| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 17.01.12 18:25l 712 Lines 21947 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB729
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V7 29
Path: IZ3LSV<IK6ZDE<VE3UIL<ZS0MEE<CX2SA
Sent: 120117/1721Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA #:47614 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB729
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. HNI4/AJ5C follow up (Bob Herrell)
2. Student CubeSat "Imagine The Future" (Trevor .)
3. Icom 910h (Pedro Cruz)
4. Re: Radio Pirates (Gordon JC Pearce)
5. QRP to the ISS - KD5PDN (Clint Bradford)
6. Re: Radio Pirates (Andre)
7. Re: Radio Pirates (Joe)
8. SpaceX Launch Postponed (B J)
9. More On SpaceX Delay (B J)
10. Re: HNI4/AJ5C follow up (k6yk)
11. Re: Radio Pirates (Gregg Wonderly)
12. Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite (Joe Leikhim)
13. Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite (Trevor .)
14. Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite (Alan P. Biddle)
15. Re: HNI4/AJ5C follow up (Omar Alvarez)
16. Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite (Robert McGwier)
17. IC910 Main/Sub (Tom Lubbers K8TL)
18. G3RUH PCB for FO-12 modem and 9600 baud modem (Jack Colson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:43:15 -0400
From: Bob Herrell <bob72601@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] HNI4/AJ5C follow up
Message-ID:
<CAMQtZ2RfPz_j=CnBWaXy51W3KTDGHUvG+6kFUJAhs5reuqOYvA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Good contacts for today, Jan 16, 2012 on AO-27 1907z pass: K0BAM, N8RO,
WA4NVM, and AC0RA. de Bob HI4/AJ5C
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:54:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Student CubeSat "Imagine The Future"
Message-ID:
<1326747246.80533.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
ITF-1 (YUI) CubeSat aiming for a 2013 launch, see
http://www.uk.amsat.org/3809
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:13:16 -0100
From: "Pedro Cruz" <pccu2jx@xxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Icom 910h
Message-ID: <7C1D35ADE853423482AB3C4B04D90FF9@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello to all
Any one use the Main and sub data sockets form thew icom 910 in staellite
mode .?
If yes how it is connected?
Best 73!
Pedro Cruz - CU2JX
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:13:58 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates
Message-ID: <4F149316.3010504@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 16/01/12 00:27, Ted wrote:
>
> 'I'd take the cheapie chinese radios any day'.
>
> Perhaps that is the mentality that makes the EU economic model the mess that
> it is today. Also, any, and I mean any economist will tell you that in hard
> times the average consumer (which includes notoriously cheap hams) will shop
> price above all else. That is why the chinese have everyone by the fortune
> cookies...
No, it's more to do with the standard of construction, performance and
availability of parts and service information. The Chinese are streets
ahead here.
It's particularly galling when you realise you could buy five cheapy
Chinese radios for the cost of one from a major American manufacturer -
and still expect to have all five working in two year's time!
> ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our community.
It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.
> But since the US FCC has turned into nothing more than a bunch of political
The FCC is not relevant to my interests. I love breaking FCC regulations.
--
Gordon MM0YEQ
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:21:18 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] QRP to the ISS - KD5PDN
Message-ID: <A3081062-569F-47AD-B154-78A9A760CB4F@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Doug Cook KD5PDN's first-rate article - "QRP to the ISS" - appears in the
February, 2012
issue of QST magazine.
Doug walks the reader through building a simple tape measure beam, and how
to successfully work the ISS with it and a handheld radio.
Not an ARRL member receiving QST magazine? Doug's article is available
online on the SAT SKEDS page of my Work-Sat.com Web site ...
http://tinyurl.com/QRP-ISS
Thanks to the ARRL for permission to re-publish ... and many thanks to Doug
for citing my satellite site in the article.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.work-sat.com
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:41:00 +0100
From: Andre <sats@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates
Message-ID: <4F14996C.4060101@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Op 16-1-2012 22:13, Gordon JC Pearce schreef:
>> ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our
>> community.
>
> It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.
CE is not realy worth anything, all it means is that the manufactor
claims not to use toxic paints and stuff like that, it is not even tested.
73 Andre PE1RDW
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:09:24 -0600
From: Joe <nss@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates
Message-ID: <4F14A014.6000800@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
And the Chinese have a excellent record in meeting that requirement
don't they?
:-)
I love the latest contaminated item from them. Radioactive tissue
holders..
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 1/16/2012 3:41 PM, Andre wrote:
> Op 16-1-2012 22:13, Gordon JC Pearce schreef:
>>> ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our
>>> community.
>>
>> It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.
> CE is not realy worth anything, all it means is that the manufactor
> claims not to use toxic paints and stuff like that, it is not even
> tested.
>
> 73 Andre PE1RDW
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:34:43 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SpaceX Launch Postponed
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkOEmieGSt8seVuQ-hkvUPSEjSG7+9Ea-FmKCu7uKuPy8Q@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
http://moonandback.com/2012/01/16/date-pushed-back-on-spacex-plans-for-dragon-
iss-rendezvous/
No new date was announced.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:09:06 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] More On SpaceX Delay
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkP3TmTOTyaz1vbp7qKX5GVaTPrQV-ko=0OxYnf06mh=7A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
http://www.spacenews.com/venture_space/011612-spacex-postpones-station-bound-d
ragon-launch.html
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/01/dragon-slips-spacex-determined-return-u
s-crewed-access-leo/
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:21:42 -0800
From: k6yk <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
To: bob72601@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HNI4/AJ5C follow up
Message-ID: <20120116.183030.1661.2252@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
HI Bob,
Well, if we can get the locals on the east coast to be quiet
for a minute we could have made it. I heard you a couple of times on
the 19:10 pass today, and gave a couple of calls. But the locals were
covering everything up. I had a 4 degree elevation pass on that one.
73,
John, K6YK
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:43:15 -0400 Bob Herrell <bob72601@xxxxx.xxx>
writes:
> Good contacts for today, Jan 16, 2012 on AO-27 1907z pass: K0BAM,
> N8RO,
> WA4NVM, and AC0RA. de Bob HI4/AJ5C
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
____________________________________________________________
53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f14dd5cb114430195fst02vuc
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:42:35 -0600
From: Gregg Wonderly <greggwon@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates
Message-ID: <4F14EE2B.5000508@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 1/16/2012 3:13 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> On 16/01/12 00:27, Ted wrote:
>>
>> 'I'd take the cheapie chinese radios any day'.
>>
>> Perhaps that is the mentality that makes the EU economic model the mess
that
>> it is today. Also, any, and I mean any economist will tell you that in hard
>> times the average consumer (which includes notoriously cheap hams) will
shop
>> price above all else. That is why the chinese have everyone by the fortune
>> cookies...
>
> No, it's more to do with the standard of construction, performance and
> availability of parts and service information. The Chinese are streets
ahead
> here.
>
> It's particularly galling when you realise you could buy five cheapy Chinese
> radios for the cost of one from a major American manufacturer - and still
> expect to have all five working in two year's time!
>
>> ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our community.
>
> It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.
>
>> But since the US FCC has turned into nothing more than a bunch of political
>
> The FCC is not relevant to my interests. I love breaking FCC regulations.
>
The biggest issue that causes recession and then depression in the economy, is
when the value in the economy out strips the cash available to support that
value. When everyone buys the "cheapest" item, and it is a defective item,
that
then doesn't live long enough in the economy, that can cause people to replace
it, in an emergency purchase, with a "credit purchase", which then presses the
economy with more value, and less cash.
In our current economy, things like "cheap TVs", "cheap PCs", and "cheap
appliances", in general, can result in the economy needing to "inflate" faster
than the "printing" of money is occurring in our "world banks".
There is plenty of reason to pay the more expensive price, especially, if it
is
for something that will last longer in the economy, especially, if you
resale it.
Certainly, if our economy inflated faster, we could all just spend money on
all
kinds of cheap junk, and keep everyone busy, working all day creating as much
cheap stuff as we could. But, the economy of the world, is really designed to
work that way, and more importantly, all the off shore manufacturing, is
moving
"our cash" out of reach of our "local economies", and that, in the end, is
what
creates recession, which is then nearly impossible to correct "overnight",
because the spending habits and the supply chains are not also being
restructured to keep "injected cash" in the local economy, and thus it doesn't
help anyone, except the offshore economies of the producers.
Gregg Wonderly
W5GGW
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:43:48 -0500
From: Joe Leikhim <rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
Message-ID: <4F14EE74.7070900@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Has anyone seen this. I am surprised a shuttle mission permitted this
type of booster. From what I believed, safety concerns prevented most
types of boosters.
http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1
--
Joe Leikhim
Leikhim and Associates
Communications Consultants
Oviedo, Florida
www.Leikhim.com
JLeikhim@xxxxxxx.xxx
407-982-0446
Note to GMail Account users. Due to an abnormally high volume of spam
originating from bogus GMail accounts, I have found it necessary to block
certain GMail traffic. Please phone me if you believe your message was not
received.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:33:34 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
Message-ID:
<1326774814.20068.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
--- On Tue, 17/1/12, Joe Leikhim <rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Date: Tuesday, 17 January, 2012, 3:43
> Has anyone seen this. I am surprised
> a shuttle mission permitted this type of booster. From what
> I believed, safety concerns prevented most types of
> boosters.
>
> http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1
There are several CubeSats being developed that will carry thrusters, for
example Delfi-n3Xt
http://delfispace.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id
=14&Itemid=18
The safety concerns you mention relate to satellites fitted with
conventional rocket fuel motors.
The Delfi-n3Xt approach uses nitrogen as the propellant and there are other
approaches that would also be safe to fly.
73 Trevor M5AKA
----
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:06:06 -0600
From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Trevor .'" <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>,
<rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
Message-ID: <078D22047A0B4766BAB478918D3FF867@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Trevor,
The key part is that it was a manned mission. The complexity of the safety
paperwork, let alone the mission, jumps because of that. Pyrotechnics of
any sort are always an issue, but much less when the mission only involves
hardware.
Alan
WA4SCA
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Trevor .
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:34 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
--- On Tue, 17/1/12, Joe Leikhim <rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Date: Tuesday, 17 January, 2012, 3:43
> Has anyone seen this. I am surprised
> a shuttle mission permitted this type of booster. From what
> I believed, safety concerns prevented most types of
> boosters.
>
> http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1
There are several CubeSats being developed that will carry thrusters, for
example Delfi-n3Xt
http://delfispace.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&
id=14&Itemid=18
The safety concerns you mention relate to satellites fitted with
conventional rocket fuel motors.
The Delfi-n3Xt approach uses nitrogen as the propellant and there are other
approaches that would also be safe to fly.
73 Trevor M5AKA
----
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:08:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Omar Alvarez <xe1aom@xxxxx.xxx>
To: k6yk <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>, "bob72601@xxxxx.xxxx <bob72601@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HNI4/AJ5C follow up
Message-ID:
<1326809328.76773.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I am agree with? John, for Mexican stations we hve less time to get the QSO
and the US hamradio operator have most of the pass to do it.. and in Mexico
you can count with only one hand the satellite operator per orbit...
Just a little break.
If someone do it or not I will continue try to complete the QSO.
Regards
Omar
XE1AO
DK89df
?
********************************
M.C. Omar Alvarez C?rdenas
Facultad de Telematica, U de C
316 1075
xe1aom@xxxx.xx
omar_ac@xxxxxxx.xxx
********************************
________________________________
De: k6yk <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
Para: bob72601@xxxxx.xxx
CC: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Enviado: Lunes, 16 de enero, 2012 20:21:42
Asunto: [amsat-bb] Re: HNI4/AJ5C follow up
HI Bob,
Well, if we can get the locals on the east coast to be quiet
for a minute we could have made it.? I heard you a couple of times on
the 19:10 pass today, and gave a couple of calls. But the locals were
covering everything up.? I had a 4 degree elevation pass on that one.
73,
John, K6YK
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:43:15 -0400 Bob Herrell <bob72601@xxxxx.xxx>
writes:
> Good contacts for today, Jan 16, 2012 on AO-27 1907z pass: K0BAM,
> N8RO,
> WA4NVM, and AC0RA. de Bob HI4/AJ5C
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
____________________________________________________________
53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f14dd5cb114430195fst02vuc
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:00:42 -0500
From: Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>
To: APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
Message-ID:
<CA+K5gze0khW4_GWNphTO1Scxz2WGBzCWyxoS4iUQt--kUHqB8A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
So the bomb on board (the pressure bottle for the Nitrogen system) isn't
hazardous? Try selling that to Manned flight safety folks.....
Alan and Joe are right.
Bob
N4HY
On Jan 17, 2012 4:22 AM, "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Trevor,
>
> The key part is that it was a manned mission. The complexity of the safety
> paperwork, let alone the mission, jumps because of that. Pyrotechnics of
> any sort are always an issue, but much less when the mission only involves
> hardware.
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
> Behalf Of Trevor .
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:34 PM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite
>
> --- On Tue, 17/1/12, Joe Leikhim <rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > Date: Tuesday, 17 January, 2012, 3:43
> > Has anyone seen this. I am surprised
> > a shuttle mission permitted this type of booster. From what
> > I believed, safety concerns prevented most types of
> > boosters.
> >
> > http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1
>
> There are several CubeSats being developed that will carry thrusters, for
> example Delfi-n3Xt
>
> http://delfispace.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&
> id=14&Itemid=18
>
> The safety concerns you mention relate to satellites fitted with
> conventional rocket fuel motors.
>
> The Delfi-n3Xt approach uses nitrogen as the propellant and there are other
> approaches that would also be safe to fly.
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
> ----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:33:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] IC910 Main/Sub
Message-ID:
<26770678.1326814435285.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Pedro,
For 9600B I connect PTT and TX data to the sub jack and receive audio to the
Main Jack. This has worked fine for many satellites and several different
TNC's.
For 1200b I use the aux jack. This works fine for both satellite and simplex.
Bom Gia and 73
Tom K8TL
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:37 -0500
From: "Jack Colson" <jcolson7@xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] G3RUH PCB for FO-12 modem and 9600 baud modem
Message-ID: <D915E282C919498FBA2D8F4020E6E8AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original
Is there any interest in either of these boards?
I have one each available, working the last time I used them.
Contact:
W3TMZ
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 29
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
