| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 10.12.11 02:46l 787 Lines 27141 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6670
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 670
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<CX2SA
Sent: 111210/0042Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:42579 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6670
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. QRZ.com Gridmapper Working Again (John Papay)
2. Opportunity to Test Cubesat Projects on High Altitude
Balloons (Trevor .)
3. FW: Re: moderated list (Dee)
4. Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega (Peter Guelzow)
5. Euroluna Cubesat on TV (Trevor .)
6. Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega (Stefan Wagener)
7. VEGA cubesats (g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
8. Re: FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6 (Mineo Wakita)
9. Re: moderated list (Joe Leikhim)
10. Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega (Peter Guelzow)
11. Re: Euroluna Cubesat on TV (Bent)
12. Re: FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6 (Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr))
13. SatPS32 off screen window (Jeff KB2M)
14. W5PFG/P to Grid EM31, 10 Nov 2011 (Clayton Coleman W5PFG)
15. Re: moderated list (James Duffey)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:00:11 -0500
From: John Papay <john@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] QRZ.com Gridmapper Working Again
Message-ID: <548652.65144.qm@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
I'm pleased to report that with the new QRZ.com format,
the Gridmapper has been fixed. Gridmapper allows you to
see the gridsquare of the lookup station on a Google map.
A six character square is outlined. It makes it easy to
see how far a particular station is from another grid that
you might need.
To use gridmapper click on Detail and then scroll to the bottom
of the map on the right and click on the Gridmapper link.
QRZ.com is a great resource for ham radio operators. We are
very fortunate to have it. If you don't have your email address
on qrz.com, please consider listing it. It makes it much easier
for someone to contact you if there is something going on that
you might not be aware of with respect to your operations.
73,
John K8YSE
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 21:02:02 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Opportunity to Test Cubesat Projects on High
Altitude Balloons
Message-ID:
<1323464522.58204.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
This appeared on the CubeSat mailing list
http://lists.cubesat.org/mailman/listinfo
The NASA Flight Opportunities Program is offering hosted flights aboard high
altitude balloon platforms to test new space technology in a relevant,
space-like environment. If you are developing an innovative Cubesat system
that could benefit from a demonstration at 30 km (98,000 ft) altitude, this
may be an opportunity to receive a NASA-hosted balloon-borne test flight.
For more information, visit:
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/
The Announcement of Flight Opportunities solicitation is available here:
http://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/solicitations/summary.do?method=init&solId
=%7B0A6C5D60-20F3-E7FE-D4A3-710AE8AA43B6%7D&path=open
The proposal deadline is next week on December 16, 2011.
Godspeed,
Eric
Eric Byers
Project Management
Near Space Corporation
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:21:50 -0500
From: Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FW: Re: moderated list
Message-ID: <001201ccb6b8$91223e80$b366bb80$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
-----Original Message-----
From: Dee [mailto:Morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:04 PM
To: 'Bruce'
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
I get so much info here that it would cut off avenues for information
that we may or may NOT hear about. Moderated has its limitations that
give an indication that deaf ears to certain areas do not have a point.
(Delete buttons work the same on ALL computers!) I believe that the
whole idea to anyone's doubts is that we seem to have hit a low point in
satellite construction and deployment because of the economic times,
getting rougher in the near future. As to those that ask "where to
donate?" it is your choice to support the kinds of satellites that you
want to have in orbit. I think that the amount of posts equals the
enthusiasm in the satellite community.
Questions are a good source of discussion. We Google for information
that sometimes isn't there. Answers should come from our AMSAT groups
but their hands are tied with ITAR and political issues internal to the
groups. If you recall, VOLUNTEERS are those that we rely on from day to
day operations. Step up to the plate and use your talents where they
will add to efforts of the few. Then, find out what time you have left
to write about the information you need to disburse to fellow AMSAT
members.
73,
Dee, NB2F
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Bruce
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:41 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Having been a member of the list since the early 90's, I have seen my
share of the same name calling, finger pointing etc. When AO-40 ceased
operations, there was finger pointing as to who was responsible for what
and who did what. This went on for weeks and weeks. There have been many
more instances of this.
We have always had problems with let's say one person being negative and
starting a flame thread going. What makes this list unique is that it is
not moderated and everyone can voice their opinion.
How would you feel if you posted a message to the list and you used a
word in it that the moderator felt was not appropriate for the list and
your message was bounced? It puts a tremendous amount of work and
responsibility on the moderator. He cannot do it alone so you will have
multiple moderators. Now, you have several people all of which will be
interpreting the rules a different way.
We see this in the court room on a daily basis. One guy robs a bank and
gets 5 years another does it and gets 2. One is caught DWI and gets
probation another gets 2 years. This is how our messages will be
interpreted and this is probably worse than us being able to filter what
we want when we want.
When a thread does not meet my standards, I filter the thread to the
junk bin and if there is someone that is continuously wreaking havoc, I
filter them out.
I have total control of what I read and see. And, as some have done over
the years including board members, unsubscribe. These are all choices
that are available to you and none of them needs or requires a list
moderator.
73...bruce
________________________________
From: "normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxxx <normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Fri, December 9, 2011 3:33:44 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] moderated list
Anyone else feel the need for a moderated list?
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:22:18 +0100
From: Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
To: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega
Message-ID: <4EE27C0A.9070506@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Stefan and all,
First of all, English is not my mother language. Please apologize..
Also I'm not a politician who thinks twice about what he is saying, in
particular if you have to give a talk under time pressure and not in you
native language. This is also "life".. I have to live with it..
So it might be that I could be wrongly interpreted, in particular if
someone already has a strong bias in another direction.. there is always
room for false interpretations based on your own attitude.
In my translation book "to denounce so" (denunciate the CubeSat
community) is a very crude word, in particular if used in an false
accusation which was made.
People have been killed because of this in the past!!
So I felt it appropriate to reply in the way I did..
If I misinterpreted your words and you did not mean it that way, I can
only apologize for saying you were "crude" and "blinded by rage" in your
interpretation of what I have said (or not said)...
Unfortunately you ignored the rest of my Statements.
On 09.12.2011 05:56, Stefan Wagener wrote:
> Now then, please help me and others understand your comments you made
> at AMSAT-UK (listed below): "The amateur community in general is not
> interested in Cubesats, "I know some of you might not like to hear
> that "It might sound like a high nose attitude, but it is life "Those
> that have done P3 satellites have no interest in Cubesats If those
> statements, which by the way come directly from the AMSAT-UK video of
> your presentation
>
I do not read anywhere that I or AMSAT-DL is denouncing the CubeSats (or
the CubeSat community) ??
I can not speak for the whole amateur community in general, but only for
the AMSAT-DL membership and a lot of them had the luck to experiences
satellites like P3-B (AO-10), P3-C (AO-13) and P3-D AO-40).
What is so wrong with our membership favoring another P3-E over a CubeSat?
Who was it who called those P3-E supporters being from or living in the
past century and of high nosed attitude?
Our membership is favor in finishing P3-E and getting it launched. Thus
we are concentrating in getting enough funding to finish and launch it.
We even have to go "out of the ordinary" ways to achieve this goal and
beyond. This is not easy, we never told it would be easy.. I agree, we
could have chosen an simpler way.
One of the good things of Amateur Radio is it's so-called Ham Spirit and
the many facets our hobby has.
So why not let one group doing THIS and the other doing THAT !?!?
If someone within the AMSAT-DL community comes up with a good idea, if
he thinks can raise money for it and if he is willing to actively work
on it, why should I or the AMSAT-DL membership refuse him?
Well, I suggest to read my previous mail without the mentioned words, so
that I don't have to repeat it again and again..
Sorry for the rest of you folks... "Ich habe fertig..."
I hope to have some better news soon :-)
73s Peter DB2OS
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 21:31:03 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Euroluna Cubesat on TV
Message-ID:
<1323466263.77177.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
See
http://www.uk.amsat.org/2011/12/09/danish-euroluna-project-on-tv/
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:34:10 -0600
From: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega
Message-ID:
<CAKu8kHD0Q=4bic3ZL0iu0t0=-3dv1XNv66aXzj4frwMVC9KBeg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Fair enough,
No permanent damage done. I certainly respect the decisions made by
AMSAT-DL to focus on P3E. It's a great satellite! Let's have us go
back to building and launching satellites, the big ones and the small
ones. I believe we are all on the same page and the more diverse the
satellites are the better for all of us.
Good luck with P3E!
Stefan
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx> wrote:
> Hi Stefan and all,
>
> First of all, English is not my mother language. Please apologize..
>
> Also I'm not a politician who thinks twice about what he is saying, in
> particular if you have to give a talk under time pressure and not in you
> native language. This is also "life".. I have to live with it..
>
> So it might be that I could be wrongly interpreted, in particular if someone
> already has a strong bias in another direction.. there is always room for
> false interpretations based on your own attitude.
>
> In my translation book "to denounce so" (denunciate the CubeSat community)
> is a very crude word,? in particular if used in an false accusation which
> was made.
>
> People have been killed because of this in the past!!
>
> So I felt it appropriate to reply in the way I did..
>
> If I misinterpreted your words and you did not mean it that way, I can only
> apologize for saying you were ?crude? and ?blinded by rage? in your
> interpretation of what I have said (or not said)...
>
> Unfortunately you ignored the rest of my Statements.
>
> On 09.12.2011 05:56, Stefan Wagener wrote:
>
> Now then, please help me and others understand your comments you made at
> AMSAT-UK (listed below): "The amateur community in general is not interested
> in Cubesats, "I know some of you might not like to hear that "It might sound
> like a high nose attitude, but it is life "Those that have done P3
> satellites have no interest in Cubesats If those statements, which by the
> way come directly from the AMSAT-UK video of your presentation
>
>
> I do not read anywhere that I or AMSAT-DL is denouncing the CubeSats (or the
> CubeSat community) ??
>
> I can not speak for the whole amateur community in general, but only for the
> AMSAT-DL membership and a lot of them had the luck to experiences satellites
> like P3-B (AO-10), P3-C (AO-13) and P3-D AO-40).
>
> What is so wrong with our membership favoring another P3-E over a CubeSat?
>
> Who was it who called those P3-E supporters being from or living in the past
> century and of high nosed attitude?
>
> Our membership is favor in finishing P3-E and getting it launched.? Thus we
> are concentrating in getting enough funding to finish and launch it.? We
> even have to go ?out of the ordinary? ways to achieve this goal and beyond.
> This is not easy, we never told it would be easy.. I agree, we could have
> chosen an simpler way.
>
> One of the good things of Amateur Radio is it's so-called Ham Spirit and the
> many facets our hobby has.
>
> So why not let one group doing THIS and the other doing THAT !?!?
>
> If someone within the AMSAT-DL community comes up with a good idea, if he
> thinks can raise money for it and if he is willing to actively work on it,
> why should I or the AMSAT-DL membership refuse him?
>
> Well, I suggest to read my previous mail without the mentioned words, so
> that I don't have to repeat it again and again..
>
> Sorry for the rest of you folks... "Ich habe fertig..."
> I hope to have some better news soon :-)
>
> 73s Peter DB2OS
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 22:10:06 -0000
From: <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] VEGA cubesats
Message-ID: <362979D7E56940DD9541086D1E66E5F9@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
Hi All,
I understand that here is still some uncertainty as to how many and which
cubesats will actually be taken into space on the Vega Maiden Flight. Not
all of the original 9 selected satellites have been fully completed in time
for the required pre-launch processes. I expect we will see more precise
information issued by ESA within the next few weeks.
73
Graham
G3VZV
-----Original Message-----
From: Mineo Wakita
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 3:17 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Robusta_and_Baumanets
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/hamradio/je9pel/esa9cubf.htm
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:13:49 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6
Message-ID: <54217DE9BF4C47189F13A87426B34A57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
I confirmed today that Up 145.980MHz / Down 437.345MHz, 9600bps
20:59-21:12JST, 9 Dec 2011, Ele 59 N-E-ES
Up 145.980MHz / Down 437.345MHz, 9600bps
-----------------------------------------------------
[UISS Auto-Log date - Mode: All Packets - 2011/12/09]
-----------------------------------------------------
Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=26 >[21:02:53]
:SAT :Hello via FAST1
Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=26 >[21:02:58]
:SAT :Hello via FAST1
Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=54 >[21:03:18]
=3523.05N/13936.61E- Yokohama Japan via FAST1 {UISS52}
Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=30 >[21:06:15]
:SAT :Hello via FAST1 9k6
----------------------------------------------------------
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:16:35 -0500
From: Joe Leikhim <rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Message-ID: <4EE288C3.9080501@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
No more so than should we have to have permission to transmit on a satellite.
That being said, I have noticed over the years that a lot of childish stuff
has been said on the AMSAT-BB which may have impacted the participation of
volunteers, contribution of donations or professional offers of assistance
(launch opportunities). You really never know who is reading, and you may
scare off potential membership or contribution.
Please think before hitting send. Unlike the PTT button, you have still a
chance NOT to "say whats on your mind".
>Message: 15
>Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 4:33:44 -0500
>From:<normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>
>To:"amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>Subject: [amsat-bb] moderated list
>Message-ID:<20111209093344.KKIX1.12900.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>Anyone else feel the need for a moderated list?
--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
Leikhim and Associates
Communications Consultants
Oviedo, Florida
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:18:55 +0100
From: Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
To: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega
Message-ID: <4EE2894F.7060302@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Thanks Stefan,
I can only agree with what you say..
I hope to meet you one day in person...
best wishes
Peter, DB2OS
On 09.12.2011 22:34, Stefan Wagener wrote:
> Fair enough,
>
> No permanent damage done. I certainly respect the decisions made by
> AMSAT-DL to focus on P3E. It's a great satellite! Let's have us go
> back to building and launching satellites, the big ones and the small
> ones. I believe we are all on the same page and the more diverse the
> satellites are the better for all of us.
>
> Good luck with P3E!
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
wrote:
>> Hi Stefan and all,
>>
>> First of all, English is not my mother language. Please apologize..
>>
>> Also I'm not a politician who thinks twice about what he is saying, in
>> particular if you have to give a talk under time pressure and not in you
>> native language. This is also "life".. I have to live with it..
>>
>> So it might be that I could be wrongly interpreted, in particular if
someone
>> already has a strong bias in another direction.. there is always room for
>> false interpretations based on your own attitude.
>>
>> In my translation book "to denounce so" (denunciate the CubeSat community)
>> is a very crude word, in particular if used in an false accusation which
>> was made.
>>
>> People have been killed because of this in the past!!
>>
>> So I felt it appropriate to reply in the way I did..
>>
>> If I misinterpreted your words and you did not mean it that way, I can only
>> apologize for saying you were ?crude? and ?blinded by rage? in your
>> interpretation of what I have said (or not said)...
>>
>> Unfortunately you ignored the rest of my Statements.
>>
>> On 09.12.2011 05:56, Stefan Wagener wrote:
>>
>> Now then, please help me and others understand your comments you made at
>> AMSAT-UK (listed below): "The amateur community in general is not
interested
>> in Cubesats, "I know some of you might not like to hear that "It might
sound
>> like a high nose attitude, but it is life "Those that have done P3
>> satellites have no interest in Cubesats If those statements, which by the
>> way come directly from the AMSAT-UK video of your presentation
>>
>>
>> I do not read anywhere that I or AMSAT-DL is denouncing the CubeSats (or
the
>> CubeSat community) ??
>>
>> I can not speak for the whole amateur community in general, but only for
the
>> AMSAT-DL membership and a lot of them had the luck to experiences
satellites
>> like P3-B (AO-10), P3-C (AO-13) and P3-D AO-40).
>>
>> What is so wrong with our membership favoring another P3-E over a CubeSat?
>>
>> Who was it who called those P3-E supporters being from or living in the
past
>> century and of high nosed attitude?
>>
>> Our membership is favor in finishing P3-E and getting it launched. Thus we
>> are concentrating in getting enough funding to finish and launch it. We
>> even have to go ?out of the ordinary? ways to achieve this goal and beyond.
>> This is not easy, we never told it would be easy.. I agree, we could have
>> chosen an simpler way.
>>
>> One of the good things of Amateur Radio is it's so-called Ham Spirit and
the
>> many facets our hobby has.
>>
>> So why not let one group doing THIS and the other doing THAT !?!?
>>
>> If someone within the AMSAT-DL community comes up with a good idea, if he
>> thinks can raise money for it and if he is willing to actively work on it,
>> why should I or the AMSAT-DL membership refuse him?
>>
>> Well, I suggest to read my previous mail without the mentioned words, so
>> that I don't have to repeat it again and again..
>>
>> Sorry for the rest of you folks... "Ich habe fertig..."
>> I hope to have some better news soon :-)
>>
>> 73s Peter DB2OS
>>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:30:44 +0100
From: Bent <oz6bl@xxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Euroluna Cubesat on TV
Message-ID: <4EE28C14.3000909@xxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 2011-12-09 22:31, Trevor . wrote:
> See
>
> http://www.uk.amsat.org/2011/12/09/danish-euroluna-project-on-tv/
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>
>
You should probably have one of your Danish friends next to you to get
full benefit of the video. But it is interesting quand m?me.
Bent, OZ6BL
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:37:36 -0500
From: "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6
Message-ID: <4EE28DB0.3080603@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
So, with that confirmation coupled with earlier 1200 baud confirmations
on 145.825, it would seem that the 1200/9600 baud uplink frequencies
published on the original FASTRAC page are backwards.
http://fastrac.ae.utexas.edu/for_radio_operators/overview.php
Does anyone have a contact on the FASTRAC team to get the bad
information corrected? Or have the frequencies only been switched with
the opening of the digipeater?
http://www.uk.amsat.org/2011/12/01/fastrac-1-digipeater-activated/
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
On 12/9/2011 5:13 PM, Mineo Wakita wrote:
> I confirmed today that Up 145.980MHz / Down 437.345MHz, 9600bps
>
> 20:59-21:12JST, 9 Dec 2011, Ele 59 N-E-ES
> Up 145.980MHz / Down 437.345MHz, 9600bps
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> [UISS Auto-Log date - Mode: All Packets - 2011/12/09]
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=26 >[21:02:53]
> :SAT :Hello via FAST1
> Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=26 >[21:02:58]
> :SAT :Hello via FAST1
> Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=54 >[21:03:18]
> =3523.05N/13936.61E- Yokohama Japan via FAST1 {UISS52}
> Fm JE9PEL To APRS Via FAST1* <UI pid=F0 Len=30 >[21:06:15]
> :SAT :Hello via FAST1 9k6
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:59:03 -0500
From: "Jeff KB2M" <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Amsat BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPS32 off screen window
Message-ID: <009101ccb6c6$256c5be0$704513a0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Has anyone had a SatPC32 problem where the program opens in a window off
screen. I'm stuck here and none of the standard window fixes to bring the
window back onscreen I goggled up work. I need to know where SatPC32 stores
it's startup window information, somehow it must of got clobbered. I'm
running XP...
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:34:17 -0600
From: Clayton Coleman W5PFG <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] W5PFG/P to Grid EM31, 10 Nov 2011
Message-ID:
<CAPovOweoYaAjSBJUhTrxwcxFf0HRiCGqNZMrcJ4jEx5xpWbR9w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I will be traveling to EM31 tomorrow afternoon, 10 November. If you
need grid EM31 confirmed, please email me. There are a couple of
SO-50 passes I will be able to work but only if requested.
73
Clayton
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:39:09 -0700
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Message-ID: <60F4FD2E-A025-4C4E-9C7A-3B5C641C0036@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:33 AM, <normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
> Anyone else feel the need for a moderated list?
Nope.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 670
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
