| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 21.05.11 07:04l 750 Lines 22325 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6283
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 283
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0GOS<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 110521/0455Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:6469 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6283
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch (Clint Bradford)
2. Re: Software (Jeff Moore)
3. Re: Coax (Jeff Moore)
4. Re: 70c Band safe from auction, Thanks WB2OQQ
(saguaroastro@xxx.xxxx
5. Re: Coax (Dave Guimont)
6. AO51 (Andrew Glasbrenner)
7. Coax and Software correction (Mike1234)
8. My Comments on AO-51 (Mike1234)
9. Re: AO51 (George Henry)
10. Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch (George Henry)
11. Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch (Rick Tejera)
12. Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
(Brandon Rasmussen)
13. Re: 70c Band safe from auction, Thanks WB2OQQ (Charles Suprin)
14. Coax (Kevin Deane)
15. Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch (Roger Kolakowski)
16. ARISSAT-1 TLM DOWNLOAD (Pete Norris, K1HZU)
17. Re: Coax and Software correction (Alan P. Biddle)
18. Primer on Digital modes for Sats (Jeremy Widner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:20:44 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4EC32869-6BE1-47C6-A7BE-D099D4B381D6@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
The story behind the photo taken of the Space Shuttle from an in-flight
passenger jet. Stefanie Gordon shot the image of Endeavour's launch with her
iPhone as her plane descended for a landing.
http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/17/in-flight-iphone-snaps-space-shuttle-launch/
Clint Bradford
clintbradford@xxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:28:29 -0700
From: "Jeff Moore" <tnetcenter@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Software
To: <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "AMSAT" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <F48FEB62CD494314B555A9DB00E665A0@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
What software are you referring to??
Jeff -- KE7ACY
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike1234"
<mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
I was wondering if there is a new version and if it is going to be down at
Dayton? I'm going to Dayton Saturday !
Mike N8GBU
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:33:50 -0700
From: "Jeff Moore" <tnetcenter@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Coax
To: <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "AMSAT" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <DDB4DB58A6FA426797451C24F56A0481@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
You might want to consider hardline for the lowest possible loss. You
aren't specific enough in your question to really be able to provide the
answer you're looking for.
What kind of antennas are you using?
What frequencies?
Are you using a rotor?
Are they on a tower?
Are you using on-mast preamps?
Will they be portable?
Help us out here!
Jeff -- KE7ACY
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike1234"
<mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
I was wondering what would be the right coax for a 50 foot run for satellite
work ? Actually maybe a little less ? Your help would be appreciated. Thank
you in advance.
Mike N8GBU
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:44:52 -0400
From: <saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70c Band safe from auction, Thanks WB2OQQ
To: Larry Teran <ki6yaa@xxxxx.xxx>, Donald Jacob <wb5eku@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <20110520154452.AO4I6.407233.imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Received this morning from one of my Listserves:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:
Mike Lisenco, N2YBB
n2ybb@xxxx.xxx
917-865-3538
May 19, 2011, Massapequa Park, NY - A delegation of Amateur Radio operators
from the Long Island / New York City area met this morning with Congressman
Peter T. King (R-NY) to discuss his recent proposed legislation, HR 607, and
its impact on Amateur Radio.
Congressman King said that he fully understands and appreciates the
importance of Amateur Radio and the service it provides to the community,
and that he would see to the modification of the bill so that the 420 - 440
MHz band would be excluded from the spectrum to be auctioned. The delegation
included Mike Lisenco, N2YBB, ARRL Section Manager for New York City / Long
Island (NLI), Peter Portanova, WB2OQQ, NLI Local Government Liaison (LGL),
George Tranos, N2GA, NLI State Government Liaison (SGL), and Jim Mezey,
W2KFV, NLI ARES Section Emergency Coordinator (SEC).
"The Congressman went on to explain that it was never his intention to
remove the 70 centimeter band from Amateur use. He further asked us to `get
the word out' and inform the Amateur Radio community that 70 centimeters is
not in jeopardy," said Lisenco.
Lisenco, Mezey and Tranos spoke about the importance of Amateur Radio
emergency communications while Portanova, who is also the local AMSAT
representative, addressed satellite and other amateur use of the 70
centimeter band.
The Congressman was very receptive to the group, who also extended an
invitation to attend Field Day locations in his District.
---- Donald Jacob <wb5eku@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hi Larry,
> Thanks for the info. Just one question for clarification.
> Is the full ham spectrum, 420 through 450MHz safe from
> the auction.
>
> 73
> Don WB5EKU
>
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Larry Teran <ki6yaa@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > I would like to thanks?Peter Portanova, WB2OQQ on his participation to
> > visit Congressman Peter T. King (R-NY) to discuss his recent proposed
> > legislation, HR 607, and its impact on Amateur Radio, as well as the
> > other delegates that participated on, for now the 70cm ham portion is
> > safe from the auction.
> >
> > Thanks Peter!!
> >
> > 73's Larry KI6YAA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:08:52 -0700
From: Dave Guimont <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Coax
To: mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <6D.49.28813.E4AC6DD4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>I was wondering what would be the right coax for a 50 foot run for satellite
>work ? Actually maybe a little less ? Your help would be appreciated. Thank
>you in advance.
Mike,
The best you can afford! And just as important, use the best N
connectors, properly soldered for 2 meters and anything above.
Save money on the radio, but not on the connections.....
73, Dave, WB6LLO
dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx
Disagree: I learn....
Pulling for P3E...
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:27:35 -0400
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO51
To: "AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <AEC8CE7C-0436-45B4-9237-23B691A56B09@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Due to interference from a repeater, we'll try using 145.920 as the uplink
this weekend.
73, Drew KO4MA
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:57:14 -0400
From: "Mike1234" <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Coax and Software correction
To: "AMSAT" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <7A900B5B33C84CE58142C28C96F0F29A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sorry guys its been a busy day I thought I put in the left out information.
The coax for satellite work I was talking about was for two meters and 440
to link up with the ham satellites. I have about a 50 foot run or less.The
software I was referring to was SATPC 32 I have version 12.8 I thought I saw
somebody post there was a new version out and if so will it be at Dayton?
Sorry Guys
Mike N8GBU
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:08:09 -0400
From: "Mike1234" <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] My Comments on AO-51
To: "AMSAT" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <8D1EBEFBDDBA4892A6FEBC02425492DC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have been following the comments of AO-51 failing. I'm new to working the
birds and have yet to start to do anything with the birds. Primarily from
health problems, the weather and other personal things going on in my life.
I keep my membership up with AMSAT and bought a bunch of stuff from the
website. I also have donated on the website too. From a guy who hasn't even
used a bird yet. We need a new bird, I saw the one at last years Dayton
hamfest and was amazed at the size !
Mike N8GBU
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO51
To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <101828.71613.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Any idea where the offending repeater is located?? Any callsigns heard?
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message ----
> From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: "AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 3:27:35 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO51
>
> Due to interference from a repeater, we'll try using 145.920 as the uplink
this
>weekend.
>
> 73, Drew KO4MA
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <140181.20961.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
And what was her iPhone doing turned on during approach?? Still a no-no on all
commercial carriers, AFAIK...
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message ----
> From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
> To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 2:20:44 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
>
> The story behind the photo taken of the Space Shuttle from an in-flight
>passenger jet. Stefanie Gordon shot the image of Endeavour's launch with her
>iPhone as her plane descended for a landing.
>
>
> http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/17/in-flight-iphone-snaps-space-shuttle-launch/
>
>
>
>
> Clint Bradford
> clintbradford@xxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:05:28 -0700
From: Rick Tejera <saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
To: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <75917380-CD50-4AAB-B711-55B9A3C561F3@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Airplane mode?
Sent from my iPod
Rick Tejera
Editor, SACnews
Saguaro Astronomy Club
www.saguaroastro.org
K7TEJ
On May 20, 2011, at 14:34, George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> And what was her iPhone doing turned on during approach? Still a no-no on
all
> commercial carriers, AFAIK...
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
>> To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 2:20:44 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
>>
>> The story behind the photo taken of the Space Shuttle from an in-flight
>> passenger jet. Stefanie Gordon shot the image of Endeavour's launch with
her
>> iPhone as her plane descended for a landing.
>>
>>
>> http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/17/in-flight-iphone-snaps-space-shuttle-launch/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Clint Bradford
>> clintbradford@xxx.xxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:23:25 -0600
From: Brandon Rasmussen <brandonbrasmussen@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4DD6E9DD.1070409@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Very neat photo.
From the looks of the photograph, the plane's altitude looks to be in
the upper 20000's or lower 30000's at least. (The cloud deck on launch
day was about 5000' with tops at 5500'.) Most carriers require PED's to
be turned off while descending through 10000'. So this passenger would
have been well within regulations to take the photo.
73,
Brandon, K7BBR
On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, George Henry wrote:
> And what was her iPhone doing turned on during approach? Still a no-no on
all
> commercial carriers, AFAIK...
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
>> From: Clint Bradford<clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
>> To: AMSAT BB<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 2:20:44 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
>>
>> The story behind the photo taken of the Space Shuttle from an in-flight
>> passenger jet. Stefanie Gordon shot the image of Endeavour's launch with
her
>> iPhone as her plane descended for a landing.
>>
>>
>> http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/17/in-flight-iphone-snaps-space-shuttle-launch/
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:36:41 -0400
From: Charles Suprin <hamaa1vs@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70c Band safe from auction, Thanks WB2OQQ
To: saguaroastro@xxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>, Donald Jacob <wb5eku@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=VsXkhCTVYcZR_U=6iyCLcEm6fag@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Howdy,
This may be my ignorance of the process but I thought amendments were voted
on. In that case can't the bill pass without the amendment that protects us?
Charles
Aa1vs
On May 20, 2011 3:53 PM, <saguaroastro@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> Received this morning from one of my Listserves:
>
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>
> Contact:
> Mike Lisenco, N2YBB
> n2ybb@xxxx.xxx
> 917-865-3538
>
> May 19, 2011, Massapequa Park, NY - A delegation of Amateur Radio
operators from the Long Island / New York City area met this morning with
Congressman Peter T. King (R-NY) to discuss his recent proposed legislation,
HR 607, and its impact on Amateur Radio.
>
> Congressman King said that he fully understands and appreciates the
importance of Amateur Radio and the service it provides to the community,
and that he would see to the modification of the bill so that the 420 - 440
MHz band would be excluded from the spectrum to be auctioned. The delegation
included Mike Lisenco, N2YBB, ARRL Section Manager for New York City / Long
Island (NLI), Peter Portanova, WB2OQQ, NLI Local Government Liaison (LGL),
George Tranos, N2GA, NLI State Government Liaison (SGL), and Jim Mezey,
W2KFV, NLI ARES Section Emergency Coordinator (SEC).
>
> "The Congressman went on to explain that it was never his intention to
remove the 70 centimeter band from Amateur use. He further asked us to `get
the word out' and inform the Amateur Radio community that 70 centimeters is
not in jeopardy," said Lisenco.
>
> Lisenco, Mezey and Tranos spoke about the importance of Amateur Radio
emergency communications while Portanova, who is also the local AMSAT
representative, addressed satellite and other amateur use of the 70
centimeter band.
>
> The Congressman was very receptive to the group, who also extended an
invitation to attend Field Day locations in his District.
>
>
>
> ---- Donald Jacob <wb5eku@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> Hi Larry,
>> Thanks for the info. Just one question for clarification.
>> Is the full ham spectrum, 420 through 450MHz safe from
>> the auction.
>>
>> 73
>> Don WB5EKU
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Larry Teran <ki6yaa@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> > I would like to thanks Peter Portanova, WB2OQQ on his participation to
>> > visit Congressman Peter T. King (R-NY) to discuss his recent proposed
>> > legislation, HR 607, and its impact on Amateur Radio, as well as the
>> > other delegates that participated on, for now the 70cm ham portion is
>> > safe from the auction.
>> >
>> > Thanks Peter!!
>> >
>> > 73's Larry KI6YAA
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
author.
>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
>> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:36:50 -0700
From: Kevin Deane <summit496@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Coax
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <col107-w41BBC59649465810DFB12D83710@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Here is my two cents:
Anything UHF has a higher loss so it is pretty simple. Get the good stuff,
9913 or LMR 400 or better. I think we got 50 Ft of 9913 with factory ends
for like $78 bucks shipped. If it is a permanent install I would use the
best hardline I could get.
Kevin
KF7MYK
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:44:12 -0400
From: Roger Kolakowski <Rogerkola@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
To: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4DD6FCCC.7090509@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Good Girls Go to Heaven, Bad Girls Go Everywhere
Roger
WA1KAT
On 5/20/2011 5:34 PM, George Henry wrote:
> And what was her iPhone doing turned on during approach? Still a no-no on
all
> commercial carriers, AFAIK...
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Clint Bradford<clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
>> To: AMSAT BB<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 2:20:44 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch
>>
>> The story behind the photo taken of the Space Shuttle from an in-flight
>> passenger jet. Stefanie Gordon shot the image of Endeavour's launch with
her
>> iPhone as her plane descended for a landing.
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Pete Norris, K1HZU" <k1hzu@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISSAT-1 TLM DOWNLOAD
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <162189.86816.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi all:
When the TLM download became available, I downloaded it into XP, as the
Vista version was not ready. Does anyone know whether it has been released
or not? My Vista setup would be far better to run it in than my XP.
Thanks to all. I'm anxiously waiting for July.
Pete, K1HZU
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 21:40:58 -0500
From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Coax and Software correction
To: <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT'" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <B95353CB2F404D288F6EFE99D2E3EF62@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mike,
There is a version 12.8a, but that has been out for some time. We have it
here, however.
Alan
WA4SCA
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Mike1234
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 2:57 PM
To: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] Coax and Software correction
Sorry guys its been a busy day I thought I put in the left out information.
The coax for satellite work I was talking about was for two meters and 440
to link up with the ham satellites. I have about a 50 foot run or less.The
software I was referring to was SATPC 32 I have version 12.8 I thought I saw
somebody post there was a new version out and if so will it be at Dayton?
Sorry Guys
Mike N8GBU
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:16:09 -0500
From: Jeremy Widner <jeremyrwidner@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Primer on Digital modes for Sats
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <BANLkTin6V1iz7EStzUX0KjXc=B+8Ra+dzw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Where would I start if I am looking for a primer on digital modes on Sats?
--
73
Jeremy Widner
K0PDX
http://k0pdx.us
Secretary Raytown Amateur Radio Club - K0GQ
http://k0gq.com/
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 283
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
