| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 02.08.10 21:19l 713 Lines 18139 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5328
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 328
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<IK6ZDE<VE3UIL<N9PMO<W1NGL<CX2SA
Sent: 100802/1904Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:11435 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5328
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. TS 2000 vs. ??? (Ted)
2. (no subject) (wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx
3. Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject) (Michael Rudzki)
4. Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? - correction
(Michael Rudzki)
5. Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject) (Ted)
6. Re: Re:K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? - correction
(John Belstner)
7. DN42 (Lee Ernstrom)
8. RE: Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? - correction
(Michael Rudzki)
9. uk meetning (Nick Pugh K5QXJ)
10. Re: uk meetning (Graham Shirville)
11. Re: uk meetning (Nick Pugh K5QXJ)
12. UO-22 just 100000 on 3rd Aug 2010 (Mineo Wakita)
13. Re: Schedule for 2010 AMSAT Space Symposium ? (JoAnne Maenpaa)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:49:53 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] TS 2000 vs. ???
Cc: "'Amsat BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000901cb31b2$ba20e9d0$2e62bd70$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Input needed...
I really love the 'satellite' feature on my TS 2000 and I'd be lost without
it.
But, we know the TS 2000 is not known for good VHF/UHF receive qualities.
And there is the birdie issue.
So, is there another base/mobile radio with the same 'satellite' feature and
that has much better receive capabilities. I would prefer a current model
radio or at least a recent vintage.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Ted
K7TRK
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<1958600009.868464.1280702354617.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxx
xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
OK what call is correct? K8E or K8EEN AO51 pass@xxxxxxxxx
WA4HFN
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:00:31 -0400
From: Michael Rudzki <n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL111-W448285DBD6B579B491FBCA86AC0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Damon,
If you were on AO-51 this afternoon/early evening, the callsign was K8E. We
are in
EN57 (Eagle Harbor, Michigan) for the week and are planning to travel up to
EN67
one day this week. It's supposed to rain on Monday, so that may be out.
I am using two HTs and an Arrow Antenna. I don't use FM sats that often, so
I take
it SO-50 and AO-51 are my best choices, since HO-68 is in SSB/CW mode this
week.
QSL via N8MR, if you want to confirm.
73,
Mike, N8MR
(no subject)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
OK what call is correct? K8E or K8EEN AO51 pass@xxxxxxxxx
WA4HFN
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:23:00 -0400
From: Michael Rudzki <n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? -
correction
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL111-W65BAED22E5AF9EB3E5C76A86AC0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Correction - HO-68 will be in FM/PACSAT mode all week. To those who
have more experience with FM sats - what are my chances of making
any QSOs with HTs (5 watts max) and an Arrow antenna?
73,
Mike, N8MR
Damon,
If you were on AO-51 this afternoon/early evening, the callsign was K8E.
We are in EN57 (Eagle Harbor, Michigan) for the week and are planning
to travel up to EN67 one day this week. It's supposed to rain on Monday,
so that may be out.
I am using two HTs and an Arrow Antenna. I don't use FM sats that
often, so I take it SO-50 and AO-51 are my best choices, since HO-68 is
in SSB/CW mode this week.
QSL via N8MR, if you want to confirm.
73,
Mike, N8MR
(no subject)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
OK what call is correct? K8E or K8EEN AO51 pass@xxxxxxxxx
WA4HFN
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:23:06 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)
To: "'Michael Rudzki'" <n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000001cb31d0$821e6620$865b3260$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Mike, maybe I'm reading the HO 68 schedule wrong, but it says FM/PACSAT
all week (the schedule that came out at 10:17am today)
Ted
K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Michael Rudzki
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 4:01 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)
Damon,
If you were on AO-51 this afternoon/early evening, the callsign was K8E. We
are in
EN57 (Eagle Harbor, Michigan) for the week and are planning to travel up to
EN67
one day this week. It's supposed to rain on Monday, so that may be out.
I am using two HTs and an Arrow Antenna. I don't use FM sats that often, so
I take
it SO-50 and AO-51 are my best choices, since HO-68 is in SSB/CW mode this
week.
QSL via N8MR, if you want to confirm.
73,
Mike, N8MR
(no subject)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
OK what call is correct? K8E or K8EEN AO51 pass@xxxxxxxxx
WA4HFN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:38:48 +0000
From: "John Belstner" <w9en@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re:K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? -
correction
To: "Michael Rudzki" <n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<102330334-1280705929-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-872955330-@xxxx
xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx.xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Your chances are very good Mike and HO-68 is an easy one to hear.
Don't forget AO-27.
73, John W9EN
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Rudzki <n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Sender: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:23:00
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re:
K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)?
- correction
Correction - HO-68 will be in FM/PACSAT mode all week. To those who
have more experience with FM sats - what are my chances of making
any QSOs with HTs (5 watts max) and an Arrow antenna?
73,
Mike, N8MR
Damon,
If you were on AO-51 this afternoon/early evening, the callsign was K8E.
We are in EN57 (Eagle Harbor, Michigan) for the week and are planning
to travel up to EN67 one day this week. It's supposed to rain on Monday,
so that may be out.
I am using two HTs and an Arrow Antenna. I don't use FM sats that
often, so I take it SO-50 and AO-51 are my best choices, since HO-68 is
in SSB/CW mode this week.
QSL via N8MR, if you want to confirm.
73,
Mike, N8MR
(no subject)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
OK what call is correct? K8E or K8EEN AO51 pass@xxxxxxxxx
WA4HFN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:04:03 -0600
From: "Lee Ernstrom" <iamsavedbygrace@x.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] DN42
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP63E7F51CD8C9805A500938ADAD0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I plan on being in DN42ca again early Tuesday morning and I hope to be
able to work AO51 again for those of you who need that grid.
Afterwards I will spend the rest of the day helping my son build his
house just across the Idaho/Utah line in DN41. In the afternoon I might
get a chance to go back to DN42 and work an evening pass.
Thought you might like the heads up.
WA7HQD
Lee Ernstrom
Syracuse, Utah DN31xb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:19:24 -0400
From: Michael Rudzki <n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? -
correction
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL111-W33C8D549C5C4BD33FC6EB186AD0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Rick and everyone else who sent advoce on HO-68. I'll try that satellite
this
week and see what happens. Hopefully I can put a new grid or two in a few
logs.
73,
Mike, N8MR
> From: wa4nvm@xxxxxxx.xxx
> To: n8mr@xxxxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: K8E in EN57 and EN67 (was no subject)? -
correction
> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:16:39 -0500
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I will look for you this week. I have heard you the last two days, but
> couldn't
> make it thru the QRM.
>
> 73,
> Rick WA4NVM
>
>
> >
> > Correction - HO-68 will be in FM/PACSAT mode all week. To those who
> > have more experience with FM sats - what are my chances of making
> > any QSOs with HTs (5 watts max) and an Arrow antenna?
> >
> > 73,
> > Mike, N8MR
> >
> >
> > Damon,
> >
> > If you were on AO-51 this afternoon/early evening, the callsign was K8E.
> > We are in EN57 (Eagle Harbor, Michigan) for the week and are planning
> > to travel up to EN67 one day this week. It's supposed to rain on Monday,
> > so that may be out.
> >
> > I am using two HTs and an Arrow Antenna. I don't use FM sats that
> > often, so I take it SO-50 and AO-51 are my best choices, since HO-68 is
> > in SSB/CW mode this week.
> >
> > QSL via N8MR, if you want to confirm.
> >
> > 73,
> > Mike, N8MR
> >
> >
> >
> > (no subject)
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
> > From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> >
> > OK what call is correct? K8E or K8EEN AO51 pass@xxxxxxxxx
> > WA4HFN
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 05:40:13 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] uk meetning
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <026001cb322f$16db65c0$44923140$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I was traveling and missed the streaming of the AMSAT meet in the UK. Has it
been archived on the web?
Thanks
nick
Office 337 593 8700
Cell 337 258 2527
Helping UL become a world Class Engineering and Educational School
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:25:17 +0100
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: uk meetning
To: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <EF5118FA926642E08CEBD55BF30CDBED@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Nick,
Relax...we will be transferring the files to the usual BATC server within
the next 10/14 days where they will be available to view or download!
We will make sure that their availability is announced on the news
cheers
Graham G3VZV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:40 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] uk meetning
>I was traveling and missed the streaming of the AMSAT meet in the UK. Has
>it
> been archived on the web?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> nick
>
> Office 337 593 8700
>
> Cell 337 258 2527
>
>
>
> Helping UL become a world Class Engineering and Educational School
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:56:51 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: uk meetning
To: "'Graham Shirville'" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>,
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <028401cb3242$2d8b3800$88a1a800$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks
nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Shirville [mailto:g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 6:25 AM
To: Nick Pugh K5QXJ; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] uk meetning
Hi Nick,
Relax...we will be transferring the files to the usual BATC server within
the next 10/14 days where they will be available to view or download!
We will make sure that their availability is announced on the news
cheers
Graham G3VZV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:40 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] uk meetning
>I was traveling and missed the streaming of the AMSAT meet in the UK. Has
>it
> been archived on the web?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> nick
>
> Office 337 593 8700
>
> Cell 337 258 2527
>
>
>
> Helping UL become a world Class Engineering and Educational School
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:18:50 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] UO-22 just 100000 on 3rd Aug 2010
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <2C556765964346D680D23D41E9C3C3BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
UO-22 was launched on 17 July 1991. It's now Non-Operational.
I predict here that UO-22 might be passed over just 100000 of
the orbit number using the latest TLE.
OSCAR 22 (UoSAT 5)
1 21575U 91050B 10212.53322685 .00000036 00000-0 25462-4 0 8963
2 21575 098.4959 161.9541 0006690 228.5705 131.4898 14.39726937999601
100000 - 99960 = 40 ... orbit numbers until 100000
40/14.39726937 = 2.778304619 ... orbits/mean motion = days
212.53322685 + 2.778304619 = 215.311531469 ... epock time
215 - 212 = 3 ... 3rd Aug 2010
0.311531469 * 24 = 7.476755256 ... 7 hours
0.476755256 * 60 = 28.60531536 ... 28 minutes
0.605315360 * 60 = 36.31892160 ... 36 seconds
Therefore it is 07:28:36 UTC, 3rd Aug 2010.
It maybe contains +/- one and a half hour's obserbational lag.
In addition, the counter number returns to 0 when the orbit number
exceeds 100000.
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:31:31 -0500
From: "JoAnne Maenpaa" <k9jkm@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Schedule for 2010 AMSAT Space Symposium ?
To: <k8tb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000601cb3247$0622ec90$1268c5b0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Tom,
You asked:
> Does anyone know what time events will start on
> Friday, October 8th?
The 2010 Symposium Committee is at work regarding the details of
The schedule. The details depend on the topics and quantity of the
presentations still being worked on by the authors.
We will generally follow the timing framework of previous year's
Symposiums which can be summarized as:
Thursday, October 7
AMSAT Board of Directors Meeting
Morning Friday, October 8
Symposium Registration Opens
AMSAT Board of Directors Meeting continues
Lunch
Friday, October 8 (1300)
Registration continues
Symposium Opening Remarks and Introductions
First Round of Presentations until ~1700
Saturday, October 9
Registration continues
Second Round of Presentations (0800 - 1000)
AMSAT General Membership Meeting (1000 - 1200)
Lunch
Third Round of Presentations (1300 - 1700)
Break
Attitude Adjustment with Cash Bar and Gathering (~1800)
AMSAT Annual Banquet and Speaker (~1900)
Door Prize Drawing (~2100)
Sunday, October 10
Area Coordinators Field Ops Breakfast
Fourth Round of Presentations (0800 - 1000)
Symposium Closing Remarks
Tour of FermiLab Tevatron (1200 - 1500 approx.)
The times listed are US Central Daylight Time (UTC - 5).
AMSAT's 2010 Symposium Committee looks forward to welcoming
everyone to Chicago this October!
--
73 de JoAnne K9JKM
k9jkm@xxxxx.xxx
Editor, AMSAT News Service
Copy Editor, AMSAT Journal
2010 Symposium Proceedings Editor
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 328
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
