece la Federacion de Radioaficionados de Cuba a sus miembros para
respaldar el cumplimiento de los objetivos de la organizacion y su politica
informativa. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el
servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:23:39 +0200
From: PE0SAT | Amateur Radio <pe0sat@xxxxx.xx>
To: i8cvs <domenico.i8cvs@xxx.xx>
Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Looking for Maspro relays
Message-ID: <a89fa7180b1b11917a58c2fcfc06801d@xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Hi Domenico,
Thanks for the response.
What is the reason for replacing it with a CX 120?
When I do replace them with a CX 120 will it be possible to use more HF
power?
73 Jan PE0SAT
On 24-07-2012 23:26, i8cvs wrote:
> Hi Jan PE0SAT
>
> It is not a coax relay and so you can replace it with a similar one
> with
> the same contact size.
>
> By the way it is much better to replace it with a small coax relay
> model
> CX 120 A made by TohTsu wich costs Euro 38,00 in Italy and is
> suitable
> for coax cable RG58/CU
>
> 73" de
>
> i8CVS Domenico
>
>>
>> Hi, thanks for reading.
>>
>> I have to replace the relay for RHCP/LHCP switching of the VHF model
>> because it is no longer switching.
>>
>> Is there anybody out there who knows where I can get these?
>>
>>
>> 73 Jan PE0SAT
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:58:25 +0200
From: LOGERSATGROUP SAT <loggersat@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] New website
Message-ID:
<CAOg_W9txRNCVXYxEnH3LPMvHCsWVA0Ea64HMJd7kgdZ8nO7AcQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi, everybody there is a new website where everybody ciuld post all reports
from sats in use.
Use it ? and we hope you like.
cheers
satlog
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:39:14 +0100 (BST)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Rochester ISS TV News Report
Message-ID:
<1343241554.2723.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
The YNN (channel 9) TV news report on the Rochester ISS contact can be seen at
http://www.uk.amsat.org/?p=9200
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 234
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
