| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 22.01.11 07:16l 705 Lines 19485 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB641
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 41
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0GOS<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 110122/0511Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:46838 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB641
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. SO67 (Hans)
2. Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68? (Bill Dzurilla)
3. For sale: Kansas City Tracker w/cable (Bill Dzurilla)
4. Re: nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive (Mark L. Hammond)
5. Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68?
(Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
6. TS-2000 Questions! (Stuart Balanger)
7. Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68? (Joe)
8. ISS ground digi (Andrew Rich)
9. NanoSail-D (Fred VE3FAL)
10. ARRL VUCC (Jim Adams)
11. Video: very low bitrate digital voice communications
(Bruce Robertson)
12. Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68? (Bill Dzurilla)
13. Re: ARRL VUCC (Loren)
14. Re: ARRL VUCC (John Neeley)
15. Nasa web page (Robert McGwier)
16. NASA TV (Robert McGwier)
17. Re: ARRL VUCC (Andrew Glasbrenner)
18. EM06/EM07/EM16/EM17 (Tyler Nicholas)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:13:48 +0200
From: "Hans" <hans@xxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO67
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <F833C9E77D91485BBFA02386A8D1523C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all
Schedule for Eastern Asia and Australia for week 4 starting Monday 24
January 2011 now on www.amsatsa.org.za <http://www.amsatsa.org.za/>
Reports have been received of sudden boosted audio burst. Reports are
invited. Does it happen on all contacts or contact with stations that run
higher power? Every orbit? Please send me a mail at saamsat@xxxxxxx.xx.xx.
Audio clips always appreciated.
Thanks
73 Hans ZS6AKV
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:19:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <797488.49158.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
And what about HO-68? I also asked a year ago and got the same answer that
Joe did. But it still seems impossible to upload HO-68 QSOs to LOTW, comes
back as "Invalid".
73, Bill NZ5N
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:15:08 -0600
> From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question
> To: "'Jeff Yanko'" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>,
> <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Message-ID: <COL114-DS14DFAA6BBC9DB16684A9DB8AF80@xxx.xxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I did close to a year ago and they said they knew about the
> problem, but
> were busy with VUCC and web re-design.? It is probably
> a good time to remind
> them :-)
>
> 73,
> Joe kk0sd
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:24:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] For sale: Kansas City Tracker w/cable
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <958768.75953.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I have for sale the Kansas City Tracker board complete with the interface
cable. $60 shipped CUSA. It moves your rotor automatically to track the
orbit of a satellite. Only works with older computers. Info at
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/catalog/kct/.
73, Bill NZ5N
billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:54:32 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive
To: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>, "'Matt'"
<mateuszpigon@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <yLub1f00H56cfur05Lubkt@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Does anybody have an S-band frequency to listen to??
Mark N8MH
At 06:56 PM 1/21/2011 +0100, Mike Rupprecht wrote:
>No signals (both afternoon passes) heard ...
>
>73, Mike
>DK3WN
>
>-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
>Auftrag von Matt
>Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Januar 2011 18:27
>An: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>Betreff: [amsat-bb] nanosail over Europe, aftenoon - no receive
>
>Hallo
>
>Did anybody received NANOSAIL over Europe today aftenoon?
>Maybe my 70cm receiving set up has poor sensitivity.
>
>SQ7DQX
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:01:39 -0700
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=6ApRZYVLGqM-2TX3g-9O5mwXQYoZRQUCZTAJP@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Bill!
> And what about HO-68? ?I also asked a year ago and got the same answer that
> Joe did. ?But it still seems impossible to upload HO-68 QSOs to LOTW, comes
> back as "Invalid".
HO-68 works fine now. I have a handful of HO-68 QSLs from my uploads
last night. SO-67 may be the only satellite that isn't set up yet. I have
not
checked TQSL for that satellite, since I had no SO-67 QSOs from outside
the USA. I had uploaded some QSOs through the ISS cross-band repeater
using "ARISS" as the satellite name from Mexico in 2009, but no matches
on those QSOs yet. None of my satellite QSOs were rejected when I
uploaded them, but I have many more to do from my stateside log.
It sounds like you may need to download the latest TQSL configuration
file, and possibly update the TQSL program to the current version. For
just the configuration file, log into the LOTW page, go to Your Account,
then Your Certificates for the configuration file. You can get the current
version of the TQSL software from https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw without having
to log in.
Even though I still want to put together my initial satellite VUCC
application,
I am now curious to see how many QSLs I can come up with from my
stateside log. I'll probably get the rest of my satellite QSOs uploaded
first,
and then go back to the VUCC paperwork.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:38:13 -0500
From: Stuart Balanger <wa2bss@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] TS-2000 Questions!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=EGTBEYPDhZ5A=bNZmY_vuyHytQYGCuHrXmUu2@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
*I have received & have set up the Kenwood TS-200
& have a little problem, the initials "TNC" on the
digitial display indicatethe the internal "TNC" is
on \, & was wondering how dow I turn off the Internal "TNC"?
Also, can listen to the Mt.B eacon "97" repeater,
but can't get the offset to work!
All help greatly apprieated! 73,.Stu (WA2BSS)
*
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:38:39 -0500
From: Joe <jbarkley@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68?
To: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D3A0AEF.9000800@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Bill,
I just looked my TQSL program and under the edit and create function,
There is a listing for Hope Oscar 68. I would edit your ADIF file with TQSL,
that is what I had to do on some EME contacts I had that were invalid
for whatever reason.
Tnx,
Joe
KI4TZ
Bill Dzurilla wrote:
> And what about HO-68? I also asked a year ago and got the same answer
that Joe did. But it still seems impossible to upload HO-68 QSOs to LOTW,
comes back as "Invalid".
>
> 73, Bill NZ5N
>
>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:15:08 -0600
>> From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question
>> To: "'Jeff Yanko'" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>,
>> <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>> Message-ID: <COL114-DS14DFAA6BBC9DB16684A9DB8AF80@xxx.xxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> I did close to a year ago and they said they knew about the
>> problem, but
>> were busy with VUCC and web re-design. It is probably
>> a good time to remind
>> them :-)
>>
>> 73,
>> Joe kk0sd
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:16:43 +1000
From: "Andrew Rich" <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS ground digi
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <7D2FB05F48F543F18C30C1F4902CAD5B@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Perhaps one of the smart guys that make TNC"s from uP can include some
search and replace code in the digi path ?
Add another option "Satellite SGATE DIGI"
Search for "SGATE" replace with "WIDE2-1" or preserve the "SGATE" as well.
Maybe a satellite "robot" can be made like I did years ago with a PIC chip
It listened for "SGATE" to come in on the serial line , (ie satellite in
range) and the TX for 10 minutes every minute then went back to sleep.
Maybe we need to launch a satellite that "triggers" ground stations, and
then relays the list ?
The ground unit could be considered a "transponder" itself.
Maybe the sat could have some smarts and "POLL" heard ground stations ?
Maybe the ground transponders could have a "lock" light.
I see the ground device as being a simple radio and a uP style TNC
Just a few ideas.
The best satellite I liked was dove i thnk its was ?
Just straight packet down ?
What would be cool is a satellite that sends it position LAT and LON.
Andrew VK4TEC
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Rich
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] ISS ground digi
I was hoping to get get away with a solar remote site
DIGI_NED needs a PC ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Ray Wells
To: aprssig@xxxx.xxx
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] ISS ground digi
Andrew,
Have you looked at DigiNed? It has great flexibility.
Ray vk2tv
On 22/01/11 09:40, Andrew Rich wrote:
Hello
I need a hand
I would like to onwards digi the ISS beacons and also beacon via ISS
But I would like to do it via a DIGI and it MAY be on another frequency.
I can work out the frequency bit, thats fine.
It the downlink path I am having issues working out.
ISS only have SGATE
How do you make the "go further" than just "SGATE"
How can you turn
RS0ISS-4>CQ,SGATE:>ARISS - International Space Station (BBS/APRS on)
into
RS0ISS-4>CQ,SGATE,<another digi>, <another digi>:>ARISS -
International Space Station (BBS/APRS on)
Perhaps a simple cross band VF repeater might be the trick ? Get
around the packet path issues ?
- Andrew -
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig@xxxx.xxx
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig@xxxx.xxx
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig@xxxx.xxx
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:59:52 -0500
From: "Fred VE3FAL" <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] NanoSail-D
To: <UISS_ON6MU@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <CFB0581C835F4D7FB71438711F1BABC5@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Did not copy any signals today of NanoSail-D..
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member,SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
RU QRP Club # 285
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:07:25 -0700
From: Jim Adams <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARRL VUCC
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTindv6PN4rwV14ZV_rH5gWRReiPaRtLeaZNCHn1M@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Got my ARRL VUCC Satellite #209 today. Nice large certificate too. Woo hoo!
Jim Adams - K0BAM
Ridgway, Colorado
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:25:56 -0400
From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Video: very low bitrate digital voice
communications
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTimbEz7JFC=8XNo-=nt8HeszTjZg4eC=HV8m7vww@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I'm sure many of you are very interested in the current state of
Codec2, the open-source, low-bitrate voice codec that is being led by
David Rowe VK5DGR. If so, I'd like to draw your attention to the
following video that ZL3IN and I made over the past weekend, which
comprises the actual audio of our first meeting over the Internet,
using codec2 bitstreams. I hope you'll agree that this alpha-level
software is very usable right now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k-nhHE6CrI
Our conversation was conducted using a bash script that I wrote to
provide simple codec2 voice communication over the Internet. Since
October, I've been spending what would normally be my ham time working
on that, or trying to help improve the c2 performance on low-power
CPUs.
Codec2 could be very important to AMSAT's future. Running currently at
2500 bps, and aiming for 2400 bps with FEC, it could make satellite
voice communication comprise a smaller bandwidth, offering less
demanding downlink systems. Because it is open source, the codec could
even be implemented in the satellite, perhaps to provide voice-encoded
telemetry for a FUNcube-like project of the future.
The Codec2 site is http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?page_id=452
The source files of my conversation with ZL3IN, and many ancillary c2
materials are available on my blog:
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
73, Bruce
VE9QRP
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:30:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <56163.22056.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Never mind, LOTW already works with HO-68, just needed to update my
config.tq6 file. Thanks to all who replied.
73, Bill
--- On Fri, 1/21/11, Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: Re: restating LOTW question *** HO-68?
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 3:19 PM
> And what about HO-68?? I also
> asked a year ago and got the same answer that Joe did.?
> But it still seems impossible to upload HO-68 QSOs to LOTW,
> comes back as "Invalid".
>
> 73, Bill NZ5N
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:43:31 -0800
From: "Loren" <lorenrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARRL VUCC
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <208639C1A3BE46C2BE168D3DE63C6D08@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Congratulations Jim.
Keep up the good work!
73
Loren
k7cwq
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:07:11 -0800 (PST)
From: John Neeley <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARRL VUCC
To: Jim Adams <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <570077.4934.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Congrat's Jim from #201
________________________________
From: Jim Adams <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 6:07:25 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARRL VUCC
Got my ARRL VUCC Satellite #209 today. Nice large certificate too. Woo hoo!
Jim Adams - K0BAM
Ridgway, Colorado
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:29:04 -0600
From: Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Nasa web page
To: amsat bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTinGXdbsBRrFnK=aPuyJBwdiazFo05LUK7SXCg-Z@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition26/russian_eva
27.html
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:01:05 -0600
From: Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] NASA TV
To: amsat bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=Bog6hstaUFS5dQLK8ukA_udo3c8dexRRNAk1L@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
NASA TV is currently talking about ARISSAT. It is a lengthy discussion, it
is the press release and says to look forward to Feb. 16.
Bob
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:34:25 -0500
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARRL VUCC
To: Jim Adams <jim9251@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D3A5041.3090307@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 1/21/2011 9:07 PM, Jim Adams wrote:
> Got my ARRL VUCC Satellite #209 today. Nice large certificate too. Woo hoo!
>
> Jim Adams - K0BAM
> Ridgway, Colorado
Congratulations from #123 and welcome to the disease!
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:07:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Tyler Nicholas <k5tdn@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] EM06/EM07/EM16/EM17
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <483143.68892.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello all,
I will be at the four corners of EM06/EM07/EM16/EM17 tomorrow (1/22) afternoon
starting around 2100z. I can only get to 2 grids at a time, so I think I will
do EM06/EM07 and EM16/EM17. I will be in EM06 when I am not at the corner, so
there's a possibility I will be on other sats this weekend.
------------------------------------
Here are the passes that I can be on:
EM06/EM07
AO-51 21:30Z - 21:44Z
FO-29 21:54Z - 22:13Z (look for me around 435.870 +-10)
EM16/EM17
AO-51 23:08Z - 23:23Z
FO-29 23:39Z - 23:59Z
-------------------------------------
73,
Tyler Nicholas K5TDN
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 41
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
