| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 21.01.11 03:39l 818 Lines 23274 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB638
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 38
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0AR<HS1LMV<DB0ZAV<CX2SA
Sent: 110121/0132Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:46608 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB638
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: finding yourself in the passband of an analogsatellite
(na2x@xxxxx.xxxx
2. SO67 today evening (Mateusz)
3. Re: HO-68 Status 110120 (Iain Young, G7III)
4. Re: SO67 today evening (P.H.)
5. Re: FW: Re: em40 needed (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
6. Nanosail-D2: and this is how it sounds (PA3GUO)
7. Re: Tone interference (David Palmer)
8. Re: SO67 today evening (Tony Langdon)
9. 40m EME (AMSAT 0) (Bob Bruninga)
10. NanoSail-D (Fred VE3FAL)
11. Re: 40m EME (AMSAT 0) (Jeff Yanko)
12. Re: NanoSail-D (Mike Rupprecht)
13. Re: NanoSail-D (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
14. Re: NanoSail-D (Fred VE3FAL)
15. Re: "Citizen Satellites" in February Scientific American
(Bob Bruninga)
16. Re: Tone interference (Louis House, KD5GM)
17. FYI - QRZ System Upgrade Tomorrow (1/21) (Zachary Beougher)
18. nano sail (jerry keeton)
19. fastrac (jerry keeton)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:10:30 -0800 (PST)
From: <na2x@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: finding yourself in the passband of an
analogsatellite
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <154441.80296.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
That is a nice tool, Mark.
I flipped the input/output ranges in my table in my response.
The table should look like this
Uplink Downlink
-----------------------------
435.22 MHz 145.93 MHz
435.23 MHz 145.92 MHz
435.24 MHz 145.91 MHz
435.25 MHz 145.90 MHz
435.26 MHz 145.89 MHz
435.27 MHz 145.88 MHz
435.28 MHz 145.87 MHz
And, for the example, if I hear some one calling CQ on 145.890 Mhz, I should
start at an uplink frequency of around 435.260 Mhz, etc..
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:48:30 +0100
From: "Mateusz" <sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO67 today evening
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <9E7BBB54E9684D6A9936E72AA0A7EC42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
I have a question - what is happening with signals on SO67:
http://www.enduro.idl.pl/wav/SO67_20_01_2011.mp3
Matt SQ7DQX
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:13:47 +0000
From: "Iain Young, G7III" <g7iii@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO-68 Status 110120
To: "<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4D38A58B.2070706@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 20/01/11 04:25, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
> Unfortunately no beacon and no transponder heard on the 0420z pass here.
Nothing heard on the 2043z 20th Jan pass over the UK either, despite it
being a long and high 20 minute pass. Would have been great to road
test my Gnuradio SDR CW receiver as webb, but next time :)
-May- have spotted something on the waterfall like it's CW beacon, but
very very weak, where as last night it was very very strong with me.
I don't think it was unless it was extremley week, didnt even show up
until well after 45 degrees elevation, where as last night, I could
spot the beacon from AOS to LOS
Did have to realign the antennas earlier, but AO-51 popped up at the
right time, in the right place with two passes earlier, so I think
they are close enough
73s
Iain
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:06:09 +0000
From: "P.H." <pholmes102@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SO67 today evening
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=mZYc=fhsFQk2AUcmO5Ww1P6xBugLQps__fd9+@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
And why do some REGULAR stations insist on using FM as opposed to FM-N
and shouting like a banshee into the mic?! It is extremely irritating
and makes hearing those who operate properly very difficult.
73
Pete
MI3EPN
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Mateusz <sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx> wrote:
>
> I have a question - what is happening with signals on SO67:
>
> http://www.enduro.idl.pl/wav/SO67_20_01_2011.mp3
>
>
>
> Matt SQ7DQX
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:20:37 -0700
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FW: Re: em40 needed
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTin==bZuwqvDV6EWjrbRqC5eUN6HN8jJNK5hPfas@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi!
>
> ?Believe me when I say, this is not what I wanted this late in my life but
> ?life deals you a hand you have to deal with. I other words, QSL cards are
> ?not on the top of my list things to do. I will get to it but in time. I did
> ?check the web site but there is not option for GIRDS.
>
Regarding the link Damon posted earlier:
http://www.radioqth.net/qsl.aspx
You can put your grid(s) and county in the MISC field in the "Optional
Information" section. It will display that information below the address
on the card. This worked well for me, before I went back to doing QSL
cards with graphics on them a couple of years ago. It would have been
easier if that page had separate fields for the county and grid(s), but
this isn't bad. Put 4 cards on a page, and it works with Avery 8387 type
postcard stock. Then the cards could be trimmed to the standard QSL
card size.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:23:49 +0100
From: PA3GUO <pa3guo@xxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Nanosail-D2: and this is how it sounds
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: pa3guo@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <15770878.1295562234400.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Dear all,
Here is a high quality mp3 audio recording of Nanosail-D2:
http://www.pa3guo.com/nanosaild2_pa3guo_20jan2011.mp3
You decode data from this file yourself, using MixW software !
(note: reception of Nanosail-D2 done using the FUNcubeDongle)
--
Henk, PA3GUO
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:31:45 -0800
From: David Palmer <dave@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tone interference
To: "Louis House, KD5GM" <kd5gm@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTik7BKkUsK6nkLd1vkHoADrCXivw2PXpgWd5Yr87@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Louis,
I have seen a few (rare) postings about the LM7806 voltage regulator
in the G-5500 not having enough bypass output filtration, and thus
becoming unstable.
Reportedly the '7806 regulator needs a 0.1 uF output capacitor for
stability, and the G-5500 uses a 0.01 uF cap instead. An unstable
regulator can either generate RF noise (as you describe) or the
voltage output can become inaccurate as the system warms up, leading
to subtle (less than 10 degree) positioning errors. For example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
I was noticing a slight drift in my display readings as my '5500
warmed up, so I checked the ouput of the 7806 in mine with a scope and
saw it was oscillating (about 200 mV at 5 MHz). I simply soldered a
0.1 uF tantalum capacitor, in parallel, to the leads of the exisiting
(0.01 uF) cap ... and that removed the oscillation entirely. Meters
then had nice stable readings after that too. I never noticed RF
noise, but the fix should be the same for both.
Hope this helps,
73 de Dave KB5WIA / CM88
AMSAT #38466
> I have discovered a pulsating tone (about 600 HZ) in my 910H receiver when
I am
> tuned to 145.900 MHz (working the Linear birds VO-52 etc). ?The tone stops
when
> I power off the G-5500/LVB tracker. ?All equipment is grounded and ferrite
core
> filters are on all of the cables to solve this problem. ?Aside from moving
all
> equipment across the room from each other, what might I be missing?
> Any help will be ?appreciated
> Thanks,
> LOUIS, KD5GM in EL29kq
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:05:26 +1100
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SO67 today evening
To: "P.H." <pholmes102@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4d38bfbd.194cdf0a.1454.ffff9485@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 09:06 AM 1/21/2011, P.H. wrote:
>And why do some REGULAR stations insist on using FM as opposed to FM-N
>and shouting like a banshee into the mic?! It is extremely irritating
>and makes hearing those who operate properly very difficult.
Good question. I found FM-N was perfect for this bird.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:17:36 -0500
From: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 40m EME (AMSAT 0)
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <05d101cbb8f8$393b7830$abb26890$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FW: Re: em40 needed
I misread this as something to do with 40m EME and got so distracted doing
the calculations that I may as well post them.
By my guess, if one could find an abandoned K mart parking lot with 160'
spacing between light poles (about 30' high), one could hang 16 dipoles. If
it was over GOOD swamp land, that might equal about 14 dB antenna gain.
The path loss at 40m is 36 dB better than at UHF so the link would be about
0 dB SNR on a CW signal maybe. But from this one has to subtract a huge
amount of noise on 40m. And it would only work at high elevations with
really QUIET sun cycle. (you could point it with some phase adjustments)...
But several dB of processing gain via DSP could bring it back up?
These are only wild guesses. But it was fun. I'd love to see an expert's
calculation just for the drill.
Bob, WB4APR
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:27:07 -0500
From: "Fred VE3FAL" <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] NanoSail-D
To: "'AMSAT BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <6D41181ADB02428A91B747FE5B0C7B02@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Gang:
What mode is the NanoSail-D data being sent in?
I am monitoring 437.270 and last pass heard nothing.
I will monitor next couple of days.
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member,SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
RU QRP Club # 285
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:29:37 -0800
From: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 40m EME (AMSAT 0)
To: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <46D8B45450F84429B76D6CD7018907D7@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Bob and all!
I recall there was a HAARP experiment in, or near the 40 meter band. If I
recall correctly, Randy, K7AGE, had recorded it for a youtube segment. I
foget the power and gain at the site, but it was no doubt impressive.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:17 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] 40m EME (AMSAT 0)
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FW: Re: em40 needed
>
> I misread this as something to do with 40m EME and got so distracted doing
> the calculations that I may as well post them.
>
> By my guess, if one could find an abandoned K mart parking lot with 160'
> spacing between light poles (about 30' high), one could hang 16 dipoles.
> If
> it was over GOOD swamp land, that might equal about 14 dB antenna gain.
>
> The path loss at 40m is 36 dB better than at UHF so the link would be
> about
> 0 dB SNR on a CW signal maybe. But from this one has to subtract a huge
> amount of noise on 40m. And it would only work at high elevations with
> really QUIET sun cycle. (you could point it with some phase
> adjustments)...
>
> But several dB of processing gain via DSP could bring it back up?
>
> These are only wild guesses. But it was fun. I'd love to see an
> expert's
> calculation just for the drill.
>
> Bob, WB4APR
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:38:12 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NanoSail-D
To: "'Fred VE3FAL'" <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT BB'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <018001cbb8fb$1a892a10$4f9b7e30$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Fred,
brand new data:
2011-01-20 23:34:21.564 UTC: NanoSailD.org
8C0F00002F2000000004008A7B020000B193C47ACFC0000000
2011-01-20 23:35:31.573 UTC: NanoSailD.org
8C0F0000312000000004008A7B0200002994C47ACFC0000000
2011-01-20 23:35:41.577 UTC: NanoSailD.org
8C0F0000322000000004008A7B0200002994C47ACFC0000000
2011-01-20 23:35:51.576 UTC: NanoSailD.org
8C0F0000322000000004008A7B0200002994C47ACFC0000000
2011-01-20 23:36:01.578 UTC: NanoSailD.org
8C0F0000322000000004008A7A0200002994C47ACFC0000000
NanoSail is sending UI Frames in 1k2 AFSK.
73, Mike
DK3WN
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von Fred VE3FAL
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Januar 2011 00:27
An: 'AMSAT BB'
Betreff: [amsat-bb] NanoSail-D
Gang:
What mode is the NanoSail-D data being sent in?
I am monitoring 437.270 and last pass heard nothing.
I will monitor next couple of days.
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member,SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
RU QRP Club # 285
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:47:59 -0500
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NanoSail-D
To: Fred VE3FAL <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTinm2RFZ-C68dvrkCK7DypEh2vWOLm0EwLrv0_rr@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Fred,
1200 baud AX.25 packets, the same as ISS.
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Jan 20, 2011 6:34 PM, "Fred VE3FAL" <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Gang:
>
> What mode is the NanoSail-D data being sent in?
>
> I am monitoring 437.270 and last pass heard nothing.
>
> I will monitor next couple of days.
>
>
>
> Fred
> CIW649/VE3FAL
> CFARS Member
> SATERN Member,SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
> DEC Amethyst District ARES
>
> RU QRP Club # 285
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:55:17 -0500
From: "Fred VE3FAL" <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NanoSail-D
To: "'Dave Webb KB1PVH'" <kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BFFE94FE8AE241FA9E4F97009C47FCC9@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks, I do have UISS on to copy if I hear it.
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member,SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
RU QRP Club # 285
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH [mailto:kb1pvh@xxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:48 PM
To: Fred VE3FAL
Cc: AMSAT BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NanoSail-D
Fred,
1200 baud AX.25 packets, the same as ISS.
Dave - KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Jan 20, 2011 6:34 PM, "Fred VE3FAL" <flesnick@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Gang:
>
> What mode is the NanoSail-D data being sent in?
>
> I am monitoring 437.270 and last pass heard nothing.
>
> I will monitor next couple of days.
>
>
>
> Fred
> CIW649/VE3FAL
> CFARS Member
> SATERN Member,SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
> DEC Amethyst District ARES
>
> RU QRP Club # 285
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:03:23 -0500
From: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: "Citizen Satellites" in February Scientific
American
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <05f301cbb8fe$9edc6900$dc953b00$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> I stopped reading Scientific American years ago.
> The quality of the articles dropped, and it took
> on a decidedly political stance on certain subjects.
If the reference is to climate change. The rhetoric can be called political
but only because talking heads have made it so. The science doesn't blow so
much in the wind and is very clear. It is happening.
Stopping reading about facts that challenge our beliefs is not generally a
good way to change it and gain enlightenment.
Bob
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:36:01 -0600
From: "Louis House, KD5GM" <kd5gm@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tone interference
To: "David Palmer" <dave@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <5CC2F959889F4A4D9E2D1DCB1D85E273@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your input to my problem. I will break out the prints and start
looking for any signs of instability in the power supply filtering. If I
can figure it out I will let you know how it turns out.
Thanks again..
LOUIS, KD5GM in EL29kq
CW, The original digital mode
AMSAT #37061: FIST #3606
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Palmer" <dave@xxxx.xxx>
To: "Louis House, KD5GM" <kd5gm@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 04:31 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Tone interference
Hi Louis,
I have seen a few (rare) postings about the LM7806 voltage regulator
in the G-5500 not having enough bypass output filtration, and thus
becoming unstable.
Reportedly the '7806 regulator needs a 0.1 uF output capacitor for
stability, and the G-5500 uses a 0.01 uF cap instead. An unstable
regulator can either generate RF noise (as you describe) or the
voltage output can become inaccurate as the system warms up, leading
to subtle (less than 10 degree) positioning errors. For example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
I was noticing a slight drift in my display readings as my '5500
warmed up, so I checked the ouput of the 7806 in mine with a scope and
saw it was oscillating (about 200 mV at 5 MHz). I simply soldered a
0.1 uF tantalum capacitor, in parallel, to the leads of the exisiting
(0.01 uF) cap ... and that removed the oscillation entirely. Meters
then had nice stable readings after that too. I never noticed RF
noise, but the fix should be the same for both.
Hope this helps,
73 de Dave KB5WIA / CM88
AMSAT #38466
> I have discovered a pulsating tone (about 600 HZ) in my 910H receiver when
> I am
> tuned to 145.900 MHz (working the Linear birds VO-52 etc). The tone stops
> when
> I power off the G-5500/LVB tracker. All equipment is grounded and ferrite
> core
> filters are on all of the cables to solve this problem. Aside from moving
> all
> equipment across the room from each other, what might I be missing?
> Any help will be appreciated
> Thanks,
> LOUIS, KD5GM in EL29kq
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:35:13 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FYI - QRZ System Upgrade Tomorrow (1/21)
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS1635DD1194A9A107D1791CB3F80@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
Not sure how many of you hang out on QRZ and regularly update your pages,
but you may want to read this: http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=281634
According to the thread, QRZ will basically be in a read-only mode for
several hours beginning tomorrow. No QRZ pages will be able to be updated,
no posts will be able to be made in any of the forums, etc.
73!
Zack
KD8KSN
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:17:40 -0600
From: "jerry keeton" <jkboxk@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] nano sail
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <91F789232D17489CAB0A79D5322659D4@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I heard packet signals at least 2 minutes ahead of the FASTRAC packet.
Didn't get a print of the signal . I see the spamers have taken over the
forums page on the fastrac website . They need to clean it out.
Jerry WB5LHD
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:27:30 -0600
From: "jerry keeton" <jkboxk@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] fastrac
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <3E43F3E8B3EE47B2A9DFDF3F295C1E7A@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
can someone tell which of the lines are the te
23:25 FAST2/KD5SZV*>KE5DTW>UA,?
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>UA,?
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I00,?,F0 (1201 baud):
FAST1 Is Now Connected. GO HORNS!
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I13,?,F0 (1201 baud):
.F772001619429944.99113151619589824191-0.7059+0.5686+0.6000 +1452528.94
+1623706.94 +6669636.31 -5843.71082 +4495.65898 +164.25
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I16,?,F0 (1201 baud):
00 -1389 850 3.032c0 9 0.00 +0.000 +0.00 628 3868
2.995 027 0.00 +0.000 +0.00 553 27
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I17,?,F0 (1201 baud):
92 2.991 018 0.00 +0.000 +0.00 2128 6368 3.001 029
0.00 +0.000 +0.00 3290 530 3.003 0 0
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I10,?,F0 (1201 baud):
0.00 +0.000 +0.00 0 0 0.000 026 0.00
+0.000 +0.00 -674 -1434 3.001c0 5 0.0
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I11,?,F0 (1201 baud):
0 +0.000 +0.00 -2768 -7028 3.002c0 2 0.00 +0.000
+0.00 -121 6617 2.995 0 0 0.00 +0.
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I12,?,F0 (1201 baud):
000 +0.00 0 0 0.000 025 0.00 +0.000 +0.00 898
-361 3.001c04944.
GCP
fast1>
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>RR2,?
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I23,?,F0 (1201 baud):
f77 1
P
23:25 FAST1>KE5DTW>I24,?,F0 (1201 baud):
gpsmmc 147415
GCP
fast1>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 38
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
