| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 13.07.11 20:43l 694 Lines 21828 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6379
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 379
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<JE7YGF<N9PMO<CX2SA
Sent: 110713/1838Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:16395 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6379
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. EM01/02 boundary op (Clayton W5PFG)
2. Delay in FUNcube Dongle sale tonight (Howard Long)
3. ICOM and PCSAT32 (Tom Lubbers K8TL)
4. Re: CALL SIGN (Jeff Moore)
5. Re: ICOM and PCSAT32 (Dee)
6. OE/OM/HA/NZ5N Report from the former Iron Curtain (Bill Dzurilla)
7. Re: 70cm Helicoil Good/Bad expensive? (Ted)
8. Re: ICOM and PCSAT32 (Bob- W7LRD)
9. heard with fo-29 this am (normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxxx
10. Re: ICOM and PCSAT32 (Erich Eichmann)
11. Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
(Bill Acito W1PA)
12. Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Ike Lawton via LinkedIn)
13. Re: heard with fo-29 this am (Mika Siira)
14. Re: heard with fo-29 this am (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
15. Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
(George Henry)
16. Re: heard with fo-29 this am (Andrew Glasbrenner)
17. Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
(Larry Gerhardstein)
18. Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
(Bill Acito W1PA)
19. Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
(Bill Acito W1PA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:33:31 -0500
From: Clayton W5PFG <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] EM01/02 boundary op
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<CAPovOwf8q0yPgKqC4wV=kaP9iEbYRDXKmkP16xOAfPpt7r8eHw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I will be on AO-51 at 21:05 UTC 12 July 2011 from Proctor, TX on the
EM01/EM02 boundary.
73
Clayton
W5PFG
--
Sent from my mobile device
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:35:00 +0100
From: "Howard Long" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Delay in FUNcube Dongle sale tonight
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <00da01cc40db$8ec9b120$ac5d1360$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Folks
I apologise for the delay in the sale this evening of FUNcube Dongles, age
is catching up on me and I had my head buried deep in something else. They
are now on sale!
Many thanks, and 73, Howard G6LVB
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:50:50 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
From: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ICOM and PCSAT32
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<21222004.1310493050766.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
IC-9100 + SATPC32.
My IC910 is on its last legs, now no speaker output. The 9100 has a big
price tag and a lot of features I am not interested in. I have been toying
with the idea of adding a second IC7000, one for TX the other for RX. The
first glitch I see is the CAT code for FM (04) on the 910 and the IC7000
(05) are different, the 9100 and the IC7000 use the same. Any one have any
thoughts?? I Have a IC7000, two are cheaper than a 9100!!
73 Tom K8TL
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:23:41 -0700
From: "Jeff Moore" <tnetcenter@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CALL SIGN
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <046FFC8937294EC0BDDCE02C5F7239C5@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To get a callsign:
1. Get an Amateur Radio license.
2. When license is received in the mail . . . .
3. Post license on wall of ground station.
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
CN94
----- Original Message ----- From: "N. Mahdinejad" <n.mahdinejad@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] CALL SIGN
Dear amsat members.
I want to have callsign for my ground station.
could you please guide what to do?is there any link fro start and what
kind of information need?
Any help would be gratefully appreciated.
Best Regards.
N.Mahdinejad
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:00:13 -0400
From: Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ICOM and PCSAT32
To: "'Tom Lubbers K8TL'" <k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <002e01cc40e7$751a9080$5f4fb180$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Tom,
I believe you can use 2 different rigs. There is a code on the 910 that
allows the second rig to be controlled by SATPC32. Look at the help info
of the program and it will explain what you must do. Anyone else have done
this already? I just came across this when I had to reset my IC-910 at
Field day as it wasn't taking commands from the computer.
Good Luck and let us know on the BB if you were able to get this done.
Also-I was correct- another person that is dis-satisfied with the price tag
of the 9100...
73,
Dee, NB2F
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Tom Lubbers K8TL
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 1:51 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] ICOM and PCSAT32
IC-9100 + SATPC32.
My IC910 is on its last legs, now no speaker output. The 9100 has a big
price tag and a lot of features I am not interested in. I have been toying
with the idea of adding a second IC7000, one for TX the other for RX. The
first glitch I see is the CAT code for FM (04) on the 910 and the IC7000
(05) are different, the 9100 and the IC7000 use the same. Any one have any
thoughts?? I Have a IC7000, two are cheaper than a 9100!!
73 Tom K8TL
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] OE/OM/HA/NZ5N Report from the former Iron Curtain
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<1310511778.3251.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Thanks to all who worked me or tried to work me today from the
Slovakia/Hungary/Austria joint border. It was fun, but a lot of work for
just seven contacts.
I had wanted to work from this spot for several years. I used to work in
Bratislava, Slovakia, live in Rajka, Hungary, and have dinner in Kittsee,
Austria. Three different languages, three different cultures, all within a
few miles. It always surprised me how little notice was paid to this site,
no plaque with the history of the site, no markings, not even a paved road,
just some abstract sculptures (put there in 1992) and a triangle shaped
border marker with an O on one side, M on another, and S on the third.
O = Osterreich = Austria
S = Slovensko = Slovakia
M = Magyarorsag = Hungary
The site is a preserve for the protected Great Bustard bird. A few bird
watchers were the only ones who came to the site for the entire 3 hours I
was there.
This spot has been the border only since the end of World War II. Although
both Slovakia and Hungary had pro-Nazi governments during the war, Slovakia
was regarded as a "victor" because the Allies regarded the Czechoslovak
government in exile in London as the true leadership of the country. Thus,
the Czechoslovaks were able to take the towns of Cunovo, Rusovce, and
Jarovce from Hungary in the post-war negotiations.
I had hoped to arrive early and work a couple of other sats before the 0930Z
AO-7 pass with the North America window. But with a late start and an
accident on the highway that caused a traffic jam, I got set up just barely
in time for AO-7 AOS. ON5NY was my first contact, followed by K8YSE and
KB1RVT. Another North American station was heard but I could not pull him
out.
My original plan was to leave after the AO-7 pass, but I decided to stay
longer. There were SO-67 and VO-52 passes shortly thereafter, both where I
had maximum elevation of 2 degrees, but I could not pull anyone out. There
was an AO-27 pass with a maximum elevation of 16 degrees that I should have
heard well, but there was nothing at all. Maybe I pushed a wrong button or
something (it was sunny and hard to read the computer screen), as the bird
was scheduled to be on. Then AO-7 came around again. It was loud despite a
maximum elevation of 6 degrees, and I worked four more stations, RW3XL,
F1DOI, DG0ER and OZ1MY. Could have worked many more but many of my CQs went
unaswered.
I have uploaded a few photos to my website at:
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border1.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border2.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border3.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border4.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border5.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border6.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border7.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border8.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border9.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border9a.jpg
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/border9b.jpg
The piece of barb wire fence you see in the photos was put there recently.
Contrary to popular belief, the entirety of the pre-1989 communist bloc was
not sealed in by fences and walls, there were many areas where there was no
barrier at all, just guard patrols. Makes me wonder why so many people flew
gliders across the Danube and the Morava to escape.
There is a short video of the area at:
http://www.youtube.com/exploreslovakia#p/c/4BBA8D4B8A33631C/5/h2Wr2Mp1jCU
Recording of the second AO-7 pass at:
http://www.qsl.net/nz5n/HRD 2011-07-12 071514.mp3
Height definitely matters for low elevation contacts. From my hilltop
location in Bratislava, I can hear AO-7 well even at 0.1 degrees elevation,
but from the border, even with an unobstructed view and 20 miles of
uninhabited fields in front of me, I lost the bird totally at about 1.1
degrees. Of course, it is that critical last degree where we make the
trans-continental and other DX contacts. Even before LOS, signals seemed
much weaker than at home.
If you missed me and just want the grid (JN88), try again on early Thursday,
when I'll be on from my home (same 4-digit grid as the border). If you want
all 3 countries, I don't think I'll go back to the same place this summer,
but there's a nice peak in Austria not far from me that you can drive to,
maybe I'll go there one morning. Hungary will be trickier, as it is totally
flat here in the Danube basin. Maybe a bigger and/or higher antenna would
make a difference.
73,
Bill NZ5N/OM3BD
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:31:54 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm Helicoil Good/Bad expensive?
To: "'Clint Bradford'" <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT BB'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <6AC8B501EE0744F7A54BAC12F1DA5CA5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
That will require a BFA adaptor !
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:am11 9:24 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm Helicoil Good/Bad expensive?
I am looking for an adapter to make this satellite helical work on my
handheld radio ...
http://tinyurl.com/SAT-HELICAL
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:06:45 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ICOM and PCSAT32
To: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<1235030293.511991.1310515604997.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxx
xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Consider? http://www.w7jv.com/ ?Kuni does good work and is fair.?
73 Bob W7LRD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lubbers K8TL" <k8tl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:50:50 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] ?ICOM and PCSAT32
IC-9100 + SATPC32.
My IC910 is on its last legs, now no speaker output. ?The 9100 has a big
price tag and a lot of features I am not interested in. I have been toying
with the idea of adding a second IC7000, one for TX the other for RX. ?The
first glitch I see is the CAT code for FM (04) on the 910 and the IC7000
(05) are different, the 9100 and the IC7000 use the same. Any one have any
thoughts?? ?I Have a IC7000, two are cheaper than a 9100!!
73 Tom K8TL
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 7:51:17 +0000
From: <normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] heard with fo-29 this am
To: "'AMSAT BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <20110713075117.I52D3.135926.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi all!
I heard another tlm beacon this am with fo-29. It was just lower in freq and
much slower. did not get a recording. Definitly had doppler.
Any ideas? How do I go about finding out?
Thanks,
Norm n3ykf
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:02:30 +0200
From: "Erich Eichmann" <erich.eichmann@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ICOM and PCSAT32
To: "Dee" <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <2401531040D1430596A88CC625C65EB8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; msat-bb] Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BAY157-ds1548F81166E8E2EB31851898470@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
I really like the simplicity of this program... it does what I want.
I am relatively new to both Win 7 and 64-bit; is there a simple way
to get it running in this OS? A compatibility mode, or some sort of
emulator/wrapper?
Bill W1PA
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ike Lawton via LinkedIn <member@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
To: Robert McGwier <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<2003468830.15351852.1310565748618.JavaMail.app@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
LinkedIn
------------
Ike Lawton requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
------------------------------------------
Robert,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Ike
Accept invitation from Ike Lawton
http://www.linkedin.com/e/nue9k3-gq2d0bk3-2l/uZZS51qQ8vtoSwf-G8aUdsIbren2oL/bl
k/I2957863228_2/1BpC5vrmRLoRZcjkkZt5YCpnlOt3RApnhMpmdzgmhxrSNBszYOnPwOczcSe3sR
ej99bTAVtTl1k3hibPoUej0VdPgOdjcLrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/
View profile of Ike Lawton
http://www.linkedin.com/e/nue9k3-gq2d0bk3-2l/rsn/129740183/fO0d/
------------------------------------------
--
(c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mika Siira <oh8mbn@xxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: heard with fo-29 this am
To: <normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx>, AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<4201451.78271310570655054.JavaMail.defaultUser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="ISO-8859-15"
>----Alkuper?inen viesti----
>L?hett?j?: normn3ykf@xxxx.xx.xxx
>P?iv?m??r?: 13.07.2011 10:51
>Vastaanottaja: "AMSAT BB"<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>Aihe: [amsat-bb] heard with fo-29 this am
>
>Hi all!
>I heard another tlm beacon this am with fo-29. It was just lower in
freq and much slower. did not get a recording. Definitly had doppler.
>Any ideas? How do I go about finding out?
>Thanks,
>Norm n3ykf
Hello Norm &BB,
Most likely it was HO-68 beacon (435.790MHz +/- doppler). Telemetry
starts with "BJ1SA XW XW" and after that follows actual telemetry data
in three digit groups (AAA TTT ...)
Mika, OH8MBN
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:00:08 -0400
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: heard with fo-29 this am
To: Mika Siira <oh8mbn@xxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<CAEMY9FfyQpunsdq3ak1UyX0+nraUoeXNO8zP1So4xcVbLYDTMw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It doesn't look like he was in the footprint of HO-68 on that pass. I
messed around with Orbitron and looks like possibly FO-20 beacon on 435.795?
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Jul 13, 2011 11:43 AM, "Mika Siira" <oh8mbn@xxxxxxx.xx> wrote:
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7
64-bit?
To: Bill Acito W1PA <w1pa@xxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1310577468.91139.YahooMailRC@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I didn't have to do anything special to get it to run on my Win7/64 machine...
Did you install SatPC32 to the default folder (Program Files\SatPC32)? Win7's
User Account Control can cause problems if programs are installed to the
Program
Files folder, and you are not running as Administrator.
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message ----
> From: Bill Acito W1PA <w1pa@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Sent: Wed, July 13, 2011 8:49:50 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
>
> I really like the simplicity of this program... it does what I want.
>
> I am relatively new to both Win 7 and 64-bit; is there a simple way
> to get it running in this OS? A compatibility mode, or some sort of
> emulator/wrapper?
>
> Bill W1PA
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:17 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: heard with fo-29 this am
To: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>, Mika Siira
<oh8mbn@xxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<16477397.1310577977995.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> It doesn't look like he was in the footprint of HO-68 on that pass. I
>messed around with Orbitron and looks like possibly FO-20 beacon on 435.795?
>
>
>Dave - KB1PVH
>
FO-20 was a solid tone only the last few years it was alive as I recall.
I'll darn sure listen for it though! FO-20 is a bit higher than FO-29 and
was better for DXing from down south here.
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:03:27 -0600
From: Larry Gerhardstein <W7IN@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7
64-bit?
To: Bill Acito W1PA <w1pa@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4E1DDDEF.7050400@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I suggest doing a right click on the exe, troubleshoot compatibility,
try recommended settings, start the program.
73, W7IN
On 7/13/2011 7:49 AM, Bill Acito W1PA wrote:
> I really like the simplicity of this program... it does what I want.
>
> I am relatively new to both Win 7 and 64-bit; is there a simple way
> to get it running in this OS? A compatibility mode, or some sort of
> emulator/wrapper?
>
> Bill W1PA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:22:26 -0400
From: "Bill Acito W1PA" <w1pa@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7
64-bit?
To: <W7IN@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <BAY157-ds1EC0EB6F142396E25DCC698470@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Tried that.... no joy.
Bill W1PA
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:31:29 -0400
From: "Bill Acito W1PA" <w1pa@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7
64-bit?
To: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BAY157-ds269A3C194250A290A150598470@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
I only have AOS.exe and its files, dropped them in their own folder in
/Program Files/ and ran as admin.
b
-----Original Message-----
From: George Henry
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:17 PM
To: Bill Acito W1PA ; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
I didn't have to do anything special to get it to run on my Win7/64
machine...
Did you install SatPC32 to the default folder (Program Files\SatPC32)?
Win7's
User Account Control can cause problems if programs are installed to the
Program
Files folder, and you are not running as Administrator.
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message ----
> From: Bill Acito W1PA <w1pa@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Sent: Wed, July 13, 2011 8:49:50 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Any way I can get AOS.EXE to run on Win7 64-bit?
>
> I really like the simplicity of this program... it does what I want.
>
> I am relatively new to both Win 7 and 64-bit; is there a simple way
> to get it running in this OS? A compatibility mode, or some sort of
> emulator/wrapper?
>
> Bill W1PA
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 379
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
