| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 24.05.12 21:04l 741 Lines 22263 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB7164
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 164
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<ON4HU<CX2SA
Sent: 120524/1902Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:60588 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB7164
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Vintage Spacelab 2 video featuring Amateur Radio (i8cvs)
2. Re: Vintage Spacelab 2 video featuring Amateur Radio (Trevor .)
3. Huudson Valley Satcom Group Net May24@xxx Eastern on N2EYH-L
Echolink (cotejaune2@xxx.xxxx
4. Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat work.
(Lee Maisel)
5. UKube-1 Taking Shape + KN-SAT1 Video (Trevor .)
6. New ARISS Web page (n4csitwo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
7. Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat work.
(Clayton Coleman W5PFG)
8. Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat work.
(Lee Maisel)
9. Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat work.
(k4rjj@xxxxxxx.xxxx
10. HORYU-2 Status? (Ford, Steve, WB8IMY)
11. Re: HORYU-2 Status? (Ken Swaggart)
12. Re: HORYU-2 Status? (Ford, Steve, WB8IMY)
13. My first portable sat qso made today. (Eric Knaps, ON4HF)
14. Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat work.
(Bob Bruninga)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:30:45 +0200
From: "i8cvs" <domenico.i8cvs@xxx.xx>
To: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>, "Amsat - BBs" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Vintage Spacelab 2 video featuring Amateur
Radio
Message-ID: <000001cd392b$a22f53c0$0401a8c0@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Trevor, M5AKA
I was receiving Tony England W0ORE from the Space Shuttle STS-51-F
Challenger Spacelab 2 in beginning august 1985.
In that days I was in vacation at my home in Paestum and able to receive
the very strong SSTV signal in 2 meters standing on the beach with only
a handheld FT-290 and his hown 1/4 wave antenna.
Some time Tony was speaking for a whole orbit with a station in England,
GB2RS if I well remember, and I should have somewhere an audio tape
cassette recordered.
Wery nice to remember that days !
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:31 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Vintage Spacelab 2 video featuring Amateur Radio
> A video of the 1985 Space Shuttle STS-51-F Challenger Spacelab 2 Post
> Flight Press Conference has been made available on YouTube.
>
> The SAREX contacts of Tony England W0ORE are mentioned at 11:40
> into the video.
>
> See http://www.uk.amsat.org/7639
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
> AMSAT-UK: http://www.uk.amsat.org/
> ----
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 22:55:14 +0100 (BST)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Vintage Spacelab 2 video featuring Amateur
Radio
Message-ID:
<1337810114.36288.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
--- On Wed, 23/5/12, i8cvs <domenico.i8cvs@xxx.xx> wrote:
> Some time Tony was speaking for a whole orbit with a station
> in England, GB2RS if I well remember, and I should have somewhere an
> audio tape cassette recordered.
Yes that would be GB3RS, there's a link on the page the TV News story that
shows the RSGB HQ station.
http://www.itnsource.com/en/shotlist/ITN/1985/08/04/AS040885006/
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: cotejaune2@xxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Huudson Valley Satcom Group Net May24@xxx Eastern
on N2EYH-L Echolink
Message-ID: <8CF0759D38B8C6F-1378-152F2@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
It is time again for the HVSGN tomorrow May24 @ 8PM Eastern on. N2EYH-L
Echolink or the Mt.Beacon 146.970 pl 100 repeater.Please join us for
the Net and share your satellite knowledge with us.I am sorry if you
tried to checkin for the last Net and did not hear us.There were
computer problems and we were unable to bring up Echolink. Echolink is
only on for the Net then it is shut off.73 Gary wa2aqh-Tom kc2dtq Hope
to hear you there.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 02:02:37 -0600
From: Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for
sat work.
Message-ID: <4FBDEB1D.4080901@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Any ideas on a good antenna combo for mounting on a large vehicle?
Possibly roofrack, specifically for satellite work?
Thanks!
Lee
W5LMM
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:47:37 +0100 (BST)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] UKube-1 Taking Shape + KN-SAT1 Video
Message-ID:
<1337856457.61042.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
The 3U CubeSat UKube-1 is moving towards full integration in July.
See http://www.uk.amsat.org/7636
A TEDxKhartoum presentation on KN-SAT1 by ST2AB. It's not in English,
however, the segment from 09:12 until 13:25 contains video showing the
development of the KN-SAT1 CubeSat including a test of the deployment of the
antennas.
See http://www.uk.amsat.org/7680
----
73 Trevor M5AKA
AMSAT-UK: http://www.uk.amsat.org/
----
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:43:17 -0400
From: <n4csitwo@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-edu" <amsat-edu@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] New ARISS Web page
Message-ID: <2AFF54AF9173471DAD0524E626C83951@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) has a new Web page for ARISS-US
volunteers. For more information about these opportunities, see:
http://www.arrl.org/ariss-volunteers
Dave, AA4KN
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:11:35 -0500
From: Clayton Coleman W5PFG <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle
for sat work.
Message-ID:
<CAPovOwduu5R9fLW53R+sgWbAKpGuqvd4RqPH8d-Ou_d-+tM=bw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Lee,
I have yet to find a better solution for FO-29, SO-50, and AO-27 mobile
than a combination of small UHF yagi with preamp for the downlink and a VHF
vertical for the uplink. While the quadrifilar helix, eggbeaters, and 19"
whip all work, nothing gives me a 100% copy of all the LEO's from AOS to
LOS like the yagi/preamp combination.
I've tested the above mentioned fixed antennas for downlink across a
variety of Texas terrain and surrounding noise environments. They all
work, some better than others, but are no where near the performance level
of a directional antenna. Since I'm a firm believer that hearing the bird
is #1, I do not compromise with a vertical. It's safer for me to pull my
vehicle over to a parking lot or rest area to work passes. I have done a
few passes "in motion" with both the quad and the 19" whip and quite
frankly terrain/obstructions play such a huge role I hardly recommend even
attempting to do it unless you are on a flat, high plain.
73
Clayton
W5PFG
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Any ideas on a good antenna combo for mounting on a large vehicle?
> Possibly roofrack, specifically for satellite work?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Lee
> W5LMM
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bb<http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo
/amsat-bb>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:02:39 -0600
From: Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle
for sat work.
Message-ID: <4FBE69AF.8070804@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Thanks Clayton!
Now if I could find a small commercial az-el rotator for an Arrow, that
would be ideal!
Lee
Clayton Coleman W5PFG wrote:
> Lee,
>
> I have yet to find a better solution for FO-29, SO-50, and AO-27
> mobile than a combination of small UHF yagi with preamp for the
> downlink and a VHF vertical for the uplink. While the quadrifilar
> helix, eggbeaters, and 19" whip all work, nothing gives me a 100% copy
> of all the LEO's from AOS to LOS like the yagi/preamp combination.
>
> I've tested the above mentioned fixed antennas for downlink across a
> variety of Texas terrain and surrounding noise environments. They all
> work, some better than others, but are no where near the performance
> level of a directional antenna. Since I'm a firm believer that
> hearing the bird is #1, I do not compromise with a vertical. It's
> safer for me to pull my vehicle over to a parking lot or rest area to
> work passes. I have done a few passes "in motion" with both the quad
> and the 19" whip and quite frankly terrain/obstructions play such a
> huge role I hardly recommend even attempting to do it unless you are
> on a flat, high plain.
>
> 73
> Clayton
> W5PFG
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx
> <mailto:maisel@xxxx.xxx>> wrote:
>
> Any ideas on a good antenna combo for mounting on a large vehicle?
> Possibly roofrack, specifically for satellite work?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Lee
> W5LMM
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>. Opinions
> expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: k4rjj@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle
for sat work.
Message-ID:
<1685120094.23788.1337879568565.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxx
xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
The company that comes out with an AZ/EL unit that is about $200 is going to
sell a million.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Maisel" <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 1:02:39 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat
work.
Thanks Clayton!
Now if I could find a small commercial az-el rotator for an Arrow, that
would be ideal!
Lee
Clayton Coleman W5PFG wrote:
> Lee,
>
> I have yet to find a better solution for FO-29, SO-50, and AO-27
> mobile than a combination of small UHF yagi with preamp for the
> downlink and a VHF vertical for the uplink. ?While the quadrifilar
> helix, eggbeaters, and 19" whip all work, nothing gives me a 100% copy
> of all the LEO's from AOS to LOS like the yagi/preamp combination. ?
>
> I've tested the above mentioned fixed antennas for downlink across a
> variety of Texas terrain and surrounding noise environments. ?They all
> work, some better than others, but are no where near the performance
> level of a directional antenna. ? Since I'm a firm believer that
> hearing the bird is #1, I do not compromise with a vertical. ? It's
> safer for me to pull my vehicle over to a parking lot or rest area to
> work passes. ?I have done a few passes "in motion" with both the quad
> and the 19" whip and quite frankly terrain/obstructions play such a
> huge role I hardly recommend even attempting to do it unless you are
> on a flat, high plain.
>
> 73
> Clayton
> W5PFG
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx
> <mailto:maisel@xxxx.xxx>> wrote:
>
> ? ? Any ideas on a good antenna combo for mounting on a large vehicle?
> ? ? ?Possibly roofrack, specifically for satellite work?
>
> ? ? Thanks!
>
>
> ? ? Lee
> ? ? W5LMM
>
> ? ? _______________________________________________
> ? ? Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>. Opinions
> ? ? expressed are those of the author.
> ? ? Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> ? ? program!
> ? ? Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:40:08 -0400
From: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <wb8imy@xxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HORYU-2 Status?
Message-ID:
<145372871023544E98881538F29B1DFC044D4941@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is anyone aware of the current status of HORYU-2? We've been attempting
to receive the telemetry at W1AW, but without success.
It is possible that we are using the wrong Keps (we have located two
different sets).
73 . . . Steve Ford, WB8IMY
QST Editor / Publications Manager
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio(tm)
225 Main Street
Newington, CT 06111
(860) 594-0200
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:55:40 -0700
From: "Ken Swaggart" <k.swaggart@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <wb8imy@xxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HORYU-2 Status?
Message-ID: <12DE1891D60B41CDBE87BA436CD99C66@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
It was transmitting CW telemetry yesterday. Object 38340 is Horyu-2
according to Space-Track.org, and they worked very well yesterday.
73,
Ken, W7KKE
-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Steve, WB8IMY
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:40
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] HORYU-2 Status?
Is anyone aware of the current status of HORYU-2? We've been attempting
to receive the telemetry at W1AW, but without success.
It is possible that we are using the wrong Keps (we have located two
different sets).
73 . . . Steve Ford, WB8IMY
QST Editor / Publications Manager
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio(tm)
225 Main Street
Newington, CT 06111
(860) 594-0200
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:30:58 -0400
From: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <wb8imy@xxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HORYU-2 Status?
Message-ID:
<145372871023544E98881538F29B1DFC044D4992@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
We finally achieved success just a bit ago. Nice, strong CW. Thanks for your
help, Ken. Not sure what we may have been doing wrong before.
73 . . . Steve Ford, WB8IMY
QST Editor / Publications Manager
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio(tm)
225 Main Street
Newington, CT 06111
(860) 594-0200?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Swaggart [mailto:k.swaggart@xxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 1:56 PM
To: Ford, Steve, WB8IMY; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HORYU-2 Status?
It was transmitting CW telemetry yesterday. Object 38340 is Horyu-2
according to Space-Track.org, and they worked very well yesterday.
73,
Ken, W7KKE
-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Steve, WB8IMY
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:40
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] HORYU-2 Status?
Is anyone aware of the current status of HORYU-2? We've been attempting
to receive the telemetry at W1AW, but without success.
It is possible that we are using the wrong Keps (we have located two
different sets).
73 . . . Steve Ford, WB8IMY
QST Editor / Publications Manager
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio(tm)
225 Main Street
Newington, CT 06111
(860) 594-0200
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:49:59 +0200
From: "Eric Knaps, ON4HF" <on4hf@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: Amsat - BBS <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] My first portable sat qso made today.
Message-ID: <4FBE82D7.5000405@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello all,
Today I made my first portable satellite qso in my backyard via SO-50.
I bought an arrow antenna from www.vpa-systems.pl and connected a
portable to it.
I didn't know it was that easy! I worked EA7HZZ and a German station
(forgot his call because I was to excited)
What a nice hobby we have!
73,
Eric.
--
Amateur Radio Station ON4HF
Eric Knaps
Satellite manager UBA
http://www.on4hf.be
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:00:59 -0400
From: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: <k4rjj@xxxxxxx.xxx>, "'Lee Maisel'" <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'amsat-bb' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle
for sat work.
Message-ID: <056401cd39df$8ed338f0$ac79aad0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> The company that comes out with an AZ/EL unit that
> is about $200 is going to sell a million.
Radioshack already does. Its called a TV rotator, and I would buy one
before they are no more!. For LEO satellites one does not need elevation
98% of the time and with a modest beam (ARROW type) you can have a $70
system. Tilt the beam up about 15 degrees so that you still have max gain
on the horizon where satellites spend 1/3rd of all their pass times below 20
degrees. Track then in AZ only.
As the satellite gets above about 30 degrees and starts to roll off a dB or
so of beam gain, remember that at that elevation the satellite is HALF as
far away so it is now 6 dB stronger! This remains true up to over 45
degrees, where you may be down 3 dB on the beam but the signal is 10 dB
closer to you! The break-even point is above about 70 degrees. BUT!
Remember, the satellite is only above 70 degrees less than 2% of all pass
times. Simply not worth spending another $700 for an elevation rotator for
1 minute a day of better access.
Also, do NOT be tempted to tilt above about 15 degrees or you are going to
lose gain on the horizon where you need it most. Lots of folks put it up
higher because it seems logical, but they are ignoring the very significant
DISTANCE factor at low elevations (sketched to scale on the web page).
Please take a look at the plots on http://aprs.org/rotator1.html
Its an old page, but the drawings are always valid.
Bob, WB4APR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Maisel" <maisel@xxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 1:02:39 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Antenna suggestions for mounting on vehicle for sat
work.
Thanks Clayton!
Now if I could find a small commercial az-el rotator for an Arrow, that
would be ideal!
Lee
Clayton Coleman W5PFG wrote:
> Lee,
>
> I have yet to find a better solution for FO-29, SO-50, and AO-27
> mobile than a combination of small UHF yagi with preamp for the
> downlink and a VHF vertical for the uplink. While the quadrifilar
> helix, eggbeaters, and 19" whip all work, nothing gives me a 100% copy
> of all the LEO's from AOS to LOS like the yagi/preamp combination.
>
> I've tested the above mentioned fixed antennas for downlink across a
> variety of Texas terrain and surrounding noise environments. They all
> work, some better than others, but are no where near the performance
> level of a directional antenna. Since I'm a firm believer that
> hearing the bird is #1, I do not compromise with a vertical. It's
> safer for me to pull my vehicle over to a parking lot or rest area to
> work passes. I have done a few passes "in motion" with both the quad
> and the 19" whip and quite frankly terrain/obstructions play such a
> huge role I hardly recommend even attempting to do it unless you are
> on a flat, high plain.
>
> 73
> Clayton
> W5PFG
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Lee Maisel <maisel@xxxx.xxx
> <mailto:maisel@xxxx.xxx>> wrote:
>
> Any ideas on a good antenna combo for mounting on a large vehicle?
> Possibly roofrack, specifically for satellite work?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Lee
> W5LMM
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>. Opinions
> expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 164
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
