| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 09.02.11 19:45l 775 Lines 24824 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB687
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 87
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<IK6ZDE<VE3UIL<CX2SA
Sent: 110209/1731Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:51315 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB687
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided) (Bruce Semple)
2. AMSAT Awards (Bruce)
3. Re: Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided) (Bob Bruninga)
4. Re: Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided) (Joe)
5. SO-50 2329UT (Rick Tejera)
6. Re: Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided) (Bruce Semple)
7. SSETI-ESEO project cancelled? (Thomas Frey)
8. Re: SSETI-ESEO project cancelled? (STeve Andre')
9. ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question (Clint Bradford)
10. VE8EV is missing HO-68 (John Boudreau)
11. Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question (Ted)
12. Re: VE8EV is missing HO-68 (Michael Chen)
13. Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question (Clint Bradford)
14. Re: Satpc32 and Azimuth only > rotors? Functional?
(Bill Dzurilla)
15. Re Portable operation certificates (andy thomas)
16. Adobe Bluffs Video (Clint Bradford)
17. Decoding Software for ARISSat-1 (Clint Bradford)
18. Re: Decoding Software for ARISSat-1 (Dave Taylor)
19. Re: [ARISS-ops] Re: Decoding Software for ARISSat-1
(Clint Bradford)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:52:51 -0500
From: Bruce Semple <bruce.semple@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided)
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <0LGB00IZ3JGFOYJ0@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Has anybody else heard this --
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqe0l7/Signal_436MHz.wav
(recorded in USB mode) -
in AM mode it just sounds like a constant tone --
The signal strength is not constant - and peaks about every 10 seconds - -
A new radar perhaps?
I was running for some time yesterday (02/07/2011) and
for at least an hour today (02/08/2011) stopping around 2100Z.
I'm located FM19 - I believe it's originating south of me.
Needless to say it makes the downlinks hard to copy!
Bruce
WA3SWJ
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:19:55 -0600
From: Bruce <kk5do@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Awards
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4D51CF9B.1090307@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Here is a list of awards issued so far in 2011.
The following have entered into the Satellite Communicators Club for
making their first satellite QSO.
Anthony Allen, W6CSA
Wyatt Dirks, AC0RA
Brian Erwin, KJ4TDM
Palo Lanca, 9A3DPL
Zeljko Eklic, 9A1WW
Vaclav Ujcik WD9HBC
The following have earned the AMSAT Communications Achievement Award.
Wyatt Dirks, AC0RA #531
Patrick Farcon, N2VYT #532
The following have earned the South Africa Satellite Communications
Achievement award
Wyatt Dirks, AC0RA #US163
Patrick Farcon, N2VYT #US164
To see all the awards visit http://www.amsat.org or
http://www.amsatnet.com
Bruce Paige, KK5DO
AMSAT Director Contests and Awards
ARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE
Houston AMSAT Net - Wed 0200z on Echolink - Conference *AMSAT*
Also streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com
Podcast at http://www.amsatnet.com/podcast.xml or iTunes
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:49:52 -0500
From: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided)
To: "'Bruce Semple'" <bruce.semple@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <00b501cbc7ea$e1175af0$a34610d0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Has anybody else heard this --
> http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqe0l7/Signal_436MHz.wav
> The signal strength is not constant -
> and peaks about every 10 seconds - -
> A new radar perhaps?
The 10 sec rotation rate nails it as an E6C Radar plane. Probably operating
off the East Coast. I have been hearing it periodically for years, and
getting ready for a satellite receive lab this week, it would have
completely spoiled the lab. So I spent over an hour on the web and on the
phone and finally got in touch with the right folks and when I said "10
seconds" they didn't need any more. That nailed it to an E6.
They are not supposed to operate on the UHF channel that overlaps the
400-420 MHz band anywhere near land, but it is unclear what the guidance is
for the band 430-450 where HAMS ARE SECONDARY.
The above is my understanding, might not be exact.
To locate it would be hard... Swinging the beam doesn't help much, because
the radar is rotating at the same time and giving all kinds of fluctuations
per second... which would mask your attempts at peaking on it.
My best guess to locate it would be to get two hams on the phone separated
by several hundred miles and to TIME the difference between the peak. That
would establish an angle from the radar between the two hams. Then both
hams compare signal strengths to an OMNI antenna (must be omni) and both
must be calibrated for equal S meter readings. The difference in peak
signal strength would get an idea of range ratio between the two stations.
That and the angle (and ignoring the mirror solution over land) would get
you a good idea where he is operating. (Maybe?)
Bob, WB4APR
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:01:57 -0600
From: Joe <nss@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided)
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D51D975.80007@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
a doppler fox hunt antenna system would get the direction also.
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/8/2011 5:49 PM, Bob Bruninga wrote:
>> Has anybody else heard this --
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqe0l7/Signal_436MHz.wav
>> The signal strength is not constant -
>> and peaks about every 10 seconds - -
>> A new radar perhaps?
> The 10 sec rotation rate nails it as an E6C Radar plane. Probably operating
> off the East Coast. I have been hearing it periodically for years, and
> getting ready for a satellite receive lab this week, it would have
> completely spoiled the lab. So I spent over an hour on the web and on the
> phone and finally got in touch with the right folks and when I said "10
> seconds" they didn't need any more. That nailed it to an E6.
>
> They are not supposed to operate on the UHF channel that overlaps the
> 400-420 MHz band anywhere near land, but it is unclear what the guidance is
> for the band 430-450 where HAMS ARE SECONDARY.
>
> The above is my understanding, might not be exact.
>
> To locate it would be hard... Swinging the beam doesn't help much, because
> the radar is rotating at the same time and giving all kinds of fluctuations
> per second... which would mask your attempts at peaking on it.
>
> My best guess to locate it would be to get two hams on the phone separated
> by several hundred miles and to TIME the difference between the peak. That
> would establish an angle from the radar between the two hams. Then both
> hams compare signal strengths to an OMNI antenna (must be omni) and both
> must be calibrated for equal S meter readings. The difference in peak
> signal strength would get an idea of range ratio between the two stations.
> That and the angle (and ignoring the mirror solution over land) would get
> you a good idea where he is operating. (Maybe?)
>
> Bob, WB4APR
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:10:31 -0700
From: Rick Tejera <saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 2329UT
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1298A585-7601-4164-B9F2-850E724DDFA6@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Was everyone on AO-51? SO-50 & AO-51 had a mutual pass at 2329 from DM33. I
tried SO-50 figuring it would be less crowded. I was right, I was the only
one on! I actually had to transmit the 74hz on tone before I could hear my
downlink. Toward the end of the pass it sounded like someone else was trying
to answer me, all I heard were a couple of short carriers, no modulation.
Was anyone else trying to work SO-50?
Sent from my iPod
Rick Tejera
Editor, SACnews
Saguaro Astronomy Club
www.saguaroastro.org
K7TEJ
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:12:32 -0500
From: Bruce Semple <bruce.semple@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Strange Signal - 436Mhz - (sample provided)
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <0LGB004XSSP14JOU@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Bob -
Thanks for running that down.
And you are exactly right - I could not get seem to get a signal strength peak
at any compass heading.
At 06:49 PM 2/8/2011, Bob Bruninga wrote:
> > Has anybody else heard this --
> > http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeqe0l7/Signal_436MHz.wav
> > The signal strength is not constant -
> > and peaks about every 10 seconds - -
> > A new radar perhaps?
>
>The 10 sec rotation rate nails it as an E6C Radar plane. Probably operating
>off the East Coast. I have been hearing it periodically for years, and
>getting ready for a satellite receive lab this week, it would have
>completely spoiled the lab. So I spent over an hour on the web and on the
>phone and finally got in touch with the right folks and when I said "10
>seconds" they didn't need any more. That nailed it to an E6.
>
>They are not supposed to operate on the UHF channel that overlaps the
>400-420 MHz band anywhere near land, but it is unclear what the guidance is
>for the band 430-450 where HAMS ARE SECONDARY.
>
>The above is my understanding, might not be exact.
>
>To locate it would be hard... Swinging the beam doesn't help much, because
>the radar is rotating at the same time and giving all kinds of fluctuations
>per second... which would mask your attempts at peaking on it.
>
>My best guess to locate it would be to get two hams on the phone separated
>by several hundred miles and to TIME the difference between the peak. That
>would establish an angle from the radar between the two hams. Then both
>hams compare signal strengths to an OMNI antenna (must be omni) and both
>must be calibrated for equal S meter readings. The difference in peak
>signal strength would get an idea of range ratio between the two stations.
>That and the angle (and ignoring the mirror solution over land) would get
>you a good idea where he is operating. (Maybe?)
>
>Bob, WB4APR
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:35:29 +0100
From: Thomas Frey <th.frey@xxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SSETI-ESEO project cancelled?
To: eu-amsat@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4D51B721.1050401@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Greetings
Since about a month the URL www.sseti.net doesn't exist anymore. Is
the SSETI-ESEO project with participation of AMSAT-UK cancelled ?
--
Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen, Regards, 73
Thomas Frey, HB9SKA
______________________________________________________________________
Thomas Frey, Holzgasse 2, CH-5242 Birr, Tel. + Fax: 056 444 93 41
http://home.datacomm.ch/th.frey/
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:09:20 -0500
From: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSETI-ESEO project cancelled?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D521370.90209@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 02/08/11 16:35, Thomas Frey wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Since about a month the URL www.sseti.net doesn't exist anymore. Is
> the SSETI-ESEO project with participation of AMSAT-UK cancelled ?
>
I can't really tell, but the whois info for it makes me think the
domain was up for renewal, and when it expired a robot came
along and snatched it up, in the hopes that its owners would
pay 25+ times the renewal price for it.
--STeve Andre'
wb8wf en72
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:21:49 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <35AC1494-E9CA-4C46-A1D4-10169C35F1E0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
When ARISSat-1 is deployed next week, confirming it will simply be "pushed"
outside the ISS, correct?
How closely will it "emulate" the orbit of the ISS? What is its intended
orbit - will it be passing the poles?
I apologize if this is covered all over the place already ...
Clint, K6LCS
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:23:54 -0700 (MST)
From: "John Boudreau" <john@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] VE8EV is missing HO-68
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<b93ee1f01ad445dce1cb4152d36d6659.squirrel@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Has anyone heard any news on the status of HO-68/XW-1?
Alan, maybe an update for the group?
73
John - VE8EV
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:40:40 -0800
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
To: "'Clint Bradford'" <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT BB'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <261FB3FF31714E96A036264A3FDD6F7E@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Nice article in QST Feb 2011 pretty well spells out what they are doing
and how...
TK, K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Clint Bradford
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 8:22 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
When ARISSat-1 is deployed next week, confirming it will simply be "pushed"
outside the ISS, correct?
How closely will it "emulate" the orbit of the ISS? What is its intended
orbit - will it be passing the poles?
I apologize if this is covered all over the place already ...
Clint, K6LCS
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:10:13 -0600
From: Michael Chen <michael.bd5rv@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VE8EV is missing HO-68
To: John Boudreau <john@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTinQ9DsSmVb=hy899dBfFC3W1ZVMRHmEbi_Bdku2@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Chinese New Year for the past week, nobody is working on the bird, and
Alan is now enjoying his vacation in FO/Frech Polynesia. :)
So....give him some time. He deserves it.
Michael Chen, BD5RV/4
AMSAT-China: http://www.camsat.cn
-----------------------------------
Twitter: ?http://twitter.com/bd5rv
Email: ? michael.bd5rv@xxxxx.xxx
MSN: ? ?bd5rv@xxxxx.xxx
Skype: ?michael-bd5rv
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John Boudreau <john@xxxxxxxx.xx> wrote:
> Has anyone heard any news on the status of HO-68/XW-1?
> Alan, maybe an update for the group?
>
> 73
> John - VE8EV
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:59:04 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <54653D35-5A50-4AD6-9DF2-64CC40D8153F@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>> ... Clint. When ARISSAT is released it will stay in the "Plane" of ISS
orbit...they will toss it retrograde meaning in the opposite direction of
the velocity vector and with its slightly lower velocity the orbit will
start to decrease...this is done so that very quickly the orbits will stop
being "prox ops" reasonably fast.
Great, succinct info - MANY thanks!
Clint, K6LCS
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:42:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Satpc32 and Azimuth only > rotors?
Functional?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <494551.48575.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Zach,
I use a single 2' long Elk antenna with 15 degrees fixed elevation. It
works well. See photos at: http://www.myhamshack.com/NZ5N/Pictures/.
Some suggest 20 or even 30 degrees fixed elevation but that's too much. You
want low fixed elevation so you will have good gain on sats when they are at
very low elevation (when they are furthest away and you have an opportunity
for the best available DX).
In my humble opinion, a pair of Gulf Alphas on a cross-boom with az-el
rotation would be overkill for what is up in the air now. With just the
Elk, I have worked Holland from south Florida (7400 km) via AO-7 at 1.5
degrees. The world DX record on AO-7 is 7766 km. I do have a mast-mounted
preamp, which greatly helps.
I use an old TV rotor for azimuth rotation. It cannot be controlled with
SatPC32. The program probably is able to control some types of azimuth-only
rotors, but I do not have the details. SatPC32 does automatically control
your rig's frequency to adjust for doppler, which is highly valuable on the
linear sats.
73, Bill NZ5N
> From: zach hillerson <qstick333@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb]? Satpc32 and Azimuth only
> rotors?? Functional?
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Message-ID: <415856.39233.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I am getting closer to putting my first satellite base
> station together (in lieu of the Arrow that I am currently
> using) and am giving serious consideration to a fixed 15*
> antenna setup such as the Gulf Alpha designs.? Having never
> mounted antennas, rotors etc... I am a bit concerned about
> my less than amazing mechanical aptitude and having to get
> cross-booms, Az/El rotors etc... working correctly.?
>
> Is anyone using SatPc32 to successfully control Azimuth
> only rotors?? If so, what is required to get everything
> working together?? I would still like to automate the rotor
> and doppler control if at all possible.?
>
> On a somewhat related note - is anyone else using a setup
> like this (fixed elevation) and if so, are you happy with
> the performance??
>
> Thanks for any thoughts, I appreciate the input,
>
> Zach
> KJ4ZVV
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:14:12 +0000 (GMT)
From: andy thomas <andythomasmail@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re Portable operation certificates
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <292881.11432.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Interesting debate. I would be interested in submitting my book of qsl cards
for an award but the problem is that my operations with an Arrow were in
different countries, such as:
F/G0SFJ/P
YL/G0SFJ/P
LZ/G0SFJ/P etc etc
and probably a half-dozen or so qsl cards from each location.
Any ideas as to which award I might apply for??? bet there isn't one!
73 de andy G0SFJ
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:56:13 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Adobe Bluffs Video
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <20A0B3BD-69F6-4AF1-B9A1-CD72CED89B30@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Is the video feed we saw from the Adobe Bluffs contact last week available
online anywhere?
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:03:29 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Decoding Software for ARISSat-1
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: K1STO White Rosalie <k1sto@xxxx.xxx>, ARISS-ops OPS
<ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <F4B583F0-6E8C-4B8B-95CE-432FD25BF3BC@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
The Web site that Carlos is using to host the decoding software is giving
browsers' "security warnings" and "invalid certificates" messages.
Can "we" assist Carlos and host his wares somewhere else?
I realize that going to his site is probably all fine ... but the warnings
are enough to possible scare some away frm the project.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect
securely to svn.sarpeidon.net, but we can't confirm that your connection is
secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely,
sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are
going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
....
If you usually connect to
this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is
trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
Technical Details
svn.sarpeidon.net uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
/end/
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:22:52 -0500
From: Dave Taylor <dave.w8aas@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Decoding Software for ARISSat-1
To: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Cc: K1STO White Rosalie <k1sto@xxxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, ARISS-ops OPS <ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <F471524C-0D3E-46B9-AD5A-F52F30A07A8B@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Or you could wait for the software to be released to the public. This
is the development site and only the brave (i.e., developers and beta
testers) should be using it. I don't think you'll see this issue when
the released software is added to the ARISSat site.
-- Dave, W8AAS
On Feb 9, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Clint Bradford wrote:
> The Web site that Carlos is using to host the decoding software is
> giving browsers' "security warnings" and "invalid certificates"
> messages.
>
> Can "we" assist Carlos and host his wares somewhere else?
>
> I realize that going to his site is probably all fine ... but the
> warnings are enough to possible scare some away frm the project.
>
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> This Connection is Untrusted
>
> You have asked Firefox to connect
> securely to svn.sarpeidon.net, but we can't confirm that your
> connection is secure.
>
> Normally, when you try to connect securely,
> sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are
> going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be
> verified.
>
> ....
>
> If you usually connect to
> this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is
> trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
>
> Technical Details
>
> svn.sarpeidon.net uses an invalid security certificate.
> The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is
> unknown.
> (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
>
> /end/
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:25:35 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [ARISS-ops] Re: Decoding Software for
ARISSat-1
To: Dave Taylor <dave.w8aas@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, ARISS-ops OPS <ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5DD26753-686E-49E2-9400-FC5048138EB3@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
THANK YOU, Dave!
Clint
On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Dave Taylor wrote:
Or you could wait for the software to be released to the public. This
is the development site and only the brave (i.e., developers and beta
testers) should be using it. I don't think you'll see this issue when
the released software is added to the ARISSat site.
-- Dave, W8AAS
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 87
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
