| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 29.06.11 21:06l 742 Lines 25327 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6353
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 353
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 110629/1905Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:13922 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6353
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Criminal Clint (saguaroastro@xxx.xxxx
2. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Joe)
3. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Dee)
4. Re: [AMSAT-BB] ISS, what the heck happened? (Bob- W7LRD)
5. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Larry Gerhardstein)
6. 5A3ST fo-29 (Marco)
7. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Larry Gerhardstein)
8. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (George and Cheryl Abbott)
9. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (w4upd)
10. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Clint Bradford)
11. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Bob Martinson)
12. Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning! (Mike Blazek)
13. Re: Pasadena (CA) Radio Club (Clint Bradford)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:07:31 -0400
From: <saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Criminal Clint
To: Joe <nss@xxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20110629100731.V3DV2.1043073.imail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
With Shovels and rakes and implements of destruction!
Rick
K7TEJ
---- Joe <nss@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> It wasn't a truck is was a red vw microbus.
>
> Joe WB9SBD
>
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>
> On 6/28/2011 7:23 PM, Ted wrote:
> > No, but they took his truck to the dump...another case of blind justice..
> > (further apologies to Arlo)
> >
> > Ted K7TRK
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
> > Behalf Of saguaroastro@xxx.xxx
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 5:03 PM
> > To: Clint Bradford; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Criminal Clint
> >
> > So did they take 37 8 by 10 color glossy photo's with circles and arrows
and
> > a paragraph on the back of each one describing what each one was to be
used
> > as eveidence against you?
> >
> > Apologies to Arlo
> > Rick
> > K7TEJ
> >
> >
> > ---- Clint Bradford<clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> >> DEE>> My town does NOT have 7 squad cars...
> >>
> >> This is - by far - the funniest line I've heard in the past 24 hours,
Dee!
> >>
> >> Clint
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:10:25 -0500
From: Joe <nss@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4E0B3251.7000606@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Wisconsin is the same way.
I can have WB9SBD on my motorcycle, car, truck, van, as many vehicles
as i want to have it on. thats gotta be a mess on their computers when
they run a plate I would think. never had it happen, but wonder what
does happen say if someone did have it on like all the above.
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 6/29/2011 7:37 AM, H. Vordenbaum wrote:
> In Texas we have "Radio Plates". I heard that you can have the same call
> sign on multiple vehicles, so I imagine you could have the same sort of
> problem if at first glance the vehicle didn't match.
> Harvey, K5HV
> Kerrville, TX
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Gerhardstein"<gerhardstein@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: "Clint Bradford"<clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
> Cc: "AMSAT BB"<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:24 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
>
>
>> In Washington state, this can not happen. See their DOL personalized
>> plate section. Anything like K6LCS "K6 LCS" are reserved for ham
>> operator plates and will not be issued for personalized. Other states,
>> including Montana, should adopt WA DOL's method of filtering ham call
>> signs. In Montana, we have seen personalized plates containing
>> combinations of letters looking exactly like ham calls--to non-hams.
>>
>> Larry W7IN, Plains MT
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:35:05 -0400
From: Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: "'Joe'" <nss@xxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <001e01cc3669$bcfa2d80$36ee8880$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
IN NJ, we have a small dash # next to the calls indicating the plate # IE
NB2F -2(in small #'s)
Then they arrest you...HA! Joking...
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:10 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
Wisconsin is the same way.
I can have WB9SBD on my motorcycle, car, truck, van, as many vehicles as i
want to have it on. thats gotta be a mess on their computers when they run
a plate I would think. never had it happen, but wonder what does happen
say if someone did have it on like all the above.
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 6/29/2011 7:37 AM, H. Vordenbaum wrote:
> In Texas we have "Radio Plates". I heard that you can have the same
> call sign on multiple vehicles, so I imagine you could have the same
> sort of problem if at first glance the vehicle didn't match.
> Harvey, K5HV
> Kerrville, TX
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Gerhardstein"<gerhardstein@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: "Clint Bradford"<clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
> Cc: "AMSAT BB"<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:24 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
>
>
>> In Washington state, this can not happen. See their DOL
>> personalized plate section. Anything like K6LCS "K6 LCS" are
>> reserved for ham operator plates and will not be issued for
>> personalized. Other states, including Montana, should adopt WA DOL's
>> method of filtering ham call signs. In Montana, we have seen
>> personalized plates containing combinations of letters looking exactly
like ham calls--to non-hams.
>>
>> Larry W7IN, Plains MT
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:09:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [AMSAT-BB] ISS, what the heck happened?
To: Alexander Sack <pisymbol@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<2069243628.8594.1309360186160.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxxxx
x.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
This goes back to a comment I made earlier and was chastised for.? However
if by some freak of nature what if there was a "real" ham up there.? Imagine
chassing the ISS on 20cw on the other side of the?world.? Propagation
characteristics,?beam pointing, doppler correction, what grid square are
they over, pile ups, etc, the head explodes!
73 Bob W7LRD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Sack" <pisymbol@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "KM9U" <arskm9u@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:57:53 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [AMSAT-BB] ISS, what the heck happened?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:40 AM, KM9U <arskm9u@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>
>>> So I think everyone read the announcement ARRL made before FD. ?Now
>>> that FD weekend is at an end, can someone explain to me why NASA
>>> couldn't let the astronauts have 10 minutes on the radio for one pass?
>>> ?I mean were they having issues with the radio itself?
>
> During Expedition 24/25, Col. Wheelock made many contacts from the ISS ?in
> the evenings and on weekends during his free time. This was not because he
> was "scheduled" to be the radio, but rather because he enjoyed doing it.
> I don't believe we can blame NASA for the current crew members obvious lack
> of interest in Amateur Radio. Had Col. Wheelock (or someone as enthustiastic
> as he) been aboard the ISS on FD, NA1SS would likely not have been silent.
>
>> Have you never make a calculation or an estimation on how it costs a 10
>> minutes of an astronaut activity all costs including on board of the ISS ?
I don't buy it.
What I do believe is the current crew isn't that interested in making
contacts with amateur radio operators. ?That's fine. ?Operating the
radio outside the educational outreach program is ertainly not part of
their mission. ?I will just have to be more patient and hope someone
gets the ham bug up there during some mission and starts to make
contacts. ?I can wait.
I DO want to state again I think it behooves NASA and the whole space
program to try to get someone on that radio like a Col Wheelock
(doesn't have to be as frequent as Col Wheelock) to generate the
enthusiasm and excitement for the ISS and the whole space program
among hams. ?My 2 cents.
> This brings up an interesting thought. The astronauts receive monetary
> compensation for performing their duties while employed by NASA. So, if
> their employer schedules them to operate amateur radio as part of their job
> assignment, would this not violate Part 97.113 (Prohibited transmissions)
> which specifically prohibits "Communications in which the station licensee
> or control operator has a pecuniary interest, including communications on
> behalf of an employer".
> Now, DON'T GET YOUR PANTIES IN A WAD! It is just a question.
>
There is no pecuniary interest involved as I see it.
-aps (KC2ZSX)
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:02:22 -0600
From: Larry Gerhardstein <gerhardstein@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: George and Cheryl Abbott <ka1ajf@xxx.xxx>
Cc: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4E0B4C8E.9080200@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
George and Cheryl,
So who is complaining? You? Harvey and I signed using our call signs.
I've never complained about hams getting more privileges, voice, WARC
bands, digital modes, LF, etc. Leaves more energy to be concerned about
hams possibly loosing privileges.
73, Larry W7IN (57 years a ham op.)
On 6/29/2011 7:04 AM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
> Why do you think that this is such a big deal?Sounds similar to the
> old timers complaining about the granting of voice privileges for
> novices back in the 80's.Get a life!
>
> -----Original Message----- From: H. Vordenbaum
>
> Harvey, K5HV
> Kerrville, TX
>
>>
>> Larry W7IN, Plains MT
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:32:07 +0200
From: "Marco" <ik1ran@xxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 5A3ST fo-29
To: "Amsat - BBs" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <08A0E11D8204443AABAA97C28496BFCF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi All ,
in afternoon Orbit 73414 FO-29 utc 15:49 i
I have QSO with 5A3ST Lybia , but I'm not sure 100%
because is in finish orbit , and in this moment , !!!! , I think is very
improbabily that station wrk satelliti
I'd be surprised if they is probably
I would be grateful if the CALL 5A3ST is a Log other
station
I look forward to contact me
Thank you in advance
73
Mark
ik1ran
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:21:29 -0600
From: Larry Gerhardstein <gerhardstein@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: George and Cheryl Abbott <ka1ajf@xxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4E0B5F19.4040900@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Who cares? In the following scenario, I would care! If I had the call
sign N1OCL and I moved from Connecticut (or where ever) to Montana and
then tried to get a ham plate for my vehicle, I would care. I believe
my application would be turned down by the Montana DOL, because the
Montana license plate number N1OCL already belongs to someone else, a
non-ham. We know the problem exists for this call. I've heard it also
exists for others as well. We suspect N1OCL is someone's airplane
registration number and the guy got it as a personalized plate number.
It perhaps is legal in Montana, but I still would be ticked off and yes,
I would care. Like I said in my first response to this thread. This
could NOT happen Washington state--see earlier post.
73, Larry W7IN
On 6/29/2011 10:26 AM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
> The discussion thread appeared concern opposition to "personalized
> "license tags resembling ham plates ,or legitimate ham plates being
> used on multiple vehicles.Who cares!.
>
> Thanks for your efforts to preserve our bandwidths! I really need to
> get back on the air.I'm still grieving the loss of AO13 and AO40.
>
> Regards, George W1GMA
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Larry Gerhardstein
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:02 PM
> To: George and Cheryl Abbott
> Cc: H. Vordenbaum ; Clint Bradford ; AMSAT BB
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
>
> George and Cheryl,
>
> So who is complaining? You? Harvey and I signed using our call signs.
> I've never complained about hams getting more privileges, voice, WARC
> bands, digital modes, LF, etc. Leaves more energy to be concerned about
> hams possibly loosing privileges.
>
> 73, Larry W7IN (57 years a ham op.)
>
> On 6/29/2011 7:04 AM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
>> Why do you think that this is such a big deal?Sounds similar to the
>> old timers complaining about the granting of voice privileges for
>> novices back in the 80's.Get a life!
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: H. Vordenbaum
>>
>> Harvey, K5HV
>> Kerrville, TX
>>
>>>
>>> Larry W7IN, Plains MT
>>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:44:55 -0400
From: "George and Cheryl Abbott" <ka1ajf@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: <gerhardstein@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <15C957C9CFED4F28A08F23D12887D920@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
If you make too big of an issue out of this motor vehicle divisions around
the country may begin to treat radio operator pates as vanity plates and
charge accordingly.I would care about being charged an additional fee by the
DVR!
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Gerhardstein
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:02 PM
To: George and Cheryl Abbott
Cc: H. Vordenbaum ; Clint Bradford ; AMSAT BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
George and Cheryl,
So who is complaining? You? Harvey and I signed using our call signs.
I've never complained about hams getting more privileges, voice, WARC
bands, digital modes, LF, etc. Leaves more energy to be concerned about
hams possibly loosing privileges.
73, Larry W7IN (57 years a ham op.)
On 6/29/2011 7:04 AM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
> Why do you think that this is such a big deal?Sounds similar to the old
> timers complaining about the granting of voice privileges for novices back
> in the 80's.Get a life!
>
> -----Original Message----- From: H. Vordenbaum
>
> Harvey, K5HV
> Kerrville, TX
>
>>
>> Larry W7IN, Plains MT
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:57:20 -0400
From: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4E0B6780.1000405@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
This is already the case in Florida. The Amateur tag is listed as a
vanity plate and you are charged accordingly. This state has hundreds of
vanity plates.
Reid, W4UPD
On 6/29/2011 1:44 PM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
> If you make too big of an issue out of this motor vehicle divisions around
> the country may begin to treat radio operator pates as vanity plates and
> charge accordingly.I would care about being charged an additional fee by the
> DVR!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Gerhardstein
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:02 PM
> To: George and Cheryl Abbott
> Cc: H. Vordenbaum ; Clint Bradford ; AMSAT BB
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
>
> George and Cheryl,
>
> So who is complaining? You? Harvey and I signed using our call signs.
> I've never complained about hams getting more privileges, voice, WARC
> bands, digital modes, LF, etc. Leaves more energy to be concerned about
> hams possibly loosing privileges.
>
> 73, Larry W7IN (57 years a ham op.)
>
> On 6/29/2011 7:04 AM, George and Cheryl Abbott wrote:
>> Why do you think that this is such a big deal?Sounds similar to the old
>> timers complaining about the granting of voice privileges for novices back
>> in the 80's.Get a life!
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: H. Vordenbaum
>>
>> Harvey, K5HV
>> Kerrville, TX
>>
>>> Larry W7IN, Plains MT
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:13:35 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: George and Cheryl Abbott <ka1ajf@xxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <C8DFB502-029C-401C-952F-78163265C20A@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>> ... If you make too big of an issue out of this motor vehicle divisions
around the country
may begin to treat radio operator pates as vanity plates and charge
accordingly ...
Originally this was almost a joke to me. But then I remember that my wife
(who was in the
car with me) asked me - quite seriously - "Is it OK for me to reach into my
purse ... " while
the original officer was back in her unit on her the radio ...
And from one with experience for decades in law enforcement:
> ------------------
> It's kind of amazing that it generally works as smoothly as it does.
> But that doesn't for one second diminish K6LCS's potentially
> life-threatening experience yesterday. His saving graces were most
> likely his own super-careful and cooperative actions in the moment, as
> well as the officers' safe handling of what, unknown to them *at the
> time*, could have been anything from a serious crime to, as it
> seemingly turned out, some sort of either system, typo, or other GIGO
> problem somewhere in the long, complex chain between Clint Bradford's
> license plate application form and the Riverside PD's dispatcher's
> screen.
> ------------------
Yes, if I was belligerent or otherwise not 100% cooperative, weapons would
have possibly
been drawn. This could have been very weird, indeed.
SO - If you are going to blame me for "making a big issue" as I attempt to
clean up the
mess that California has created with plates not conforming to CLETS and
NCIC standards
and, as a result, you pay a little more in another state for your plates,
well, I couldn't really
care. It is my intention to effect change so that no one else in California
ever has to have
what happened to me Monday occur to them.
I think that is a responsible campaign on my part. QST magazine has picked
up on it,
and will publish a piece on the situation. But I have to go - RPD is on the
phone, returning
my call ...
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:14:02 -0400
From: "Bob Martinson" <remartinson@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <003901cc3688$5336bc50$f9a434f0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
And Massachusetts
QUOTE
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of w4upd
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:57 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
This is already the case in Florida. The Amateur tag is listed as a
vanity plate and you are charged accordingly. This state has hundreds of
vanity plates.
Reid, W4UPD
UNQUOTE
Bob, K1REM
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:45:50 -0500
From: Mike Blazek <mblazek@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4E0B72DE.9000103@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Louisiana as well, both in the upcharge ($25.00) and massive number of
vanity plates! However, you can't get your call sign on a regular
personalized plate.
Mike, N5UKZ
On 6/29/2011 1:14 PM, Bob Martinson wrote:
> And Massachusetts
>
> QUOTE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
> Behalf Of w4upd
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:57 PM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: CA Ham Plates - Warning!
>
> This is already the case in Florida. The Amateur tag is listed as a
> vanity plate and you are charged accordingly. This state has hundreds of
> vanity plates.
>
> Reid, W4UPD
>
> UNQUOTE
>
> Bob, K1REM
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:46:34 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Pasadena (CA) Radio Club
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <BAB9188D-C4EE-4547-8630-681D3E88C955@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> ... What FM satellite really working with your HT have you presented to
the audience ? HI....HI !
There are now two topics in my life that I hold dear and serious - (1) is
not desiring nine cars full of armed law enforcement personnel to EVER be
behind a fellow ham's car during a simple infraction traffic stop ever again
in California, and (2) the statuses of the wonderful FM birds that we enjoy
on a daily basis.
SO - My immediate reply is, "I have successfully worked AO-27, SO-50, and
AO-51 SCORES of times in front of audiences at a Watt or two - LIVE and
without failure - what's the problem?"
(In all honesty - I did "fail" to work '50 in front of HRO San Diego one
morning. I calculated the pass incorrectly. BUT we later worked AO-51
successfully ... )
So 'cuse me if I feel a little defensive of my Personal Number 2 this
morning. I have been handling calls regarding Number 1 all morning ...
Clint, K6LCS
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 353
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
