| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 28.08.10 21:03l 252 Lines 7760 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5357
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 357
Path: IZ3LSV<IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 100828/1903Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:16397 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5357
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Latest AMSAT Journal (Alan P. Biddle)
2. Question, Re: Boxboro Hamfeste! (Stuart Balanger)
3. Re: Latest AMSAT Journal (STeve Andre')
4. Re: New Satellite Downlink? (Gordon JC Pearce)
5. Re: Question, Re: Boxboro Hamfeste! (Ben Jackson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:02:32 -0500
From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Latest AMSAT Journal
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <3DFFB1E1EB954EC59C82F11DD045970E@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Joe,
Mine arrived relatively recently. For years I have noticed that I get
magazines, newsletters, etc, not just the Journal, significantly later than
others. One of the mysteries of snail mail and living in the country.
Alan
WA4SCA
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Gary "Joe" Mayfield
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 11:24 PM
To: 'Gould Smith'; AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Latest AMSAT Journal
Gould,
Please don't take my message the wrong way. I love the journal, but
have had MANY delivery issues. I have yet to receive the May/June issue.
73,
Joe kk0sd
-----Original Message-----
From: Gould Smith [mailto:gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:21 PM
To: Gary "Joe" Mayfield; AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Latest AMSAT Journal
The latest AMSAT Journal (July/August 2010) will be at the printer's next
week.
We are always open to new submissions, this is he main contributing factor
for the delay in getting the Journal out.
Kudos to Ed Long, JoAnne Maenpaa and Bill Hook for doing a great job!
Also, Many Thanks to the authors that make the Journal such an anticipated
publication.
73,
Gould, WA4SXM
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Neeley" <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
To: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>; <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:29 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Journal
> May/June I received last Tuesday. Looks like they are an issue behind.
>
> W6ZKH
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 7:22:54 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Journal
>
> What is the most recent AMSAT Journal? When did it show up at people's
> QTH?
>
>
>
> Thanks and 73,
>
> Joe kk0sd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:51:05 -0400
From: Stuart Balanger <wa2bss@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Question, Re: Boxboro Hamfeste!
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=wXnyNvf__Pvs9SrVXKhNTiT7jYs=294D52NLO@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
*Hi all,
Haven't read any mention of any "Demo"satillite sta. @ the
New england Div. conv. (Or "Boxboro"), & was wondering if there is one?
73,.Stu
(WA2BSS)
*
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:30:03 -0400
From: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Latest AMSAT Journal
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <201008281230.03809.andres@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Saturday 28 August 2010 00:24:10 Gary "Joe" Mayfield wrote:
> Gould,
>
> Please don't take my message the wrong way. I love the journal, but
> have had MANY delivery issues. I have yet to receive the May/June issue.
>
> 73,
> Joe kk0sd
Joe,
Don't assume that AMSAT didn't send it to you 'till you've verified it with
them and they think they had a problem.
I've had delivery issues on things too, and it is the fault of the Post
Office. Your local PO can range from fantastic to wretched, and here in
Ann Arbor MI, it seems like we're more towards the wrong end of the
scale. One issue of QST had a completely mangled front cover, so bad
that I called the PO here and complained. The response was... "Oh.".
Lansing MI on the other hand, has such an efficient system that a
letter mail to my home town of Ann Arbor *gets there faster* than the
same thing mailed *in* Ann Arbor in most cases.
So when the ham mag you've been waiting for looks like a war refugee,
or has been AWOL for 1 week+, think about the system that carries it
to you. Note: This is not a rant against the USPO--I support it, but I think
it needs help, and I don't think that money is the answer.
--STeve Andre'
wb8wsf en82
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:45:23 +0100
From: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1283021123.1847.0.camel@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 23:40 +0000, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:
> Correct.
>
> There will be legal problems in Europe as citizens (and amateurs) are not
allowed to listen on frequencies that are not
> authorised in their countries.
I don't know where you've been in Europe, but that would be perfectly
legal in the UK.
Gordon MM0YEQ
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:48:13 -0400
From: Ben Jackson <bbj@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Question, Re: Boxboro Hamfeste!
To: Stuart Balanger <wa2bss@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4C7959ED.1090700@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Balanger wrote:
> *Hi all,
> Haven't read any mention of any "Demo"satillite sta. @ the
> New england Div. conv. (Or "Boxboro"), & was wondering if there is one?
Hi Stuart:
I don't know if Steve is checking e-mail, but I believe there are plans
to demos at some point. There is a booth in the vendor area and I am
sure they could give more details.
- --
Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMeVntAAoJEAQiWVsfSvVvBBAH/i2XKdBlWx78/yvVWBBiClI6
DQ9irOBlhFvUKj9N4m1sQd1tvdT+fPciQT7whotzrfJ3MiZEgBStCrL0MevUVKP+
wdOg2gIHCjjYZaeMwZAJ23ttENjN+AWpMvjfi4Tleaz6ZiU1EY/lpvgAbDYCffaE
LWA7jnJ7f0hKOEBL2od6bLRPBF7t6CuGIoHdoZVC65LgzTBXSJPI65GadJEp8/I9
jVIqtKm662yWviyfQlQ6Qdijhlkf6WtxVTQCTz9pMIiaHegM/MOojIKokH7zJuV8
/axEmBYNthrqVAF8J8EbkRv1MNshnqPWorjqA9d3CEdh69O6S+KOB05wls3KOSk=
=8odb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 357
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
