OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   17.01.12 21:04l 117 Lines 3012 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB730
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 30
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<IK6ZDE<VE2PKT<CX2SA
Sent: 120117/2002Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:47626 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB730
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. SpaceX WF9XJL STA application (Tarsala, Jan A (337C))
   2. Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite (G0MRF@xxx.xxxx


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:52:42 -0800
From: "Tarsala, Jan A (337C)" <jan.a.tarsala@xxx.xxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SpaceX WF9XJL STA application
Message-ID: <CB3B037A.B791%jan.a.tarsala@xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_
seq=50384&RequestTimeout=1000

73,

Jan
WB6VRN

MSL Telecom
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:42:52 -0500 (EST)
From: G0MRF@xxx.xxx
To: rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
Message-ID: <339b7.5d46a280.3c47293c@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Thanks Joe.

What an exciting concept.

Having got really enthusiastic, I thought I would roughly calculate how
high one of these little rockets could raise the orbit.

Given that one rocket reload pack has

40 Newtons of thrust
and lasts for about one second
We have 40 Newton seconds of specific impulse.


The mass flow rate is 18.6g in one second or 0.0168kg/s

So.....the ISP (a bit vague here) is around 219 seconds (ave thrust / mass
flow rate / 9.81ms^2)

Which should get a 3.7kg satellite's apogee about..... 40km  higher.

So...Not enough for P3E then

Oh well, not so exciting after all.  Time for a beer.

73  David  G0MRF




In a message dated 17/01/2012 03:56:37 GMT Standard Time,
rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx writes:

Has  anyone seen this. I am surprised a shuttle mission permitted this
type of  booster. From what I believed, safety concerns prevented most
types of  boosters.

http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1

--
Joe Leikhim

Leikhim and Associates
Communications  Consultants
Oviedo,  Florida

www.Leikhim.com

JLeikhim@xxxxxxx.xxx

407-982-0446

Note  to GMail Account users. Due to an abnormally high volume of spam
originating  from bogus GMail accounts, I have found it necessary to block
certain GMail  traffic. Please phone me if you believe your message was not
received.

_______________________________________________
Sent via  AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an  AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  program!
Subscription settings:  http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 30
***************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 27.10.2024 18:27:06lGo back Go up