OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   31.01.11 21:50l 797 Lines 22175 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB664
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 64
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<VE2PKT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 110131/1945Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:49039 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB664
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: x-quad (Mike Rupprecht)
   2. Re: x-quad (Matthias Bopp)
   3.  SSB pre-Amps (Dave)
   4. Re: SSB pre-Amps (Jim Jerzycke)
   5. Re: SSB pre-Amps (K8TB)
   6. Re: SSB pre-Amps (Jim Sanford)
   7. Re: SSB pre-Amps (Ernie Howard)
   8. Re: SSB pre-Amps (Andrew Glasbrenner)
   9.  VUCC 200 km question (Tom)
  10.  AO7 LU-K4 Qso (garymf@xxx.xxxx
  11.  First time on SO67 tonight (John Geiger)
  12.  SO67  04:20 (Ted)
  13. Re: KB3QLK/P FM28 Delaware 1700z 1/30 - 1700z 1/31
      (Zachary Beougher)
  14.  Fw: SSB pre-Amps (Pedro Cruz)
  15.  SSB pre-AMPS (John Ronan)
  16.  LoTW Questions (Zachary Beougher)
  17. Re: LoTW Questions (Gary "Joe" Mayfield)
  18.  On This Date - Van Allen Belt (Clint Bradford)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:00:00 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad
To: "'Ted'" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>, "'jerry'"
<jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xx>,	<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000001cbc0b8$516b67e0$f44237a0$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Ted,

see here: http://www.wimo.com/cgi-bin/verteiler.pl?url=xquad-antennas_e.html
or here (but unfortunately it's in German):
http://www.dk3wn.info/antennen.shtml

73, Mike
DK3NW


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ted [mailto:k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxxx
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2011 20:42
An: 'Mike Rupprecht'; 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hello, where can I find more /any info on these antennae

Tnx, K7TRK

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Mike Rupprecht
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 11:16 AM
To: 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hi Jerry,

I worked for more than 10 years with Wimo X-Quads (and only 25 watts).
Polarization was hardwired to RHCP.
These antennas are very compact - the floor space/performance ratio cannot
be beaten.
All my satellite activities / reception of telemetry since 1996 I have made
with this antennas and I was very satisfied.

73, Mike
DK3WN

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Ib Christoffersen
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2011 16:45
An: 'Graham Shirville'; 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hello Graham and Jerry,
A few years ago I compared the 70 cm X-QUAD with a 2 x 19 element TONNA live
on some of the satellites.
They turned out to give the same signal in my non scientific test.
73 OZ1MY/Ib

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx P? vegne
af Graham Shirville
Sendt: 30. januar 2011 15:17
Til: jerry; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Emne: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hi Jerry,

I haven't "compared" them precisely but they work pretty well for me:)

73

Graham
G3VZV
----- Original Message -----
From: "jerry" <jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:32 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] x-quad


> Hello Group
>
> Is there anyone who compared the WIMO X-quads with crossyagi's?
>
> 73's
>
> Jerry, ON4CJQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:20:57 +0100
From: "Matthias Bopp" <matthias.bopp@xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <C6DF6887531B4AD88BE3B81C5DD86966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello all,

I fully agree with Mike. They are very compact but good antennas. I achieved
ZRO level 8 on both, 2m and 70cm, using each time a single X-Quad. Based on
their size they can be easily mounted foremast without distortion of the
polarization ...

My antennas are presently down because of some reconstruction work around my
home, but you can find some pictures and description on my homepage at
www.dd1us.de (including a description how to switch them from LHCP and
RHCP).

Best regards

Matthias DD1US

www.dd1us.de


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Mike Rupprecht
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2011 21:00
An: 'Ted'; 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hi Ted,

see here: http://www.wimo.com/cgi-bin/verteiler.pl?url=xquad-antennas_e.html
or here (but unfortunately it's in German):
http://www.dk3wn.info/antennen.shtml

73, Mike
DK3NW


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ted [mailto:k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxxx
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2011 20:42
An: 'Mike Rupprecht'; 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hello, where can I find more /any info on these antennae

Tnx, K7TRK

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Mike Rupprecht
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 11:16 AM
To: 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hi Jerry,

I worked for more than 10 years with Wimo X-Quads (and only 25 watts).
Polarization was hardwired to RHCP.
These antennas are very compact - the floor space/performance ratio cannot
be beaten.
All my satellite activities / reception of telemetry since 1996 I have made
with this antennas and I was very satisfied.

73, Mike
DK3WN

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Ib Christoffersen
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2011 16:45
An: 'Graham Shirville'; 'jerry'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hello Graham and Jerry,
A few years ago I compared the 70 cm X-QUAD with a 2 x 19 element TONNA live
on some of the satellites.
They turned out to give the same signal in my non scientific test.
73 OZ1MY/Ib

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx P? vegne
af Graham Shirville
Sendt: 30. januar 2011 15:17
Til: jerry; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Emne: [amsat-bb] Re: x-quad

Hi Jerry,

I haven't "compared" them precisely but they work pretty well for me:)

73

Graham
G3VZV
----- Original Message -----
From: "jerry" <jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:32 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] x-quad


> Hello Group
>
> Is there anyone who compared the WIMO X-quads with crossyagi's?
>
> 73's
>
> Jerry, ON4CJQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:31:31 -0700
From: "Dave" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  SSB pre-Amps
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <1A6B5E530B2E48B9A4A0DA7CA0DD608D@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"


Hi group-  Is anyone using the SSBUSA-2000 and SSBUSA-7000 pre-amps?  How
are you powering them?

Thanks,

Dave
KA0SWT

  _____

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3412 - Release Date: 01/30/11




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:44:33 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSB pre-Amps
To: dave@xxxxxx.xxx
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D45DBC1.10604@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi, Dave
I'm using them, and at first I powered them up the coax from my FT-847.
I then went and connected a 2M bandpass filter to get rid of some 2M
crud in my area, and didn't check if the filter had the center pin of
the coax at DC ground or not. It did, and I popped the transistor that
switches the voltage to the coax.
Now I power them with separate power, using some "paired" red/black
cable soldered in to a PL-259. I use an RG-58 adapter, as that takes up
some of the excess space where the relatively small wires go into the
back of the plug, and also provides a nice, rounded edge for the wires
to rest against so the sharp edge of the PL-259 won't cut the insulation.

73, Jim  KQ6EA

On 01/30/2011 09:31 PM, Dave wrote:
> Hi group-  Is anyone using the SSBUSA-2000 and SSBUSA-7000 pre-amps?  How
> are you powering them?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> KA0SWT
>
>   _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3412 - Release Date: 01/30/11
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:56:09 -0500
From: K8TB <k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSB pre-Amps
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D45DE79.8050102@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Dave,

     I have a pair and in my case they are powered right up the coax to
the rig by the IC-910H. They are very good, albeit expensive preamps,
and they make a huge difference for my setup, as I have a 150 foot run
of rg-8 to the antennas.

      tom K8TB

On 1/30/2011 4:31 PM, Dave wrote:
> Hi group-  Is anyone using the SSBUSA-2000 and SSBUSA-7000 pre-amps?  How
> are you powering them?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> KA0SWT



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:35:16 -0500
From: Jim Sanford <wb4gcs@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSB pre-Amps
To: dave@xxxxxx.xxx
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D45E7A4.4060805@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I use them as well, and REALLY like them.  At Field Day, for simplicity,
I power them up the coax from the IC910.  Home station, they get
separately powered through a sequencer.
73,
Jim
wb4gcs@xxxxx.xxx


On 1/30/2011 4:31 PM, Dave wrote:
> Hi group-  Is anyone using the SSBUSA-2000 and SSBUSA-7000 pre-amps?  How
> are you powering them?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> KA0SWT
>
>    _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3412 - Release Date: 01/30/11
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:56:37 -0500
From: Ernie Howard <w8eh.ernie@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSB pre-Amps
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D45ECA5.4000405@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I have both the 2000 and 7000. They are powered up the coax with two
home made DC power inserters in the shack.


Ernie

On 1/30/2011 4:31 PM, Dave wrote:
> Hi group-  Is anyone using the SSBUSA-2000 and SSBUSA-7000 pre-amps?  How
> are you powering them?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> KA0SWT
>
>    _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3412 - Release Date: 01/30/11
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:58:01 -0500
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subgroup-  Is anyone using the SSBUSA-2000 and SSBUSA-7000 pre-amps?  How
> are you powering them?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> KA0SWT
I am using a 4 conductor wire up the tower to power the two preamps, and
my 2.4 GHz system as well.

73, Drew KO4MA


------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:28:09 -0700
From: "Tom" <k0tw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  VUCC 200 km question
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <81D4BEB7A8EE4323931270F79DC00BB1@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

What was the answer, Marvin? Am I correct in assuming that all contacts must
be within a 200 km in diameter circle?

Tom - K?TW

> Subject: [amsat-bb] VUCC 200 km question
>
> Thanks to kk5do and k6yk my question concerning the VUCC?200 km rule has
been
> answered.
>
> 73,
> Marvin
> k5mlt







------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:00:00 -0500 (EST)
From: garymf@xxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb]  AO7 LU-K4 Qso
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <8CD8EF0F01D1B86-1D04-166F0@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


 After about a month of trying  Luis LU6QI and I completed a AO7 mode B CW
QSO. EL98-FK66, Most of the work was on his end as I have poor shot to
the south.
Gary K4MF






------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:44:37 -0000
From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  First time on SO67 tonight
To: "Amsat-Bb@xxxxx. Org" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <CE4A9AAA98DB44368D45B1491DCCDFD2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Caught my first pass of SO67 tonight and had a good time on it.  Thanks to
Glen, AA5PK, for informing me that it no longer uses a PL tone, as I had
that turned on.  I was really impressed with the strength of the downlink
and can tell this is going to be a fun bird to work. Even picked up a new
grid tonight-EM95.

Let's do it again tomorrow on SO67!

73s John AA5JG

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:30:19 -0800
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  SO67  04:20
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BCCF59802CA447288A28FE4AF156E6AD@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

WOW !  what a pleasant change from AO51 !!

(little different audio, but what a signal over So Oregon tonight)

Ted, K7TRK

p.s. for Damon, W4HFN, no 'goat rope' on this bird !


------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:31:35 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: KB3QLK/P FM28 Delaware 1700z 1/30 - 1700z 1/31
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS13689955F7E25218DE9C1BB3E20@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=wang , had "a little
captian in me" hi hi.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv1KPxTCcdM

Stay tune for more portable operations - Iotas - light houses - FM28 and fm
27
******

73!

Zack
KD8KSN

-----Original Message-----
From: Zachary Beougher
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 4:20 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: KB3QLK/P FM28 Delaware 1700z 1/30 - 1700z 1/31

I just realized that Saturday is the 29 and Sunday is the 30.  So, the
correct times/dates are 1700z January 29 - 1700z January 30.

73!

Zack
KD8KSN

-----Original Message-----
From: Zachary Beougher
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:58 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] KB3QLK/P FM28 Delaware 1700z 1/30 - 1700z 1/31

Hi,

Jamie, KB3QLK, will be doing a demo(s) for his club during Winter Field Day
this Saturday-Sunday (30-31).  He will be operating the birds using his
personal call before the event, then he will be using the club?s call,
KB3BHL, during the event.  This will be a good opportunity for any stations
(especially the western stations) to work DE for WAS.

Good luck with the QSOs!

Zack
KD8KSN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:23:41 -0100
From: "Pedro Cruz" <pccu2jx@xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  Fw: SSB pre-Amps
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BC26CD54903E42F2A0B91450D9DA72FB@xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pedro Cruz" <pccu2jx@xxxx.xx>
To: <k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 2:09 PM
Subject: : SSB pre-Amps


> Hi Tom
>
> I also have an icom 910H and VHF and UHF preamps.
>
> You power it direct from the rig without the bias-t ?
>
> Whem you tx the pre amp the rig remove pwr from the preamps?
>
> Best 73 !
>
> Pedro Cruz  - CU2JX
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "K8TB" <k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 8:56 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSB pre-Amps
>
>
>> Dave,
>>
>>     I have a pair and in my case they are powered right up the coax to
>> the rig by the IC-910H. They are very good, albeit expensive preamps,
>> and they make a huge difference for my setup, as I have a 150 foot run
>> of rg-8 to the antennas.
>>
>>      tom K8TB
>>
>> On  What happens if my log entry is one minute off of stations B?s entry
(1906z versus 1905z) ? will they match up?

3) What should my mode be set at (FM, SAT)?

4) Other than date, time, call, mode, sent RST, rcvd RST, band and name (op
name), is there anything that needs to be added to it when I go to upload? 
This was the default LoTW selection for HRD, so I am assuming it is correct.

I can?t think of any other questions at the moment, but any other helpful
tips for getting it started would be appreciated.

73!

Zack
KD8KSN

------------------------------

Message: 17
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:52:00 -0600
From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LoTW Questions
To: "'Zachary Beougher'" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>,
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL114-DS25944E01432ECD61AACCF48AE20@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

The ARRL does a nice job of spelling out the parameters here:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf

The band that matters ( according to the ARRL ) is the band you transmit on,
not the band you receive on.

Here is the data you need to log the contact and have it count in LOTW

<CALL:6> [The Station You Worked]
<QSO_DATE:8> [YYYYMMDD]
<TIME_ON:6> [HHMMSS] in utc
<BAND:4> [The band you transmitted on]
<MODE:3> [SSB, CW, FM, etc.]
<PROP_MODE:3>SAT
<SAT_NAME:4> [The bird you used]
<EOR>

Please n helpful
tips for getting it started would be appreciated.

73!

Zack
KD8KSN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




------------------------------

Message: 18
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:41:48 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]  On This Date - Van Allen Belt
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5BDA0128-5AA4-4FD6-93B8-F43991D59067@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII

On January 31, 1958 - Reacting swiftly to the Soviet success with Sputnik I,
the United States makes its first foray into space a highly successful one.

http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/index/~3/0HfWdXXPRWY/

WIRED Magazine - First U.S. Satellite Discovers Van Allen Belt

Clint, K6LCS


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 64
***************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 01.04.2026 02:12:57lGo back Go up