| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 22.01.11 18:14l 783 Lines 22476 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB642
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 42
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<VE2PKT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 110122/1610Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:46935 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB642
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ARRL VUCC (Tom Deeble)
2. WiSP DDE Doppler correction in SPLIT mode, TS-2000
(sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xxx
3. Re: nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive (Nick Pugh K5QXJ)
4. Searching for old recordings, especially from OSCAR-II,
OSCAR-III, OSCAR-IV and AMSAT-OSCAR-8 (Matthias Bopp)
5. VUCC Sat (mlolmsted@xxxx.xxxx
6. VUCC QSO costs (Jeff Yanko)
7. Re: VUCC QSO costs (Zachary Beougher)
8. Re: ARRL VUCC (Zachary Beougher)
9. Re: VUCC QSO costs (Rick - WA4NVM)
10. Re: VUCC QSO costs (Rick - WA4NVM)
11. Re: TS-2000 Questions! (K5OE)
12. Re: nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
13. WiSP DDE Doppler correction in SPLIT mode, TS-2000
(sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xxx
14. Re: VUCC QSO costs (John Neeley)
15. VUCC card cost (wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx
16. LOTW (Jim Bennett)
17. Re: VUCC QSO costs (Zachary Beougher)
18. Rotor Interface Yaesu 5500 (Bill Gillenwater)
19. Re: VUCC QSO costs (Bruce Paige)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 01:57:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Tom Deeble <ka6sip@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARRL VUCC
To: jim9251@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <8CD8818B7702EFC-1D28-86D7@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Jim,
Congratulations from #208, which I just received yesterday! Very nice
looking certificate.
Always enjoy hearing that you are standing out in the snow operating portable.
Boy, a lot of work to get all the grids listed and then get the cards in
order for checking!
73's
Tom - KA6SIP
Antioch, California & sometimes Lake Tahoe portable
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Adams <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Fri, Jan 21, 2011 6:19 pm
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARRL VUCC
Got my ARRL VUCC Satellite #209 today. Nice large certificate too. Woo hoo!
Jim Adams - K0BAM
idgway, Colorado
______________________________________________
ent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
ot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
ubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:26:43 +0100
From: sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx
Subject: [amsat-bb] WiSP DDE Doppler correction in SPLIT mode,
TS-2000
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <13454634-f01d58fd08a24d9a5650871a39df7fc2@xxxx.xxxx.xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hallo
?
I found possibility of Doppler correction in TS 2000 split mode. Very
usefull during ISS/ARISS contacts.
Here is short description:
http://www.enduro.idl.pl/TS_2000_soft/ts2000.htm
?
Matt SQ7DQX
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:02:09 -0600
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive
To: "'Matt'" <mateuszpigon@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <081201cbba1b$6efba520$4cf2ef60$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
No heard here at 10:00 utc in Louisiana USA
nick
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:27 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive
Hallo
Did anybody received NANOSAIL over Europe today aftenoon?
Maybe my 70cm receiving set up has poor sensitivity.
SQ7DQX
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:35:09 +0100
From: "Matthias Bopp" <matthias.bopp@xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Searching for old recordings, especially from
OSCAR-II, OSCAR-III, OSCAR-IV and AMSAT-OSCAR-8
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <B71C184643B94DF283B087345F1AA801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
I am still trying to get the "Sounds from Space" collection at www.dd1us.de
completed. I am especially looking for any recordings of OSCAR-II,
OSCAR-III, OSCAR-IV and AMSAT-OSCAR-8.
Any help is very much appreciated.
Best regards
Matthias DD1US
www.dd1us.de
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 6:03:29 -0500
From: <mlolmsted@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] VUCC Sat
To: Jim Adams <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <15754434.1295694210443.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Congrats. from #124
Merle, AA4QE
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:11:51 -0800
From: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] VUCC QSO costs
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <77C712FF164246A8AB68517EBD3E85EA@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi all,
I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they now
charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
Thanks in advance!
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:45:33 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
To: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS4943CF68D931448E54777B3FB0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Jeff,
After you mentioned that, I went and took a look at the VUCC application
(http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf) and sure
enough it says, "enclose 20 cents per QSO" (bottom of page). So, you send
$12 for postage to get your award mailed to you, $7 for ARRL members or $12
for non-members for the award, 20 cents/QSO, and you also need to send along
sufficient postage to get your QSL cards returned to you if you mail them to
a card checker. I don't remember paying that much when I got mine. I
wonder if this applies to endorsements??
73!
Zack
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Yanko
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 6:11 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] VUCC QSO costs
Hi all,
I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they now
charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
Thanks in advance!
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:46:06 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARRL VUCC
To: "Jim Adams" <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS4D75CE88C7D19986C77A1B3FB0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Congrats from # 204!
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Adams
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 9:07 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARRL VUCC
Got my ARRL VUCC Satellite #209 today. Nice large certificate too. Woo hoo!
Jim Adams - K0BAM
Ridgway, Colorado
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:54:02 -0600
From: "Rick - WA4NVM" <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
To: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <7898D65F99D84DA0AD6EC34FFC707EBC@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Jeff and the BB,
I just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date
2009,
and the new form, date Jan. 2011) see following website:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf
It looks like instead of a flat $10 fee, they now have gone to multiple fees
for postage, the application and number of contacts. If I'm comprehending
this correctly, if you apply for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a
ARRL
member, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:
$1 postage, $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00
Is this correct? I welcome all replies, if not.
73 all,
Rick WA4NVM
> Hi all,
>
> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they
> now
> charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:00:48 -0600
From: "Rick - WA4NVM" <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
To: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <8D631A46249D48259C7BB448191F06E3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi again Jeff,
Just a follow up on previous post. Look at line #3 of the application.
Maybe
they don't charge this fee IF your in the US. Really not clear on the
wording.
73,
Rick WA4NVM
> Hi all,
>
> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they
> now
> charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:39:51 -0500 (EST)
From: K5OE <k5oe@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: TS-2000 Questions!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <8CD8850FACB8C83-83C-882E@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Stu,
>*I have received & have setetooth and voice command, just like the
Ford/Microsoft Sync in my truck
and all you will have to do is say to your TS-2020, "97 repeater" and it
will know all the other settings :-)
73,
Jerry, K5OE
... and to continue the recent bragging:
VUCC Satellite #88
WAS Oscar #276
DXCC Satellite #286
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:50:31 -0500
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx Matt <mateuszpigon@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTin80CZjbSHJHPJuPfiQW=Yk46WpMu-92OX8gQge@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Was the S band frequency ever discovered?
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Jan 21, 2011 4:05 PM, "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Does anybody have an S-band frequency to listen to??
>
> Mark N8MH
>
> At 06:56 PM 1/21/2011 +0100, Mike Rupprecht wrote:
>>No signals (both afternoon passes) heard ...
>>
>>73, Mike
>>DK3WN
>>
>>-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
>>Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
>>Auftrag von Matt
>>Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Januar 2011 18:27
>>An: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>>Betreff: [amsat-bb] nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive
>>
>>Hallo
>>
>>Did anybody received NANOSAIL over Europe today aftenoon?
>>Maybe my 70cm receiving set up has poor sensitivity.
>>
>>SQ7DQX
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:56:10 +0100
From: sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx
Subject: [amsat-bb] WiSP DDE Doppler correction in SPLIT mode,
TS-2000
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <13486830-6c300488b0c3f5238871a903f3461bd0@xxxx.xxxx.xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hallo
?
I found possibility of Doppler correction in TS 2000 split mode. Very
usefull during ISS/ARISS contacts.
Here is short description:
http://www.enduro.idl.pl/TS_2000_soft/ts2000.h find a Card Checker in your area before
sending anything to ARRL. Save on postage, etc. Hopefully the Card Checker
wont want his cut too now? Sign of the times, it looks like to me...
John W6ZKH
#37184
________________________________
From: Rick - WA4NVM <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Jeff Yanko <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 4:54:02 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
Hi Jeff and the BB,
I just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date
2009,
and the new form, date Jan. 2011) see following website:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf
It looks like instead of a flat $10 fee, they now have gone to multiple fees
for postage, the application and number of contacts. If I'm comprehending
this correctly, if you apply for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a
ARRL
member, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:
$1 postage, $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00
Is this correct? I welcome all replies, if not.
73 all,
Rick WA4NVM
> Hi all,
>
> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they
> now
> charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:19:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] VUCC card cost
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<178112048.1702717.1295705958233.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxx
xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Looks like the volunteer card counter does all the work for FREE and the
ARRL gets the spoils
WA4hfn
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:28:11 -0500
From: "Jim Bennett" <jlb3nn@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] LOTW
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <E7DF28CDF7134C1AB3EF361C105D7787@xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have been using LOTW and eQSL for over a year now. And it appears some
are just entering their contacts now since it supports VUCC. I enter my
contacts manually and sometimes I may for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a
ARRL
member, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:
$1 postage, $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00
Is this correct? I welcome all replies, if not.
73 all,
Rick WA4NVM
> Hi all,
>
> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they
> now
> charge 20 cents per QSO. Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:20:10 -0500
From: "Bill Gillenwater" <k3sv@xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Rotor Interface Yaesu 5500
To: "AmsatBBS" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5E846EAFD8F649CCAAB7DDDDFD2B51A8@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
OK, a newbee question about interfacing rotors. I have a Yaesu 5500 and I
run PCSat32. What do I need between the rotor and the computer? I would like
a few options. Do I need the Yaesu 232 interface box or will a generic box
do the job. If a generic box will work, which are the best for satellite
work with PCSat32?
Tnx 73 Bill K3SV
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:58:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Bruce Paige <kk5do@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
To: Zachary Beougher <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>, John Neeley
<w6zkh@xxx.xxx>, Rick - WA4NVM <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>, Jeff Yanko
<wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <25146.58445.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
no, if you take or send your cards to an arrl awards manager (i am one for
vucc,
was and 5bwas), you do not pay anything other than a check to the arrl for the
cost of your award plus the postage to return your cards to you (if you did
not
take them in person). we are not allowed to accept any fee for checking cards,
we volunteer to do this for other hams. i became an awards manager long ago
when
there was none in houston and i had to send my cards to san antonio. i have
checked many a card since then.
73...bruce
________________________________
From: Zachary Beougher <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: John Neeley <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>; Rick - WA4NVM <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>; Jeff
Yanko
<wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 8:38:51 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
Do you need to pay the card checker the $.20/QSO, or is that only if you
send them directly to ARRL??
I agree with Rick - the wording is not very clear.
Zack
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: John Neeley
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:07 AM
To: Rick - WA4NVM ; Jeff Yanko ; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
Sounds like to me all the better to find a Card Checker in your area before
sending anything to ARRL. Save on postage, etc. Hopefully the Card Checker
wont want his cut too now? Sign of the times, it looks like to me...
John W6ZKH
#37184
________________________________
From: Rick - WA4NVM <wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Jeff Yanko <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 4:54:02 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs
Hi Jeff and the BB,
I just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date
2009,
and the new form, date Jan. 2011) see following website:
http://www.arrl.org fee only applicable if cards are sent to
> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 42
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
