| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 17.10.10 21:03l 714 Lines 22798 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5416
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 416
Path: IZ3LSV<IK6ZDE<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<JM1YSB<7M3TJZ<CX2SA
Sent: 101017/1902Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:26485 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5416
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. ND9M/p update DN86/96 (John Papay)
2. Sumbandila (SO-67) schedule until 2010-10-17 (Johann Lochner)
3. Rig debate time... (K8TB)
4. Re: Rig debate time... (STeve Andre')
5. Re: Rig debate time... (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
6. Re: FO-29?? (Mineo Wakita)
7. Tucson AZ hamfest this morning (Patrick STODDARD)
8. Trip to NC EM 96 (KK4AK)
9. George Observatory ARISS contact today (Bruce)
10. Re: Rig debate time... (Alan Cresswell)
11. Sat Demo Yesterday (Zachary Beougher)
12. PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz? (Mark L. Hammond)
13. Re: PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz? (David Moisan)
14. ND9M Road Trip Update #11 (claryco@xxx.xxxx
15. New User-New Station-Antennas-ADVICE? (Dean Maluski)
16. Re: PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz? (Greg D.)
17. Re: PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz? ((KP4TR)Ramon Gonzalez)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:02:16 -0400
From: John Papay <john@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ND9M/p update DN86/96
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <950518.41544.qm@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Jim advises that he just left Miles City and should be
in North Dakota, DN86 for the AO-27 pass that comes up
around 2128z. He will also be on the following AO-51
pass at 2141z. Later today, travel conditions permitting,
he could be all the way to DN96 and/or the DN86/96 line.
Jim reports they are having a great trip and the weather is
extremely nice.
73,
John K8YSE/p
John Papay
john@xxxxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:51:43 +0200
From: "Johann Lochner" <lochner@xxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sumbandila (SO-67) schedule until 2010-10-17
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: Hans van de Groenendaal <hans@xxxxxxx.xx.xx>, Allan Saul
<allan@xxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Message-ID: <4CBA1E6F.31998.301BB16@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hi folks,
SO-67 is again executing its schedule and the following passes should
go ahead as initially planned:
2010-10-16 19:47
2010-10-16 20:36
2010-10-16 21:20
2010-10-16 22:38
2010-10-16 22:54
2010-10-16 23:55
We hope to upload the rest of the weekend schedule tomorrow morning
around 06:00 UTC (see below).
73 de ZR1CBC, Johann.
-----
2010-10-17 06:35
2010-10-17 06:52
2010-10-17 10:00
2010-10-17 10:20
2010-10-17 11:53
2010-10-17 13:15
2010-10-17 13:32
2010-10-17 14:50
2010-10-17 16:23
2010-10-17 17:37
2010-10-17 17:56
2010-10-17 19:09
2010-10-17 19:29
2010-10-17 20:18
2010-10-17 21:01
2010-10-17 22:35
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:01:38 -0400
From: K8TB <k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Rig debate time...
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4CBA12B2.1010700@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
So I have an Icom IC-821 that I am using for the birds, SSB and
FM. I don't know what to say, but that rig isn't quite there.
So I am trying to decide between a TS-2000 and an IC-910H. I've had
a 2000 in the past, and it is a pretty good rig. But I've heard that the
910H is "better", more or less. I have mast mounted SSB preamps to
equalize everything out.
Anyone on the list own both an IC-910H and a TS-2000, and do you
have any thoughts on the use of them for sat use? (I don't really need
the low band part of the TS-2000, I have a K3 there).
tom bosscher K8TB
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:31:04 -0400
From: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Rig debate time...
To: k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4CBA1998.1080702@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 10/16/10 17:01, K8TB wrote:
> So I have an Icom IC-821 that I am using for the birds, SSB and
> FM. I don't know what to say, but that rig isn't quite there.
> So I am trying to decide between a TS-2000 and an IC-910H. I've had
> a 2000 in the past, and it is a pretty good rig. But I've heard that the
> 910H is "better", more or less. I have mast mounted SSB preamps to
> equalize everything out.
>
> Anyone on the list own both an IC-910H and a TS-2000, and do you
> have any thoughts on the use of them for sat use? (I don't really need
> the low band part of the TS-2000, I have a K3 there).
>
> tom bosscher K8TB
Hello Tom,
I'm not sure where it is, but in the archives where was a discussion
about IC-910 vs TS-2000 wars, which had some good comments in
it. I personally prefer the IC-910 (I have one) but have played with
a TS-2000 for less than 10 hours.
So, where is the archive?
--STeve Andre'
wb8wsf en82
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:35:35 -0700
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Rig debate time...
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTinynkFxrRJ8ygA73=MwwjVy7ecGu=NAn525BKR2@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Steve,
The AMSAT-BB archives since August 2006 are at:
http://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb
Older messages are also archived at a different URL,
which I don't have out here near the middle of nowhere.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK - north of Sunsites, Arizona
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
On 10/16/10, STeve Andre' <andres@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> On 10/16/10 17:01, K8TB wrote:
>> So I have an Icom IC-821 that I am using for the birds, SSB and
>> FM. I don't know what to say, but that rig isn't quite there.
>> So I am trying to decide between a TS-2000 and an IC-910H. I've had
>> a 2000 in the past, and it is a pretty good rig. But I've heard that the
>> 910H is "better", more or less. I have mast mounted SSB preamps to
>> equalize everything out.
>>
>> Anyone on the list own both an IC-910H and a TS-2000, and do you
>> have any thoughts on the use of them for sat use? (I don't really need
>> the low band part of the TS-2000, I have a K3 there).
>>
>> tom bosscher K8TB
> Hello Tom,
>
> I'm not sure where it is, but in the archives where was a discussion
> about IC-910 vs TS-2000 wars, which had some good comments in
> it. I personally prefer the IC-910 (I have one) but have played with
> a TS-2000 for less than 10 hours.
>
> So, where is the archive?
>
> --STeve Andre'
> wb8wsf en82
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:35:38 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FO-29??
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <0E4236E62694410F91D63AEC59D187F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
JARL says: We failed to turn on a transmitter at 20:00 UTC, 16th Oct.
We inform it of the future use after 0:30 UTC on 17th.
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick STODDARD <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Tucson AZ hamfest this morning
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <721982.70879.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi!
Thanks for the QSOs during my demonstrations this morning at the Old
Pueblo Radio Club's annual hamfest in Tucson. I logged 22 QSOs on 6 passes,
using 4 different satellites (AO51, HO68, SO50, VO52). Really nice to
hear the other hamfest and JOTA stations on the air this morning, and
to show off both FM and SSB satellite operating.
I will be happy to confirm any QSOs made with WD9EWK this morning. No
need to first send me a card or SASE; just e-mail me with the QSO
details. If you're in the log, you will get a card.
After the hamfest, I drove out to the DM51bx/DM52ba boundary
in southeastern Arizona. I was on AO27 @ 2129 UTC at that line, and
want to work both eastern and western passes on AO51 (145.920/435.300),
AO7, and FO29 before the drive home (just over 3 hours from here). Just
like with QSOs at the hamfest, please e-mail me with QSO details if you
worked me and want a QSL card.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK - north of Sunsites, Arizona
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:31:20 -0400
From: "KK4AK" <kk4ak@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Trip to NC EM 96
To: "AMSAT BB list" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <07A34B3A8629456B96BF816CEFB977C8@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I will be in the mountains of NC at EM96 for the first few days of next
week. If interested look for me on the FM birds.
73
KK4AK
Allen
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:59:48 -0500
From: Bruce <kk5do@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] George Observatory ARISS contact today
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4CBA5894.10306@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Allen, N5AFV, and I had a great time at the George Observatory today for
their ARISS contact. We had 4-5 other hams there with us from the Brazos
Valley Amateur Radio Club. I'd like to thank everyone on the AO-27 pass
that we worked mid afternoon. Unfortunately it was the first pass after
the ARISS contact and was 2.5 hours after the contact so all the kids
were gone. But Allen and I were up on the roof of the observatory (an
observation deck) and had a bunch of adults waiting for the satellite
aos and when they heard it start up they were thrilled. It was more fun
when we started making contacts. Allen was about 20 feet away from me
and we both had people listening in. Allen made about 5 contacts and I
made 3 or 4 (keep in mind, I have not worked a satellite in over a year
but it is like riding a bicycle, you never forget).
73...bruce
--
Bruce Paige, KK5DO
AMSAT Director Contests and Awards
ARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE
Houston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on Echolink - Conference *AMSAT*
Also live streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com
Podcast at http://www.amsatnet.com/podcast.xml or iTunes
Latest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News
http://www.arrl.org
AMSAT on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/amsat
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:34:41 -0000
From: "Alan Cresswell" <alancresswell@xxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Rig debate time...
To: <k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <0110019F9A624FA3933DF3A6FC41E264@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Tom,
Yes, this exact debate comes up from time to time. Here for what its worth
is a contribution I made when it last came up over a year ago:
"The two radios I am familiar with are the TS-2000 and the IC-910. I have
both, and in terms of the basic performance parameters there is no
difference between them. However the TS-2000 is a much more versatile radio
than the 910. One of the main advantages of the 2000 from my point of view
is that almost anything that can be done from the front panel is also under
computer control. It also has built in DTMF tones and tone memories which I
use for satellite command ops. (It also of course has full HF
capabilities.) There are also a number of other advantages which make it my
preferred satellite radio. I use the 910 for portable operation as it is a
bit smaller and lighter than the 2000.
Hope this helps a bit. (Please note - I am in no way knocking the 910, it
is a great radio - it is just that with the way I operate the 2000 suits me
better.)"
Some other points:
I don't tend to use the 2000 for HF as I also have other HF radios.
The infamous 436.8MHz birdie on the 2000 means that only the second half of
an SO=50 pass is usable - I tend to use the 910 for SO-50.
On the other hand I can use the 2000 on AO-07 Mode A. (29MHz)
The 2000 has a +/- 20kHz RIT range - sometimes very useful. The 910 is +/-
1.2kHz which is a bit limiting.
The 910 has AFC which works well. I can easily track AO-51 S-band signals
without any operator intervention. The 2000 has no AFC function.
As is usually the case it comes down to personal preference and operating
style. I am sure you will find that either radio will do the job well.
73
Alan
ZL2BX
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of K8TB
Sent: Saturday, 16 October 2010 21:02
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Rig debate time...
So I have an Icom IC-821 that I am using for the birds, SSB and
FM. I don't know what to say, but that rig isn't quite there.
So I am trying to decide between a TS-2000 and an IC-910H. I've had
a 2000 in the past, and it is a pretty good rig. But I've heard that the
910H is "better", more or less. I have mast mounted SSB preamps to
equalize everything out.
Anyone on the list own both an IC-910H and a TS-2000, and do you
have any thoughts on the use of them for sat use? (I don't really need
the low band part of the TS-2000, I have a K3 there).
tom bosscher K8TB
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:51:19 -0400
From: "Zachary Beougher" <zack.kd8ksn@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sat Demo Yesterday
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS2E9547C88212560031C00B3590@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi all,
I just wanted to say thanks for the QSOs on SO50 yesterday morning while as
was at the CBF Amateur Radio Club. At the time we only had one member and a
Sony video camera, but they both really enjoyed it. I tried the 1805z AO27
pass along with my foxhunt teammate, K8QY (I wanted him to get his first
satellite QSO), but do to the large amount of stations on he was not able to
be successful. The only station worked on that pass was WA4HFN/p with 20
seconds left on the timer.
Videos of the SO50 pass and foxhunt will be on YouTube and my QRZ page in a
few weeks.
73!
Zack
KD8KSN
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:06:10 -0400
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <Kp6B1f00556cfur05p6Big@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All,
Yesterday I tried without success to run the DOS version of PREDICT under
64-bit Windows. I must admit while I'm not surprised, I was greatly
disappointed, since the program is so useful.
Does anybody have a fix or maybe a recompiled .exe ?
(And telling me to run it under Linux isn't a "fix" ;) )
Thanks,
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:41:45 -0400
From: David Moisan <dmoisan@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz?
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<D5370ABB89BF3F4B937FDEBD6BAB7893D559D8F1B5@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Try DOSBOX--it was made to run DOS games in 64-bit windows.
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: claryco@xxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] ND9M Road Trip Update #11
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <8CD3C2038B2606F-2384-18173@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I'm back to running counties on HF CW and SSB. With 53 counties in North
Dakota to put out, it's difficult to predict when I'll be in a particular
grid square. You can check a county hunting website (http://ch.w6rk.com) for
spots on my HF ops and see where I'm at. For the time being, it's the best
thing I've got for tracking since I'm not on APRS yet.
We should be in DN86 and DN96 for much of today (17 Oct). But since we're
just a few miles from the ND / SD state line, we're going to swing across
into SD to hit the DN85 / DN95 line for the AO27 pass which rises locally at
17/1919Z. At this latitude, I'll miss the first minute or two of voice
operation, but I'll do my best with the limited time.
After this pass, we'll return to ND to focus on the grids and counties there.
73,
Jim, ND9M / VQ9JC
Bowman ND / Bowman Co. / DN86
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:02:03 -0400
From: Dean Maluski <dean@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] New User-New Station-Antennas-ADVICE?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1287334923.18257.676.camel@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Realizing I need to crawl before I can walk but need to have a goal.
I've grown a strong interest in working SATS, have a few bucks and am
rebuilding my station for SATS from the ground up.
Been reading the G Gould Smith "Getting Started..." book I picked up in
Boxboro, MA at a fest a couple months ago.
I replaced my Kenwood 440 with a TS-2000 without the 1.2 GHz option,
thinking I may add 1.2 GHz next spring.
Added a 4 inch conduit to my tower with a 7/8 hard line and a run of
Jetstream LMR 400+ tagged RG-8U on jacket but specs are better than LMR
400 figure I'll use the Jetstream for 2 meter, or transmit side of
things.
Took down my 20 meter monoband beam, Purchased and mounted a Yaesu
G-5500 (Separated).
Ordered a Gulf-Alpha Gen purpose 2 meter H/V 440 V yagi, yes I also want
to work land locked stuff too.
LINUX!! Linux!! LINUX if possible ONLY-Seem good to go now with GPREDICT
1.1 and 1.2, 1.2 seems to not update rotor correctly but just got it
going this morning. Running 1.1 on another machine over LAN and seems to
work better.
I have a 40 foot 1943 steel tower for what it's worth, it's a thing of
beauty!!
My vision is to eventually move the Gulf Alpha antenna to the center
mast.
Here is where my questions come to play....????
What do I want for bird anteena's?
My biggest interest is packet and flying mailboxes/HEO/Eventually EME
possibly.
Thinking my next antenna purchase would be the Gulf Alpha 440 and 2
meter circular polarity antennas and the phasing assy to switch
polarity????
I have ample 4 port switches that can be used to switch at tower but of
course less is more as I don't want to go switch crazy and add more
attenuation to system than absolutely necessary.
I see SSB has some nice pre-amps, NEED I suspect eventually..
I'm getting stir crazy waiting for arrival of Yagi, one more day on
tower and I should be complete except for arrival of Gulf Alpha Yagi
that he is building.
Not really sure what my question is. Reading and reading, trying not to
buy too ,many unnecessary components while I impatiently wait for
antenna to arrive but forward thinking as I finalize tower today, need
to re-mount my WX station and security camera. Also adding a camera
behind garage to look up at top of tower so I can see what the heck is
going on with rotors-COOL!
In mounting WX station, need to stay high as possible but of course
can't interefere with back end of Yagi's
Antenna advice, any advise if someone has the time? Hope to QSO soon
with ya'll on the birds. Been listening on a vertical but question the
doppler accuracy so have not attempted to transmit yet.
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:25:32 -0700
From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz?
To: <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU133-W1698B2A1D62BDAE54DC917A9590@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Mark,
I don't have that problem (I *do* run it under Linux :-) ), but what I
believe some do for this sort of thing is to get DosBox running first, and
then run stuff from inside there. DosBox is a full PC emulation and DOS
environment, separate from the embedded CMD prompt. http://www.dosbox.com
Good luck,
Greg KO6TH
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:06:10 -0400
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> From: marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz?
>
> Hi All,
>
> Yesterday I tried without success to run the DOS version of PREDICT under
64-bit Windows. I must admit while I'm not surprised, I was greatly
disappointed, since the program is so useful.
>
> Does anybody have a fix or maybe a recompiled .exe ?
>
> (And telling me to run it under Linux isn't a "fix" ;) )
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:27:09 -0400
From: "(KP4TR)Ramon Gonzalez" <kp4tr.ramon@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PREDICT for 64-bit Winderz?
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4CBB31ED.5050109@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Here's my answer.
Install Sun/Oracle Virtualbox within Windows 7 and install Windows
95/ME/XP in VirtualBox. Then install Predict/Instantrack or any other
DOS based software you really need to run on this virtual machine.
73!
On 10/17/2010 9:06 AM, Mark L. Hammond wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Yesterday I tried without success to run the DOS version of PREDICT under
64-bit Windows. I must admit while I'm not surprised, I was greatly
disappointed, since the program is so useful.
>
> Does anybody have a fix or maybe a recompiled .exe ?
>
> (And telling me to run it under Linux isn't a "fix" ;) )
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 416
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
