| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 11.01.11 17:44l 739 Lines 22720 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB617
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V6 17
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<VE2PKT<CX2SA
Sent: 110111/1641Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:44699 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB617
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: unknown signal (Mark L. Hammond)
2. Re: Sat protocol (John Neeley)
3. Re: Sat protocol (rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
4. Re: unknown signal (Mike Rupprecht)
5. Re: Sat protocol (Jim Jerzycke)
6. Re: Sat protocol (John Neeley)
7. Re: Sat protocol (Zachary Beougher)
8. Italian Repeaters on IARU Satellite Freqs
(Keith Baker KB1SF/VA3KSF)
9. Fwd: Re: Re: Sat protocol (Edward R. Cole)
10. Sat Protocol (Dads)
11. AMSAT-UK Front cover (Andrew Glasbrenner)
12. AO-51 (Carl Rimmer)
13. Re: satellite protocol and HO-68 (Tom Schuessler)
14. GO-32 (jerry)
15. Re: Ao51 Protocol ? (WILLIAMS MICHAEL)
16. Re: Ao51 Protocol ? (jmfranke)
17. Re: WB2OQQ @ HAM RADIO UNIVERSITY TOMORROW (Dee)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:03:09 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: unknown signal
To: jerry <jkboxk@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTimyux9trj_fdj9z9hmEThhhuUikVCPHgC+GVdVD@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It might have been GO-32 telemetry, based on what you saw.
Check out Mike DK3WN's OnlineKISS+ program and see if you can capture
some frames via your TNC. That will help you see what is really
coming through...
73,
Mark N8MH
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:14 PM, jerry <jkboxk@xxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Robert G8ATE
>
> Thanks for the reply . I live in the boonies , at least 10 miles from the
nearest super market scanner . So I think
> I can rule that out . I do have a remote weather station , Maybe from that
, but I've never seen it before . I thought maybe that or some internal
software message ? I just thought it strange it happened as GO32 was
overhead and that is what I was listening for.
>
> Thanks again
> Jerry WB5LHD
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:42:55 -0800 (PST)
From: John Neeley <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
To: wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <590820.13001.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Problem is Damon, is that some of the worse offenders are guys who've been
around ever since I have been. Everyone out to get that elusive Grid Square
that they've worked a zillion times before. I too did the same as you, and
pretty much void the FM'er anymore, unless something special comes up.
For another 2 cents worth: (I know I'll get flamed) If there is some station
announcing here on the BB that they are going to a special grid location
that is
rare or needed by someone, then give them and others a break. Namely, if he
or
even any other station that is working Portable or HT status, work him, then
QRT, and leave the freq for others. 'Hogging' the channel, working or calling
the same old station you've worked a zillion times before and not letting
others
work the Portable/HT stations, just to satisfy your QSO count for more
wallpaper
just doesnt hack it, in my opinion. end of rant & extinguisher in
hand.............
John W6ZKH
DM06
Linears 99% of the time.....now
________________________________
From: "wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx <wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 11:40:10 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sat protocol
Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical for QST on
how to
work the birds!
Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to them proper way
(
BE A MENTOR )
Something needs to be done thats for sure
WA4HFN Damon em55
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:00:47 -0600
From: "rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx <rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
To: "wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx <wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <919242CE-D6CE-479A-A3EC-E4BDC57AE0F9@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I have talked directly to the editor in chief of QST. I got a "not
interested" response
Ron
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>
>
>
> Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical for QST on
how to work the birds!
>
> Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to them proper
way ( BE A MENTOR )
>
> Something needs to be done thats for sure
>
> WA4HFN Damon em55
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:09:14 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: unknown signal
To: "'Amsat - BBs'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <007801cbb10a$a2c3a070$e84ae150$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi Jerry,
you heard the GO-32 beacon (every 30 sec a short burst). It's no UI-frame so
you can't use MixW.
If you use a TNC in KISS mode you will receive a short beacon like that:
[47 Bytes KISS Frame (without CRC)]
1 > C0 00 0A 0B 15 00 8C 00 3C 7D 01 00 54 65 63 68 53 61 74 2D
21 > 56 34 2E 32 10 40 00 00 00 00 40 08 10 00 40 00 04 00 00 00
41 > 00 00 50 0E 00 00 C0
?.....?.<}..TechSat-V4.2.@....@...@.......x...x
73, Mike
DK3WN
PS: At the moment GO-32 is active in beacon mode with CPU-B. I expect that
GO-32 will fall back into its emergency mode very soon.
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im
Auftrag von jerry keeton
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Januar 2011 00:41
An: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Betreff: [amsat-bb] unknown signal
Was monitoring 435.325 listening for GO-32 . Got the message below but not
sure if that is from Oscar 32 . Was on 9600 bps . Anyone have any clues?
Jerry WB5LHD
1:Fm -2 To vr-2 <I P R3 S2 pid=7C Len=7 >[17:19:51]
?????^
2:Fm -2 To vr-2 <I P R3 S2 pid=7C Len=7 >[17:19:51]
?????^
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:11:35 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
To: "rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx <rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4D2B7607.40907@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Maybe try CQ-VHF?
Jim KQ6EA
On 01/10/2011 09:00 PM, rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
> I have talked directly to the editor in chief of QST. I got a "not
interested" response
>
> Ron
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical for QST on
how to work the birds!
>>
>> Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to them proper
way ( BE A MENTOR )
>>
>> Something needs to be done thats for sure
>>
>> WA4HFN Damon em55
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:29:56 -0800 (PST)
From: John Neeley <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
To: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>, "rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
<rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <863052.60037.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Does anyone even read that mag?? We need old Wayne Green and 73 magazine back
again, I'd just about bet that would work......between 73 and HamRadio mags,
they were the BEST ham rags out......too bad they got eaten up.
John W6ZKH
________________________________
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx <rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 1:11:35 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
Maybe try CQ-VHF?
Jim KQ6EA
On 01/10/2011 09:00 PM, rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
> I have talked directly to the editor in chief of QST. I got a "not
interested"
>response
>
> Ron
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical for QST on
how
>>to work the birds!
>>
>>
>> Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to them proper
way (
>>BE A MENTOR )
>>
>>
>> Something needs to be done thats for sure
>>
>> WA4HFN Damon em55
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:54:02 -0500
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
To: "Jim Jerzycke" <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS2156F1D688A22C3E672750B30E0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Or the AMSAT Journal.....
Zack
KD8KSN
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Jerzycke
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 4:11 PM
To: rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol
Maybe try CQ-VHF?
Jim KQ6EA
On 01/10/2011 09:00 PM, rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
> I have talked directly to the editor in chief of QST. I got a "not
> interested" response
>
> Ron
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical for QST on
>> how to work the birds!
>>
>> Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to them proper
>> way ( BE A MENTOR )
>>
>> Something needs to be done thats for sure
>>
>> WA4HFN Damon em55
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:54:34 -0500
From: "Keith Baker KB1SF/VA3KSF" <kb1sf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Italian Repeaters on IARU Satellite Freqs
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT Officers'" <officers@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <AEAA42498C8E4266AE2CCE209560EB63@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Greetings All.
By way of a "heads up:, I'm not sure we (AMSAT-NA) can do anyting about
this. However, our friends in Europe might bring up the issue in discussion.
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=279925
As time goes on, my hunch is that this problem is only going to get worse.
73,
Keith
KB1SF
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:53:33 -0900
From: "Edward R. Cole" <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fwd: Re: Re: Sat protocol
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <201101102353.p0ANrdYi037352@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
My original post got rejected by either networkref.com or comcast.net
Re: Amsat Journal - the readership of the journal probably are
already aware of proper sat. protocol
you want a wider readership to be published.
73, ED
>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:11:51 -0900
>To: "rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx <rnutter@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>,
>"wanot
>>interested" response
>>
>>Ron
>>
>>Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical
>> for QST on how to work the birds!
>> >
>> > Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to
>> them proper way ( BE A MENTOR )
>> >
>> > Something needs to be done thats for sure
>> >
>> > WA4HFN Damon em55
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
>> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
>======================================
>BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
>EME: 144-1.4kw*, 432-100w*, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
>DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa@xxxxxxx.xxx
>======================================
>*temp not in service
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
======================================
BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-1.4kw*, 432-100w*, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa@xxxxxxx.xxx
======================================
*temp not in service
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:20:30 -0600
From: "Dads" <w0sat@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sat Protocol
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT125-DS140823033ECA0D455D0511E40F0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Sat operators: When I started in satellites in the 1990,s.things
were different.
They had a person that sort of monitored a
lot of satellite passes
and conversations.
He was a ham that operated sats too.
What he did was sort of police the
operators,
When you used too much power he sent you
an e- mail.
I believe the rule of thumb to operate on
the satellite is
never use no morepower on the uplink than
you have on
the beacon signal downlink.
So when he became a SK we didn,t have any
body to monitor
our QSO,s.
Maybe you old timers can remember his call.
Maybe Jan 2011 19:48:13 -0500
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT-UK Front cover
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <99024D0A-A8DE-47A2-8530-996B980FA67C@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
That's one of the best satellite related pictures I've seen in a long time!
I'm proud to be a member.
73, Drew KO4MA
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:40:29 -0500
From: Carl Rimmer <cfrimmer@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-51
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4D2BA6FD.8070009@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I have to agree with the others regarding the mis-use of AO-51. I don't
get on there every pass but the other day was ridiculous. I thought it
was CH19. There is absolutely no respect. Another gripe I have are
those who work every pass and contact the same people each pass. That
makes it very crowded. I would suggest listening for new calls and grid
squares. As the satellites get more and more publicity, new people
will be coming on board. Perhaps there operating skills are not as good
as yours, but they have a right to make contacts. Check your log books
and if you have worked someone, give another person a chance to work
them. There were several new calls for me the other day but it was so
bad that I just shut it down.
Is ham radio joining the ranks of the general populous and losing our
civility? It sure seems like it.
73,
W8KRF
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:13:55 -0600
From: "Tom Schuessler" <tjschuessler@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: satellite protocol and HO-68
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <00ae01cbb13d$951edba0$bf5c92e0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hello all,
Been doing the FM satellite passes now for 7 months and have been reading
the thread on satellite operating protocol that has been making the rounds
the last day with interest. I have a thought worth mulling over I think,
especially as we attempt to attract more hams to our niche of the hobby.
My comment about satellite protocol has to do with how HO-68 is used when in
the FM/PACSAT mode. The power level competition between the FM folks and
the packet folks make for a very challenging environment for most operators,
especially the handheld guys like me. The packet folks have a right as do
the FM folks and I am sure there is as much frustration amongst Packet
satellite operators as is experienced by the average FMer. If I had the
resources to do SSB/CW I would gladly be using that mode when it comes
around on HO-68 but that is not in the financial game plan for now.
Don't get me wrong, I am much appreciative of the China AMSAT folks for
championing a very serviceable d I get this much . I use UISS set at 9600bps to capture the
signal .
Thanks again .
Jerry WB5LHD
GO-32-------01/10/2011
Fm VLK-12 To -11 <I R0 S0 pid=0 [DAMA] [EAX25]>[17:56:59]
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:14:55 -0800 (PST)
From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Ao51 Protocol ?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <904563.69748.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Domenico, I8CVS said:
"To solve the above problem the only way is to use satellites with linear
transponder like VO-52. OSCAR-7 and FO-29 with several QSO on CW
and SSB at the same time without QRM in the same passband."
-------------------------
These multiple QSOs at the same time can also be full duplex.
73,
Mike Williams, K9QHO
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:34:46 -0500
From: "jmfranke" <jmfranke@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Ao51 Protocol ?
To: "Amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <97F7B45FD80542A49551A6B06700ECEE@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Another part of the solution would be to operate AO-51 in V/S or L/S more
often.
John WA4WDL
--------------------------------------------------
From: "WILLIAMS MICHAEL" <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:14at the BARA meeting that had attended your presentation
and they enjoyed it. Good job
On all that you did.
73,
Dee, NB2F
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Peter Portanova
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 7:13 PM
To: Mark L. Hammond
Cc: amsAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: WB2OQQ @ HAM RADIO UNIVERSITY TOMORROW
Mark,
I too am glad we connected today on HRU's W2V special event call, exchanging
grids with you could not have been planned any better. I had 65 "satellite
students" in my presentation today and 17 braved the 22 degree wind chill
for the passes. I then explained to them who N8MH is and just happened to
bring with me some of your detailed and educational details, of the last few
days, on how you and the other command team members are managing AO-51
during the eclipses, they were thrilled with that information. and now want
your autograph! Thank you Mark for helping me make my time at HRU good for
AMSAT!
73- Pete
WB2OQQ
www.massapequanyweather.com
http://www.qrz.com/db/WB2OQQ?
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 17
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
