| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 09.12.11 18:34l 776 Lines 26350 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6668
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 668
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<PY1AYH<PY1AYH<CX2SA
Sent: 111209/1630Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:42533 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6668
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. I STILL have a question! (K4FEG)
2. Re: I STILL have a question! (G0MRF@xxx.xxxx
3. Re: moderated list (Jeffrey Koehler)
4. Re: moderated list (Jeff Welsh)
5. DO-64 Successor Delfi-n3xt (PE0SAT)
6. Re: moderated list (Doug Dietz)
7. FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6 (Mineo Wakita)
8. Re: DO-64 Successor Delfi-n3xt (Trevor .)
9. Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega (Bruce Robertson)
10. Re: I STILL have a question! (Bruce Robertson)
11. Re: moderated list (Bruce)
12. Robusta and Baumanets?2 (Trevor .)
13. Re: Robusta_and_Baumanets (Mineo Wakita)
14. Re: FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6 (Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr))
15. Re: Amateur Satellite Service (Rsoifer@xxx.xxxx
16. Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega (John Becker)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:06:06 -0600
From: K4FEG <K4FEG@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] I STILL have a question!
Message-ID: <4EE1DD8E.80103@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
With all that has been said here since the "expected" death of AO-51 I
want to KNOW what I can do to help move towards whichever, next
satellite that can be got into space.
I don't care about the delivery vehicle , whether or not it is a cube,
sphere, pyramid or in the shape of a Volkswagen Beetle.
I am interested in a satellite that can be used by amateurs to
"communicate" I have my personal preferences as to what type of
satellite I would prefer but *_at this point I don't care what type of
satellite it is.
_*
_*I know how to adapt to what ever mode it operates on.
*_
_*I just want to know WHAT TO SUPPORT AND HOW TO SUPPORT IT!*_
all I have heard ,"stop the attacks, do this do that"
I still don't have a clear picture of what is the closest to being ready
and what we need to do to facilitate it's completion.I can't support it
if the "powers to be" won't tell us what is needed.
Information is power and I don't have any information on what direction
we need to head.
that's my opinion!
*_Lead, follow or get out of the way!_*
Frank
K4FEG
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 06:02:52 -0500 (EST)
From: G0MRF@xxx.xxx
To: K4FEG@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: I STILL have a question!
Message-ID: <2ca74.4ac07d08.3c1344dc@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi Frank.
The next AMSAT satellite due for launch is likely to be Funcube from
AMSAT-UK. It will be possible to donate to this project from later this month
via the AMSAT-UK web site.
UKube also carries a linear transponder, It's not an 'AMSAT' project, but
the boards have been provided by AMSAT-UK. Fortunately -and we are REALLY
lucky here- that project is already fully funded by the UK Space agency
In the meantime, you can use Paypal to donate to Fox at _www.amsat.org_
(http://www.amsat.org) . I believe Fox is still at the advanced design stage
but this will be a short process due to all the experience AMSAT-NA have
gained with ARISSat.
Or you can take the optimists view and support the completion of the
hardware for P3E. Which if a launch can be identified will be spectacular for
everyone. (But please let it be able to run on solar power alone!!)
Sorry if I've missed any other projects...but I'm sure they will speak up
Thanks
David
In a message dated 09/12/2011 10:19:33 GMT Standard Time, K4FEG@xxxxx.xxx
writes:
With all that has been said here since the "expected" death of AO-51 I
want to KNOW what I can do to help move towards whichever, next
satellite that can be got into space.
I don't care about the delivery vehicle , whether or not it is a cube,
sphere, pyramid or in the shape of a Volkswagen Beetle.
I am interested in a satellite that can be used by amateurs to
"communicate" I have my personal preferences as to what type of
satellite I would prefer but *_at this point I don't care what type of
satellite it is.
_*
_*I know how to adapt to what ever mode it operates on.
*_
_*I just want to know WHAT TO SUPPORT AND HOW TO SUPPORT IT!*_
all I have heard ,"stop the attacks, do this do that"
I still don't have a clear picture of what is the closest to being ready
and what we need to do to facilitate it's completion.I can't support it
if the "powers to be" won't tell us what is needed.
Information is power and I don't have any information on what direction
we need to head.
that's my opinion!
*_Lead, follow or get out of the way!_*
Frank
K4FEG
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 03:33:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeffrey Koehler <jeffk13057@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxxx
<normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Message-ID:
<1323430398.80850.androidMobile@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Yup.
This name calling and finger pointing is getting ridiculous.
WB2SYK
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:10:43 -0500
From: Jeff Welsh <jhwelsh@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Jeffrey Koehler <jeffk13057@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Message-ID:
<CAGHdFOSiBK5riKzM8gQHx_LDjgqydXPV7ByysZ=67Th8Rz5JUw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I think it's time for me to officially unsubscribe.
It's unfortunate because there is so much information presented here, but
the cycle of negativity is a bit much.
--jeff
N3QO
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Jeffrey Koehler <jeffk13057@xxxxx.xxx>wrote:
> Yup.
>
> This name calling and finger pointing is getting ridiculous.
>
> WB2SYK
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:33:28 +0100
From: "PE0SAT" <pe0sat@xxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] DO-64 Successor Delfi-n3xt
Message-ID: <20111209123328.710021A383@xx.xxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
The DO-64 successor will be launched in 260 days.
have a look at: http://www.delfispace.nl/
"Communication Subsystem (COMMS) ? Currently, three radios are envisioned
on Delfi-n3Xt: an improved version of the transceiver flown on Delfi-C3,
the advanced transceiver payload and a S-band transmitter. The subsystem
will continuously transmit housekeeping and payload data, operate the
high-speed data link above Delft and act as a linear transponder service
for radio amateurs. The transponder service is a return favour since the
radio amateur community allows us to use their frequencies."
73 Jan PE0SAT
--
With regards PE0SAT
Internet web-page http://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:07:28 -0500
From: Doug Dietz <dcdietz@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Jeffrey Koehler <jeffk13057@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Message-ID: <A8492304-2AEF-4E9F-B090-4B7E4A90D84E@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
YUp silence those that disagree...........remember HITLER
On Dec 9, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Jeffrey Koehler wrote:
> Yup.
>
> This name calling and finger pointing is getting ridiculous.
>
> WB2SYK
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 22:43:15 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6
Message-ID: <297BF1311A394BD4BA7B92136D03A0EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
Now,
Up 145.825MHz/Down 437.345MHz, 1200bps
Up 145.980MHz/Down 437.345MHz, 9600bps (Info. by JH1BCL)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/hamradio/je9pel/fastdigi.htm
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:45:43 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: DO-64 Successor Delfi-n3xt
Message-ID:
<1323438343.29013.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Yes DNEPR launch in September is certainly good news. The IARU coodination
page says the 145/435 frequencies are the same as DO-64 with the addition of
2401.500 MHz.
http://www.amsatuk.me.uk/iaru/finished_detail.php?serialnum=138
The launch announcement said:
On Monday 31st of October, TU Delft has signed a launch contract with
Innovative Solutions in Space-ISIS BV for the launch of Delfi-n3Xt.
Delfi-n3Xt is now planned for a launch in September 2012 with a the Russian
Dnepr launch vehicle. This means that the countdown to launch for Delfi-n3Xt
has started.
The last two months of 2011 will be dedicated to making a fully functional
engineering model of the satellite. In the first quarter of 2012, the
hardware and software will be tuned an finalized. In the second quarter of
2012, system level tests will be performed. In the summer of 2012 the
preparations for launch and early operations will commence.
These are very exciting times for the team, partners and everybody who is
and has been involved in the mission!
http://www.delfispace.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blo
g&id=1&Itemid=3
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:15:32 -0400
From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega
Message-ID:
<CA++Umbnw28O56FQXj20gcy206GNH4QERxWaUs9Y57+zdrxU=tQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Whatever the politics or attitudes involved, I think it is possible to
view the situation more optimistically.
We all know that in today's climate a HEO flight will entail either a
huge donation campaign or a free ride. If both AMSAT-NA and AMSAT-DL
were chasing these funds, we would lose the opportunities that FOX is
offering in Cubesat design, and we'd certainly never raise the money
necessary for HEO. As it is, I think -DL is doing a great job
positioning themselves within the Euro context, but obviously there
are difficult economic headwinds for them to overcome.
I suppose we can all agree that the SDX on ARISSAT and about to be
flown on the FOXES will be an important technology whatever the orbit
of a future amateur communication satellite. In many ways, the
advantages of SDX are even more profound in HEO; indeed, if I remember
correctly, it was first conceived for Eagle, a HEO bird.
Thus if ITAR relaxes somewhat, AMSAT-NA's know-how in SDX can assist a
future HEO project in countries like India, where a future HEO launch
subsidized by the government is still possible. (And if it doesn't,
AMSAT-NA can still partner with cubesat projects within the US, a
sizable number.)
I suspect the misunderstanding below comes from two meanings of the
word 'cubesat', a confusion that I've noticed several times in the
last couple of weeks. Most accurately defined, cubesat is a physical
format and cheap launch system. However, because until now most
satellites in the cubesat format have not had a communications
component, we amateurs have tended to consider them 'telemetry and
control' satellites, omitting the communications component which we
all enjoy.
If, with reference to this latter definition, you were to say 'most
amateurs aren't interested in cubesats', you'd probably be right.
(Though I'm among those who find them fascinating.) However, the goal
of Fox-and-Friends (sorry, I've been avoiding making that joke for a
while now) is to provide Echo-quality communications. If you say 'most
amateurs aren't interested in cubesats' with reference to those
capabilities, I think you'd be quite wrong: who would stipulate that
the satellite must be big, heavy and expensive to launch in order to
have fun communicating with a neighboring country through it?
I hope nobody thinks I've misrepresented their ideas. I just think
there is far more that unites us than divides, especially with the
amazing opportunities that are on the way.
73, VE9QRP
Bruce
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for responding. I am amazed by your reaction to a simple post.
> Calling it "crude, false, blinded by rage" is quite a statement. But
> hey, you have every right to your opinion!
>
> Now then, please help me and others understand your comments you made
> at AMSAT-UK (listed below):
>
> "The amateur community in general is not interested in Cubesats,
> "I know some of you might not like to hear that
> "It might sound like a high nose attitude, but it is life
> "Those that have done P3 satellites have no interest in Cubesats
>
> If those statements, which by the way come directly from the AMSAT-UK
> video of your presentation (available online) are made by the
> president of AMSAT-DL at an international meeting, I certainly do not
> call this an endorsement but rather a denouncement of AMSAT-DL's
> interest in cubesats.
>
> If you call this "crude, false and blinded by rage"... ?I am not sure
> what your talking about and it certainly does not help or aid in the
> discussion.
>
> The simple basic fact is that AMSAT-DL under your leadership is not
> building, designing or planning any CubeSat projects (as far as I
> know). Now, please prove me wrong. I would love to support
> (financially) an AMSAT-DL Cubesat mission.
>
>
> Stefan VE4NSA (DG1GWS)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
wrote:
>> On 08.12.2011 16:17, Stefan Wagener wrote:
>>> very simple, politics.
>>>
>>> AMSAT-DL's ?leadership has openly
>>> denouced Cubesats. So two of the biggest AMSATs either can't or don't
>>> want to. Talk about a pathetic situation for our community.
>>>
>>> Stefan VE4NSA
>>>
>>
>> I don't know what kind of problem you have and why you make such crude
>> and false presences.
>>
>> What is so wrong when we are saying that we (the AMSAT-DL members and
>> BOD) want to build and fly another "AMSAT P3-E" rather than a CubeSat?
>>
>> Should we scrap P3-E for the sake of another CubeSat??
>>
>> Neither does the AMSAT-DL BOD nor does our membership condemn or
>> disapprove CubeSats.
>>
>> In the past years we had CubeSat team from German Universities coming to
>> our Symposium.
>> We have even given advice to some of them or help *if wanted*. We also
>> attended a critical design review of SwissCube, etc..
>> I was personally at the CubeSat laboratory of the University of Tokyo a
>> couple of years ago to see some of their first CubeSats and discuss some
>> ideas with the Students and their Professor.
>>
>> We have simply decided to concentrate our efforts to what is more
>> important for our community.
>>
>> If you would have listen *carefuly* and not blinded by rage to what I
>> have said during the AMSAT-UK Colloquium, you would not make repeatedly
>> such statements...
>>
>>
>> Peter DB2OS
>> President AMSAT-DL
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:29:16 -0400
From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
To: G0MRF@xxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: I STILL have a question!
Message-ID:
<CA++Umb=z6W-iG4Mz4VQzaOHSqXgtHioDhzAUkWs4mg-hLAsH5w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reading between the lines of the President's reports from AMSAT-NA,
there are some other ways that we in -NA can 'donate', which might, in
the long run, be as effective as cash donations.
We are constantly making the case that our participation in ARISSAT,
etc. has educational outcomes. But we do not make it very easy for the
average teacher to use these resources in the classroom; and evidently
our partners would very much like to see evidence of real use.
My interpretation of these reports is that we need two things. First,
more satellite-savvy hams getting in the classroom. Second, a suite of
lesson plans based around ARISSAT or FOX or both. Obviously, we can
collaborate with UK (my guess is that ITAR doesn't cover a basic
lesson on Doppler shift, but I'll check with my lawyers :-)
Who teaches for a living here, esp. at the high school level? Who
likes to visit classrooms? What resources already exist? Do you have
some ppts lying around that could be integrated into a larger suite?
Let's start collaborating!
73, Bruce
VE9QRP
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:02 AM, <G0MRF@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hi Frank.
>
> The next AMSAT satellite due for launch is likely to be Funcube ?from
> AMSAT-UK. It will be possible to donate to this project from later ?this
month
> via the AMSAT-UK web site.
>
> UKube also carries a linear transponder, It's not an 'AMSAT' project, but
> the boards have been provided by AMSAT-UK. Fortunately -and we are REALLY
> lucky ?here- ?that project is already fully funded by the UK Space ?agency
>
> In the meantime, you can use Paypal to donate to Fox at _www.amsat.org_
> (http://www.amsat.org) . I believe Fox is still ?at the advanced design
stage
> but this will be a short process due to all the ?experience AMSAT-NA have
> gained with ARISSat.
>
> Or you can take the optimists view and support the completion of the
> hardware for P3E. Which if a launch can be identified will be spectacular
for
> everyone. (But please let it be able to run on solar power alone!!)
>
> Sorry if I've missed any other projects...but I'm sure they will speak ?up
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
>
> In a message dated 09/12/2011 10:19:33 GMT Standard Time, K4FEG@xxxxx.xxx
> writes:
>
> With all ?that has been said here since the "expected" death of AO-51 I
> want to KNOW ?what I can do to help move towards whichever, next
> satellite that can be ?got into space.
> I don't care about the delivery vehicle , whether or not it ?is a cube,
> sphere, pyramid or in the shape of a Volkswagen Beetle.
> I am ?interested in a satellite that can be used by amateurs to
> "communicate" I ?have my personal preferences as to what type of
> satellite I would prefer ?but *_at this point I don't care what type of
> satellite it ?is.
> _*
> _*I know how to adapt to what ever mode it operates ?on.
> *_
> _*I just want to know WHAT TO SUPPORT AND HOW TO SUPPORT ?IT!*_
> all I have heard ,"stop the attacks, do this do that"
> I still ?don't have a clear picture of what is the closest to being ready
> and what ?we need to do to facilitate it's completion.I can't support it
> if the ?"powers to be" won't tell us what is needed.
>
> Information is power and I ?don't have any information on what direction
> we need to ?head.
>
> that's my opinion!
>
> *_Lead, follow or get out of the ?way!_*
> Frank
> K4FEG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 06:40:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Bruce <kk5do@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moderated list
Message-ID:
<1323441651.16095.YahooMailRC@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Having been a member of the list since the early 90's, I have seen my share of
the same name calling, finger pointing etc. When AO-40 ceased operations,
there
was finger pointing as to who was responsible for what and who did what. This
went on for weeks and weeks. There have been many more instances of this.
We have always had problems with let's say one person being negative and
starting a flame thread going. What makes this list unique is that it is not
moderated and everyone can voice their opinion.
How would you feel if you posted a message to the list and you used a word
in it
that the moderator felt was not appropriate for the list and your message was
bounced? It puts a tremendous amount of work and responsibility on the
moderator. He cannot do it alone so you will have multiple moderators. Now,
you
have several people all of which will be interpreting the rules a different
way.
We see this in the court room on a daily basis. One guy robs a bank and gets 5
years another does it and gets 2. One is caught DWI and gets probation another
gets 2 years. This is how our messages will be interpreted and this is
probably
worse than us being able to filter what we want when we want.
When a thread does not meet my standards, I filter the thread to the junk bin
and if there is someone that is continuously wreaking havoc, I filter them
out.
I have total control of what I read and see. And, as some have done over the
years including board members, unsubscribe. These are all choices that are
available to you and none of them needs or requires a list moderator.
73...bruce
________________________________
From: "normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxxx <normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Fri, December 9, 2011 3:33:44 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] moderated list
Anyone else feel the need for a moderated list?
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:49:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Robusta and Baumanets?2
Message-ID:
<1323442162.60106.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
There is some information on Robusta 145.950/437.325 MHz (VEGA Jan) and
Baumanets?2 (Soyuz Q1) in these slides (in French)
http://www.ies.univ-montp2.fr/robusta/satellite/IMG/pdf/PR_GN_2011.06.20_Conf_
Le_Bourgetv2.pdf
http://www.ies.univ-montp2.fr/robusta/satellite/?lang=en
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:17:44 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Robusta_and_Baumanets
Message-ID: <DA99A17A70BF4CA7B3D545DD1F10FF2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/hamradio/je9pel/esa9cubf.htm
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:32:02 -0500
From: "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FAST-1/Digi-ON 1k2/9k6
Message-ID: <4EE229F2.2000506@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Negative. The split 9600/1200 frequencies were published on FASTRAC's
original page at
http://fastrac.ae.utexas.edu/for_radio_operators/overview.php
However, the announcement of the digipeater availability at
http://www.uk.amsat.org/2011/12/01/fastrac-1-digipeater-activated/
supersedes this and the new 1200baud frequency has been observed to work
as advertised on the new link which says:
> Frequency Information for FASTRAC-1
> - FASTRAC-1 ?Sara Lily? Downlink Frequency: 437.345 MHz
> - FASTRAC-1 ?Sara Lily? Uplink Frequency (1200 or 9600 baud): 145.825 MHz
> - FASTRAC-1 ?Sara Lily? Satellite Call Sign: FAST1
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
On 12/9/2011 8:43 AM, Mineo Wakita wrote:
> Now,
>
> Up 145.825MHz/Down 437.345MHz, 1200bps
> Up 145.980MHz/Down 437.345MHz, 9600bps (Info. by JH1BCL)
>
> http://www.ne.jp/asahi/hamradio/je9pel/fastdigi.htm
>
> JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:32:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Rsoifer@xxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Amateur Satellite Service
Message-ID: <280dc.1c519ba4.3c138405@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi all,
If you would like to learn more about this subject, go to
http://www.iaru.org/satellite/sat-freq-coord.html
73 Ray W2RS
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:58:26 -0600
From: John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 9 cubesats on board Vega
Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20111208174706.017c15e0@xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
How about as much afford on a replacement for AO-40
or it's type.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 668
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
