| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 03.03.11 04:58l 733 Lines 20508 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB6134
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 134
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0GOS<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 110303/0255Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:56194 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB6134
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: AMSAT-Fox? Satellite Naming Rights (Bill Dzurilla)
2. Broken Sats (Kevin Deane)
3. Re: Broken Sats (Andrew Glasbrenner)
4. iPHONE4 & iTouch 4 (Pat McGrath)
5. Re: iPHONE4 & iTouch 4 (Bryan Green)
6. Re: Educational Launch of Nanosatellites Youtube video (Trevor .)
7. Re: L Band antenna (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
8. Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow or Elk and HT?
(Bryan Green)
9. Re: AMSAT-Fox? (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
10. Re: AMSAT Fox News (Trevor .)
11. Re: Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow or Elk and
HT? (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
12. Re: Broken Sats (i8cvs)
13. Re: AMSAT Fox News (Anthony Monteiro)
14. Re: AMSAT-Fox? (Anthony Monteiro)
15. Re: AMSAT-Fox? (Joe Fitzgerald)
16. Re: Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow or Elk and
HT? (k6yk)
17. Re: AMSAT Fox News (Bob Bruninga )
18. Re: AMSAT-Fox? (Clint Bradford)
19. Re: AMSAT-Fox? (Joseph Armbruster)
20. Re: Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow or Elk and
HT? (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:32:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-Fox? Satellite Naming Rights
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <997710.65280.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Instead of having people make donations to pick a name, what about selling
corporate naming rights? Corporations pay mega-millions for stadium naming
rights, we have corporate names on other aeronautical objects (e.g., the
Goodyear Blimp), and even schools are thinking about selling naming rights
to raise money. Not sure how much a coporation would be willing to pay for
naming rights on a ham satellite, but it has to be more than what AMSAT
would raise by asking for donations.
73, Bill NZ5N
> Alan,
>
> You said 'Willing to pay for it'.
>
> In my mind, this brings up an interesting fundraising
> possibility. Of
> course, this would revolve around how much the project
> management and
> engineering Cared about having their own pet-name for a
> project.
>
> How about a "Pay to Name The Sat" drive, that could work
> like this:
>
> - You take submissions for satellite names from anyone via
> web-submission
> ? * Restrictions on the allowable names would be
> clearly defined during
> submission!!
> - The BOD or Lead Engineers would come together and choose
> the top 5
> - Then you have a website, where people can donate N
> dollars for the name
> they like the most.
> - Whichever name receives the most $'s by a certain date,
> would be the name
> that is chosen to fly!
>
> All proceeds to go the Amsat project.
>
>
> Just a thought,
> Joseph Armbruster
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:38:40 -0800
From: Kevin Deane <summit496@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Broken Sats
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL107-W23F7F7C04D853F15A8BA0A83C00@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Does anyone moniter the sats that are broken to see if they come back to
life? Like the RS-15 and now my fav HO-68 is broke now, thats the first one
I talked on. Amsat says AO-7 semi operational but seems to work just fine.
Anyway was wondering if there were any that have a glimmer of hope that I
might moniter in my case of absolute bordation???
Kevin
KF7MYK
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:54:30 -0500
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Broken Sats
To: Kevin Deane <summit496@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D6EAE86.20403@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 3/2/2011 3:38 PM, Kevin Deane wrote:
> Amsat says AO-7 semi operational but seems to work just fine.
Only when illuminated, hence the "semi-"
You could listen for NO-44, AO-10, UO-11, which are all varying degrees
of dead to operational. There are about a couple dozen cubesats to
listen for as well. Take a look at DK3WN's webpages and blog for a good
list.
http://www.dk3wn.info/p/
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:20:50 -0800
From: "Pat McGrath" <ka6tya@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] iPHONE4 & iTouch 4
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000301cbd91f$b51a62d0$1f4f2870$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Need advise on the best apps and why for Ham & Satellite activities.
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:42:01 -0800
From: Bryan Green <kl7cn.w6@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: iPHONE4 & iTouch 4
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=d18tUjNgDYCk=uqwYyUU2_xRaqfpb__m=VpSP@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Pat McGrath <ka6tya@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Need advise on the best apps and why for Ham & Satellite activities.
I like and use Go Sat Watch:
http://www.gosoftworks.com/GoSatWatch/GoSatWatch.html
The price is $9.99.
Bryan Green KL7CN
Usually /W6 in CM98fn
408-836-7279
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:06:46 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Educational Launch of Nanosatellites Youtube
video
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <764902.3291.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Thanks for that link.
Although no call signs were given in the video I understand all three of the
CubeSat presenters are licensed:
David Klumpar KD7MFJ - Explorer-1
James Lumpp KG4YLI - KySat-1
Brian Sanders AC0RY - Hermes
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Wed, 2/3/11, charlie Cantrill <ki4rdt@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: charlie Cantrill <ki4rdt@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Educational Launch of Nanosatellites Youtube video
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Wednesday, 2 March, 2011, 9:30
> Here is a Youtube video describing
> the ELaNa mission which is piggybacked on the Glory
> Launch.ELaNa: Educational Launch of Nanosatellites - Catch a
> Ride with Gloryhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYddpBvMOUo
> Charlie CantrillKI4RDT
>
>
> ? ? ?
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:36:05 -0500
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: L Band antenna
To: AMSAT -BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTikmPLVqMJRra5eWZYAmV4ZJ7g+HOiSbGXK1H3mZ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks to all who replied. I just ordered a Directive Systems 25 element
loop yagi with a six foot boom.
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:56:06 -0800
From: Bryan Green <kl7cn.w6@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow or
Elk and HT?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTin7CPMbSCQhLL6KGjh6RGvsjw_8_Z6AeeeaATOC@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Does anyone have a recommendation for a UHF preamp suitable for use with an
HT and an Arrow? I always wish I had one when I listen for SO-50... it seems
like it ought to be inline with BNC connectors and battery powered to
maintain portability...
Thanks in advance!
Bryan Green KL7CN
Usually /W6 in CM98fn
408-836-7279
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:01:17 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-Fox?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20110302155433.00be5160@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 01:56 PM 3/2/2011 -0500, Dee <morsesat@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>Clint,
>As long as our engineers are sitting down and designing something for us,
>they can call it what they want.
I wonder what Dick Jansson would call Eagle then....
Wounded Duck?
KB7ADL
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:01:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Fox News
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <35414.2463.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Under the section "AMSAT-Fox planned features include"
It says
"AMSAT's flexible, CubeSat compatible software defined transponder is a new
approach providing a robust and reliable radio link for future CubeSats
allowing university teams to concentrate on their scientific objectives."
Now although listed under "AMSAT-Fox planned features" that bullet point
doesn't have the key word Fox in it.
Can someone clarify if the FM transponder on Fox will be SDX or if that's an
aspiration for later CubeSats ?
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Tue, 1/3/11, JoAnne Maenpaa <k9jkm@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: JoAnne Maenpaa <k9jkm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Fox News
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Tuesday, 1 March, 2011, 21:25
> Hello Everyone,
>
> The http://www.amsat.org web page news has been updated to
> introduce AMSAT
> Fox.
>
> --
> 73 de JoAnne K9JKM
> k9jkm@xxxxx.xxx
> Editor, AMSAT News Service
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:17:35 -0500
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow
or Elk and HT?
To: Bryan Green <kl7cn.w6@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTimBqHjo=DU4cetT1iST0FGK5x0HGL=X+ZK1uqZX@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bryan,
I have a SP432VDG from ARR, it was a great improvement.
http://www.advancedreceiver.com/page7.html
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Mar 2, 2011 6:12 PM, "Bryan Green" <kl7cn.w6@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:21:50 +0100
From: "i8cvs" <domenico.i8cvs@xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Broken Sats
To: "Kevin Deane" <summit496@xxxx.xxx>, "Amsat - BBs"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000901cbd938$fd8d8f60$0401a8c0@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Kevin, KF7MYK
I suggest to look time to time at the OSCAR-10 beacon a steady carrier on
145.812 MHz +/- doppler
73" de
i8CVS Domenico
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Deane" <summit496@xxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 9:38 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Broken Sats
>
>
> Does anyone moniter the sats that are broken to see if they come back to
life? Like the RS-15 and now my fav HO-68 is broke now, thats the first one
I talked on. Amsat says AO-7 semi operational but seems to work just fine.
Anyway was wondering if there were any that have a glimmer of hope that I
might moniter in my case of absolute bordation???
>
> Kevin
> KF7MYK
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:51:45 -0500
From: Anthony Monteiro <aa2tx@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Fox News
To: <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <201103030051.p230pcF5009158@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Hi Trevor,
The AMSAT Fox CubeSat bus will include both an analog FM
transponder and a software defined transponder (SDX.) For the
Fox mission, we intend to program the SDX for high performance
digital modes for our command and telemetry channels but the
SDX could be programmed for almost anything including a linear
or packet transponder on a follow up mission.
73,
Tony AA2TX
AMSAT VP Engineering
---
At 06:01 PM 3/2/2011, Trevor . wrote:
>Under the section "AMSAT-Fox planned features include"
>
>It says
>
>"AMSAT's flexible, CubeSat compatible software defined transponder
>is a new approach providing a robust and reliable radio link for
>future CubeSats allowing university teams to concentrate on their
>scientific objectives."
>
>Now although listed under "AMSAT-Fox planned features" that bullet
>point doesn't have the key word Fox in it.
>
>Can someone clarify if the FM transponder on Fox will be SDX or if
>that's an aspiration for later CubeSats ?
>
>73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:57:56 -0500
From: Anthony Monteiro <aa2tx@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-Fox?
To: <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <201103030057.p230vaJB009435@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Hey Clint,
You wouldn't really want us to call the satellite "Foxtrot"
would you? Think about the logo! Would you have us
"Dancing with the stars...?" :)
73,
Tony AA2TX
AMSAT VP Engineering
---
>-----Original Message-----
>From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
>Behalf Of Clint Bradford
>Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:13 AM
>To: AMSAT BB
>Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT-Fox?
>
>OK - I'll ask. Why is this satellite not named, "AMSAT-Foxtrot?"
>
>It was about 1956 that the U.S. military did away with "Fox" in lieu of
>"Foxtrot" for its phonetic alphabet. Even the English army did away with
>"Fox"over 50 years ago.
>
>The ITU and militaries cite the sixth letter of the phonetic alphabet as
>"Foxtrot." Whose phonetic alphabet do we use to name AMSAT satellites?
>
>Clint Bradford
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:05:11 -0500
From: Joe Fitzgerald <jfitzgerald@xxxx.xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-Fox?
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4D6EF757.8030202@xxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 3/2/2011 12:13 AM, Clint Bradford wrote:
> OK - I'll ask. Why is this satellite not named, "AMSAT-Foxtrot?"
>
The software guys, being mostly of the Unix persuasion lobbied for
something very terse like AMASAT-fo or AMSAT-fx.
There were a few Windows guys who wanted
C:\ArerospaceVehicle.Satellite.AMSAT.Foxtrot(FollowOnToECHO-AO51)
AMSAT-Fox came out as a compromise.
-Joe KM1P
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:57:41 -0800
From: k6yk <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow
or Elk and HT?
To: kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20110302.181511.953.652328@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
And I have run my SP432VDG on a spare HT battery
many times, about 9 or 10 volts.
73,
John, K6YK
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:17:35 -0500 Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
writes:
> Bryan,
>
> I have a SP432VDG from ARR, it was a great improvement.
> http://www.advancedreceiver.com/page7.html
>
> Dave - KB1PVH
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
> On Mar 2, 2011 6:12 PM, "Bryan Green" <kl7cn.w6@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
____________________________________________________________
Mortgage Rates Hit 2.99%
If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Gov't Refi Programs
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d6ef9be37bab167c70st04vuc
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:16:26 -0500 (EST)
From: "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Fox News
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20110302211626.AHS55276@xxxxx.xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> AMSAT-Fox came out as a compromise.
OK, but please lets not call it AMSAT Fox News if we want anyone to trust us.
Bob
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:35:19 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-Fox?
To: Anthony Monteiro <aa2tx@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <69D040BC-7B67-4CC0-B49F-5C76C9BDC8D4@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>> ...You wouldn't really want us to call the satellite "Foxtrot" would you?
As a marketing person, that could be a GREAT logo for the project ...
In many areas, "senior citizens" are one of the largest demographic
classification of people getting on the 'Net and increasing their connection
speeds ... they're getting more "tech savvy" all the time ...
How could it hurt "us" by having a "50's" logo for a project?
I can see giving ham classes to seniors ... increasing the volume of my
voice during talks ... (grin)
Clint
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:38:21 -0500
From: Joseph Armbruster <josepharmbruster@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-Fox?
To: Joe Fitzgerald <jfitzgerald@xxxx.xxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5C0EB131-D18F-4394-AC4E-367F048A2CF3@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Naturally, this made the linux, osx and windows folk happy. Why? Because
the hits for the "Fox-Toolkit" went up!
See: http://www.fox-toolkit.org/
Joseph Armbruster
On Mar 2, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Joe Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 3/2/2011 12:13 AM, Clint Bradford wrote:
>> OK - I'll ask. Why is this satellite not named, "AMSAT-Foxtrot?"
>>
>
> The software guys, being mostly of the Unix persuasion lobbied for
> something very terse like AMASAT-fo or AMSAT-fx.
>
> There were a few Windows guys who wanted
> C:\ArerospaceVehicle.Satellite.AMSAT.Foxtrot(FollowOnToECHO-AO51)
>
> AMSAT-Fox came out as a compromise.
>
> -Joe KM1P
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:44:38 -0500
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Battery-powered UHF Preamp suitable for Arrow
or Elk and HT?
To: k6yk <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTim2StXNL8qJJYKC2dkTrayDm6iJeLeE4+r65iKq@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I ran mine off of 8 AA batteries in a battery holder from Radio Shack.
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Mar 2, 2011 9:16 PM, "k6yk" <k6yk@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> And I have run my SP432VDG on a spare HT battery
> many times, about 9 or 10 volts.
>
> 73,
> John, K6YK
>
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:17:35 -0500 Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
> writes:
>> Bryan,
>>
>> I have a SP432VDG from ARR, it was a great improvement.
>> http://www.advancedreceiver.com/page7.html
>>
>> Dave - KB1PVH
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
>> On Mar 2, 2011 6:12 PM, "Bryan Green" <kl7cn.w6@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
>> author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Mortgage Rates Hit 2.99%
> If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Gov't Refi Programs
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d6ef9be378b1167c6fst04vuc
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 134
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
