OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   31.10.11 21:04l 295 Lines 9560 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6606
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 606
Path: IZ3LSV<IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 111031/1903Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:35612 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6606
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Charge for Satellite Tracking? (Armando Mercado)
   2. Re: Keps! new cubesats... (Mark L. Hammond)
   3. AMSAT AGM to be broadcast on EchoLink (Gould Smith)
   4. Re: SRM not heard (Sandeep Shah)
   5. RAX-2 (Carl Rimmer W8KRF)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:44:11 -0400
From: "Armando Mercado" <am25544@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Charge for Satellite Tracking?
Message-ID: <D7E160200FED4555B334FF5138F66E79@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Greetings,

Well, how would we feel if  USSTRATCOM started
charging for the use of their data that we use to
track our satellites?

Also, using your amateur station for monetrary
gain, even if it is for a not for profit organization,
seems problematical.

Help if you want, don't if you don't.

Simple enough.

73, Armando N8IGJ





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:50:32 -0400
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
To: James Cutler <jwcutler@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Carl Rimmer W8KRF <w8krf@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Keps! new cubesats...
Message-ID: <rSqY1h00J4ltuWb05SqYLL@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

To show you how uncertain this whole thing is---this morning I went to
Space-Track and got a set of keps for these birds.   Most were dated with
"day 304".

Just now, I went for another "fresh" set--they had gone back to "day 303"
and when compared to the previous set from early this morning, and all the
AOS times are about 2-3 minutes different!

Heh.

73,

Mark N8MH

At 09:25 AM 10/31/2011 -0400, James Cutler wrote:
>We suspect RAX-2 to be Object E.   Our ground station rotators though are
failing so we're having difficulty tracking.  Our new Alfa Spids should
arrive this week so we can fix.
>
>The Utah team tracked objects B and D and they were able to communicate
with their satellites.  Since they are using high gain, narrow beam antenna,
there is little doubt that these objects are antyhing else.
>
>--Jamie
>
>----
>James W. Cutler, Assistant Professor
>University of Michigan
>Department of Aerospace Engineering
>1320 Beal Avenue
>3013 FXB Building
>Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2140
>Ph: 734-615-7238
>Fax: 734-763-0578
><http://www.umich.edu/~jwcutler/>http://www.umich.edu/~jwcutler/
>
>
>On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Mark L. Hammond
<<mailto:marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>Carl,
>
>James Cutler "is" RAX-2...he's the faculty advisor to the students who
built it.
>
>The website is most certainly behind, because we are just now getting KEPS
via SpaceTrack.
>
>RAX-2 is probably one of the objects C, D, E, F, G listed below--but most
likely NOT A, B, or H.
>
>Here they are again--grabbed just now:
>
>
>OBJECT A
>1 37849U 11061A   11302.66421759 +.00000178 +00000-0 +10000-3 0 00099
>2 37849 098.7116 238.9909 0001984 118.3667 333.6358 14.22213241000181
>OBJECT B
>1 37850U 11061B   11302.62545336 +.00000480 +00000-0 +51357-4 0 00069
>2 37850 101.6952 233.0228 0253352 289.9995 191.7441 14.77439893000169
>OBJECT C
>1 37851U 11061C   11302.94063822 +.00148715 +00000-0 +11864-1 0 00048
>2 37851 101.7071 233.4846 0255164 289.2247 068.1438 14.77565457000225
>OBJECT D
>1 37852U 11061D   11302.94064686 +.00001317 +00000-0 +11875-3 0 00172
>2 37852 101.7026 233.4847 0255574 288.8425 068.5226 14.77447189000225
>OBJECT E
>1 37853U 11061E   11302.94060934 +.00035908 +00000-0 +29140-2 0 00036
>2 37853 101.6965 233.4869 0254859 289.2129 068.1595 14.77516832000229
>OBJECT F
>1 37854U 11061F   11303.54982327  .00014649  00000-0  11859-2 0    30
>2 37854 101.6986 234.3636 0256120 286.9239 070.4027 14.77691305   296
>OBJECT G
>1 37855U 11061G   11302.87272701  .00005061  00000-0  41578-3 0    34
>2 37855 101.7081 233.4066 0257546 289.0631 068.2617 14.77654712   194
>OBJECT H
>1 37856U 11061H   11303.53330434  .00817553  77249-5  81830-3 0    44
>2 37856 107.3170 237.6855 0390613 329.7694 028.1472 15.39999395   318
>
>
>
>Mark N8MH
>
>At 02:18 PM 10/30/2011 -0400, Carl Rimmer W8KRF wrote:
>>None of these are RAX-2.  At least, not if the RAX-2 website is right. 
There are people tracking RAX-2, so would you please share the keps you are
using?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>==========================================================================
>>Message: 4
>>Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:59:23 -0400
>>From: "Mark L.
Hammond"<<mailto:marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
>>To: James
Cutler<<mailto:jwcutler@xxxxx.xxx>jwcutler@xxxxx.xxx>,<mailto:amsat-bb@xxxxx.x
xx>amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>>Subject: [amsat-bb] Keps! new cubesats...
>>Message-ID:<<mailto:qnzP1h0094ltuWb05nzQRs@xxxxx.xxx>qnzP1h0094ltuWb05nzQRs@
xxxxx.xxx>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>Let the lottery begin...
>>
>>
>>OBJECT C
>>1 37851U 11061C   11302.87290423  .00363180  00000-0  28380-1 0    23
>>2 37851 101.7088 233.3889 0254268 289.0505 068.2827 14.77654778   204
>>OBJECT D
>>No Record
>>OBJECT E
>>1 37853U 11061E   11302.87289146  .00054233  00000-0  43824-2 0    22
>>2 37853 101.6952 233.3891 0255073 289.4018 067.9690 14.77521204   207
>>OBJECT F
>>1 37854U 11061F   11302.87272970  .00031269  00000-0  25123-2 0    26
>>2 37854 101.6987 233.3835 0256260 288.7205 068.6394 14.77687338   191
>>OBJECT G
>>1 37855U 11061G   11302.87272701  .00005061  00000-0  41578-3 0    34
>>2 37855 101.7081 233.4066 0257546 289.0631 068.2617 14.77654712   194
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Mark L. Hammond  [N8MH]
>>======================================================================
>>
>>--
>>*Carl W8KRF*
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed
are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings:
<http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/
amsat-bb
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed
are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings:
<http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/
amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:41:19 -0400
From: "Gould Smith" <gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT AGM to be broadcast on EchoLink
Message-ID: <69530AC35ADF44E4B13978624FAB6C54@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

The 2011 AMSAT Annual General Meeting will be broadcast on EchoLink Saturday
5 Nov 2001 beginning about 3:15pm Pacific time (2215 UTC).
The Annual Meeting is being held in conjunction with the AMSAT Symposium in
San Jose, CA from 4-6 Nov 2011.
The Meeting is scheduled to last one hour and forty-five minutes.

Connect to the AMSAT Conference server which should accommodate 100 users.

73,
Gould, WA4SXM

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:59:18 +0530
From: Sandeep Shah <vu3sxe@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx vuhams@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SRM not heard
Message-ID: <4EAECCDE.3070900@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hello Dinesh

I did check I do have the same keps,

Nitin I thought I would hear becon or Data or anything, not sure if it
works during sunlight only,  even now I did not hear anything both on
SRM and Jugnu.Do you have any updates..Do share the same, thanks..

Vu3sxe..

On 10/31/2011 12:38 AM, Dinesh Cyanam wrote:
> SRMSAT
> 1 37841U 11058D   11302.40520615 +.00000264 +00000-0 +00000-0 0 00159
> 2 37841 019.9668 322.6738 0011190 170.0774 189.9902 14.10076842002444

--
Regards,
Sundeep Shah/Vu3sxe
Bangalore, India,
0 94484 26365.



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:15:46 -0400
From: Carl Rimmer W8KRF <w8krf@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] RAX-2
Message-ID: <4EAEE5D2.2000205@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Using Object C, E, and F, I did hear RAX-2 this morning but could not
copy the data.  Since I do not have an external TNC, I used the TS-2000
internal TNC.

For those who have the TS-2000, I set Menu 46=Main; Menu 47=9600 bps;
Menu 48=TNC Band; and Menu 55=On.  I then used HyperTerm to connect to
the TNC and did a RESET.  I turned Kiss=On, Mon=On, MCON=On, and
MCOM=On.  I disconnected from Hyperterm and ran RAX_Serial_to_TCP.bat; I
then ran RAX_GS_Client.bat.  The Summary Panel is being displayed and I
received not errors from either BAT file.  I have the Mode set to FM on
437.345 MHz.  I had to manually tune (from 5 KHz above to 5 KHz below
the center frequency during the pass) since the TNC is using the COM
port negating any CAT control.  As I said before, I am seeing a very
strong signal on my S-meter about every 20 secs.  Since 9.6K sound much
like noise, I can not really distinguish the data from the noise.

Anyone have a suggestions as to why I am not displaying data?
--
*Carl W8KRF*


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 606
****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 20.10.2024 14:31:43lGo back Go up