OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   16.02.12 07:05l 854 Lines 24621 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB777
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 77
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<CX2SA
Sent: 120216/0458Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:51175 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB777
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Yaesu G-5400 light (Alan P. Biddle)
   2. Don't worry! (Bato, Andras)
   3. Re: MASAT-1 (Bruce Robertson)
   4. MaSat Telemetry Software (Andy Kellner)
   5. Re: MASAT-1 (Mike Rupprecht)
   6. Masat website update - 'packets received' now working.
      (Andy Kellner)
   7. Re: Masat website update - 'packets received' now	working.
      (Mark L. Hammond)
   8. Re: MASAT-1 (Mike Rupprecht)
   9. Re: MASAT-1 (Mark L. Hammond)
  10. Dick Daniels (Dave Guimont)
  11. Re: Dick Daniels (Dee)
  12. Re: Dick Daniels (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
  13. Last Saturday's balloon (Nigel A. Gunn, W8IFF/G8IFF)
  14. Re: Masat website update - 'packets received' now working.
      (Mark L. Hammond)
  15. Re: Last Saturday's balloon (Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr))
  16. Feb 16th Sat Demo (Dale Hershberger)
  17. Re: Yaesu G-5400 light (Gary Mayfield)
  18. ARISSat-1 Keplerian Elements Analysis - Eclipses and
      Elevation (Joseph Armbruster)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:31:38 -0600
From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Bob- W7LRD'" <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu G-5400 light
Message-ID: <2B4BFD0CCCD94BF09AD76BF85F2B2BBB@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Vince's LED fix is the right one!  However, several years ago, I was fixing
mine, and noticed the bulbs have series resistors which are not shown in the
schematic.  I had spare bulbs from Yaesu, and replaced the resistors at the
same time with the next higher standard value. (33 ohms to 39 ohms, or
something close.)  The loss in output was negligible, and they have yet to
burn out.  When they do, I have LEDs set aside.

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA


-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:26 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Yaesu G-5400 light



Has anyone come up with a bulb, led, candle anything that will stop burning
out in the control unit?

73 Bob W7LRD
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:41:08 -0000
From: "Bato, Andras" <bato@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Don't worry!
Message-ID: <20120215204003.D62B79426E@xxxx.xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

I use Masat-1 decoder with a number of other stations all over the world.



Please take a look into your folder where your decoder is installed.



You may find files made daily like this:



Masat-1_20120214.txt



This sample  contains a few frames from those I have received and decoded
yesterday:



PACKET 03 C6 03 19 C6 7B 00 00 3B 00 00 00 46 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 81d87f1ca520f3ec4bb16da39a689bb43d96a1d9
1329221453140

PACKET 04 C7 03 19 C3 70 0D 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 4F 80 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1dcada218f5ce5cacf4642b70897f4e827a61412
1329221454984

PACKET 04 C8 03 1A AB 08 DB 08 80 08 1C 08 98 08 82 08 E6 FF F5 FF 34 00 E1
01 81 ED D4 F8 AD AD 00 00 7b9696597e5cceae99df54089978180fdfc1f3e7
1329221455968



The decoder software uploads this data to the Budapest command station
automatically.



The senders' countries are shown on http://cubesat.bme.hu/



and the callsigns can be found on http://www.ha5mrc.hu/hamsat/sats.html



gl de ha6nn

Andras











------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:54:58 -0400
From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1
Message-ID:
<CA++Umbno8-rTax3ct2uy68sb5WVbOB8H9PD97QXUe44RDxrXjA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I just tried F and G. G was the better fit, with a 80+ deg. pass, it
held up pretty well against the doppler, though not perfectly.

73, Bruce


On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Had a blast collecting telemetry for MaSat-1 just now. I used object
> C, which was not correct for doppler. Judging by the point at which
> the signal ended on my clear horizon, I think it might be
> F or G.
>
> For those who are new to the software, I'd note that the strongest
> signal on the waterfall is the one that should be aligned
> approximately with the 575 Hz mark. It is quite tolerant of your being
> off by a 100 Hz or so, I'd say. I also think that the CW signal should
> be on the 1200 Hz mark (i.e., don't tune the CW to a typical CW tone,
> which is around 600 Hz).
>
> Does anyone know how close to the upper and lower marks I can set my
> filter on the TS-2000?
>
> 73, Bruce
>
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com



--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:45:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Andy Kellner <hawat1@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] MaSat Telemetry Software
Message-ID:
<1329342314.55105.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

All,

I got some answers from the team in Hungary and apparently the software is
_in_deed_ automatically
sending the packets to the server over there ! The 'offline' sign in the
lower left corner has nothing
to do with it:

> Hi Andreas,

> Thanks for the packets!

> New TLE from Celestrak:
> 2012-006C
> 1 38079U 12006C?  12045.91493796? .00003662? 00000-0? 10000-3 0? ? 77
> 2 38079? 69.4856 235.4820 0781498? 42.5136 323.3856 14.05527418?  208

> The automatic packet report works in background.
> I checked the logs, and you sent us 561 packet online until now.

> Regards,
> Tibor Mezei

Well there you go. Sent them 560 packets and didn't even know it :) And in
another email:

> Dear Andy,

> Please try to use the telemetry softwares automatic packet sending.
> It works for a lot of people. Actually the sign
> "Offline" in the lower left corner of the telemetry window was shown
> for a future improvement and shows something else. It is misleading,
> so we will remove it in the next release.
> Please answer to the ham@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx address where my colleague,
> HA3PL Levi, who is more competent in these topics, will answer to your
> further reports.

> Sincerely,

> Zsolt V?rhegyi
> Masat-1 Developer Team


Still doesn't explain why the 'Server side logging' checkbox is unchecked
_and_ grayed out. But I guess its all research software very much under
development.

Andreas - VK4HHH


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "'Bruce Robertson'" <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT-BB'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1
Message-ID: <006d01ccec2b$46f59430$d4e0bc90$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="Windows-1252"

Bruce,

try Object D ...

73 Mike
DK3WN

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Bruce Robertson
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012 21:55
An: AMSAT-BB
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1

I just tried F and G. G was the better fit, with a 80+ deg. pass, it
held up pretty well against the doppler, though not perfectly.

73, Bruce


On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Had a blast collecting telemetry for MaSat-1 just now. I used object
> C, which was not correct for doppler. Judging by the point at which
> the signal ended on my clear horizon, I think it might be
> F or G.
>
> For those who are new to the software, I'd note that the strongest
> signal on the waterfall is the one that should be aligned
> approximately with the 575 Hz mark. It is quite tolerant of your being
> off by a 100 Hz or so, I'd say. I also think that the CW signal should
> be on the 1200 Hz mark (i.e., don't tune the CW to a typical CW tone,
> which is around 600 Hz).
>
> Does anyone know how close to the upper and lower marks I can set my
> filter on the TS-2000?
>
> 73, Bruce
>
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com



--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:54:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Andy Kellner <hawat1@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Masat website update - 'packets received' now
working.
Message-ID:
<1329342873.15382.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Looks like the Masat team updated / fixed their website, too.
Now when you go to the 'track our satellite' section, it actually shows the
position
of the satellite and - more importantly - the 'Packets Received' from each
registered

Amateur station ! So now you can check if the packet upload is actually
working.

http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/


Good stuff. Nicely Done, Masat team.

Andreas - VK4HHH


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:13:36 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Andy Kellner <hawat1@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Masat website update - 'packets received' now
working.
Message-ID:
<CAPRXzyqGALc7YE3wQ3HDZ6CyaTv-SY476cO1LT1xqrKerxbZJQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

FYI:   I have sent a couple hundred packets in, and they don't show...

Mark N8MH

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andy Kellner <hawat1@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Looks like the Masat team updated / fixed their website, too.
> Now when you go to the 'track our satellite' section, it actually shows
the position
> of the satellite and - more importantly - the 'Packets Received' from each
registered
>
> Amateur station ! So now you can check if the packet upload is actually
working.
>
> http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/
>
>
> Good stuff. Nicely Done, Masat team.
>
> Andreas - VK4HHH
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



--
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:27:41 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "'Bruce Robertson'" <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT-BB'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1
Message-ID: <006e01ccec31$083fbfd0$18bf3f70$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="Windows-1252"

See here - why ...

http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=26038

73 Mike
DK3WN

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Bruce Robertson
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012 21:55
An: AMSAT-BB
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1

I just tried F and G. G was the better fit, with a 80+ deg. pass, it
held up pretty well against the doppler, though not perfectly.

73, Bruce


On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Had a blast collecting telemetry for MaSat-1 just now. I used object
> C, which was not correct for doppler. Judging by the point at which
> the signal ended on my clear horizon, I think it might be
> F or G.
>
> For those who are new to the software, I'd note that the strongest
> signal on the waterfall is the one that should be aligned
> approximately with the 575 Hz mark. It is quite tolerant of your being
> off by a 100 Hz or so, I'd say. I also think that the CW signal should
> be on the 1200 Hz mark (i.e., don't tune the CW to a typical CW tone,
> which is around 600 Hz).
>
> Does anyone know how close to the upper and lower marks I can set my
> filter on the TS-2000?
>
> 73, Bruce
>
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com



--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:44:55 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Mike Rupprecht <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1
Message-ID:
<CAPRXzyp40_kLq=RERc6=pF5iKYOE8FeSaECCDMCP9AJcYUCA3g@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Obj. D for Masat-1 worked well for me just now...thanks, Mike :)

73,

Mark N8MH

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Mike Rupprecht <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
wrote:
> See here - why ...
>
> http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=26038
>
> 73 Mike
> DK3WN
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
> Auftrag von Bruce Robertson
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012 21:55
> An: AMSAT-BB
> Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: MASAT-1
>
> I just tried F and G. G was the better fit, with a 80+ deg. pass, it
> held up pretty well against the doppler, though not perfectly.
>
> 73, Bruce
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> Had a blast collecting telemetry for MaSat-1 just now. I used object
>> C, which was not correct for doppler. Judging by the point at which
>> the signal ended on my clear horizon, I think it might be
>> F or G.
>>
>> For those who are new to the software, I'd note that the strongest
>> signal on the waterfall is the one that should be aligned
>> approximately with the 575 Hz mark. It is quite tolerant of your being
>> off by a 100 Hz or so, I'd say. I also think that the CW signal should
>> be on the 1200 Hz mark (i.e., don't tune the CW to a typical CW tone,
>> which is around 600 Hz).
>>
>> Does anyone know how close to the upper and lower marks I can set my
>> filter on the TS-2000?
>>
>> 73, Bruce
>>
>> --
>> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



--
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]



------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:07:16 -0800
From: Dave Guimont <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Dick Daniels
Message-ID: <71.D7.10690.5AA3C3F4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

So sorry to hear about Dick....we've all lost mostly a great friend.
plus a great knowledge base...

   God Bless

Dave



            73, Dave, WB6LLO
                dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx

                    Disagree: I learn....

               Pulling for P3E...



------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:43:58 -0500
From: Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Dave Guimont'" <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Dick Daniels
Message-ID: <000001ccec3b$b05cf750$1116e5f0$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>

Extremely sorry to hear of Dick's passing.  Another oldtimer off the
list waiting for an HEO to happen....Knowledge we can never recover...
The clock is ticking for all of us.   GO FOX...
Dee, NB2F

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Dave Guimont
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:07 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Dick Daniels

So sorry to hear about Dick....we've all lost mostly a great friend.
plus a great knowledge base...

   God Bless

Dave



            73, Dave, WB6LLO
                dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx

                    Disagree: I learn....

               Pulling for P3E...

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:09:37 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Dick Daniels
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20120215175636.00c03bd0@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 06:43 PM 2/15/2012 -0500, Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>Extremely sorry to hear of Dick's passing.  Another oldtimer off the
>list waiting for an HEO to happen....Knowledge we can never recover...
>The clock is ticking for all of us.   GO FOX...
>Dee, NB2F


Yes, Dick was one of the best. He must have had a part in helping to
build almost every Amsat satellite. I remember seeing photo's of him
and King next to AO-7 in the Satellite Experimenters Handbook, 1st.




------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:07:49 +0000
From: "Nigel A. Gunn, W8IFF/G8IFF" <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Last Saturday's balloon
Message-ID: <4F3C64F5.4050002@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

So what happened to the balloon launched in Texas last Saturday.?
It seems to have disappeared around midnight Z Saturday night.

de W8IFF


------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:36:23 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Andy Kellner <hawat1@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Masat website update - 'packets received' now
working.
Message-ID: <4f3c6ba8.c4a1ec0a.7715.49ea@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Okay, I had a brain failure here (least I think so...)

I used my gmail address to register my station on the webpage, but used my
amsat address when the program started.  I registered online weeks ago, so
when the registration page came up, I didn't even consider that it was
supposed to "match" to the website registration page.

Will know tomorrow, but that has to be my problem.

Makes sense...another "duh" moment :)

73,

Mark N8MH

At 05:13 PM 2/15/2012 -0500, Mark L. Hammond wrote:
>FYI:   I have sent a couple hundred packets in, and they don't show...
>
>Mark N8MH
>
>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andy Kellner <hawat1@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> Looks like the Masat team updated / fixed their website, too.
>> Now when you go to the 'track our satellite' section, it actually shows
the position
>> of the satellite and - more importantly - the 'Packets Received' from
each registered
>>
>> Amateur station ! So now you can check if the packet upload is actually
working.
>>
>> http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/
>>
>>
>> Good stuff. Nicely Done, Masat team.
>>
>> Andreas - VK4HHH
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>--
>Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]



------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:38:35 -0500
From: "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Last Saturday's balloon
Message-ID: <4F3C6C2B.6080105@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Look at the raw packets and check out how the temperature was falling.
I personally think the batteries froze up and the tracker shut down over
the Gulf.

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

On 2/15/2012 9:07 PM, Nigel A. Gunn, W8IFF/G8IFF wrote:
> So what happened to the balloon launched in Texas last Saturday.?
> It seems to have disappeared around midnight Z Saturday night.
>
> de W8IFF
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>



------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:59:46 -0900
From: Dale Hershberger <daleh@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat bbs <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Feb 16th Sat Demo
Message-ID: <4F3C7122.9090102@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I am passing this on to the BBS.  I know it is short notice
but wanted to get it out.  Craig (KL4E) will be working out of
Anchorage on site and I will be at my home QTH approx 70
air miles south on the Kenai Peninsula.  Hope to make contact
with you.... These classes are put on by the Anchorage Amateur
Radio Club.

De KL7XJ
AMSAT Area Coordinator Alaska


Hello Everyone>>>

      As you can see from the message traffic below, we have been invited to
deliver a special satellite technology briefing and demonstration to a group
of
Anchorage Police who have signed up for Amateur Radio training.  The plan, as
shown in red below is to attempt to make contacts on at least two passes on
SO-50 during the class period on the evening of the 16th and to conduct
classroom training between the appearances of the bird.  We also plan to check
into the Anchorage area ARES Net on both 2M voice and packet at 8 PM AST in
the
midst of all the other activities!

      If SO-50 is locally visible to you during the appropriate time frame, we
would like to ask you to please come up on this FM LEO and provide our new
hams
with some contacts so that they'll gain some knowledge and appreciation of
what
AMSAT and our ham radio satellites are all about.

      Thank you so very much.  Hope to hear you on the satellites really soon!

                                         Best of 73s,

                                         Craig, KL4E



------------------------------

Message: 17
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:31:09 -0600
From: Gary Mayfield <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu G-5400 light
Message-ID: <BAY169-W47D03BE8F1EAF7993302228A620@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Bob,      I did LEDs too.  You can see how I did it at www.kk0sd.net 73,Joe
kk0sd
 > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:26:03 +0000
> From: w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Yaesu G-5400 light
>
>
>
> Has anyone come up with a bulb, led, candle anything that will stop
burning out in the control unit?
>
> 73 Bob W7LRD
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 		 	   		

------------------------------

Message: 18
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:56:02 -0500
From: Joseph Armbruster <josepharmbruster@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISSat-1 Keplerian Elements Analysis - Eclipses
and	Elevation
Message-ID: <F0AFDE13-6C89-40FB-ADFE-BAFA82343F00@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

All,

I did some work tonight calculating Eclipses and looking at differences in
elevation.

If you are interested in peer reviewing my calculations, please let me know
and I will send you some files.

http://libjoe.blogspot.com/2012/02/arissat-1-analysis-eclipses-and.html

Enjoy!
Joseph Armbruster, KJ4JIO


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 77
***************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 26.10.2024 22:24:29lGo back Go up