| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 03.02.12 16:45l 792 Lines 25721 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB758
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 58
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<CX2SA
Sent: 120203/1540Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:49569 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB758
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: GPS Time observation (Alan Cresswell)
2. Re: GPS Time observation (Jim Jerzycke)
3. Re: GPS Time observation (jmfranke)
4. Re: GPS Time observation (Jim Jerzycke)
5. HudsonValleySatcomGroupNetTonight@xxxxxxxxxxxxx N2EYH-L OR
MtBeacon Repeater 146.970pl100 (cotejaune2@xxx.xxxx
6. re instanttrack and windows 7 (Scott Smith)
7. Re: InstantTrack and windows 7 (Tony Langdon)
8. Re: GPS Time observation (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
9. Re: GPS Time observation (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
10. Re: GPS Time observation (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
11. Re: InstantTrack and windows 7 (Mark L. Hammond)
12. USB Rotor Controller - $17.40 (Thomas Doyle)
13. Fw: New version - Masat Ground station Client software
(Nitin Muttin)
14. CHIBIS-M (David Hopkins)
15. fox (Nick Pugh)
16. Re: fox (Alan P. Biddle)
17. Re: fox (Dee)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:12:03 -0000
From: "Alan Cresswell" <alancresswell@xxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <ACD0A4C5975044CC9BFFD86A806249F4@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Well the most likely explanation would seem to be related to your GPS
display routine. If you are getting accurate position information the
timing from the satellites must be within a few nanoseconds. The satellite
time currently differs from UTC by plus 15 seconds because UTC is retarded
by one leap second on a regular basis but the satellite time is not altered.
The satellites broadcast this offset from UTC but only every 12.5 minutes.
It is not unusual for a GPS display to have a relatively low priority
compared to the intensive position calculations and give a time display that
differs by a second or two from UTC.
73
Alan
ZL2BX
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Dave Guimont
Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012 18:29
To: Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Interesting question, Vince...am sure someone on here will be able to
answer it. I know at one time the civilian population was restricted
from the most accurate location, and as I also remember the military
accuracy was within a centimeter if several observations were
taken...Nice to see your smiling face on here, my friend...
Anyone?
73 Dave
>I have an old GPS unit, a Magellan explorist 210. It's fairly
>accurate determining position. After it has acquired about eight to
>ten satellites the position error averages between 20 to 35
>feet. Now the question, the other day I was looking at one of the
>information pages the unit can display and on it, it gives the time
>in UTC. Just for fun I thought I would see how close the time was to
>WWV. I was surprised to see the unit was between one to four seconds
>off over various tests compared to WWV. IS this typical of all GPS
>units or do some display the time of day more accurately?
>
>KB7ADL
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
73, Dave, WB6LLO
dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx
Disagree: I learn....
Pulling for P3E...
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:18:27 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <4F2AEF93.7040803@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I think this has something to do with "GPS Time" vs "Earth Time".
IIRC, GPS time doesn't take into account the Leap Seconds that have been
added to Earth time since the first GPS satellites have been launched. I
think some of the newer receivers can compensate for this, but I'm not sure.
It's been about 14 years since I last worked in the GPS industry, and
I'm a bit rusty on all the new stuff!
73, Jim KQ6EA
On 02/02/2012 04:57 PM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
> I'm not sure about GPS,but I have noticed that the clock on our cable
> box is off by up to 4 seconds at times.Customer service was not aware
> or concerned when I let them know.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:28 AM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] GPS Time observation
>
>
> I have an old GPS unit, a Magellan explorist 210. It's fairly accurate
> determining position. After it has acquired about eight to ten satellites
> the position error averages between 20 to 35 feet. Now the question,
> the
> other day I was looking at one of the information pages the unit can
> display and on it, it gives the time in UTC. Just for fun I thought I
> would
> see how close the time was to WWV. I was surprised to see the unit was
> between one to four seconds off over various tests compared to WWV. IS
> this typical of all GPS units or do some display the time of day more
> accurately?
>
> KB7ADL
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:44:11 -0500
From: "jmfranke" <jmfranke@xxx.xxx>
To: "Jim Jerzycke" <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <E09DDF4B886F4D868240137CF7E019F3@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
The difference between GPS time and UTC is adjusted as necessary. The
adjustments come in the form of leap seconds and are added when needed at
the end of June or December. The difference between GPS time and UTC is
currently 15 seconds. There will be a leap second added this coming June 30.
What is being seen is the casual user GPS receiver software does not put a
high priority on time display.
John WA4WDL
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jim Jerzycke" <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:18 PM
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
> I think this has something to do with "GPS Time" vs "Earth Time".
>
> IIRC, GPS time doesn't take into account the Leap Seconds that have been
> added to Earth time since the first GPS satellites have been launched. I
> think some of the newer receivers can compensate for this, but I'm not
> sure.
>
> It's been about 14 years since I last worked in the GPS industry, and I'm
> a bit rusty on all the new stuff!
>
> 73, Jim KQ6EA
>
> On 02/02/2012 04:57 PM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
>> I'm not sure about GPS,but I have noticed that the clock on our cable box
>> is off by up to 4 seconds at times.Customer service was not aware or
>> concerned when I let them know.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL
>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:28 AM
>> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] GPS Time observation
>>
>>
>> I have an old GPS unit, a Magellan explorist 210. It's fairly accurate
>> determining position. After it has acquired about eight to ten satellites
>> the position error averages between 20 to 35 feet. Now the question,
>> the
>> other day I was looking at one of the information pages the unit can
>> display and on it, it gives the time in UTC. Just for fun I thought I
>> would
>> see how close the time was to WWV. I was surprised to see the unit was
>> between one to four seconds off over various tests compared to WWV. IS
>> this typical of all GPS units or do some display the time of day more
>> accurately?
>>
>> KB7ADL
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:02:20 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: jmfranke <jmfranke@xxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <4F2AF9DC.40600@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Ahhh...., yes. "UTC". That's what I meant by "Earth Time".
Need...more...coffee...
73, Jim
On 02/02/2012 08:44 PM, jmfranke wrote:
> The difference between GPS time and UTC is adjusted as necessary. The
> adjustments come in the form of leap seconds and are added when needed
> at the end of June or December. The difference between GPS time and
> UTC is currently 15 seconds. There will be a leap second added this
> coming June 30. What is being seen is the casual user GPS receiver
> software does not put a high priority on time display.
>
> John WA4WDL
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Jim Jerzycke" <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
>
>> I think this has something to do with "GPS Time" vs "Earth Time".
>>
>> IIRC, GPS time doesn't take into account the Leap Seconds that have
>> been added to Earth time since the first GPS satellites have been
>> launched. I think some of the newer receivers can compensate for
>> this, but I'm not sure.
>>
>> It's been about 14 years since I last worked in the GPS industry, and
>> I'm a bit rusty on all the new stuff!
>>
>> 73, Jim KQ6EA
>>
>> On 02/02/2012 04:57 PM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
>>> I'm not sure about GPS,but I have noticed that the clock on our
>>> cable box is off by up to 4 seconds at times.Customer service was
>>> not aware or concerned when I let them know.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:28 AM
>>> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>>> Subject: [amsat-bb] GPS Time observation
>>>
>>>
>>> I have an old GPS unit, a Magellan explorist 210. It's fairly accurate
>>> determining position. After it has acquired about eight to ten
>>> satellites
>>> the position error averages between 20 to 35 feet. Now the
>>> question, the
>>> other day I was looking at one of the information pages the unit can
>>> display and on it, it gives the time in UTC. Just for fun I thought
>>> I would
>>> see how close the time was to WWV. I was surprised to see the unit was
>>> between one to four seconds off over various tests compared to WWV. IS
>>> this typical of all GPS units or do some display the time of day more
>>> accurately?
>>>
>>> KB7ADL
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
>>> author.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
>>> author.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:21:46 -0500 (EST)
From: cotejaune2@xxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] HudsonValleySatcomGroupNetTonight@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
N2EYH-L OR MtBeacon Repeater 146.970pl100
Message-ID: <8CEB0102F25F915-2070-118B8@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Please join us for the Net tonight Feb 02 on Echolink N2EYH-L @ 8PM.All the
cool people will be there.73 de WA2AQH Garty/KC2DTQ Tom
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:39:09 -0700
From: "Scott Smith" <ve6itv@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] re instanttrack and windows 7
Message-ID: <57C54DDC628A4B809CB77A4625619B45@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks to Bruce and Alan i now have InstantTrack working on my windows 7
computer appreciate the help guys have a great day.
73 de VE6ITV Scott
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:00:16 +1100
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
To: kk5do@xxxxx.xxxx Scott Smith <ve6itv@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: InstantTrack and windows 7
Message-ID: <4f2b1588.90d7e70a.600b.7f69@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 04:39 AM 2/3/2012, Bruce wrote:
>yes, download a program called dosbox. you can then run the old dos programs.
>http://www.dosbox.com/
That's the one I was trying to think of. :)
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:16:58 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20120202160559.00becc30@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 11:57 AM 2/2/2012 -0500, "George and Cheryl Abbott" <ka1ajf@xxx.xxx> wrote:
>I'm not sure about GPS,but I have noticed that the clock on our cable box
>is off by up to 4 seconds at times.Customer service was not aware or
>concerned when I let them know.
Well the clock on my VCR constantly flashes 12:00.
;-)
KB7ADL
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:19:09 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20120202160828.00c01820@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 10:28 AM 2/2/2012 -0800, Dave Guimont <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
>Interesting question, Vince...am sure someone on here will be able to
>answer it. I know at one time the civilian population was restricted from
>the most accurate location, and as I also remember the military accuracy
>was within a centimeter if several observations were taken...Nice to see
>your smiling face on here, my friend...
>
>Anyone?
>
>73 Dave
Hello again my friend, Nice to see you around too. I used the military
units when I was in the army. The units could be loaded with crypto to
remove the selective availability skew. That was back in the 90's.
73
KB7ADL
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:22:57 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20120202161743.00c0ee60@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 03:44 PM 2/2/2012 -0500, you wrote:
>The difference between GPS time and UTC is adjusted as necessary. The
>adjustments come in the form of leap seconds and are added when needed at
>the end of June or December. The difference between GPS time and UTC is
>currently 15 seconds. There will be a leap second added this coming June
>30. What is being seen is the casual user GPS receiver software does not
>put a high priority on time display.
>
>John WA4WDL
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>From: "Jim Jerzycke" <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:18 PM
>To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: GPS Time observation
>
>>I think this has something to do with "GPS Time" vs "Earth Time".
>>
>>IIRC, GPS time doesn't take into account the Leap Seconds that have been
>>added to Earth time since the first GPS satellites have been launched. I
>>think some of the newer receivers can compensate for this, but I'm not sure.
>>
>>It's been about 14 years since I last worked in the GPS industry, and I'm
>>a bit rusty on all the new stuff!
>>
>>73, Jim KQ6EA
>>
>>On 02/02/2012 04:57 PM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
>>>I'm not sure about GPS,but I have noticed that the clock on our cable
>>>box is off by up to 4 seconds at times.Customer service was not aware or
>>>concerned when I let them know.
Thanks everyone for educating me on GPS. I wasn't concerned that it didn't
display the exact time, but I was kind of curious as to why it didn't.
73
KB7ADL
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:14:25 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxxx "'Scott Smith'" <ve6itv@xxxxx.xxx>,
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: InstantTrack and windows 7
Message-ID: <4f2b26e3.0c6a650a.768a.06e9@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
One of the really impressive things I've been able to do with the virtual
WinXP under Win7---running old DOS programs that use hardware comm ports 1
or 2 with TNCs! It works wonderfully. (Seems like I tried it with DOSBOX
without any luck...)
Mark N8MH
At 11:42 AM 2/2/2012 -0600, Alan P. Biddle wrote:
>Scott,
>
>No problem, unless you want to run it in full screen or graphics mode. WIN7
>does not fully support DOS programs in full screen mode. However, there are
>a couple of ways around that. You can run it in a virtual XP machine. I
>have WIN7 Pro, and it is a free download.
>
>However, there is a simpler method. There is a program called DOSBox which
>is intended to run really old legacy games. It works perfectly with ITrack,
>and makes a much smaller footprint on your machine.
>
>http://www.dosbox.com/
>
>Even though I have the virtual XP machine, I prefer to use the DOSbox
>version. With a little obvious tweaking of the configuration, it will come
>up as before.
>
>73s,
>
>Alan
>WA4SCA
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
>Behalf Of Scott Smith
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 11:11 AM
>To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>Subject: [amsat-bb] InstantTrack and windows 7
>
>Hi folks, just updated one of my computers to windows 7. Does InstantTrack
>work with this version of windows?. Have no problem on my other computers
>using windows XP. Any help appreciated .
>73 de VE6ITV Scott
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:32:31 -0600
From: Thomas Doyle <tomdoyle1948@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] USB Rotor Controller - $17.40
Message-ID:
<CAHnRQRJwZ_8R5FrYJama7dZhgbViYbsiYJk1t+GNYUSMpUDt1w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Someone might find this interesting.
http://www.tomdoyle.org/CheapRotorController/
73 W9KE Tom Doyle
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:12:26 +0530 (IST)
From: Nitin Muttin <vu3tyg@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: Amsat India <amsatindia@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fw: New version - Masat Ground station Client
software
Message-ID:
<1328244146.24574.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The new verion has a bug and the below error is shown the bat file is
executed.
"Unable to access jar file2010-gndcclient-java3.jar"
?
Java needs to be started manually, double click on the jar file or runjava
-jar GNDClient.jar. The final version will be available next week from the
MASAT Team.
Regards
Nitin [VU3TYG]
--------- Original Message --------
From: Tibor Mezei <mezei@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
To: vu3tyg@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx <vu3tyg@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: Masat Ground station Client software
Date: 01/02/12 19:41
?Hello,Sorry, we forget to update the bat, and sh file-s.So you have to
double click on the jar file or runjava -jar GNDClient.jarWe collect the
bugs to release the final version next week.
?
Thanks for your report.
Regards,
Tibor MezeiAm
?
2. Februar 2012 17:06 schrieb Nitin Muttin
<vu3tyg@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx
?
Hello Tibor,
I installed the new version but the software does not
execute, attached is the error. I am using Winxp with service pack 3.
?
?73
Nitin [VU3TYG]
?
?-----Original Message-----
From: zemei88@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:zemei88@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Tibor
Mezei
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 6:03 AM
?To: Nitin Muttin [VU3TYG]
?Subject: Re: Masat Ground station Client software
?Dear Nitin,
?
?
the newest version of the MASAT-1 client software is
?available on our website:
http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/foldi-allomas/kliens-szoftver/
Regards,
Tibor
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:31:27 +1000
From: David Hopkins <davhop@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] CHIBIS-M
Message-ID:
<20120203063127.EIRC22866.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Gentlemen,
Anyone heard CHIBIS-M at all today?
I have listened on three pass today, but heard nothing.
David
David G. Hopkins (VK4ZF)
CAPALABA QLD
AUSTRALIA
27.32.38S 153.12.03E
QG62OL
Skype :- davhop
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:21:24 -0600
From: "Nick Pugh" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] fox
Message-ID: <06b401cce25d$9594e1e0$c0bea5a0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Did Fox win a NASA grant for launch?
nick
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:57:36 -0600
From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Nick Pugh'" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: fox
Message-ID: <B77A1CA9A0D5455D813F2F876D61F580@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Nick,
Good question. So far, no announcement from NASA on the awards. It is
being monitored closely, and an announcement will be made very quickly once
we have the results.
Alan
WA4SCA
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Nick Pugh
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 4:21 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] fox
Did Fox win a NASA grant for launch?
nick
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:37:33 -0500
From: Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Nick Pugh'" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: fox
Message-ID: <003401cce289$c01e4d30$405ae790$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Nick & all.
If we hear about this, there will be a special bulletin since the
financial significance of this is important.
73,
Dee, NB2F
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Nick Pugh
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 5:21 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] fox
Did Fox win a NASA grant for launch?
nick
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 58
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
