| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 15.01.11 21:17l 818 Lines 25325 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB626
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 26
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<IK6ZDE<VE2PKT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 110115/2008Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:45510 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB626
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Office Closed (Martha)
2. Fw: SATPC32 (Jack Barbera)
3. Re: Desensitized Receiver Issues (Zachary Beougher)
4. Cause Of Galaxy 15 Satellite Malfunction Identified (B J)
5. Re: Cause Of Galaxy 15 Satellite Malfunction Identified
(Auke de Jong, VE6PWN)
6. Re: VUCC & LoTW (Jeff Yanko)
7. Re: VUCC & LoTW (Joe)
8. Looking for activity where there is little. (Tom Schuessler)
9. HO68 1706z Pass??? (Zachary Beougher)
10. Re: HO68 1706z Pass??? (Zachary Beougher)
11. Re: HO68 1706z Pass??? (Glenn AA5PK)
12. Re: Looking for activity where there is little. (Rick Tejera)
13. SATCONTROL_FCD (Mike Rupprecht)
14. Re: HO68 1706z Pass??? (Zachary Beougher)
15. Re: VUCC & LoTW (Ted)
16. SO67 Schedule for Europe (Hans)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:01:34 -0500
From: Martha <martha@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Office Closed
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, Board of Directors <bod@xxxxx.xxx>,
AMSAT Officers <officers@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTikKRqvE=jDnsuFhryCDmP47fXWa6s5Odf=BEWFM@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
The AMSAT office will be closed on Monday, January 17th in observance of
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.
--
73- Martha
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:50:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Jack Barbera <barberaalderwood@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fw: SATPC32
To: Amsat Reflector <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <109411.59133.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
?
need a little help.Is it possible to add addition Sats to track?Go from 12
to18?
or 24.If not could it be added to the wish list?
Thanks
?Jack WA1ZDV
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:07:16 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Desensitized Receiver Issues
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS357DBE60DE3D0E2138C74B3F30@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
Thanks everybody for the tips - Chuck got it all figured out and working!
73!
Zack
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: Zachary Beougher
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:40 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Desensitized Receiver Issues
Hi All,
I have a friend who is experiencing receiver sensitivity issues when he
tries to transmit into the birds using his IC-V82 and IC-U82 and Arrow II
antenna. When he transmits on 2m the 440 downlinked is wiped out. I have
never had this issue before, so I don?t really know the easiest solution to
it when using 2 HTs. Could someone please pass along some tips on how to
resolve this issue to me, and I will forward them on to him?
Thank you!
Zack
KD8KSN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:38:01 -0800 (PST)
From: B J <top_gun_canada@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cause Of Galaxy 15 Satellite Malfunction
Identified
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <184603.82782.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1101/14galaxy15/
http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/134564-intelsat-galaxy-1
5-drifts-from-zombie-a-phoenix.htm
http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2011/01/14/intelsat-galaxy-15-returns-to-servic
e/
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:41:35 -0700
From: "Auke de Jong, VE6PWN" <sparkycivic@xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cause Of Galaxy 15 Satellite Malfunction
Identified
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <001001cbb476$df746940$6500a8c0@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
This is a perfect example of human ingenuity for the benefit of all. I'm
glad that they have been so forthcoming about the technical details around
the problem... now future satellites, including Amateur satellites, will
benefit from this experience.
The message? The importance of fault-tolerance cannot be understated! I
guess it's not a new message, but still a good one.
Auke
----- Original Message -----
From: "B J" <top_gun_canada@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 8:38 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cause Of Galaxy 15 Satellite Malfunction Identified
> http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1101/14galaxy15/
>
http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/134564-intelsat-galaxy-1
5-drifts-from-zombie-a-phoenix.htm
>
http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2011/01/14/intelsat-galaxy-15-returns-to-servic
e/
>
> 73s
>
> Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3380 - Release Date: 01/14/11
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:39:40 -0800
From: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW
To: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <C448383DB7CA4EAAAF2CB3269637C559@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Ted and all,
I got the LoTW VUCC set up without a problem. I had already uploaded 545
satellite QSOs over the past couple of years so they were waiting to be
used. Well, after getting everything in order I have a grand total
of.....21 matches, or 3.85% of my satellite log. With LoTW VUCC now active
it will hopefully get those with electronic logging to upload their
satellite QSO's, even better, to get those with paper logs to convert to
electronic logging, go back and enter QSO's from the previous couple years,
to take advantage of this service. After seeing this disappointing results,
I know we, in the Amateur Satellite community, can do better.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
Las Vegas, NV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Ted'" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>; <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:02 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW
>
>
> Boy, after playing with this on LOTW, we may need an 'owners manual'. I
> created a 'VUCC Satellite' account and uploaded my entire HRD Logbook:
>
> Prior to the upload, I added a 'propagation' field to the log and did a
> bulk
> edit to add 'sat' to each FM contact in my log (you can choose another
> field
> to search, but since I don't log anything on FM other than the sats that
> works for me).
>
> Uploaded the log to LOTW. Nothing shows under the 'VUCC Satellite'
> account.
> (note: when I created just a pure VUCC account, several contacts showed up
> as FM contacts)
>
> So, Im guessing we need to find out which ADIF fields are necessary in a
> log
> upload to make the LOTW happy...
>
> THAT is above my pay grade, so I hope to see some good answers from the
> group when I wake up tomorrow..
>
> 73, Ted, K7TRK
>
> FYI.from LoTW site:
>
> "Jan 13, 2011: VUCC award support is now live -- Under the Awards tab you
> will find a VUCC button. The VUCC <http://www.arrl.org/vucc> is ARRL's
> award recognizing VHF, UHF, and SHF work and counts Maidenhead grid
> squares."
>
>
> Is this a good thing or ??? do we need to set up anything different in an
> HRD Logbook to make this work ?? questions, questions..
>
> 73, Ted K7TRK
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 07:41:46 -0500
From: Joe <jbarkley@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW
To: Jeff Yanko <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D31960A.4080308@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Jeff,
I had a similar experience but not the volume you have.
I found that some of my contacts did not have the proper
SAT name that the TQSL program was looking for and
I edited the file and wound up with about 15 more contacts.
Just a thought..
73,
Joe
KI4TZ
Jeff Yanko wrote:
> Hi Ted and all,
>
> I got the LoTW VUCC set up without a problem. I had already uploaded 545
> satellite QSOs over the past couple of years so they were waiting to be
> used. Well, after getting everything in order I have a grand total
> of.....21 matches, or 3.85% of my satellite log. With LoTW VUCC now active
> it will hopefully get those with electronic logging to upload their
> satellite QSO's, even better, to get those with paper logs to convert to
> electronic logging, go back and enter QSO's from the previous couple years,
> to take advantage of this service. After seeing this disappointing results,
> I know we, in the Amateur Satellite community, can do better.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
> Las Vegas, NV
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: "'Ted'" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>; <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:02 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW
>
>
>
>> Boy, after playing with this on LOTW, we may need an 'owners manual'. I
>> created a 'VUCC Satellite' account and uploaded my entire HRD Logbook:
>>
>> Prior to the upload, I added a 'propagation' field to the log and did a
>> bulk
>> edit to add 'sat' to each FM contact in my log (you can choose another
>> field
>> to search, but since I don't log anything on FM other than the sats that
>> works for me).
>>
>> Uploaded the log to LOTW. Nothing shows under the 'VUCC Satellite'
>> account.
>> (note: when I created just a pure VUCC account, several contacts showed up
>> as FM contacts)
>>
>> So, Im guessing we need to find out which ADIF fields are necessary in a
>> log
>> upload to make the LOTW happy...
>>
>> THAT is above my pay grade, so I hope to see some good answers from the
>> group when I wake up tomorrow..
>>
>> 73, Ted, K7TRK
>>
>> FYI.from LoTW site:
>>
>> "Jan 13, 2011: VUCC award support is now live -- Under the Awards tab you
>> will find a VUCC button. The VUCC <http://www.arrl.org/vucc> is ARRL's
>> award recognizing VHF, UHF, and SHF work and counts Maidenhead grid
>> squares."
>>
>>
>> Is this a good thing or ??? do we need to set up anything different in an
>> HRD Logbook to make this work ?? questions, questions..
>>
>> 73, Ted K7TRK
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:07:35 -0600
From: "Tom Schuessler" <tjschuessler@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Looking for activity where there is little.
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <001b01cbb4d6$b4f4bc50$1ede34f0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hello all,
With all the rumblings about excessive, rude and uncivil activity,
especially on AO-51, there are passes from both SSB and FM satellites that
go completely unused. For the last few nights, I have drug out in the late
evening to attempt to make a few QSO's on SO-50. On both nights, last
evening was a 05:51 AOS 1-15-2011, I could hear the satellite via an
occasional retransmitted carrier, but there was no one else on. Tonight in
North Texas I have a great 70 degree pass at 04:38 AOS and would encourage
others to give it a shot, especially if you are newer to the FM birds.
SO-50 is available 24/7 but pass times vary due to the nature of it's orbit.
It can be a bit challenging in different ways compared to other sats. First
it is relatively low power, 250mw. Second, it does require a PL and I even
forgot that it requires a different PL to activate than to just use so I
will have to try that tonight. (Perhaps that was the issue for me last
night, I will check my memories). Also it does seem to me that it does
downlink about 5Kc below published frequencies. SO-50 does seem to need a
bit more switching of the polarization, (For me and my arrow, that means
quit a bit of spinning), to hear and get in. Additionally, it is not a bent
pipe, retransmitting noise even if it hears nothing like AO-51 does so
manual aiming is trickey if you do not hear anything coming down.
All in all though SO-50 is a good bird to work and it would be nice to see
some activity on it during the odd hour passes.
I will hopefully see some of you on for the 04:3x Z pass Jan 16.
73 de N5HYP
Tom Schuessler
2713 Lake Gardens Drive
Irving, Texas 75060
972-986-7456
214-403-1464 (Cell)
n5hyp@xxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:14:53 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HO68 1706z Pass???
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS23359E4E5CB8E61505A7AFB3F20@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I did not hear HO68 a few minutes ago when I went out for the 1706z pass ?
can anyone confirm that? I have had some station issues lately, so maybe
the issue is on my end. From what I understood in Alan?s email yesterday,
HO68 was back in operation.
Zack
KD8KSN
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:27:11 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO68 1706z Pass???
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS25EB9C145C9EF16175FF7CB3F20@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
I see on http://oscar.dcarr.org/ that AA5PK, KB1RVT and KB9BNK also reported
HO68 being off.....
Zack
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: Zachary Beougher
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 12:14 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] HO68 1706z Pass???
I did not hear HO68 a few minutes ago when I went out for the 1706z pass ?
can anyone confirm that? I have had some station issues lately, so maybe
the issue is on my end. From what I understood in Alan?s email yesterday,
HO68 was back in operation.
Zack
KD8KSN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:31:33 -0600
From: "Glenn AA5PK" <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO68 1706z Pass???
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <75A35DA5A4594ECD8BB19175F878F8D9@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
We weren't expecting the transponder, but we didn't hear the beacon either.
Glenn AA5PK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 11:27 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO68 1706z Pass???
>I see on http://oscar.dcarr.org/ that AA5PK, KB1RVT and KB9BNK also reported
> HO68 being off.....
>
> Zack
> KD8KSN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zachary Beougher
> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 12:14 PM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] HO68 1706z Pass???
>
> I did not hear HO68 a few minutes ago when I went out for the 1706z pass ?
> can anyone confirm that? I have had some station issues lately, so maybe
> the issue is on my end. From what I understood in Alan?s email yesterday,
> HO68 was back in operation.
>
> Zack
> KD8KSN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:38:17 -0700
From: "Rick Tejera" <saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Looking for activity where there is little.
To: "'Tom Schuessler'" <tjschuessler@xxxxxxx.xxx>,
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<20110115174009.CTAB13015.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Tom,
I agree with you completely. I too enjoy working SO-50 on the odd hour
passes. (Was out with the family last night so was on the air). I too notice
the bird is very sensitive to polarization. I have a separate memory
programmed in for the on tone. On the late passes I'll key that shortly
after the bird comes over the hill and then check to see if I can hear
myself on the downlink.
As you said, it's a fine bird and a great alternative to the pileup on
AO-51.
I also enjoy the late passes on SO-67 when it on over NA.
I'll try to be on tonight's pass. Look's like we have a mutual window from
0440UT to 0448UT
73
Clear Skies
Rick Tejera
Editor SACnews,
Public Outreach Coordinator
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix, Arizona
www.saguaroastro.org
saguaroastro@xxx.xxx
K7TEJ, AMSAT 38452
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Tom Schuessler
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 10:08
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Looking for activity where there is little.
Hello all,
With all the rumblings about excessive, rude and uncivil activity,
especially on AO-51, there are passes from both SSB and FM satellites that
go completely unused. For the last few nights, I have drug out in the late
evening to attempt to make a few QSO's on SO-50. On both nights, last
evening was a 05:51 AOS 1-15-2011, I could hear the satellite via an
occasional retransmitted carrier, but there was no one else on. Tonight in
North Texas I have a great 70 degree pass at 04:38 AOS and would encourage
others to give it a shot, especially if you are newer to the FM birds.
SO-50 is available 24/7 but pass times vary due to the nature of it's orbit.
It can be a bit challenging in different ways compared to other sats. First
it is relatively low power, 250mw. Second, it does require a PL and I even
forgot that it requires a different PL to activate than to just use so I
will have to try that tonight. (Perhaps that was the issue for me last
night, I will check my memories). Also it does seem to me that it does
downlink about 5Kc below published frequencies. SO-50 does seem to need a
bit more switching of the polarization, (For me and my arrow, that means
quit a bit of spinning), to hear and get in. Additionally, it is not a bent
pipe, retransmitting noise even if it hears nothing like AO-51 does so
manual aiming is trickey if you do not hear anything coming down.
All in all though SO-50 is a good bird to work and it would be nice to see
some activity on it during the odd hour passes.
I will hopefully see some of you on for the 04:3x Z pass Jan 16.
73 de N5HYP
Tom Schuessler
2713 Lake Gardens Drive
Irving, Texas 75060
972-986-7456
214-403-1464 (Cell)
n5hyp@xxxx.xxx
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:42:05 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SATCONTROL_FCD
To: <funcube@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <000601cbb4e3$ed1085d0$c7319170$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
All,
Those who want to use their FUNcube Dongle to track satellites may like to
try my tool SATCONTROL_FCD (first beta release).
You can download a zip file here:
http://www.dk3wn.info/files/SatControl_FCD.zip
The sat.ini can be configured as needed (own locator, path to your TLE file
/ Doppler.sql (SatPC32). The front end FCHid.exe needs to be running first.
If you enable the checkbox in the frequency frame SATCONTROL_FCD will write
the calculated frequency directly into the FCD controller software.
73, Mike
DK3WN
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:51:00 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO68 1706z Pass???
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS1723A79FF4A78FE002BBDBB3F20@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
No, I was listening to the repeater. I misunderstood Alan's email
yesterday. I thought the repeater was back on.
Zack
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark L. Hammond
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 12:33 PM
To: Zachary Beougher
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HO68 1706z Pass???
I think CW beacon only---is that what you listened for??
At 12:14 PM 1/15/2011 -0500, you wrote:
>I did not hear HO68 a few minutes ago when I went out for the 1706z pass ?
>can anyone confirm that? I have had some station issues lately, so maybe
>the issue is on my end. From what I understood in Alan???s email
>yesterday, HO68 was back in operation. Zack KD8KSN
>_______________________________________________ Sent via
>AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an
>AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:14:50 -0800
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW
To: "'Jeff Yanko'" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <F3C07D8B0DDE4795B280866A2ADFA76A@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Jeff, 9 out of 189 here....I'm sure our numbers will go up as people upload
their logs properly
73, Ted
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Yanko [mailto:wb3jfs@xxx.xxxx
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 1:40 AM
To: Ted; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW
Hi Ted and all,
I got the LoTW VUCC set up without a problem. I had already uploaded 545
satellite QSOs over the past couple of years so they were waiting to be
used. Well, after getting everything in order I have a grand total
of.....21 matches, or 3.85% of my satellite log. With LoTW VUCC now active
it will hopefully get those with electronic logging to upload their
satellite QSO's, even better, to get those with paper logs to convert to
electronic logging, go back and enter QSO's from the previous couple years,
to take advantage of this service. After seeing this disappointing results,
I know we, in the Amateur Satellite community, can do better.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
Las Vegas, NV
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:57:21 +0200
From: "Hans" <hans@xxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO67 Schedule for Europe
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <8E814FCFD53342008875A46B40A8CBF0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all
The SO67 Schedule for Europe is available on www.amsatsa.org.za
<http://www.amsatsa.org.za/>
73 Hans
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 26
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
