| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 28.08.10 10:34l 706 Lines 21701 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5356
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 356
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<F6IQF<IK6ZDE<VE2PKT<CX2SA
Sent: 100828/0829Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:16329 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5356
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. CM89, CN70 and CN81 visits. (John Neeley)
2. Re: New Satellite Downlink? (George Henry)
3. Re: New Satellite Downlink? (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
4. [Fwd: Re: Re: New Satellite Downlink?] (Roger Kolakowski)
5. SO-50 (Dobarrows)
6. Re: New Satellite Downlink? (Sebastian)
7. Re: New Satellite Downlink (Michael)
8. Re: New Satellite Downlink (Stephen Melachrinos)
9. Re: New Satellite Downlink (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
10. AMSAT Journal (Gary "Joe" Mayfield)
11. Re: AMSAT Journal (John Neeley)
12. Re: New Satellite Downlink? (keith schaffrath)
13. Re: New Satellite Downlink? (keith schaffrath)
14. Latest AMSAT Journal (Gould Smith)
15. Re: Latest AMSAT Journal (Bruce)
16. Re: Latest AMSAT Journal (Gary "Joe" Mayfield)
17. Thank you for the QSO's during Demo (Michael Elliott)
18. ARISS Facebook Page (n4csitwo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
19. July 2010 XE2/WD9EWK videos uploaded to YouTube
(Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Neeley <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] CM89, CN70 and CN81 visits.
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <956062.16008.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To those who worked me on those grids the period from Aug 18 thru Aug 23, send
me an email with the data and I'll get a card out to you. No need of an
SASE or
card in return.
John W6ZKH
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:28:02 -0500
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <E28DFD831436433F9D3D1011469C9943@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Question: since there is no amateur radio allocation at 149.985, "we"
(hams) would be asking the Navy, to whom the downlink frequency is
allocated, to transmit one-way amateur communications thru this satellite,
correct?
Doesn't anyone else see potential legal problems involved here?
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:27 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] New Satellite Downlink?
> Possible new AMSAT Application?
>
> We may have access to two old TRANSIT navigation satellites with
> a 50 baud downlink at 149.985 (and 400 MHz). (presently coming
> over in the mid afternoon). My problem is, coming up with any
> meaningful application to use them for communications that would
> capture the interest of students, hams or volunteers in support
> of education, public service or emergency comms or just plain
> fun...
>
> The downlink can be heard on an OMNI antenna (though I would
> suggest a 3/4 wave (55") vertical) and could be decoded by a
> simple software only application with a sound card. (someone has
> to write it)...
>
> The total useful message capability is about 500 bytes
> transmitted every 2 minutes (at 50 baud). The uplink is very
> specialized and can ONLY BE DONE from one (or two) very special
> commmand stations. These satellites of course were the original
> Navy Navigation satellite system (also called OSCARS) and so the
> message would be in-place of the normal navigation data. SO in
> a sense, this is a downlink BROADCAST application. Since ham
> radio is two way, I'm stumped for applications.
>
> The total message capability of 500 Bytes can contain one long
> ARRL bulletin, or 20 APRS position/status reports, or say 20 or
> so APRS text messages, or say 50 "callsign exchanges" or maybe
> even 1 thumbnail image... but what's the application?
>
> Even if we allow say, INTERNET link to the command station for
> "anyone" to contribute to the twice per-day upload, then
> everyone's receiver application can receive them... For what?
>
> So Im looking for ideas. All I can come up with so far is:
> 1) ARRL Bulletins? (I don't even know how often ARRL sends
> bulletins...)
> 2) Navy/Army/AF MARS broadcast bulletins...
> 3) Internet message in-to-command-upload-to message RF downlink.
> Two stations do this to each other and it counts as a two-way
> QSO?
> 4) ...
>
> Every scenario of interest usually begins with the much higher
> value of UPLINK from the individual field station, not
> downlink.. Hence I am stumped.
>
> HUMMH... Maybe purely educational? If the software can run on
> any PC with a sound card connected to any scanner... Then every
> school can use it as a satellite downlink signal of interest..
> What kind of thumbnail image can fit in 500 bytes? Send in your
> picture and get it downlinked on a given day?
>
> Etc..
>
> Will need a DSP volunteer to write the sound card decoder.
>
> Bob, WB4APR
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:40:04 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
To: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4C784CD4.5030607@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Correct.
There will be legal problems in Europe as citizens (and amateurs) are not
allowed to listen on frequencies that are not
authorised in their countries.
On 27-Aug-10 23:28, George Henry wrote:
> Question: since there is no amateur radio allocation at 149.985, "we"
> (hams) would be asking the Navy, to whom the downlink frequency is
> allocated, to transmit one-way amateur communications thru this satellite,
> correct?
>
> Doesn't anyone else see potential legal problems involved here?
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:59:18 -0400
From: Roger Kolakowski <Rogerkola@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] [Fwd: Re: Re: New Satellite Downlink?]
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx >> Amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4C785156.9060801@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:31:47 -0400
From: Dobarrows <dobarrows@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <8CD145F88786F6A-F1C-12582@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sometimes I have not heard SO-50 on late night passes. Then I key up
my transmitter with a 74.4 hz tone. After that, I key my transmitter
on and off with a 67hz tone while tuning the receiver set in cw mode
until I find a carrier that goes on and off with my keying somewhere
near where I expect the downlink to be. I then give my station ID and
change the receive mode to fm. I know that SO-50 is alive and well.
I don't know if it is well understood, but SO-50's downlink will only
be on as long as there is a signal in the uplink with the 67hz tone on.
You let up on the mike and the downlink ceases until someone else
transmits. AO27 and AO51 have continuous carriers when turned on so
they are easier to locate when there is little activity. (Little
activity doesn't happen often here in North America on AO27 and AO51).
73,
Dave W8IJ
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:42:10 -0400
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <7A076A3B-F350-4A9D-83F8-4FB98A7828F5@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Absolutely!
73 de W4AS
On Aug 27, 2010, at 7:28 PM, George Henry wrote:
> Question: since there is no amateur radio allocation at 149.985, "we"
> (hams) would be asking the Navy, to whom the downlink frequency is
> allocated, to transmit one-way amateur communications thru this satellite,
> correct?
>
> Doesn't anyone else see potential legal problems involved here?
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:04:17 -0400
From: "Michael" <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5ABF86A0442F4959BE848588D56DB342@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
But ultimately doesn't all frequency allocation fall back on the F.C.C. I
mean even with the Military ?
Best wishes
Mike
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:17:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Stephen Melachrinos <melachri@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1502790464.81729.1282958229662.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
No. Government allocations (within the US) are the responsibility of the NTIA.
FCC only has jurisdiction over non-government allocations.
Steve
W3HF
Aug 27, 2010 09:09:06 PM, mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>But ultimately doesn't all frequency allocation fall back on the F.C.C. I
mean
>even with the Military ?
> Best wishes
>
>
> Mike
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 02:16:50 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink
To: Michael <mikef1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4C787192.10501@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Not for the majority who are not in the US.
On 28-Aug-10 01:04, Michael wrote:
> But ultimately doesn't all frequency allocation fall back on the F.C.C. I
mean even with the Military ?
> Best wishes
>
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3096 - Release Date: 08/26/10
18:34:00
>
--
Nigel A. Gunn, 1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA. tel +1 937
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF 9H3GN), e-mail nigel@xxxxx.xxx
www http://www.ngunn.net
Member of ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548, Flying Pigs QRP
Club International #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS, ALC,
GCARES, XWARN, EAA382.
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:22:54 -0500
From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Journal
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL114-DS13CD6F7ABD4CDCB871A76F8A870@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
What is the most recent AMSAT Journal? When did it show up at people's QTH?
Thanks and 73,
Joe kk0sd
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Neeley <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Journal
To: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>,
AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <239920.90215.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
May/June I received last Tuesday. Looks like they are an issue behind.
W6ZKH
________________________________
From: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 7:22:54 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Journal
What is the most recent AMSAT Journal? When did it show up at people's QTH?
Thanks and 73,
Joe kk0sd
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: keith schaffrath <n6ors1@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <411812.83929.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: keith schaffrath <n6ors1@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Satellite Downlink?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <432568.25968.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
How about each day a new message that is part of a puzzle. So you have to
catch at least one
broadcast a day to solve the puzzle. It would create a little interest and
make for some good
practice.
Keith N6ORS
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:21:24 -0400
From: "Gould Smith" <gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Latest AMSAT Journal
To: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>,
<AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <E14C840096D0438DBABB017B4CA703D9@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
The latest AMSAT Journal (July/August 2010) will be at the printer's next
week.
We are always open to new submissions, this is he main contributing factor
for the delay in getting the Journal out.
Kudos to Ed Long, JoAnne Maenpaa and Bill Hook for doing a great job!
Also, Many Thanks to the authors that make the Journal such an anticipated
publication.
73,
Gould, WA4SXM
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Neeley" <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
To: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>; <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:29 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Journal
> May/June I received last Tuesday. Looks like they are an issue behind.
>
> W6ZKH
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 7:22:54 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Journal
>
> What is the most recent AMSAT Journal? When did it show up at people's
> QTH?
>
>
>
> Thanks and 73,
>
> Joe kk0sd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bruce <kk5do@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Latest AMSAT Journal
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <436627.46318.qm@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Also, watch for the results of Field Day 2010 in the July/August issue of the
AMSAT Journal.
73...bruce
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:24:10 -0500
From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Latest AMSAT Journal
To: "'Gould Smith'" <gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL114-DS8CA35D66B4CBB7C1DAE308A870@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Gould,
Please don't take my message the wrong way. I love the journal, but
have had MANY delivery issues. I have yet to receive the May/June issue.
73,
Joe kk0sd
-----Original Message-----
From: Gould Smith [mailto:gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:21 PM
To: Gary "Joe" Mayfield; AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Latest AMSAT Journal
The latest AMSAT Journal (July/August 2010) will be at the printer's next
week.
We are always open to new submissions, this is he main contributing factor
for the delay in getting the Journal out.
Kudos to Ed Long, JoAnne Maenpaa and Bill Hook for doing a great job!
Also, Many Thanks to the authors that make the Journal such an anticipated
publication.
73,
Gould, WA4SXM
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Neeley" <w6zkh@xxx.xxx>
To: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>; <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:29 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Journal
> May/June I received last Tuesday. Looks like they are an issue behind.
>
> W6ZKH
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 7:22:54 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Journal
>
> What is the most recent AMSAT Journal? When did it show up at people's
> QTH?
>
>
>
> Thanks and 73,
>
> Joe kk0sd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:11:00 -0400
From: Michael Elliott <k4moa@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Thank you for the QSO's during Demo
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=KxgkBZJEtmAh3EBXRGQ1JZFE=cc=MrgaYxUeo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I wanted to post a quick thank you to a few stations who were able to work
me during a Satellite Demonstration on Thursday evening. The Isothermal
Amateur Radio Club is located in Rutherford County, NC which is one of the
three counties where I work. Thursday was our third club meeting and I was
asked to do a short program. I hope I did Satellite operations justice and
I hope to hear a couple of those guys on the birds one day.
In the meantime, I would like to thank the following stations for making a
contact with me.
- N8RO
- ND9M
- KB0RZD
- KD8KSN
- K0TWB
We had 5 or 6 there for the demonstration which was about an hour prior to
the Isothermal Amateur Radio Club Meeting. We had a really nice 60 degree
pass and it was a comfortable evening to be outside. I think we had about
18 for the regular club meeting and presentation.
Thanks to those who offered advice for presentations and putting on a
demonstration...
73's,
Michael, K4MOA
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:56:09 -0400
From: <n4csitwo@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISS Facebook Page
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-florida" <amsat-florida@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <AAC740AADC584D368CC62ED8AFED1294@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
ARISS has moved into the social networking realm.
I'd like to invite you to visit our Facebook Page at Amateur Radio on the
International Space Station (ARISS). The page is new, but we have several
photos and videos posted with more to come.
73s,
Dave, AA4KN
ARISS PR
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Patrick STODDARD \(WD9EWK/VA7EWK\)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] July 2010 XE2/WD9EWK videos uploaded to YouTube
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <935953.62777.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi!
I just uploaded 3 more videos to my "channel" on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/va7ewk
from my late July trip to Baja California. One video from an FO-29 pass
at grid DM21jw on 29 July 2010, and two videos from AO-7 and FO-29 passes
at grid DM22gp on 30 July 2010. Thanks to the 3 cameramen for capturing
the video during these passes - David XE2DAK for the FO-29 video at
DM21jw, Alex XE2BSS/N2IX for the AO-7 video at DM22gp, and Larry KI6YAA
for the FO-29 video at DM22gp. All three videos show my normal all-mode
satellite station in operation - two FT-817NDs, Elk Antennas handheld
2m/70cm log periodic, Heil Traveler headset/mic.
I apologize for the lower video quality in the DM21 video; that video was
made with a Sony 7MP still-photo camera that only makes 320x240 AVI
videos, while the other two were made using my Nokia N900 phone with a 5MP
(for still photos) camera that makes MP4 files. I was not thinking fast
enough to turn on the camera in the N900 down at DM21, so David used the
other (still-photo) camera to make that video.
Since I was traveling by myself up in Canada last month, and I have not
rigged up a tripod that can hold my N900 phone (it does not have the
threaded socket for mounting on camera tripods), I have no video from
that trip. I may try to rectify that before I hit the road again in a
few weeks. K8YSE's web site has audio from these trips and others where
I have operated away from home:
http://www.papays.com/sat/general.html
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 356
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
